This study assesses the incidence of noise in ceramic on ceramic (COC) bearings compared to metal on polyethylene (MOP) bearings. Noise after MOP implants has rarely been studied and they never been linked to squeaking. We have developed a noise characterising hip questionnaire and sent it along with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) to 1000 patients; 509 respondents, 282 COC and 227 MOP; median age 63.7 (range 45–92), median follow up 2.9 years (range 6–156 months). 47 (17%) of the COC patients reported noise compared to 19 (8%) of the MOP patients (P=0.048). 9 COC and 4 MOP patients reported their hip noise as squeaking. We found the incidence of squeaking in the COC hips to be 3.2% compared to 1.8% in the MOP hips. Overall, 27% patients with noise reported avoiding recreational activities because of it and patient's with noisy hips scored on average 4 points less in the OHS (COC: P=0.04 and MOP: P =0.007). This is the first study to report squeaking from MOP hip replacements. We therefore believe the squeaking hip phenomenon is not exclusive to hard bearings. Surprisingly, only a small proportion of patients described nose from their as a ‘squeak’. Noisy hip implants may have social implications, and patients should be aware of this. We have shown a relationship between noise and a lower OHS. However, longer follow-up and further study is needed to link noise to a poorly functioning implant

Cemented total hip arthroplasty yields reliable results in short to medium term studies, but aseptic loosening remains a problem in long-term follow up, especially in young and active patients. Aseptic loosening has been related to wear, and in order to minimize wear various alternatives to the traditional metal on polyethylene have been proposed. Both ceramic on polyethylene (COP) and metal on metal (MOM) have been shown to produce less wear than metal on polyethylene (MOP). In order to study the effect of the bearing, we have utilized identical stems and cups while comparing the different bearings. Methods and material. 396 hips were randomized to MOP, COP or MOM using a cemented triple tapered polished stem (MS-30; Sulzer Orthopedics) with a cemented polyethylene cup (Weber; Sulzer, Orthopedics) and a 28 millimeter head. For the MOP and COP articulations, a all-polyethylene cup was used with a Protasul™ metal head or a Sulox™ alumina head, whereas a polyethylene cup with metal insert was used for the MOM articulations (Weber Polyethylene Cup with Metasul™ Insert) with a Metasul™ metal head. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiological evaluation was performed after two, five and seven years. Ethical approval was obtained. Results. HHS was available for 338 hips after seven years. The HHS in the MOP group (116 hips) was 93.7 (SD 9.0), 93.5 in the COP group (112 hips) (SD 8.8), and 91.0 (SD 13.4) in the MOM group (110 hips). Radiographic evaluation was available for 335 hips. Radiolucencies around the stem larger than one millimeter were found in five of 115 MOP hips, seven of 111 COP hips and in seven of 110 MOM hips. Periacetabular radiolucencies identified as larger than one millimeter were found in none of the 116 MOP hips, five of the 112 COP hips and in 19 of the 110 MOM hips. Ten revisions were performed. In the MOP group there were three revisions (infection, dislocation, pain); one in the COM group (infection), and six in the MOM group (three infections, two aseptic loosening and one septic loosening). Discussion. Clinically, the three bearing types perform equally well at seven years, and there are few signs of impending failure for the stem. However, there are an alarmingly high proportion of cups showing signs of loosening. Two hips have been revised in the MOM group for aseptic loosening as opposed to none in the two other groups, which adds to the concern. The MOM articulation used in this study should be monitored closely for signs of aseptic loosening

Introduction. Alternative bearings – metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have been introduced in the last decade with the aim to diminish wear and, subsequently, aseptic loosening and osteolysis. These bearings were aimed for younger, more active patients. Clinical results which would compare the performance of various alternative and traditional bearings are scarce. Methods. Between January 2000 and December 2002, we performed 487 total hip replacements in 474 patients using three types of bearings: metal-on-metal (MOM), metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC). All patients received the same type of acetabular cup (Bicon-Plus, Plus Orthopedics) and same type of femoral component (SL-Plus, Plus Orthopedics). We used the hospital computer database for the evaluation of patient data and data on revision operations. Results. At a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (range, 6.8 to 9.9 years), eighteen hips were revised. Seventeen revisions were aseptic, and one was septic. The percentage of revision in the whole group was 3.7%. The percentage of revisions for individual groups of bearings varied and ranged from 1.5% in the MOP group, 4.1% in the COC group to 8.7% in the MOM group. Reasons for revisions were analyzed in details. We noticed that the percentage of aseptic loosening differed among the groups, with the MOM group having the highest percentage of revisions due to aseptic loosening. Conclusions. The results obtained for this large series of THRs with the same type of acetabular and femoral components, and differing only in the type of bearing, indicate that the combination of material of acetabular cup and femoral head affect the performance of the hip prosthesis

Aims

To evaluate the outcomes of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) following a fracture of the acetabulum, with evaluation of risk factors and comparison with a patient group with no history of fracture.

United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines recommend the use of total hip replacement (THR) for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in cognitively intact patients, who were independently mobile prior to the injury. This study aimed to analyse the risk factors associated with revision of the implant and mortality following THR, and to quantify risk. National Joint Registry data recording a THR performed for acute fracture of the femoral neck between 2003 and 2010 were analysed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the extent to which risk of revision was related to specific covariates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse factors affecting peri-operative mortality (< 90 days). A total of 4323 procedures were studied. There were 80 patients who had undergone revision surgery at the time of censoring (five-year revision rate 3.25%, 95% confidence interval 2.44 to 4.07) and 137 patients (3.2%) patients died within 90 days. After adjusting for patient and surgeon characteristics, an increased risk of revision was associated with the use of cementless prostheses compared with cemented (hazard ratio (HR) 1.33, p = 0.021). Revision was independent of bearing surface and head size. The risk of mortality within 90 days was significantly increased with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (grade 3: odds ratio (OR) 4.04, p < 0.001; grade 4/5: OR 20.26, p < 0.001; both compared with grades 1/2) and older age (≥ 75 years: OR 1.65, p = 0.025), but reduced over the study period (9% relative risk reduction per year).

THR is a good option in patients aged < 75 years and with ASA 1/2. Cementation of the femoral component does not adversely affect peri-operative mortality but improves survival of the implant in the mid-term when compared with cementless femoral components. There are no benefits of using head sizes > 28 mm or bearings other than metal-on-polyethylene. More research is required to determine the benefits of THR over hemiarthroplasty in older patients and those with ASA grades > 2.