For many surgeons amputation is the usual treatment in sarcoma of the foot. The aim of our study was to report the functional and oncologic results of treatment in 54 sarcomas of the foot to assess if conservative treatment was acceptable. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 54 patients with sarcomas of the foot, aged 6 to 50 (mean 17), 30 females and 26 males. At time of referral, 18 had a local recurrence of a previous inadequate treatment. There were 27 soft tissue sarcomas (STS: 10 synovial sarcomas, 6 rhadomyosarcomas, 1 liposarcomas and 10 others) and 27 bone tumours (16 Ewing's, 8 chondrosarcomas, 3 osteosarcomas). Toes tumours were excluded, 18 tumours involved the metatarsal, 12 the plantar soft tissues, 11 the calcaneum, 3 the talus, 2 the midtarsal bones. Surgery consisted in 19 resection without reconstruction, 21 resections with bone reconstruction, 9 partial amputations of the foot, and 6 trans tibial amputations. In 34 cases surgical margins were adequate (R0), in 13 patients resection was inadequate (9 R1 and 4 R2). In 7 cases the margins were not assessed. After a 5.5 years average follow-up (3m to 17y), 31 patients had no evidence of disease, 8 were in second remission, 4 had an evolutive disease and 11 were deceased. The mean MSTS score was 26/30 (31 cases). In conclusion, a conservative treatment is feasible in metatarsal bones with skin coverage by flap if necessary. In STS adequate margins are difficult to achieve with a high rate of local recurrence. In calcaneus and talus, a conservative treatment is possible in tumours limited to bone after good response to chemotherapy. In other cases conservative treatment is debatable because amputation gives excellent functional results