Mirels’ score predicts the likelihood of sustaining pathological fractures using pain, lesion site, size and morphology. The aim is to investigate its reproducibility, reliability and accuracy in upper limb bony metastases and validate its use in pathological fracture prediction.

A retrospective cohort study of patients with upper limb metastases, referred to an Orthopaedic Trauma Centre (2013–18). Mirels’ was calculated in 32 patients; plain radiographs at presentation scored by 6 raters. Radiological aspects were scored twice by each rater, 2-weeks apart. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were calculated (Fleiss’ kappa test). Bland-Altman plots compared variances of individual score components &total Mirels’ score.

Mirels’ score of ≥9 did not accurately predict lesions that would fracture (11% 5/46 vs 65.2% Mirels’ score ≤8, p<0.0001). Sensitivity was 14.3% &specificity was 72.7%. When Mirels’ cut-off was lowered to ≥7, patients were more likely to fracture (48% 22/46 versus 28% 13/46, p=0.045). Sensitivity rose to 62.9%, specificity fell to 54.6%. Kappa values for interobserver variability were 0.358 (fair, 0.288–0.429) for lesion size, 0.107 (poor, 0.02–0.193) for radiological appearance and 0.274 (fair, 0.229–0.318) for total Mirels’ score. Values for intraobserver variability were 0.716 (good, 95% CI 0.432–0.999) for lesion size, 0.427 (moderate, 95% CI 0.195–0.768) for radiological appearance and 0.580 (moderate, 0.395–0.765) for total Mirels’ score.

We showed moderate to substantial agreement between &within raters using Mirels’ score on upper limb radiographs. Mirels’ has poor sensitivity &specificity predicting upper limb fractures - we recommend the cut-off score for prophylactic surgery should be lower than for lower limb lesions.

Introduction

Surgical treatment of spinal metastasis belongs to the standards of oncology. The risk of spinal cord compression represents an operative indication. Intraoperative bleeding may vary, depending on the extent of the surgical technique. Some primary tumors, such as the renal cell carcinoma, present a major risk for hemorrhage and preoperative embolisation is mandatory. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the possible benefit of embolisation in different types of primary tumors.

Purpose. To investigate the prognostic effect of surgical margins in soft tissue sarcoma on Local Recurrence (LRFS), Metastasis (MFS) and Disease Free Survival (DFS). Patients and Methods. This is a retrospective, single center study of 105 consecutive patients operated with curative intent. Quality of surgery was rated according to the International Union Against Cancer classification (R0/R1) and a modification of this classification (R0M/R1M) to take into account growth pattern and skip metastases in margins less than 1mm. Univariate and multivariate analysis was done to identify potential risk factors. Kaplan-Mayer estimated cumulative incidence for LRFS, MFS and DFS were calculated. Survival curves were compared using Log rank tests. Results. Estimated LRFS was 0.64 [0.52;0.76] at 5 years following R1 surgery, 0.9 [0.85;0.95] following R0 (p=0.023), 0.64 [0.519;0.751] following R1M surgery and 0.92 [0.87;0.96] following R0M (p=0.01). The R status was associated with DFS (p=0.028), but not MFS (p=0.156). The RM status was associated with both outcomes (p=0.001 and p=0.007). Multivariate analysis showed an independent association with LRFS for RM status (HR 6.77 [1.78–25.7], p=0.005), with DFS for RM status (HR 2.83 [1.47–5.43], p=0.001) and Grade (HR=3.17 [1.38–7.27], p=0.003) and with MFS for Grade (HR=3.96 [1.50–10.5], p=0.006). Conclusions. In Soft Tissue Sarcoma, surgical margins are the strongest prognostic factor for LRFS. In this study, taking growth pattern and skip metastases into account for margins less than 1mm increased prognostic significance of surgical margins for LRFS, DFS and MFS

Aims

The use of multimodal non-opioid analgesia in hip fractures, specifically acetaminophen combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), has been increasing. However, the effectiveness and safety of this approach remain unclear. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes among patients with hip fractures who preoperatively received either acetaminophen combined with NSAIDs, NSAIDs alone, or acetaminophen alone.