Patients with solitary spinal metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) have better prognosis and survival rates compared to other spinal metastatic disease. Adjuvant therapy has been proven ineffective. Selected patients can be treated with Total En bloc Spondylectomy (TES) for solitary intra-osseous metastasis in the thoracolumbar spine secondary to renal cell carcinoma. Five patients with solitary vertebral metastasis secondary to RCC underwent TES for radical resection of the spinal pathology after pre-operative embolisation. The procedure involves en bloc laminectomy and corpectomy with posterior instrumented fusion and anterior instrumentation with cage reconstruction following the spondylectomy. All patients were fully staged pre-operatively and assessed according to the Tokuhashi scoring system. Recurrence of spinal metastasis and radiological failure of reconstruction All patients demonstrated full neurological recovery and reported significant pain relief. One patient died at 11 months post-op due to a recurrence of the primary. The other four are well at 24, 45, 52 and 66 months post-op without evidence of recurrence in the spine. There were no major surgical complications. Careful patient selection is required to justify this procedure. The indication is limited to solitary intra-osseous lesions where complete resection of the tumour is possible. The main advantage of this treatment is that it affords significant pain relief and restores spinal stability whilst minimizing local recurrence.
Objective. To evaluate functional and oncological outcomes following sacral resection. Methods. Retrospective review of 97 sacral tumours referred to spinal or oncology units between 2004 and 2009. Results. 61 males, 37 females (average age of 47 (range 3 – 82). Average duration of symptoms 13 months. 17 metastatic disease, excluded from further discussion. Of the remainder 36/81(44%) underwent surgery – 21 excision, 9 excision and instrumented stabilisation, and 6 curettage. 13(16%) patients were inoperable - 8 advanced disease, 3 unable to establish local control, 2 recurrence. Colostomy was performed in 11/21(52%) patients who underwent excision. Deep wound infections in 6/21(29%). No difference in infection rates between definitive surgery with or without colostomy – 3/11(27%) vs. 3/10(30%). In the instrumented group, no colostomies were performed due to concerns about deep infection and none resulted (0/9). Radiological failure of stabilisation was noted in 7/9(78%). However, functionally, 3/9(33%) were mobilising independently, 3/9(33%) crutches, 2/9(22%) able to transfer and 1/9(11%) undocumented. Mean follow-up 25 months (range 0-70). Local recurrence in 9/36(25%) of operated patients.
The revised Tokuhashi, Tomita and modified Bauer
scores are commonly used to make difficult decisions in the management
of patients presenting with spinal metastases. A prospective cohort
study of 199 consecutive patients presenting with spinal metastases,
treated with either surgery and/or radiotherapy, was used to compare
the three systems. Cox regression, Nagelkerke’s R2 and
Harrell’s concordance were used to compare the systems and find their
best predictive items. The three systems were equally good in terms
of overall prognostic performance. Their most predictive items were
used to develop the Oswestry Spinal Risk Index (OSRI), which has
a similar concordance, but a larger coefficient of determination
than any of these three scores. A bootstrap procedure was used to
internally validate this score and determine its prediction optimism. The OSRI is a simple summation of two elements: primary tumour
pathology (PTP) and general condition (GC): OSRI = PTP + (2 – GC). This simple score can predict life expectancy accurately in patients
presenting with spinal metastases. It will be helpful in making
difficult clinical decisions without the delay of extensive investigations. Cite this article:
