Aims. This study investigates the use of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) score in a young hip arthroplasty population, and its ability to capture additional benefit beyond the ceiling effect of conventional patient-reported outcome measures. Methods. From our electronic database of 751 hip arthroplasty procedures, 221 patients were included. Patients were excluded if they had revision surgery, an alternative hip procedure, or incomplete data either preoperatively or at one-year follow-up. Included patients had a mean age of 59.4 years (SD 11.3) and 54.3% were male, incorporating 117 primary total hip and 104 hip resurfacing arthroplasty operations. Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), and the MET were recorded preoperatively and at one-year follow-up. The distribution was examined reporting the presence of ceiling and floor effects. Validity was assessed correlating the MET with the other scores using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and determining responsiveness. A subgroup of 93 patients scoring 48/48 on the OHS were analyzed by age, sex, BMI, and preoperative MET using the other metrics to determine if differences could be established despite scoring identically on the OHS. Results. Postoperatively the OHS and EQ-5D demonstrate considerable negatively skewed distributions with ceiling effects of 41.6% and 53.8%, respectively. The MET was normally distributed postoperatively with no relevant ceiling effect. Weak-to-moderate significant correlations were found between the MET and the other two metrics. In the 48/48 subgroup, no differences were found comparing groups with the EQ-5D, however significantly higher mean MET scores were demonstrated for patients aged < 60 years (12.7 (SD 4.7) vs 10.6 (SD 2.4), p = 0.008), male patients (12.5 (SD 4.5) vs 10.8 (SD 2.8), p = 0.024), and those with preoperative MET scores > 6 (12.6 (SD 4.2) vs 11.0 (SD 3.3), p = 0.040). Conclusion. The MET is normally distributed in patients following hip arthroplasty, recording levels of activity which are undetectable using the OHS. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(5):317–326

This study investigates the use of the Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) score in a hip arthroplasty population and its ability to capture additional benefit beyond the maximum Oxford Hip Score (OHS). OHS, EuroQol-5D index (EQ-5D), and the MET were prospectively recorded in 221 primary hip arthroplasty procedures pre-operatively and at 1-year. The distribution was examined reporting the presence of ceiling & floor effects. Validity was assessed correlating the MET with the other scores using Spearman's rank and determining responsiveness using the standardised response mean (SRM). A subgroup of 93 patients scoring 48/48 on the OHS were analysed by age group, sex, BMI and pre-operative MET using the other two metrics to determine if differences could be established despite all scoring identically on the OHS. 117 total hip and 104 hip resurfacing arthroplasty operations were included. Mean age was 59.4 ± 11.3. Post-operatively the OHS and EQ-5D demonstrate significant negatively skewed distributions with ceiling effects of 41% and 53%, respectively. The MET was normally distributed post-operatively with no ceiling effect. Weak-moderate but statistically significant correlations were found between the MET and the other two metrics both pre & post-operatively. Responsiveness was excellent, SRM for OHS: 2.01, EQ-5D: 1.06 and MET: 1.17. In the 48/48 scoring subgroup, no differences were found comparing groups with the EQ-5D, however significantly higher MET scores were demonstrated for patients aged <60 (12.7 vs 10.6, p=0.008), male patients (12.5 vs 10.8, p=0.024) and those with pre-operative MET scores >6 (12.6 vs 11.0, p=0.040). The MET is normally distributed in patients following hip arthroplasty, recording levels of activity which are undetectable using the OHS. As a simple, valid activity metric, it should be considered in addition to conventional PROMs in order to capture the entire benefit experienced following hip arthroplasty

Patients may be able to return to higher level activities following hip arthroplasty with modern techniques and prostheses, but the Oxford hip score, the standard PROM used by the NJS exhibits severe skew and kurtosis. The commonest score is 48/48. Most patients score above 40 preventing any discrimination between approaches or prostheses. We therefore sought both subjective and objective metrics which were relevant and valid without skew or high kurtosis in postoperative patients. The Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) reports energy usage in kcal/min burnt across a range of activities, condensed into a score of 0–25. A MET over 8 is considered ‘conditioning exercise’ tethered to life expectancy. A 2 point difference in average MET is considered a clinically relevant difference. Walking speed is a simple valid metric tethered to life expectancy, with a 0.1m/sec difference in walking speed equates to a clinically important difference. Oxford Hip Score (OHS), and the MET were prospectively recorded in 221 primary hip arthroplasty procedures pre-operatively and at 1-year using a web based application. Pre and postoperative Gait analysis was undertaken on a subgroup of 34 patients, in comparison with age and sex matched controls. Post-operatively, the OHS demonstrated significant skewed distributions with ceiling effects of 41% scoring 48/48. The MET was normally distributed around a mean of 10.3, with a standard deviation of 3.8 and no ceiling effect. Walking speed was normally distributed around a mean of 1.8m/sec, with a standard deviation was 0.15 m/sec. The MET is a simple patient reported score, which is normally distributed in patients following hip arthroplasty, around a mean of 10.3 with a standard deviation of 3.8. This valid activity metric correlates well with fast walking speed. This is also normally distributed with a standard deviation of over 0.1m/sec confirming low kurtosis. These simple measures have face validity: undertaking less active pastimes and being unable to keep up with other walkers are obviously inadvisable. The normal kurtosis of these metrics suggest that they may able to detect clinically relevant differences in outcome which are undetectable with commonly used PROMs. For surgeons developing less invasive approaches or using novel stems, these measures may detect clinically important improvements undetectable by the Oxford Hip Score