Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1094 - 1099
1 Aug 2018
Gupta S Malhotra A Mittal N Garg SK Jindal R Kansay R

Aims. The aims of this study were to establish whether composite fixation (rail-plate) decreases fixator time and related problems in the management of patients with infected nonunion of tibia with a segmental defect, without compromising the anatomical and functional outcomes achieved using the classical Ilizarov technique. We also wished to study the acceptability of this technique using patient-based objective criteria. Patients and Methods. Between January 2012 and January 2015, 14 consecutive patients were treated for an infected nonunion of the tibia with a gap and were included in the study. During stage one, a radical debridement of bone and soft tissue was undertaken with the introduction of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. At the second stage, the tibia was stabilized using a long lateral locked plate and a six-pin monorail fixator on its anteromedial surface. A corticotomy was performed at the appropriate level. During the third stage, i.e. at the end of the distraction phase, the transported fragment was aligned and fixed to the plate with two to four screws. An iliac crest autograft was added to the docking site and the fixator was removed. Functional outcome was assessed using the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. Results. The mean age of patients was 38.1 years (. sd. 12.7). There were 13 men and one woman. The mean size of the defect was 6.4 cm (. sd. 1.3). the mean follow-up was 33.2 months (24 to 50). The mean external fixator index was 21.2 days/cm (. sd. 1.5). The complication rate was 0.5 (7/14) per patient. According to the classification of Paley, there were five problems and two obstacles but no true complications. The ASAMI bone score was excellent in all patients. The functional ASAMI scores were excellent in eight and good in six patients. The mean MSTS composite score was 83.9% (. sd. 7.1), with an MSTS emotional acceptance score of 4.9 (. sd. 0.5; maximum possible 5). Conclusion. Composite fixation (rail-plate) decreases fixator time and the associated complications, in the treatment of patients of infected nonunion tibia with a segmental defect. It also provides good anatomical and functional results with high emotional acceptance. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1094–9


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 187 - 187
1 Sep 2012
Ruggieri P Calabrò T Valencia JD Mavrogenis A Romantini M Guerra G Mercuri M
Full Access

Aim. Bone metastases of the upper limb are a frequent complication of primary tumors. The aim of this study is to evaluate treatment and functional results of patients with prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus. Method. Between 1975 and 2007, 67 patients were treated by resection of humeral metastasis and reconstruction with prosthesis. Cemented modular prostheses of the proximal humerus were implanted in 59 cases (all MRS Bioimpianti® prostheses), uncemented prostheses in 2 (HMRS® Stryker), 4 elbow Coonrad-Morrey prostheses (in 2 cases with bone allograft), 1 elbow custom-made cemented and 1 intercalary prosthesis (Osteobridge Merete®). Sites of primary tumors: kidney (23), lung (13), bone and unknow (7 each), liver and breast (3 each), bladder, endometrium, thyroid, soft tissues and nervous tissues (2 each), ovarium (1). Complications were evaluated and univariate analysis with actuarial Kaplan-Meier curves of implant survival was performed. Functional results were assessed with the MSTS system. Results. At mean follow-up 27 months oncologic outcome showed 7 patients NED (mean time 7 yrs.), 57 DOD, 3 lost to follow-up. Complications were deep infection (2 cases, 3%) and loosening (1 case, 1.5%) causing failure requiring revision. Functional results were good or excellent in 93% of patients, with average score of 71%. Conclusion. Resection of metastatic lesion is indicated: 1) for patients with solitary metastases and long free interval from treatment of primary cancer, 2) for patients with meta-epiphyseal metastases not amenable to durable internal fixation even in presence multiple metastases. Indications of resections are increasing, due to prolonged survival with newer medical treatments. Different reconstructive techniques are available, depending on type of resection and soft tissues removal. Cemented prostheses are mostly used, since cemented fixation is not affected by radiotherapy. Although prognosis was poor, prosthetic reconstructions of the humerus provided satisfactory results


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 181 - 181
1 Sep 2012
Ruggieri P Pala E Calabrò T Romagnoli C Romantini M Casadei R Abati C Mercuri M
Full Access

Aim. Aim of this study was to review surgical treatment of femural metastases, comparing nailing versus resection and prosthetic reconstruction. Method. Between 1975 and 2008 110 patients were surgically treated for metastatic disease of the femur. Prostheses were implanted in 57 cases (16 HMRS® Stryker, 38 MRP® Bioimpianti, 2 Osteobridge® and 1 GMRS®). In 53 patients femoral nailing was performed with different types of locked nails (32 Gamma, 14 Grosse-Kempft and 6 T2-Stryker®). Sites of primary tumor were breast (33 cases), kidney (18), lung (17), undifferentiated carcinoma (14), g.i. (8), bladder and prostate (5 each), endometrium and thyroid (3 each), skin (2), pheochromocytoma and pancreas (1 each). Indications to nails were given in patients with femoral metastasis and poor prognosis: multiple metastases, short free interval, unfavourable histotype, poor general conditions. Resection and prosthesis was preferred for patients with solitary metastasis, long free interval, favourable histotype, good general conditions or in whenever the extent of the lesion was not amenable to a durable internal fixation. Complications were analysed. Univariate analysis by Kaplan-Meier curves of implant and oncological survival was performed. Functional results were assessed with MSTS system. Results. Outcome showed: 23 AWD at mean 52 months, 57 DWD at mean 9 months, 30 lost to follow up. Survival in patients treated with femoral nailing was about 10% at 5 years versus 20% for patients treated with resection. Patients with resections had a better survival curve at 2 years. Complications were: infections (4/110, 3.7%), aseptic loosening (1/110, 1%). Statistical analysis showed a significantly better survival for patients resected versus those treated by internal fixation (p=0.0214). Multivariate analysis indicated that pathologic fracture is the only significant adverse prognostic factor (p=0.006). Conclusion. Internal fixation is indicated in patients with multiple metastases and poor prognosis. When expected survival is longer and there is a solitary metastasis a resection is preferable. Indications of resections are progressively increasing due to newer medical treatment giving longer survival to metastatic patients