Aims. The aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion. Methods. The Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study (SSSS) was conducted between 2006 and 2012 at five public and two private hospitals. Six centres participated in this two-year MRI follow-up. We randomized 222 patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two adjacent levels into two groups, decompression alone and decompression with fusion. The presence or absence of a preoperative spondylolisthesis was noted. A new stenosis on two-year MRI was used as the primary outcome, defined as a dural sac cross-sectional area ≤ 75 mm. 2. at the operated level (restenosis) and/or at the level above (proximal adjacent level stenosis). Results. A total of 211 patients underwent surgery at a mean age of 66 years (69% female): 103 were treated by decompression with fusion and 108 by decompression alone. A two-year MRI was available for 176 (90%) of the eligible patients. A new stenosis at the operated and/or adjacent level occurred more frequently after decompression and fusion than after decompression alone (47% vs 29%; p = 0.020). The difference remained in the subgroup with a preoperative spondylolisthesis, (48% vs 24%; p = 0.020), but did not reach significance for those without (45% vs 35%; p = 0.488). Proximal adjacent level stenosis was more common after fusion than after decompression alone (44% vs 17%; p < 0.001). Restenosis at the operated level was less frequent after fusion than decompression alone (4% vs 14%; p = 0.036). Vertebral slip increased by 1.1 mm after decompression alone, regardless of whether a preoperative spondylolisthesis was present or not. Conclusion. Adding fusion to a decompression increased the rate of new stenosis on two-year MRI, even when a spondylolisthesis was present preoperatively. This supports decompression alone as the preferred method of surgery for spinal stenosis, whether or not a degenerative spondylolisthesis is present preoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1343–1351

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the type of cervical disc herniation influences the severity of symptoms at the time of presentation, and the outcome after surgical treatment. Methods. The type and extent of disc herniation at the time of presentation in 108 patients who underwent anterior discectomy for cervical radiculopathy were analyzed on MRI, using a four-point scale. These were dichotomized into disc bulge and disc herniation groups. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the neck and arm at baseline and two years postoperatively. The perceived recovery was also assessed at this time. Results. At baseline, 46 patients had a disc bulge and 62 had a herniation. There was no significant difference in the mean NDI and SF-36 between the two groups at baseline. Those in the disc bulge group had a mean NDI of 44.6 (SD 15.2) compared with 43.8 (SD 16.0) in the herniation group (p = 0.799), and a mean SF-36 of 59.2 (SD 6.9) compared with 59.4 (SD 7.7) (p = 0.895). Likewise, there was no significant difference in the incidence of disabling arm pain in the disc bulge and herniation groups (84% vs 73%; p = 0.163), and no significant difference in the incidence of disabling neck pain in the two groups (70.5% (n = 31) vs 63% (n = 39); p = 0.491). At two years after surgery, no significant difference was found in any of the clinical parameters between the two groups. Conclusion. In patients with cervical radiculopathy, the type and extent of disc herniation measured on MRI prior to surgery correlated neither to the severity of the symptoms at presentation, nor to clinical outcomes at two years postoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1242–1248

Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of using MRI scans to calculate the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Methods. A total of 100 patients were retrospectively included in the study. The SINS score was calculated from each patient’s MRI and CT scans by two consultant musculoskeletal radiologists (reviewers 1 and 2) and one consultant spinal surgeon (reviewer 3). In order to avoid potential bias in the assessment, MRI scans were reviewed first. Bland-Altman analysis was used to identify the limits of agreement between the SINS scores from the MRI and CT scans for the three reviewers. Results. The limit of agreement between the SINS score from the MRI and CT scans for the reviewers was -0.11 for reviewer 1 (95% CI 0.82 to -1.04), -0.12 for reviewer 2 (95% CI 1.24 to -1.48), and -0.37 for reviewer 3 (95% CI 2.35 to -3.09). The use of MRI tended to increase the score when compared with that using the CT scan. No patient having their score calculated from MRI scans would have been classified as stable rather than intermediate or unstable when calculated from CT scans, potentially leading to suboptimal care. Conclusion. We found that MRI scans can be used to calculate the SINS score reliably, compared with the score from CT scans. The main difference between the scores derived from MRI and CT was in defining the type of bony lesion. This could be made easier by knowing the site of the primary tumour when calculating the score, or by using inverted T1-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination MRI to assess the bone more reliably, similar to using CT. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):971–975

Aims. Early cases of cauda equina syndrome (CES) often present with nonspecific symptoms and signs, and it is recommended that patients undergo emergency MRI regardless of the time since presentation. This creates substantial pressure on resources, with many scans performed to rule out cauda equina rather than confirm it. We propose that compression of the cauda equina should be apparent with a limited sequence (LS) scan that takes significantly less time to perform. Methods. In all, 188 patients with suspected CES underwent a LS lumbosacral MRI between the beginning of September 2017 and the end of July 2018. These images were read by a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist. All images took place on a 3T or 1.5T MRI scanner at Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK, and Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK. Results. The 188 patients, all under the age of 55 years, underwent 196 LS lumbosacral MRI scans for suspected CES. Of these patients, 14 had cauda equina compression and underwent emergency decompression. No cases of CES were missed. Patients spent a mean 9.9 minutes (8 to 10) in the MRI scanner. Conclusion. Our results suggest that a LS lumbosacral MRI could be used to diagnose CES safely in patients under the age of 55 years, but that further research is needed to assess safety and efficacy of this technique before changes to existing protocols can be recommended. In addition, work is needed to assess if LS MRIs can be used throughout the spine and if alternative pathology is being considered. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):501–505

The purpose of this study was to devise a simple but reliable radiological method of identifying a lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) with a solid bony bridge on sagittal MRI, which could then be applied to a lateral radiograph. The vertical mid-vertebral angle (VMVA) and the vertical anterior vertebral angle (VAVA) of the three most caudal segments of the lumbar spine were measured on MRI and/or on a lateral radiograph in 92 patients with a LSTV and 94 controls, and the differences per segment (Diff-VMVA and Diff-VAVA) were calculated. The Diff-VMVA of the two most caudal vertebrae was significantly higher in the control group (25° (. sd. 8) than in patients with a LSTV (type 2a+b: 16° (. sd. 9), type 3a+b: -9° (. sd. 10), type 4: -5° (. sd. 7); p < 0.001). A Diff-VMVA of ≤ +10° identified a LSTV with a solid bony bridge (type 3+4) with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 89% on MRI and a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 74% on a lateral radiograph. A sensitivity of 100% could be achieved with a cut-off value of 28° for the Diff-VAVA, but with a lower specificity (76%) on MRI than with Diff-VMVA. Using this simple method (Diff-VMVA ≤ +10°), solid bony bridging of the posterior elements of a LSTV, and therefore the first adjacent mobile segment, can be easily identified without the need for additional imaging. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1533–7

Background. Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a spinal condition requiring emergency spinal surgery once diagnosed. The patient-reported symptoms are often subtle and none have been shown to be sensitive or specific in confirming CES. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) is the diagnostic gold standard, and guidelines recommend MRI access within 24-hours of symptom presentation. Limited sequence MRI scans (sagittal T2 sequences of the whole spine) have been shown to successfully identify patients with scan-positive CES despite reducing the duration of an MRI. The aim of this audit was to examine utilisation of same-day MRI requests by spinal practitioners from a newly operational same-day emergency care spinal unit over the two-year period. Methods and results. Data was routinely collected over the two-year period and retrospectively reviewed. Data extraction occurred for cases of suspected CES with a same-day scan. Data extraction included type of MRI scan (lumbar/ whole spine/ CES protocol); outcome (admission/ discharge); final diagnosis. After clinical examination, only 258 (24% of 1085) suspected CES cases were identified and scanned within 24 hours, 58% (n=149) of which were with CES limited sequence scans. Only 12% (n=30) demonstrated scan- positive CES resulting in surgery within 24-hours. MRI same-day requests increased between 2020 (n=81, 21%) and 2021 (n=177, 26%), although utilisation of limited sequence scans improved (n=39, 48% in 2020; n=109, 62% in 2021). Conclusion. Limited sequence MRI scans are a time- and cost-saving means of providing screening for those with suspected CES. Improved utility was demonstrated over the 2-year period by the spinal practitioners. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No sources of funding

Background. Intervertebral disc degeneration (DD) is a complex age-related condition that constitutes the main risk factor for disabling back pain. DD is assessed using different traits extracted from MR imaging (MRI), normally combined to give summary measures (e.g. Pfirmann score). The aetiology of DD is poorly understood and despite its high heritability (75%), the precise genetic predisposition is yet to be defined. Genome wide association study (GWAS) is used to discover genetic variants associated with a disease or phenotype. It tests variants across the whole genome. It requires large samples to provide adequate but unfortunately there is poor availability of spine imaging data due to the high cost of MRI. We have adopted new methods to examine different MRI traits independently and use the information of those traits to boost GWAS power using specialized statistical software for jointly analyse correlated traits. Methods/Results. We examined DD MRI features disc narrowing, disc bulge, disc signal intensity and osteophyte formation in the TwinsUK cohort who had undergone T2-weighted sagittal spine MRI. GWAS were performed on the four traits. MTAG software was used to boost single trait GWAS power using the information in the other trait GWAS. 9 different loci were identified. Conclusions. Preliminary results suggest genes GDF6, SP1/SP7 are associated with individual trait signal intensity. In addition, novel associated genes with potential for shedding new light on pathogenic mechanisms are identified. Additional cohorts will be included in the design as a replication to test reproducibility of the results. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Funded by Disc4All, EU Horizon 2020, MSCA-2020-ITN-ETN GA: 955735

Background. An understanding of the patterns of healthcare services used after MRI of the spine in general practice would provide information about how MRI scans are used in primary care. Aim. To describe the healthcare use of patients referred for lumbar MRI in general practice, and to investigate the association between specific patient characteristics, back pain characteristics and MRI abnormalities with subsequent specialist consultation. Methods. Patients already referred by their general practitioner for MRI of the lumbar spine were recruited. The MRI radiology reports were scored on abnormalities. The questionnaires filled in at baseline, and at 3 and 12-month follow-up, included potential clinical predictors from history taking and use of healthcare services (consultation, surgery). Results. Of the 683 included patients being referred for MRI by their general practitioner, 55% were being referred for consultation with a specialist during the first 3 months of follow-up. Patients with no history of back complaints, severe leg pain, more disability, and/or a history of back surgery had a greater chance of being referred to a specialist. Addition of the reported MRI findings did not add to the predictive value of being referred based on only clinical factors. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that the general practitioners decision whether or not to refer a patient to a specialist was not dependent on the MRI report, but was mostly based on history taking. From a clinical perspective, these results raise questions about the usefulness of the lumbar MRI in general practice patients with low back pain. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding for the research: This study is partly funded by a program grant of the Dutch Arthritis Foundation. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in spinal imaging characteristics between subjects with or without lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) in a population-based cohort. Methods. This was a radiological analysis of 2,387 participants who underwent L1-S1 MRI. Means and ranges were calculated for age, sex, BMI, and MRI measurements. Anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameters were used to differentiate those with DSS from controls. Other imaging parameters included vertebral body dimensions, spinal canal dimensions, disc degeneration scores, and facet joint orientation. Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests were conducted to search for measurement differences between those with DSS and controls. In order to identify possible associations between DSS and MRI parameters, those who were statistically significant in the univariate binary logistic regression were included in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression after adjusting for demographics. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported where appropriate. Results. Axial AP vertebral canal diameter (p < 0.001), interpedicular distance (p < 0.001), AP dural sac diameter (p < 0.001), lamina angle (p < 0.001), and sagittal mid-vertebral body height (p < 0.001) were significantly different between those identified as having DSS and controls. Narrower interpedicular distance (OR 0.745 (95% CI 0.618 to 0.900); p = 0.002) and AP dural sac diameter (OR 0.506 (95% CI 0.400 to 0.641); p < 0.001) were associated with DSS. Lamina angle (OR 1.127 (95% CI 1.045 to 1.214); p = 0.002) and right facet joint angulation (OR 0.022 (95% CI 0.002 to 0.247); p = 0.002) were also associated with DSS. No association was observed between disc parameters and DSS. Conclusion. From this large-scale cohort, the canal size is found to be independent of body stature. Other than spinal canal dimensions, abnormal orientations of lamina angle and facet joint angulation may also be a result of developmental variations, leading to increased likelihood of DSS. Other skeletal parameters are spared. There was no relationship between DSS and soft tissue changes of the spinal column, which suggests that DSS is a unique result of bony maldevelopment. These findings require validation in other ethnicities and populations. Level of Evidence: I (diagnostic study). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):725–733

Aims. To identify the incidence and risk factors for five-year same-site recurrent disc herniation (sRDH) after primary single-level lumbar discectomy. Secondary outcome was the incidence and risk factors for five-year sRDH reoperation. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted using prospectively collected data and patient-reported outcome measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), between 2008 and 2019. Postoperative sRDH was identified from clinical notes and the centre’s MRI database, with all imaging providers in the region checked for missing events. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate five-year sRDH incidence. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent variables predictive of sRDH, with any variable not significant at the p < 0.1 level removed. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. Complete baseline data capture was available for 733 of 754 (97.2%) consecutive patients. Median follow-up time for censored patients was 2.2 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.0 to 5.0). sRDH occurred in 63 patients at a median 0.8 years (IQR 0.5 to 1.7) after surgery. The five-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for sRDH was 12.1% (95% CI 9.5 to 15.4), sRDH reoperation was 7.5% (95% CI 5.5 to 10.2), and any-procedure reoperation was 14.1% (95% CI 11.1 to 17.5). Current smoker (HR 2.12 (95% CI 1.26 to 3.56)) and higher preoperative ODI (HR 1.02 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.03)) were independent risk factors associated with sRDH. Current smoker (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.12 to 4.09)) was an independent risk factor for sRDH reoperation. Conclusion. This is one of the largest series to date which has identified current smoker and higher preoperative disability as independent risk factors for sRDH. Current smoker was an independent risk factor for sRDH reoperation. These findings are important for spinal surgeons and rehabilitation specialists in risk assessment, consenting patients, and perioperative management. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(3):315–322

Background. Criticisms about overuse of MRI in low back pain are well documented. Yet, with the exception of suspicion of serious pathology, little is known about factors that influence clinicians' preference for MRI. We investigated the factors associated with physiotherapists' preference for MRI for patients consulting with benign low back and leg pain (LBLP) including sciatica. Methods. Data were collected from 607 primary care patients consulting with LBLP and assessed by 7 physiotherapists, in the ATLAS cohort study. Following clinical assessment, physiotherapists documented whether he/she wanted the patient to have an MRI. Factors potentially associated with clinicians' preference for imaging were selected a priori, from patient characteristics and clinical assessment findings. A mixed-effect logistic regression model examined the associations between these factors and physiotherapists' preference for MRI. Results. Physiotherapists expressed a preference for MRI in 32% (196/607) of patients, of whom 22 did not have a clinical diagnosis of sciatica (radiculopathy). Factors associated with preference for MRI included; clinical diagnosis of sciatica (OR 4.23: 95% CI 2.29,7.81), greater than 3 months pain duration (OR 2.61: 95% CI 1.58,4.30), high pain intensity (OR 1.24: 95%CI 1.11,1.37), patient's low expectation of improvement (OR 2.40: 95% 1.50,3.83), physiotherapist's confidence in the diagnosis (OR 1.19: 95% CI 1.07,1.33) with greater confidence associated with higher probability of preference for MRI. Conclusion. A clinical diagnosis of sciatica and longer symptom duration were most strongly associated with physiotherapists' preference for MRI. Given current best practice guidelines, these appear to be justifiable reasons for wanting patients to have an MRI. Conflicts of interest: None. Funding. SE was supported through an NIHR internship linked to an NIHR Research Professorship awarded to NEF (RP-01-015). NEF is an NIHR Senior Investigator. KK is supported through a HEFCE Senior Clinical Lecturer award. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health

Aims. Diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome (CES) remains difficult; clinical assessment has low accuracy in reliably predicting MRI compression of the cauda equina (CE). This prospective study tests the usefulness of ultrasound bladder scans as an adjunct for diagnosing CES. Methods. A total of 260 patients with suspected CES were referred to a tertiary spinal unit over a 16-month period. All were assessed by Board-eligible spinal surgeons and had transabdominal ultrasound bladder scans for pre- and post-voiding residual (PVR) volume measurements before lumbosacral MRI. Results. The study confirms the low predictive value of ‘red flag’ symptoms and signs. Of note ‘bilateral sciatica’ had a sensitivity of 32.4%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of only 17.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 88.3%. Use of a PVR volume of ≥ 200 ml was a demonstrably more accurate test for predicting cauda equina compression on subsequent MRI (p < 0.001). The PVR sensitivity was 94.1%, specificity 66.8%, PPV 29.9% and NPV 98.7%. The PVR allowed risk-stratification with 13% patients deemed ‘low-risk’ of CES. They had non-urgent MRI scans. None of the latter scans showed any cauda equina compression (p < 0.006) or individuals developed subsequent CES in the intervening period. There were considerable cost-savings associated with the above strategy. Conclusion. This is the largest reported prospective evaluation of suspected CES. Use of the PVR volume ≥ 200 ml was considerably more accurate in predicting CES. It is a useful adjunct to conventional clinical assessment and allows risk-stratification in managing suspected CES. If adopted widely it is less likely incomplete CES would be missed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):677–682

Introduction

Nucleus replacement surgery has the potential to be an early treatment option for chronic lower back pain. The surgery involves removal (nuclectomy) and replacement of the native degenerated nucleus with a material designed to restore the disc's physiological properties. Multiple techniques have been considered to perform a nuclectomy, however the advantages and disadvantages of each are not well understood. The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare three nuclectomy techniques: automated-shaver, rongeurs, and laser.

Establish the positive predictive value of clinical examination predicted radicular level to MRI. To identify the value of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) assessment tool in the assessment of patients presenting with radicular symptoms of lumbar spine source. 8 patients attending the ESP Orthopaedic triage service, presenting with radicular pain in which MRI is clinically indicated. Prospective study on patients attending ESP Orthopaedic triage service. Patients were clinically examined, both parts LANSS score was completed. Following the assessment a radicular level was selected. Following MRI the results were compared. Positive predicted values (PPV) for clinical examination and sensitivity and specificity of a LANSS score>12 was calculated. LANSS score. MRI report. PPV of 75% of therapist predicted level being same level or adjacent level to MRI stated level. 66% specificity and 100% sensitivity of patients in study with LANNS>12 having MRI evaluated radicular nerve root compression. This pilot suggests that clinical examination and the LANSS score is useful in establishing the presence of radicular nerve root compression. This evidence supports the need for further research

We carried out an MRI study of the lumbar spine in 15 patients with achondroplasia to evaluate the degree of stenosis of the canal. They were divided into asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. We measured the sagittal canal diameter, the sagittal cord diameter, the interpedicular distance at the mid-pedicle level and the cross-sectional area of the canal and spinal cord at mid-body and mid-disc levels. The MRI findings showed that in achondroplasia there was a significant difference between the groups in the cross-sectional area of the body canal at the upper lumbar levels. Patients with a narrower canal are more likely to develop symptoms of spinal stenosis than others

Purpose and background:. Sacroiliitis identified by MRI is considered as a keystone in the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis. To reduce the number of unnecessary MRI scans it would be ideal if sacroiliac (SI) joint pain provocation tests could be used to identify patients at risk of having sacroiliitis. The aim of the current study was to investigate the diagnostic value of three pain provocation SI-joint tests for sacroiliitis identified by MRI. Methods:. Patients (n=454, mean age 32 years, 54% women) without clinical signs of nerve root compression were selected from a cohort consisting of patients with persistent low back pain referred to an outpatient spine clinic. Data from the Gaenslen's Test, Thigh Thrust Test and Long Dorsal Sacroiliac Ligaments Test and sacroiliitis identified by MRI were analysed. Results:. The prevalence of SI-joints with sacroiliitis was 5%. In the whole study group, only the Thigh Trust Test was associated with sacroiliitis, ROC area 0.58 (95% CI 0.51–0.65), sensitivity 31% (18–47) and specificity 85% (82–87). In men, sacroiliitis was associated with all three SI joint tests and multitest regimens, with the greatest ROC area found for ≥ 1 positive out of 3 tests, (0.68 (0.56–0.80)), sensitivity 56% (31–79) and specificity 81% (77–85). In women, no significant associations were observed between the assessed SI joint tests and sacroiliitis. Conclusions:. Only in men were the performed SI-joint tests found to be associated with sacroiliitis identified by MRI. Although, the diagnostic value was limited, the results indicate that the use of SI joint tests for sacroiliitis may be optimised by gender-separated analyses

We describe the prevalence of spondylolisthesis in Scheuermann's Kyphosis (SK) from retrospective review of 104 SK patients over 6 years. All patients referred to our institution for symptomatic SK undergo MRI scan from hindbrain to sacrum. Our MRI database was reviewed for all SK patients. All scans with spondylolisthesis were re-analysed. 117 scans were identified, 13 patients did not fulfil the MRI criteria for SK and thus 104 (74M: 31F) scans of SK are reported. There were 5 spondylolisthesis (1 cervical and 4 lumbosacral). Of the 4 lumbosacral there were 2 Meyerding grade-1; 1 grade-2 and 1 grade-5 spondyloptosis). An overall rate of 5% for listhesis was therefore found. The prevalence of spondylolisthesis is around 3% in the general population based on a CT study of 510 patients (Belfi 2006) and Fredrickson's (1984 and 2003) prospective study of 500 children. We describe the prevalence in SK patients being higher at 5%. This may be related to the adaptive change of increased lumbar lordosis in SK, certainly it supports the previous description higher rates of spondylolysis in SK

Background. Almost 80% of people experience low back pain at least once in their life. A quarter suffers from Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain (NS-CLBP), where symptoms cannot be justified radiologically. There is evidence that imaging negatively impacts outcomes (increased painkillers and doctors' visits) in NS-CLBP patients. Despite clinical guidelines recommending against the use of imaging, healthcare practitioners and patients still request imaging to explain symptoms. Method. Qualitative, semi-structured interviews with NS-CLBP patients, physiotherapists, and doctors conducted using purposeful sampling of 6–11 people from each group. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. Validity was ensured by data triangulation with participants. Results. Interviews with 11 patients who had an MRI scan, 6 physiotherapists and 6 spine surgeons. Four main themes emerged from synthesis of findings across these three groups. Discussion. This study provides an insight of the lived experience of NS-CLBP among three different groups. It highlights the difference in expectation between healthcare provider and patients about how CLBP should be managed and the lack of coordination between primary and secondary healthcare services. Although patients seek imaging to explain NS-CLBP, they react to the results negatively. In accordance with fear avoidance model, participants reported fear avoidance behaviours and anxiety following MRI. That affect daily life activities and participation. Conclusion. This study highlights the need for early management of NS-CLBP patients in primary care. The psychosocial consequences of diagnosing by MRI are fear avoidance and anxiety. The current biomedical education to those patients may promotes these consequences. Conflict of interest. No conflicts of interest. Study fund. This research was supported through a PhD scholarship from Prince Sattam bin Abdul-Aziz University, Saudi Arabia, at the University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Purpose and background:. MRI findings associated with spondyloarthritis (SpA) can be difficult to distinguish from the more prevalent findings of degeneration. Despite this, the two groups of MRI-findings are often evaluated in separate studies and in different study populations, which may reduce their applicability in daily clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of degenerative and SpA related MRI-findings in the spine and sacroiliac joints (SIJ) in patients with persistent LBP. Methods:. Patients with persistent LBP (n=1037, median age 33 [IQR 27–37], 54% women) referred to an outpatient, secondary care and non-surgical department were included in the study. MRI of the whole spine and the SIJ was performed and degenerative and SpA-related MRI-findings were evaluated by experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Results:. The prevalence of disc degeneration, disc contour changes, and Modic changes were 87%(±1.1), 82%(±1.2) and 48%(±1.6). All degenerative spinal findings were most frequent in men and patients aged 30–40 years. Spinal SpA-related MRI-findings were rare. In the SIJ, 28%(±1.4) had at least one MRI finding, with bone marrow oedema (BMO) being the most common (21%(±1.3)). SIJ erosions were most prevalent in patients aged 18–29 years and BMO in patients aged 30–40 years. SIJ sclerosis and fatty marrow deposition were most common in women. Post hoc analysis showed that SIJ BMO, sclerosis and erosions were most frequent in women indicating pregnancy-related LBP. Conclusion:. The high prevalence of SIJ MRI findings associated with age, gender, and pregnancy-related LBP need further investigation of their clinical importance in patients with persistent LBP

Incidence of pars defect associated with idiopathic scoliosis has been reported as 6% based on roentgenographic evaluation in previous studies. (Fisk et al, 1978). We aim to present our results in an MRI based study. 224 patients of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who had an MRI scan over a period of three years (2006-2008), performed either as a preoperative investigation or due to other symptoms were reviewed. All MRI scans were reviewed by two experienced musculoskeletal radiology consultants independently. Among 224 patients 13 (5.8%) patients were found to have pars defect. Mean age-group of patients were (19 years, range-11-40). 84.6% (n=11) patients were female and 15.3% patients were male. There was varying severity of curve patterns. We have noted two lumbar/thoraco-lumbar curves (Lenke 5), King Type I-6, King Type II-2 and three King Type III curves. All scoliotic deformities were non-structural. Bilateral pars defect was noted in nine (69%) patients. Previous studies (Fisk et al, 1978; Mau H 1981) have described the incidence of pars defect as approximately 6.2%. Recent studies have emphasized use of MRI to diagnose pars defect based on signal changes in the pedicle (Sairyo et al.). Our study reveals the incidence of pars defect in AIS to be 5.8 % based on MRI diagnosis which does not seem to be different to previous roentgenographic studies