Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 12 - 12
16 May 2024
Tweedie B Townshend D Coorsh J Murty A Kakwani R
Full Access

Lateral approach open calcaneal osteotomy is the described gold standard procedure in the management of hindfoot deformity. With development of minimally invasive surgery, a MIS approach has been described, citing fewer wound complications and lower risk of sural nerve injury. This audit compares MIS to the traditional procedure. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing calcaneal osteotomy in Northumbria Trust in the past 5 years was performed. A total of 105 osteotomies were performed in 97 patients; 28 (13M:15F) in MIS group and 77 (40M:37F) had an open approach. The average age was 52.1 (range 16–83) for MIS and 51.5 (range 18–83) in the open group. All patients were followed up for development of wound complication, nerve injury and fusion rate. Wound complications were similar (10.7% in MIS group vs 10.3% in Open group) with no significant difference (p=0.48). Patients were treated for infection in 3(3.8%) cases in the open group and 2(7.1%) in the MIS group. This difference was not significant (p=0.43). 4 (14.3%) patients in the MIS group had evidence of sural nerve dysfunction post-operatively (managed expectantly), compared to 12(15.5%) patients in the open group (p=0.44). Of these, 2 went on to undergo neuroma exploration. There was no difference in nerve dysfunction in varus or valgus correction. Mean translation in the open group was measured as 7.3mm(SD=1.91;3 to 13mm) and 7.5mm(SD=1.25;5 to 10mm) in the MIS group. Translation was similar in varus or valgus correction. Non-union occurred in 2 patients in the MIS group and none in the open group (p= 0.06). MIS calcaneal osteotomy is a safe technique, that works as effectively as osteotomy performed through an open approach. There were lower rates of nerve injury, wound complication and infection, but this was not significantly different comparing groups. There was a higher risk of non-union in MIS technique


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 20 - 20
4 Jun 2024
Lewis T Robinson PW Ray R Dearden PM Goff TA Watt C Lam P
Full Access

Background. Recent large studies of third-generation minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery (MIS) have demonstrated significant improvement in clinical and radiological outcomes. It remains unknown whether these clinical and radiological outcomes are maintained in the medium to long-term. The aim of this study was to investigate the five-year clinical and radiological outcomes following third-generation MIS hallux valgus surgery. Methods. A retrospective observational single surgeon case series of consecutive patients undergoing primary isolated third-generation percutaneous Chevron and Akin osteotomies (PECA) for hallux valgus with a minimum 60 month clinical and radiographic follow up. Primary outcome was radiographic assessment of the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) pre-operatively, 6 months and ≥60 months following PECA. Secondary outcomes included the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, patient satisfaction, Euroqol-5D Visual Analogue Scale and Visual Analogue Scale for Pain. Results. Between 2012 and 2014, 126 consecutive feet underwent isolated third-generation PECA. The mean follow up was 68.8±7.3 (range 60–88) months. There was a significant improvement in radiographic deformity correction; IMA improved from 13.0±3.0 to 6.0±2.6, (p < 0.001) and HVA improved from 27.5±7.6 to 7.8±5.1. There was a statistically significant but not clinically relevant increase of 1.2±2.6° in the HVA between 6 month and ≥60 month radiographs. There was an increase in IMA of 0.1±1.6º between 6 month and ≥60 month radiographs which was not statistically or clinically significant. MOXFQ Index score at ≥follow up was 10.1±17.0. The radiographic recurrence rate was 2.6% at final follow up. The screw removal rate was 4.0%. Conclusion. Radiological deformity correction following third-generation PECA is maintained at a mean follow up of 68.8 months with a radiographic recurrence rate of 2.6%. Clinical PROMs and patient satisfaction levels are high and comparable to other third-generation studies with shorter duration of follow up


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 23 - 23
1 Nov 2014
Kendal A Ball T Rogers M Cooke P Sharp R
Full Access

Background:. Calcaneal osteotomy is an established technique in correcting hind foot deformity. Patients have traditionally received an open osteotomy through Atkins lateral approach. In order to reduce the rate of wound complications associated with the Atkins approach, a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique has been adopted since 2011. This uses a low-speed, high-torque burr to perform the same osteotomy under radiographic guidance. The results of the new MIS technique, including post-operative complication rates, are compared to the standard open approach. Methods:. The safety of the new MIS technique was investigated by conducting a case controlled study on all patients who underwent displacement calcaneal osteotomy at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford from 2008 to 2014. The primary outcome measure was 30 day post-operative complication rate. Secondary outcome measures included operating time, duration of stay, fusion rates and amount of displacement achieved. Results:. 82 patients underwent calcaneal osteotomy as part of their corrective surgery; 50 patients in the Open approach group and 32 patients in MIS group. The average age at the time of surgery was 47.7 years (range 16–77) for the Open group and 48.5 (range 21–77) in the MIS group. A mean calcaneal displacement of 8.0mm (s.d. 1.32, 7 to 11 mm) and 8.33mm (s.d.1.53, 6 to 10 mm) was achieved through the MIS and open approaches respectively. There were significantly fewer wound complications in the MIS group (6.25%) compared to the Open group (28%, P=0.021) and the MIS group was associated with significantly lower rates of wound infection (3% versus 20%, P = 0.043). Three patients in the Open group experienced sural peripheral neuropathy. Conclusions:. MIS calcaneal osteotomy was found to be a safe technique. It was as effective as calcaneal osteotomy performed through an open lateral approach but was associated with significantly fewer wound complications and fewer nerve complications


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 14 - 14
1 Sep 2012
Morgan S Jones C Palmer S
Full Access

Open cheilectomy is an established surgical treatment for hallux rigidus. Cheilectomy is now being performed using minimally invasive (MIS) techniques. In this prospective study we report the outcome of minimally invasive cheilectomy comparing the results with a matched group who had cheilectomy using standard open procedure. Methods. Prospective study of 47 patients. 22 patients had MIS cheilectomy between March 2009 and September 2010. We compared the outcome with a matched group (25 patients) who had open cheilectomy. Functional outcome was assessed using the Manchester Oxford Foot and ankle questionnaire (MOXFQ). The MOXFQ is a validated questionnaire designed to be self-completed and used as an outcome measure for foot surgery. Patients' satisfaction and complications were recorded. Results. In the MIS group, the median follow up was 11 months (4–23). The median preoperative MOXFQ score was 34/64(23) and the median postoperative score was 19/64 (p = <0.02). In the open group the median follow up was 17 months (9–27). The median preoperative MOXFQ score was 35/64 and the median postoperative score was 7.5/64 (p = <0.0001). The metric score of the three domains of the MOXFQ showed statistical improvement in both groups. The improvement didn't reach statistical significance between the open and MIS groups. There were three failures in the open group (Fusion) compared to none in the MIS. Discussion. There was significant improvement in foot pain, function and social aspect in the MIS group comparable to the open group. In our analysis we didn't account for the learning curve involved in the MIS technique. The MIS procedure has the advantage of small incision and dissection and accordingly less swelling and quicker recovery. Conclusion. MIS cheilectomy is an effective alternative procedure with satisfactory functional outcome and high patient satisfaction. Results are comparable to the standard open cheilectomy with a lower apparent failure rate


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 13 - 13
1 Sep 2012
Prasthofer AW Upadhyay P Dhukaram V
Full Access

MIS (minimally invasive surgery) aims to improve cosmesis and facilitate early recovery by using a small skin incision with minimal soft tissue disruption. When using MIS in the forefoot, there is concern about neurovascular and tendon damage and cutaneous burns. The aim of this anatomical study was to identify the structures at risk with the proposed MIS techniques and to determine the frequency of iatrogenic injury. Materials and Methods. 10 paired normal cadaver feet were used. All procedures were performed using a mini C-arm in a cadaveric lab by 2 surgeons: 1 consultant who has attended a cadaveric MIS course but does not perform MIS in his regular practice (8 feet), and 1 registrar who was supervised by the same consultant (2 feet). In each foot, the surgeon performed a lateral release, a MICA (minimally invasive chevron and Akin) procedure for the correction of hallux valgus, and a minimally invasive DMO (distal metatarsal extra-articular osteotomy) procedure. Each foot was then dissected and photographed to identify any neurovascular or tendon injury. Results. The dorsal medial cutaneous and the plantar interdigital nerves were intact in all specimens. There was no obvious damage to the arterial plexus supplying the first metatarsal head. No flexor or extensor tendon injuries were identified. There is a significant learning curve to performing the osteotomy cuts in the desired plane. In the DMO, the dissection also revealed some intact soft tissue at the osteotomy site indicating that the metatarsal heads were not truly floating. Discussion. Although there has been concern regarding neurovascular and tendon injury, our findings indicate minimal risk, which is consistent with reports in the literature. This study also reflects the learning curve. Conclusion. We suggest that training on cadaveric specimens may be advantageous, particularly, with regard to the plane of the osteotomy


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXII | Pages 4 - 4
1 May 2012
Redfern D
Full Access

I consider the term ‘minimally invasive surgery’ (MIS) to represent a wide range of techniques directed at achieving a surgical objective with less collateral tissue damage. The surgeon choosing to employ such techniques may aspire to achieve improved or more consistent outcome for their patients but is this so? What are the complications? In certain areas of surgery the concept of MIS is well established (e.g. knee and ankle arthroscopy). In forefoot surgery the concept has been met with interest but also skepticism. Much of this skepticism pivots around concerns that the loss of direct vision (maintained in arthroscopic techniques) may increase the risk of complications. In other words, there is a concern that due to the loss of direct visualization (replaced by intra-operative xray imaging), any benefit that might arise from the less invasive technique of the operation will be negated by either poorer quality of surgical correction or higher risk of injury to adjacent structures. All surgery is associated with a degree of risk and in considering the complications specifically associated with MIS of the forefoot we must try to separate out those complications related to the specific MIS technique involved and those that are not. In other words, we need to identify whether the complication has occurred as a result of incorrect surgical planning (e.g. wrong choice of osteotomy/flaws in surgical objective), poor execution of the surgical technique, or as a result of the MIS instrumentation/equipment. I will discuss the above in relation to my experience of complications encountered whilst employing minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment of forefoot pathology over the last 2 years


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 67 - 67
1 Sep 2012
Morgan S Roushdi I Benerjee R Palmer S
Full Access

Introduction. Symptomatic hallux valgus is a common clinical problem, current trends is towards minimally invasive procedures. The goal of this study is to evaluate the outcome of minimally invasive chevron ostoetomy, comparing it with a matched group who had open chevron osteotomy. Methods. Prospective study, 54 patients. MIS group 25 patients between October 2009 and November 2010. Open group 29 patients between Feb 2008 and October 2010. Inclusion criteria included, mild to moderate hallux valgus, no previous history of foot surgery, no history of inflammatory arthritis, or MTPJ arthritis. All the operations were performed by the senior author. Functional outcome and pain were evaluated using pre and post operative Manchester Oxford Foot and ankle questionnaire (MOXFQ). IMA and HVA, avascular necrosis and union were assessed. Complications and satisfaction were recorded. Results. The MIS group with mean age at operation of 55, showed significant improvement in all the domains of the MOXFQ. Walking (p <0.018), foot pain (p = <0.013), social interaction (p = <0.001). The mean HVA and IMA corrections were 11.8° and 6.3°, (p < 0.001). The open group with mean age at operation of 55 years showed significant improvement in all domains of the MOXFQ, walking (p = <0.0001), foot pain (p = <0.002), social interaction (p = <0.0001). The HVA and IMA corrections were 10.5 and 5.9 degrees respectively (p = <0.001). The improvement in MOXFQ and HVA and IMA corrections were not statistically significant between the MIS and open groups. Discussion and Conclusion. Our results showed that the MIS chevron osteotomy is an effective procedure with minimal complications and satisfactory functional outcome, comparable to the open standard chevron osteotomy. Larger sample size is required to confirm our findings


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXII | Pages 33 - 33
1 May 2012
Dawe E Ball T Annamalai S Davis J
Full Access

Minimally Invasive foot surgery remains controversial. Potential benefits include a reduced incidence of wound complications, faster return to employment and normal footwear. There are no studies published regarding the results of minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy. Patients and Methods. Thirty eight patients with painful grade I hallux rigidus underwent dorsal cheilectomy between April 2006 and June 2010. Minimally invasive cheilectomy (MIC) was introduced in August 2009. AOFAS scores, satisfaction, return to normal shoes and employment were assessed. Results. Twenty two patients had open cheilectomy (OC) whilst 16 had MIC. Mean follow-up was 6 months for the MIC group and 35 months for the OC group. Mean AOFAS score was 75/100 (SD 17) in the MIC group and 70/100 (SD 18). Patients rated their satisfaction as 9.1/10 for MIC and 8.6/10 for OC. There was no significant difference in time to return to normal shoes (P = 0.32) or employment (P = 0.07). Two patients (one MIS, one OC) had a superficial wound infection which resolved with oral antibiotics. One patient had a first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in the MIS group. Two patients in the OC group went on to have a first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion and one underwent joint resurfacing. Discussion. These results suggest MIC has comparable early results to OC. Larger studies are required to further establish the benefits of MIC. Conclusion. Minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy seems to offer a safe alternative to open cheilectomy with promising early results. Patient satisfaction with this procedure is very high


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXII | Pages 39 - 39
1 May 2012
Walker R Redfern D
Full Access

In recent years the Weil osteotomy has become the dominant technique employed by most surgeons for distal metatarsal osteotomy. This is generally a reliable technique but problems with stiffness can frequently occur in the operated metatarso-phalangeal joints. We present our experience with a minimally invasive distal metatarsal extra-articular osteotomy technique. This technique utilises a high-speed burr via a tiny skin portal to perform a distal metatarsal extra-articular osteotomy under image intensifier guidance without the need for fixation. A consecutive series of 55 osteomies in 21 patients were included in the study. All osteotomies were performed for metatarsalgia/restoration of metatarsal cascade. The mean age was 49 (38-78), and 20/21 were female. The senior author performed all surgery. All patients were allowed to weight bear immediately in a postoperative shoe and then an ordinary shoe from 4-6 week post-operatively. Mean follow-up was 8 months (4-13) and patients were assessed clinically and scored using the AOFAS scoring system and a subjective outcome score. The mean AOFAS score improved significantly postoperatively. All patients were very satisfied/satisfied with the outcome. Two patients had minor superficial portal infections, which resolved with oral antibiotics. One patient reported irritating numbness and stiffness in toes (1st case performed). Most patients reported swelling persisting to 3-4 months. There was one symptomatic delayed at 4 months treated successfully with short air boot immobilisation. There were no mal unions. This series suggests that MIS distal metatarsal osteotomy results compare well with outcomes reported with modern open techniques such as the Weil. We now favour an MIS distal metatarsal osteotomy technique for most indications due to the minimal stiffness observed postoperatively as well as much reduced surgical time without the need for tourniquet


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 27 - 27
1 Sep 2012
Cove R Guerin S Stephens M
Full Access

Method. A questionnaire was given to delegates at the British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS) annual scientific meeting 3rd–5th November 2010. A total of 75 questionnaires were included within the analysis. The questionnaire asked delegates for their most commonly performed procedure for a variety of common foot and ankle conditions. Results. Which procedure do you most commonly perform?. Hallux valgus mild;. Chevron 60.0%. Scarf 28.0%. Hallux Valgus Moderate;. Scarf 85.3%. Chevron 12.0%. Hallux Valgus Severe;. Scarf 65.3%. Basal Osteotomy 29.3%. 1st MTPJ OA Fusion;. crossed screws 54.7%. Plate 26.7%. Lesser toe Metatarsalgia;. Weil 48.6%. BRT 22.8%. Hammer second toe;. PIPJ Fusion 62.7%. Oxford Procedure 15%. Tib Post stage 1;. Debridement 60.0%. Conservative 24.0%. Tib Post stage 2;. FDL Transfer 76.0%. Calc. osteotomy 78.7%. Achilles tendon rupture. Open Repair 61.5%. Percutaneous 13.8%. In delegates' normal practice they would fuse an osteoarthritic ankle 90% and perform a Total Ankle replacement 10% of the time. The method of fusion is split 50/50 between arthroscopic and open. Regarding the anaesthetic used for forefoot surgery most are using GA + Regional Block (mean 60%) only occasionally using regional anaesthesia alone (mean 8%). Only 12.3% of delegates have tried minimally invasive [forefoot] surgery (MIS), 17.3% of delegates think they will do more MIS in the future. The practice of British orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons is broadly in line with an evidence-based approach. Knowledge of current practice may help trainees make sense of the myriad foot and ankle operations described in the literature


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 3 | Pages 365 - 373
1 Mar 2016
Lucas y Hernandez J Golanó† P Roshan-Zamir S Darcel V Chauveaux D Laffenêtre O

Aims

The aim of this study was to report a single surgeon series of consecutive patients with moderate hallux valgus managed with a percutaneous extra-articular reverse-L chevron (PERC) osteotomy.

Patients and Methods

A total of 38 patients underwent 45 procedures. There were 35 women and three men. The mean age of the patients was 48 years (17 to 69). An additional percutaneous Akin osteotomy was performed in 37 feet and percutaneous lateral capsular release was performed in 22 feet. Clinical and radiological assessments included the type of forefoot, range of movement, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle (AOFAS) score, a subjective rating and radiological parameters.

The mean follow-up was 59.1 months (45.9 to 75.2). No patients were lost to follow-up.