A major cause of morbidity in lower limb amputees is phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP). This study aimed to determine if surgical interposition of nerve endings into adjacent muscle bellies at the time of major lower limb amputation can decrease the incidence and severity of PLP and RLP. Data was retrospectively collected from January 2015 to January 2021, including eight patients that underwent nerve interposition (NI) and 36 that received standard treatment. Primary outcomes included the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain severity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, behaviour, and interference. Secondary outcome included Neuro-QoL Lower Extremity Function assessing mobility. Cumulative scores were transformed to standardised t scores. Across all primary and secondary outcomes, NI patients had lower PLP and RLP. Mean ‘worst pain’ score was 3.5 out of 10 for PLP in the NI cohort, compared to 4.89 in the control cohort (p=0.298), and 2.6 out of 10 for RLP in the NI cohort, compared to 4.44 in the control cohort (p=0.035). Mean ‘best pain’ and ‘current pain’ scores were also superior in the NI cohort for PLP (p=0.003, p=0.022), and RLP (p=0.018, p=0.134). Mean PROMIS t scores were lower for the NI cohort for RLP (40.1 vs 49.4 for pain intensity; p=0.014, 44.4 vs 48.2 for pain interference; p=0.085, 42.5 vs 49.9 for pain behaviour; p=0.025). Mean PROMIS t scores were also lower for the NI cohort for PLP (42.5 vs 52.7 for pain intensity; p=0.018); 45.0 vs 51.5 for pain interference; p=0.015, 46.3 vs 51.1 for pain behaviour; p=0.569). Mean Neuro-QoL t score was lower in NI cohort (45.4 vs 41.9;p=0.03). Surgical interposition of nerve endings during lower limb amputation is a simple yet effective way of minimising PLP and RLP, improving patients’ subsequent quality of life. Additional comparisons with targeted muscle reinnervation should be performed to determine the optimal treatment option

Summary Statement. A porcine model using Yucatan minipigs was found to be very promising for the investigation of healing around transcutaneous osseointegrated implants. Pigs demonstrated surprising agility and adaptability including the ability to ambulate on three legs during the immediate postoperative period. Introduction. Previous non weight-bearing and weight-bearing caprine, canine and ovine models have evaluated design, material, and biological coating variations in an attempt to improve the wound healing and skin-implant seal around transcutaneous osseointegrated implants. Although these models have primarily been used as a window into the application of transcutaneous osseointegrated implants in humans, some important model characteristics affecting wound healing and infection have been missing including: 1) replication of the physiological tissue response, and 2) availability of a transcutaneous site with sufficient soft tissue coverage. Pig skin, like human, is relatively hairless, tightly attached to the subcutaneous tissue, vascularised by a cutaneous blood supply, and healed by means of epithelialization. Swine have been extensively utilised for superficial and deep wound healing studies and can offer ample soft tissue coverage following a lower limb amputation. Development of a porcine model is important for continued understanding and improvement of weight-bearing transcutaneous osseointegration. Methods. Two male Yucatan mini-pigs (9 months, 36kg) were fit with transcutaneous osseointegrated prostheses using a single-stage transtibial amputation and prosthesis implantation procedure. The endo-prosthesis consisted of a cylindrical intraosseous threaded section and a smooth transcutaneous section. The transcutaneous sections were smooth to promote epithelialization and deter direct skin-implant adhesion. The implants were custom manufactured from medical grade Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The exo-prosthesis, consisting of an adjustable length leg and foot, was attached by clamp to the supercutaneous portion of the implant following either one or two days of sling constraint to limit initial weight-bearing. Various exo-prosthesis designs and configurations were trialed. The animals’ behavior and gait were closely observed. Weight-bearing was monitored using a force plate. At 5 and 8 weeks, clinical, microbiological, and histological data were examined to assess wound healing and infection at the skin-bone-implant interface. Results. The pigs demonstrated surprising agility and adaptability. They were able to successfully ambulate on three legs during the post-op period before weight-bearing was permitted. They adapted quickly to changes in exo-prosthesis design, position, and length. Although bacterial colonization was verified, neither of the animals exhibited clinical signs of infection over the respective eight and five week studies. Histological results indicated that there was no skin to implant adhesion but that epithelial growth was progressing towards the implant in one animal. Healing of the transcutaneous wound site showed substantial progress but a definitive skin seal was non-existent at the eight week time point. Discussion/Conclusion. This is likely the first animal model developed, having soft tissue characteristics similar to those found in humans, in which an axially-loaded, weight-bearing implant was successfully used. Results indicated that this porcine model offers many advantages over previous models for the development, evaluation, and comparison of the various techniques being advocated to achieve successful transcutaneous osseointegration in humans. The Yucatan miniature pig's ability to ambulate on three legs during the immediate post-operative period and quickly adjust to changes in the exo-prosthesis design, coupled with their physiological similarity to humans, makes them a valuable model for future studies