The aim of this study was determine if the detection of pathology in children with a limp can be optimised by screening with blood tests for raised inflammatory markers.

The entry criteria for the study were children (0–15 years) presenting to our hospital Emergency Department from 2012–2015 with a non-traumatic limp or pseudoparalysis of a limb, and no sign of fracture or malignancy on plain radiographs. ESR and CRP blood tests were performed along with other standard investigations. Children with ESR or CRP over 10 underwent MRI scan of their area of pain or tendernesss, with those under 7 years old having general anaesthetic. MRI provided the diagnosis in cases of osteomyelitis, pyomyositis, fasciitis, cellulitis, discitis, as well as non-infective conditions such as malignancy and fracture not visible on plain radiographs. Where a joint effusion was present, the diagnosis of septic arthritis was made from organisms cultured following surgical drainage, or high white cell count in joint fluid if no organisms were cultured. The study was completed once data from 100 consecutive children was available.

64% of children had an infective cause for their symptoms (osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, pyomyositis, fasciitis, cellulitis or discitis). A further 11% had positive findings on MRI from non-infective causes (juvenile idiopathic arthritis, cancer, or occult fracture). The remaining 25% had either a normal scan, or transient synovitis. ESR was a more sensitive marker than CRP, since ESR was raised in 97% of those with abnormal scans, but CRP in only 70%. There were no complications from any of the GA MRI scans. Conclusion: This shows that MRI imaging of all children with a limp and either raised ESR or CRP is a sensitive method to minimise the chance of missing important pathology in this group, and is not wasteful of MRI resources.

Aims

To identify a suite of the key physical, emotional, and social outcomes to be employed in clinical practice and research concerning Perthes' disease in children.

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 16 children treated for spondylodiscitis at our hospital between 2000 and 2007. The mean follow-up was 24 months (12 to 38). There was a mean delay in diagnosis in hospital of 25 days in the ten children aged less than 24 months. At presentation only five of the 16 children presented with localising signs and symptoms. Common presenting symptoms were a refusal to walk or sit in nine children, unexplained fever in six, irritability in five, and limping in four. Plain radiography showed changes in only seven children. The ESR was the most useful investigation when following the clinical course of the disease. Positive blood cultures were obtained in seven children with Staphylococcus aureus being isolated in five. Antibiotics were used in 14 children and spinal bracing in six. Children with spondylodiscitis often present with a confusing clinical picture leading to late diagnosis.

The early use of MRI in the investigation of children with an atypical picture may avoid unnecessary delay in starting treatment and possibly prevent long-term problems. All except one of our children had made a complete clinical recovery at final follow-up. However, all six children in the > 24-month age group showed radiological evidence of degenerative changes which might cause problems in the future.