Massive posterosuperior cuff tears (mRCT) retracted to the glenoid are surgically challenging and often associated with high retear rates. Primary repair is a less-favourable option and other salvage procedures such as SCR and tendon transfers are used. This study presents clinical and radiological outcomes of muscle advancement technique for repair of mRCT. Sixty-one patients (mean age 57±6, 77% males and 23% females) (66 shoulders) underwent all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair that included supraspinatus and infraspinatus subperiosteal dissection off scapular bony fossae, lateral advancement of tendon laminae, and tension-free double-layer Lasso Loop repair to footprint. Pre-and post-operative range of motion (ROM), cuff strength, VAS, Constant, ASES, and UCLA scores were assessed. Radiologic assessment included modified Patte and Goutallier classifications. All patients had MRI at 6 months to evaluate healing and integrity of repair was assessed using Sugaya classification with Sugaya 4 and 5 considered retears. Advanced fatty degeneration (Goutallier 3-4) was present in 44% and 20% of supraspinatus and infraspinatus. Tendon retraction was to the level of or medial to glenoid in 22%, and just lateral in 66%. 50.8% mRCT extended to teres minor. Subscapularis was partially torn (Lafosse 1-3) in 46% and completely torn (Lafosse 4-5) in 20%. At mean follow-up (52.4 weeks), a significant increase in ROM, Relative Cuff Strength (from 57% to 90% compared to contralateral side), VAS (from 4 ±2.5 to 1±1.7), Constant (50±17.8 to 74 ±13.0), ASES (52 ±17.5 to 87 ±14.9), and UCLA (16± 4.9 to 30 ±4.9) scores were noted. There were six retears (10%), one failure due to P. acnes infection. 93% returned to pre-injury work and 89% of cases returned to pre-injury sport. Satisfaction rate was 96%. Muscle advancement technique for mRCT is a viable option with low retear rates, restoration of ROM, strength, and excellent functional outcomes

Introduction. Kinematics analyses of the spine have been recognized as an effective method for functional analysis of the spine. CT is suitable for obtaining bony geometry of the vertebrae but radiation is a clinical concern. MRI is noninvasive but it is difficult to detect bone edges especially at endplates and processes where soft tissues attach. Kinematics analyses require tracking of solid bodies; therefore, bony geometry is not always necessary for kinematics analysis of the spine. This study aimed to develop a reliable and robust method for kinematics analysis of the spine using an innovative MRI-based 3D bone-marrow model. Materials and Methods. This IRB-approved study recruited 17 patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery to treat a single-level symptomatic herniation as part of a clinical trial for a new dynamic stabilization device. T1 & T2 sagittal MRI scans were acquired as part of the pre-operative evaluation in three positions: supine and with the shoulders rotated 45° to the left and right to induce torsion of the lumbar spine. 3D bone-marrow models of L5 and S1 at the neutral and rotated positions were created by selecting a threshold level of the bone-marrow intensity at bone-marrow/bone interface. Validated 3D-3D registration techniques were used to track movements of L5 and S1. Segmental movements at L5/S1 during torsion were calculated. Results. Bone-marrow models were created not only in the vertebral body but also in superior/inferior, transverse and spinous processes, pedicles and laminae. Segmental rotation (mean±SD) at L5/S1 was shown to be symmetric for both left and right motions (p=0.149; Left: 1.04°±0.93° and Right: 1.33°±0.80°). The range of motion recorded was: left [0.05°-3.70°] and right [0.35°-3.25°]. These values were equivalent to previously reported values of axial lumbar rotation measured by 3D CT lumbar models. Conclusions. This study demonstrated feasibility of kinematic analyses using the 3D bone-marrow model created with clinical MRI. The bone-marrow model shows the bone-marrow/bone interface geometry –the internal structure of the vertebra rather than outside geometry usually used for kinematic analyses– that is easily and consistently detected due to its high-contrast interface MRI intensity, which does not require lengthy manual tracing of the bony contour. The bone-marrow model includes key elements of the vertebra including posterior elements and the 3D-3D registration technique used for 3D-CT model can be applied (Fig.1). This type of methodology can be used in the clinic to evaluate with sufficient accuracy subject-specific spinal kinematics without exposure to additional radiation. The MRI-based 3D bone-marrow model may also be useful for kinematic analyses of other major joints such as hip, knee, ankle and shoulder joints