Aims. Proximal femur fractures treatment can involve anterograde nailing with a single or double cephalic screw. An undesirable failure for this fixation is screw cut-out. In a single-screw nail, a tip-apex distance (TAD) greater than 25 mm has been associated with an increased risk of cut-out. The aim of the study was to examine the role of TAD as a risk factor in a cephalic double-screw nail. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on 112 patients treated for intertrochanteric femur fracture with a double proximal screw nail (Endovis BA2; EBA2) from January to September 2021. The analyzed variables were age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, fracture type, side, time of surgery, quality of reduction, pre-existing therapy with bisphosphonate for osteoporosis, screw placement in two different views, and TAD. The last follow-up was at 12 months. Logistic regression was used to study the potential factors of screw cut-out, and receiver operating characteristic curve to identify the threshold value. Results. A total of 98 of the 112 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 65 patients were female (66.3%), the mean age was 83.23 years (SD 7.07), and the mean follow-up was 378 days (SD 36). Cut-out was observed in five patients (5.10%). The variables identified by univariate analysis with p < 0.05 were included in the multivariate logistic regression model were screw placement and TAD. The TAD was significant with an odds ratio (OR) 5.03 (p = 0.012) as the screw placement with an OR 4.35 (p = 0.043) in the anteroposterior view, and OR 10.61 (p = 0.037) in the lateral view. The TAD threshold value identified was 29.50 mm. Conclusion. Our study confirmed the risk factors for cut-out in the double-screw nail are comparable to those in the single screw. We found a TAD value of 29.50 mm to be associated with a risk of cut-out in double-screw nails, when good fracture reduction is granted. This value is higher than the one reported with single-screw nails. Therefore, we suggest the role of TAD should be reconsidered in well-reduced fractures treated with double-screw intramedullary nail. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(6):457–463

Background. Hip fractures affect annually over 350,000 people in the USA and over 1.6 million worldwide. About 50% of these numbers are intertrochanteric fractures,. The surgeon should be able to minimize the morbidity associated with the fracture by: recognizing the fracture pattern, choosing the appropriate fixation device, performing accurate reductions with ideal implant placement and being conscious of implant costs. In this study we assessed the ability of the orthopaedic surgeons to recognize fractures pattern, and choosing the ideal implant for the recognized fracture. Methods. We assessed 134 orthopaedic surgeons with questionnaires that assessed 14 different intertrochanteric femoral fractures. We evaluated the fractures as stable or unstable. We chose for each fracture the appropriate fixation device: either a Dynamic Hip Screw (for stable fractures) or an Intra Medullary Nail (for unstable ones), taking into consideration fracture's stability and implants’ costs. We compared the answers of the assessed surgeons to ours. Results. 134 orthopaedic surgeons fulfilled our questionnaires. The average agreement among the assessed surgeons and the authors for fractures’ stability distributed as follows: 78.2% agreement for the stable fractures, 86.2% for the unstable fractures. The agreement for the appropriate fixator between both groups (authors and surgeons) distributed as follows: in choosing the dynamic hip screws for the stable fractures 79.6% agreed with our choice. When choosing the Intra Medullary Nail for the unstable fractures 72.4% of the surgeons agreed with our choice. Interestingly, surgeons that their subspecialty is orthopaedic trauma tended to use more the Intra Medullary Nails in the stable fractures compared to the other surgeons. Conclusions. The majority of the assessed surgeons know to recognise inertrochanteric fractures’ stability and to choose the appropriate fixation device. 20% of surgeons did not agree with our choices. Choosing an Intra Medullary Nail for the stable fracture is not a mistake, but the wrong fixation device for the unstable fracture may cause non-union, mal-union or hardware failure, and might complicate patients’ rehabilitation and cure. We believe that a team discussion should take place for each and any case before operation, and whenever there is a doubt about fractures stability, the Iintra Medullary Nail should be chosen