Aims. Due to widespread cancellations in elective orthopaedic procedures, the number of patients on waiting list for surgery is rising. We aim to determine and quantify if disparities exist between inpatient and day-case orthopaedic waiting list numbers; we also aim to determine if there is a ‘hidden burden’ that already exists due to reductions in elective secondary care referrals. Methods. Retrospective data were collected between 1 April 2020 and 31 December 2020 and compared with the same nine-month period the previous year. Data collected included surgeries performed (day-case vs inpatient), number of patients currently on the orthopaedic waiting list (day-case vs inpatient), and number of new patient referrals from primary care and therapy services. Results. There was a 52.8% reduction in our elective surgical workload in 2020. The majority of surgeries performed in 2020 were day case surgeries (739; 86.6%) with 47.2% of these performed in the independent sector on a ‘lift and shift’ service. The total number of patients on our waiting lists has risen by 30.1% in just 12 months. As we have been restricted in performing inpatient surgery, the inpatient waiting lists have risen by 73.2%, compared to a 1.6% rise in our day-case waiting list. New patient referral from primary care and therapy services have reduced from 3,357 in 2019 to 1,722 in 2020 (49.7% reduction). Conclusion. This study further exposes the increasing number of patients on orthopaedic waiting lists. We observed disparities between inpatient and day-case waiting lists, with dramatic increases in the number of inpatients on the waiting lists. The number of new patient referrals has decreased, and we predict an influx of referrals as the pandemic eases, further adding to the pressure on inpatient waiting lists. Robust planning and allocation of adequate resources is essential to deal with this backlog. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):530–534

Aims. Currently, there is no single, comprehensive national guideline for analgesic strategies for total joint replacement. We compared inpatient and outpatient opioid requirements following total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine risk factors for increased inpatient and outpatient opioid requirements following total hip or knee arthroplasty. Methods. Outcomes after 92 primary total knee (n = 49) and hip (n = 43) arthroplasties were analyzed. Patients with repeat surgery within 90 days were excluded. Opioid use was recorded while inpatient and 90 days postoperatively. Outcomes included total opioid use, refills, use beyond 90 days, and unplanned clinical encounters for uncontrolled pain. Multivariate modelling determined the effect of surgery, regional nerve block (RNB) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA), and non-opioid medications after adjusting for demographics, ength of stay, and baseline opioid use. Results. TKAs had higher daily inpatient opioid use than THAs (in 5 mg oxycodone pill equivalents: median 12.0 vs 7.0; p < 0.001), and greater 90 day use (median 224.0 vs 100.5; p < 0.001). Opioid refills were more likely in TKA (84% vs 33%; p < 0.001). Patient who underwent TKA had higher independent risk of opioid use beyond 90 days than THA (adjusted OR 7.64; 95% SE 1.23 to 47.5; p = 0.01). Inpatient opioid use 24 hours before discharge was the strongest independent predictor of 90-day opioid use (p < 0.001). Surgical procedure, demographics, and baseline opioid use have greater influence on in/outpatient opioid demand than RNB, NA, or non-opioid analgesics. Conclusion. Opioid use following TKA and THA is most strongly predicted by surgical and patient factors. TKA was associated with higher postoperative opioid requirements than THA. RNB and NA did not diminish total inpatient or 90-day postoperative opioid consumption. The use of acetaminophen, gabapentin, or NSAIDs did not significantly alter inpatient opioid requirements. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:398–404

Introduction. Outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is emerging as a viable alternative to the historically accepted hospital based inpatient TJA in the United States. Several studies have focused on the financial advantages of outpatient TJA, however little research has discussed patient reported outcome measures (PROM) and the overall patient experience. This is a retrospective comparison of PROM data in patients undergoing outpatient vs. inpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. An internal quality metric database analysis was performed on patients undergoing THA between 2/14/14 to 5/1/2015. Outpatients underwent THA at a newly opened ambulatory surgery center. Inpatients underwent THA in a hospital setting. Ninety-six outpatients and 152 inpatients between the ages of 29–65 years old were included. The Oxford Hip, VAS Pain, and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires were completed pre-operatively, and at 3- and 6-months post-op. The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire asked 8 questions including “how well did the surgery on your joint increase your ability to perform regular activities?” Patients chose from poor, fair, good, very good, and excellent. Chi-squared analyses determined differences in percentages between outpatient and inpatient PROM. Independent samples t-tests determined significant improvements between pre-op and 3 month post-op PROM scores. Results. Outpatients reported significantly greater improvements in functionality at 3 months post-operatively compared to inpatients (20.9 vs. 17.0 raw score improvement) as assessed using the Oxford Hip Score Questionnaire. Thus, outpatients showed a 23% greater improvement compared to inpatients. This was statistically significant (p<0.01). Outpatients showed a significantly higher improvement in VAS pain score compared to inpatients (84.5% vs. 66.2%, p<0.01) at 3 months post-op. Outpatients reported a significantly higher score (on a 100 point scale) when rating how normal their joint felt (85.0 vs. 76.8, p=.022) at 3 months post-op. A significantly higher percentage of outpatients reported their pain relief as “excellent” compared to inpatients (71.7% vs. 56.3%, p<0.01) at 3 months post-op. A significantly higher percentage of outpatients reported their ability to perform regular activities as “excellent” compared to inpatients (57.7% vs. 30.6%, p=.002) at 3 months post-op. A significantly higher percentage of outpatients reported their ability to perform regular activities as “very good-to-excellent” compared to inpatients (82.7% vs. 65.9%, p=.033) at 3 months post-op. A significantly higher percentage of outpatients reported that they “definitely would” have surgery again compared to inpatients (84.6% vs. 69.4%, p=.046) at 3 months post-op. Conclusion. Significantly greater PROM and VAS pain score improvements were reported by outpatient THA patients vs. inpatient THA patients of similar age between the pre-operative time point and 3-months post-op. Outpatient THA patients report a greater improvement on the Oxford Hip Score scale, VAS pain score, THA normal joint, and THA satisfaction questionnaire. The implementation of outpatient THA procedures shows greater overall patient satisfaction and improvement 3 months post-operation. This study demonstrates our initial experience with outpatient THA. The results have met and/or exceeded the inpatient experience with regards to patient reported outcomes measures

Introduction. Outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is emerging as a viable alternative to the historically accepted hospital-based inpatient TJA in the United States. Several studies have focused on the financial advantages of outpatient TJA, however little research has discussed patient reported outcome measures (PROM) and the overall patient experience. The purpose of this study is to compare PROM data in patients undergoing outpatient vs. inpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed in the first year of a newly opened outpatient facility. Methods. An internal quality metric database analysis was performed on patients undergoing TKA between 2/14/14 and 5/1/2015. Outpatient TKA was performed at an ambulatory surgery center. Three-hundred and forty-three TKA patients (both inpatient and outpatient) between the ages of 37–65 years old were included. The Oxford Hip, VAS Pain, and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires were completed pre-operatively, and at 3- and 6-months post-op. The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire asks 8 questions including “how well did the surgery on your joint increase your ability to perform regular activities?” Patients chose from poor, fair, good, very good, and excellent. Chi-squared analyses determined differences in percentages between outpatient and inpatient PROM. Independent samples t-tests determined significant improvements between pre-op and 6 month post-op PROM scores. Results. Outpatients showed a significantly higher improvement in VAS pain score at 6 months compared to inpatients (74.5% vs. 61.6%, p<0.01). Outpatients rated their pain relief as “very good-to-excellent” significantly higher than inpatients (90.0% vs. 74.0%, p=.020) at 6 months post-op. Outpatients rated their ability to perform regular activities as “very good-to-excellent” more frequently as inpatients (82.0% vs. 59.3%, p=.004) at 6 months post-op. This difference was significant. A significantly higher percentage of outpatients reported “very good-to-excellent” meeting of expectations compared to inpatients (82.0% vs. 63.4%, p=.017) at 6 months post-op. No statistical difference was found between outpatients and inpatients in terms of Oxford Knee (function) scores at 6 months post-op. No statistical differences between the inpatient and outpatient groups were noted at the 3 month post-op time point. Conclusion. Significantly greater improvement was reported by outpatient TKA patients vs. inpatient TKA patients at six months post-op. Outpatients report a greater improvement on the VAS Pain score, and report a higher frequency of top-box ratings on the TKA normal joint and TKA satisfaction questionnaires. The implementation of outpatient TKA procedures shows greater overall patient satisfaction and improvement 6 months post-operation. This study illustrates that a de novo outpatient TJA pathway and facility can be successfully implemented with very high levels of patient satisfaction and patient reported success

Closed ankle fractures have been reported to account for 10% off all fractures presenting to the Emergency Department. Many of these injuries require acute surgical management either via direct admission or through defined outpatient surgical pathways. While both methods have been shown to be safe, few studies have examined the cost effectiveness of each clinical scenario. The purpose of this study is to compare cost and resource utilization associated with inpatient and outpatient ankle fracture surgery at a Canadian academic institution. This is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent acute ankle fracture surgery at London Health Sciences Centre between 2016 and 2018. Thirty patients who underwent inpatient ankle surgery for closed, isolated ankle fractures at University Hospital were compared to 30 consecutive patients who underwent outpatient ankle surgery for similar fractures at Victoria hospital. Data pertaining to age at time of surgery, sex, BMI, fracture type, operating/recovery room time, and length of hospital stay were collected. All emergency room visits, readmissions and complications within 30 days of surgery were also recorded. Inpatient and outpatient cohorts were similar with respect to average age (48 vs. 44, P=0.326) and body mass index (29.8 vs. 29.1, P=0.741). There was a greater proportion of patients with an American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) Classification of 3 or greater in the inpatient surgery group (48% vs. 23%). The inpatient group spent an average of 1.2 days in hospital while waiting for surgery and a average of 72 hours in hospital for their entire surgical encounter. The outpatient group spent an average of eight days (at home) waiting for surgery while spending an average of 7.4 hours in hospital during their entire surgical encounter. Outpatient ankle fracture surgery was associated with a cost savings of 35.9% in comparison to inpatient ankle fracture surgery (P < 0 .001). There were no significant differences in the rates of emergency room visits, readmissions, or complications between cohorts. Preliminary findings suggest that outpatient ankle fracture surgery is appropriate for most patients, requires less hospital resources and is associated with similar rates of readmission and complications as inpatient surgery. An established outpatient surgical pathway may offer significant cost savings in the treatment of the common closed ankle fracture that requires surgical intervention

Background. Inpatient dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered a non-reimbursable “never event” by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. There is extensive evidence that technical procedural factors affect dislocation risk, but less is known about the influence of non-technical factors. We evaluated inpatient dislocation trends following elective primary THA, and identified patient and hospital characteristics associated with the occurrence of dislocation. Methods. We used discharge records from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2002–2011). Temporal trends were assessed and multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with dislocation. Results. The in-hospital dislocation rate increased from 0.025% in 2002 to 0.15% in 2011, despite a downward trend in length of stay (P<0.001). Patient characteristics associated with the occurrence of dislocation were black or Hispanic race/ethnicity, lower household income, and Medicaid insurance. Comorbidities associated with dislocation included hemiparesis/hemiplegia, drug use disorder, chronic renal failure, psychosis, and obesity. Dislocations were less likely to occur at teaching hospitals and in the South. Conclusion. The in-hospital dislocation rate following elective primary THA is increasing, in spite of shorter stays and surgical advances over time. Given the sociodemographic disparities in dislocation risk documented herein, interventions to address social determinants of health might do as much or more to reduce the occurrence of dislocation than technical improvements

INTRODUCTION. The benefits of combining enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) interventions with an outpatient THA/TKA program are uncertain. The primary objective was to compare adverse event rate and secondly to compare pain management, functional recovery, PROMs and patients' satisfaction. METHODS. We conducted an ambidirectional single subject cohort study on 48 consecutive patients who experienced both a standard-inpatient and an ERAS-outpatient THA/TKA (contralaterally). We compared complications according to Clavien-Dindo scale and Comprehensive Complications Index (CCI), and unplanned episodes of care. Postoperative pain assessed with a numeric rating scale, opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents, functional recovery, patient-reported outcome measures (WOMAC, KOOS, HOOS, Forgotten Joint Score and Patient Joint Perception) and patients' satisfaction were also evaluated. RESULTS. Following the ERAS-outpatient surgery, complication rates were reduced by more than 50% (2.1 vs 4.4, p<0.001), CCI was significantly lower (12.3 vs 19.1, p<0.001), and similar unplanned episodes of care were observed (p>0.999). In the first 8 postoperative hours, perceived pain was similar (p>0.805) while opioid consumption was significantly reduced with ERAS-outpatient care (9.3 vs 26.5 MME, p<0.001). Patients walked, climbed stairs, showered, performed activities of daily living, practised sports, went back to work sooner after ERAS-outpatient surgery (p<0.001), but PROMs were similar between groups at the last follow-up (p> 0.188). Patients were more satisfied with hospital stay, pain management, functional recovery, wound management, and overall experience of the ERAS-outpatient pathway and recommended it significantly more (p <0.002). DISCUSSION. Most studies comparing outpatient to inpatient programs conclude that outpatient surgeries did not increase complication or readmission rates, and, overall, were not inferior. We found that compared to std-inpatient practice, ERAS-outpatient program reduced complications by half while not resulting in more unplanned episodes of care. Moreover, it resulted in similar pain relief with fewer opioids, faster early functional recovery and higher satisfaction. Patients were significantly more inclined to recommend the ERAS-outpatient pathway after having personally experienced both outpatient and inpatient protocols. These finding are likely multifactorial and linked to the specific ERAS interventions. CONCLUSION. Results of this study highlight the importance of following ERAS principles when implementing an outpatient THA/TKA program

Aim. Hospital systems have recently instituted early systemic sepsis recognition systems, where vital signs and laboratory findings are monitored and automatically alert providers to potential sepsis. Although there are very few reports evaluating the use of sepsis alert systems outside of the emergency room or intensive care unit, many hospital systems have made the decision to apply the sepsis alarm protocols to all inpatients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if an alarm system using systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria is a valuable tool to predict systemic sepsis in the immediate postoperative period (POD#0–4) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Method. 10,791 primary and revision TJA patients at one institution, from 2010–2014, were retrospectively reviewed for positive SIRS criteria on each hospital day from the date of surgery to postoperative day four (POD#4). SIRS criteria included temperature > 38°C or < 36°C, heart rate > 90 beats per minute, respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute, and white blood cell (WBC) > 12,000/mm3 or < 4,000/mm3. Additionally, hospital coding data was cross-referenced to identify patients who were diagnosed with systemic sepsis within 10 days after having a TJA. Results. Of the 10,791 patients undergoing a primary or revision TJA, only 1 patient was diagnosed with sepsis within 10 days of TJA, yielding a prevalence of 0.00009. During POD#0–4, 1798 patients would have triggered at least a 2 criteria SIRS alarm, yielding a false positive rate of 16.7% and a positive predictive value for systemic sepsis of 0.06% (95%CI: 0 to 0.31%). 416 patients would have triggered at least 3 criteria SIRS alarm, yielding a false positive rate of 3.9% and positive predictive value of 0.24% (95%CI:0.01 to 1.33%). The SIRS criteria in the one septic patient in this study did become positive, but did so only after the clinical team had already initiated sepsis care. Conclusions. A SIRS based alarm system for sepsis does not appear to have any utility in the postoperative period after TJA. We are concerned that the high false positive rate of these alarms may result in unnecessary sepsis work-ups, extended hospital stays, and potentially degrade the perceived importance of the sepsis alarms in other cohorts of hospital patients. Further research is necessary to determine if TJA patients with a length of stay greater than normal may benefit from an automatic sepsis alarm system

Fractures of the distal radius are common, and form a considerable proportion of the trauma workload. We conducted a study to examine the patterns of injury and treatment for adult patients presenting with distal radius fractures to a major trauma centre serving an urban population. We undertook a retrospective cohort study to identify all patients treated at our major trauma centre for a distal radius fracture between 1 June 2018 and 1 May 2021. We reviewed the medical records and imaging for each patient to examine patterns of injury and treatment. We undertook a binomial logistic regression to produce a predictive model for operative fixation or inpatient admission. Overall, 571 fractures of the distal radius were treated at our centre during the study period. A total of 146 (26%) patients required an inpatient admission, and 385 surgical procedures for fractures of the distal radius were recorded between June 2018 and May 2021. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall from a height of one metre or less. Of the total fractures, 59% (n = 337) were treated nonoperatively, and of those patients treated with surgery, locked anterior-plate fixation was the preferred technique (79%; n = 180). The epidemiology of distal radius fractures treated at our major trauma centre replicated the classical bimodal distribution described in the literature. Patient age, open fractures, and fracture classification were factors correlated with the decision to treat the fracture operatively. While most fractures were

Abstract. Introduction. Neck of femur (NOF) fracture patients are at risk of developing venous thromboembolisms (VTE). VTE risks could be reduced by adhering to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendation for 1 month of prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin. This audit aimed to assess and improve local compliance to national guidelines on VTE prophylaxis in NOF fracture patients following discharge. Methods. A retrospective consecutive case series of all NOF fractures treated at our institution from May – July 2021 was conducted. Those not eligible for outpatient VTE prophylaxis were excluded (anticoagulated for other indications, completed prophylactic course in hospital, inpatient death, pharmacological prophylaxis contraindicated). The agent and duration of VTE prophylaxis, and the occurrence of clinically significant VTE or bleeds were recorded. A re-audit was conducted in March 2022. Results. From May – July 2021, only 1/65 (1.5%) patient was discharged on a VTE prophylaxis regime consistent with NICE guidelines (1 enoxaparin, 56 rivaroxaban, 6 apixaban; 58 35-day course, 5 28-day course). A quick-guide document summarising the standard inpatient and outpatient VTE prophylaxis regimes for various orthopaedic indications was designed and widely disseminated. In March 2022, 30/34 (88.2%) patients were discharged with enoxaparin and 24/34 (70.6%) received a 28-day course. There were no cases of clinically significant VTE or bleeds in both cycles. Conclusion. Local compliance to national guidelines improved significantly with the implementation of a standardised VTE prophylaxis protocol. Our quick-guide document is a reproducible way of communicating consensus and ensuring consistency within a department

We recently performed a clinical trial comparing motor sparing blocks (MSB) to periarticular infiltration (PAI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We found that MSBs provided longer analgesia (8.8 hours) than PAI with retention of quadriceps strength, and with similar function, satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. However, its potential increased cost could serve as a barrier to its adoption. Therefore, our aim was to compare the costs of MSBs to PAI following TKA. We conducted a retrospective review of data from our previous RCT. There were 82 patients included in the RCT (n=41 MSB group, n=41 PAI group). We compared the mean total costs associated with each group until hospital discharge including intervention costs, healthcare professional service fees, intraoperative medications, length of stay, and postoperative opioid use. Seventy patients were included (n=35 MSB group, n=35 PAI group). The mean total costs for the MSB group was significantly higher ($1959.46 ± 755.4) compared to the PAI group ($1616.25 ± 488.33), with a mean difference of $343.21 (95% CI = $73.28 to $664.11, p = 0.03). The total perioperative intervention costs for performing the MSB was also significantly higher however postoperative inpatient costs including length of stay and total opioid use did not differ significatnly. Motor sparing blocks had significantly higher mean total and perioperative costs compared to PAI with no significant difference in postoperative inpatient costs. However, its quadricep sparing nature and previously demonstrated prolonged postoperative analgesia can be used to facilitate an outpatient TKA pathway thereby offsetting its increased costs

The coronavirus pandemic has reduced the capability of Canadian hospitals to offer elective orthopaedic surgery requiring admission, despite ongoing and increasing demands for elective total hip and total knee arthroplasty surgery (THA and TKA). We sought to determine if the coronavirus pandemic resulted in more outpatient THA and TKA in Nova Scotia, and if so, what effect increased outpatient surgery had on 90 day post-operative readmission or Emergency Department/Family Doctor (FD) visits. The study cohort was constructed from hospital Discharge Abstract Data (DAD), inpatient admissions, and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) data, day surgery observations, using Canadian Classification of Health Intervention codes to select all primary hip and knee procedures from 2005-2020 in Nova Scotia. Emergency Department and General Practitioner visits were identified from the Physician Billings data and re-admissions from the DAD and NACRS. Rates were calculated by dividing the number of cases with any visit within 90 days after discharge. Chi-squared statistics at 95% confidence level used to test for statistical significance. Knee and hip procedures were modelled separately. There was a reduction in THA and TKA surgery in Nova Scotia during the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. Outpatient arthroplasty surgery in Nova Scotia in the years prior to 2020 were relatively stable. However, in 2020 there was a significant increase in the proportion and absolute number of outpatient THA and TKA. The proportion of THA increased from 1% in 2019 to 14% in 2020, while the proportion of TKA increased from 1% in 2019 to 11% in 2020. The absolute number of outpatient THA increased from 16 cases in 2019, to 163 cases in 2020. Outpatient TKA cases increased from 21 in 2019, to 173 in 2020. The increase in outpatient surgery resulted in an increase in 90 day presentations to ED following TKA but not THA which was not statistically significant. For outpatient THA and TKA, there was a decrease in 90 day readmissions, and a statistically significant decrease in FD presentations. Outpatient THA and TKA increased significantly in 2020, likely due to the restrictions imposed during the coronavirus pandemic on elective Orthopaedic surgery requiring admission to hospital. The increase in outpatient surgery resulted in an increase in 90 day presentations to ED for TKA, and a decrease in 90 day readmissions and FD presentations for THA and TKA. Reducing the inpatient surgical burden may result in a post-operative burden on ED, but does not appear to have caused an increase in hospital readmission rates

Aim. Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with a half-life of 14 days (range 6.1 to 18.4), significantly longer than other antimicrobials, which avoids the need for daily antibiotic dosing. This multi-centre observational study aims to describe the use of dalbavancin to facilitate discharge in treating bone and joint infections. Method. All adult patients treated with dalbavancin from January 2017 to September 2022 in four UK bone infection units were included. Data collected through a standardised data collection form included:. Clinical and microbiological characteristics. Hospital length of stay. Complications. Patient suitability for hypothetical treatment options, such as Outpatient Parenteral. Antibiotic Team (OPAT). Clinical outcome. Treatment-related costs were calculated for dalbavancin and the preferred hypothetical treatment option that would have been administered for the same duration. The costs were subtracted to calculate the cost difference. Clinical success was defined as the absence of definite failure in accordance with the OVIVA Trial protocol. Results. Thirty-six patients were included: 20 males and 16 females, with a median age of 53 (IQR 43–73): Thirteen were septic arthritis, twelve were prosthetic joints, seven were spondylodiscitis and five were other orthopaedic-related implant infections. In twenty cases the infecting organism was Staphylococcus aureus, fourteen were due to coagulase-negative staphylococci and two no cultured organism. Reasons for dalbavancin. The reasons for choosing dalbavancin over alternatives were due to either:. Necessity due to poor adherence (21), or lack of viable OPAT options due to antibiotic resistance or intolerance (7). OR. Convenience to avoid the need for OPAT (8). Dalbavancin was initiated at 1500mg after a median of 12 days (IQR 6–17) of in-hospital antimicrobial therapy. Subsequent dalbavancin doses were based on clinical decisions and ranged from 1000mg to 1500mg. Healthcare benefits. Switching to dalbavancin reduced treatment costs by a median of £3526 (IQR 1118 - 6251) compared with the preferred theoretical alternatives. A median of 31 hospital days (IQR 23–47) was avoided among patients who would have required a prolonged inpatient stay. Outcome. Overall, 20 patients (55.6%) were successfully treated after a median follow-up of 8 months (IQR, 5.8 – 18.4). No patients developed an adverse drug reaction. Conclusions. Dalbavancin can safely facilitate outpatient treatment in patients with limited oral options and in whom OPAT is unsuitable. Dalbavancin is cost-effective compared with the alternative of an inpatient stay

Prolonged bedrest in hospitalized patients is a major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially in high risk patients with hip fracture. Thrombelastography (TEG) is a whole blood viscoelastic hemostatic assay with evidence that an elevated maximal amplitude (MA), a measure of clot strength, is predictive of VTE in orthopaedic trauma patients. The objective of this study was to compare the TEG MA parameter between patients with hip fracture who were more mobile post-operatively and discharged from hospital early to patients with hip fracture with reduced mobility and prolonged hospitalizations post-operatively. In this prospective cohort study, TEG analysis was performed in patients with hip fracture every 24-hours from admission until post-operative day (POD) 5, then at 2- and 6-weeks post-operatively. Hypercoagulability was defined by MA > 65. Patients were divided into an early (within 5-day) and late (after 5-day) discharge group, inpatient at 2-weeks group, and discharge to MSK rehabilitation (MSK rehab), and long term care (LTC) groups. Two-sample t-test was used to analyze differences in MA between the early discharge and less mobile groups. All statistical tests were two-sided, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. In total, 121 patients with a median age of 81.0 were included. Patients in the early discharge group (n=15) were younger (median age 64.0) and more likely to ambulate without gait aids pre-injury (86.7%) compared to patients in the late discharge group (n=105), inpatients at 2-weeks (n=48), discharged to MSK rehab (n=30), and LTC (n=20). At two weeks post-operative, the early discharge group was significantly less hypercoagulable (MA=68.9, SD 3.0) compared to patients in the other four groups. At 6-weeks post-operative, the early discharge group was the only group to demonstrate a trend towards mean MA below the MA > 65 hypercoagulable threshold (MA=64.4, p=0.45). Symptomatic VTE events were detected in three patients (2.5%) post-operatively. All three patients had hospitalizations longer than five days after surgery. In conclusion, our analysis of hypercoagulability secondary to reduced post-operative mobility demonstrates that patients with hip fracture who were able to mobilize independently sooner after hip fracture surgery, have a reduced peak hypercoagulable state. In addition, there is a trend towards earlier return to normal coagulation status as determined by the TEG MA parameter. Post-operative mobility status may play a role in determining individualized duration of thromboprophylaxis following hip fracture surgery. Future studies comparing TEG to clinically validated mobility tools may more closely evaluate the contribution of venous stasis due to reduced mobility on hypercoagulation following hip fracture surgery

Prolonged bedrest in hospitalized patients is a major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially in high risk patients with hip fracture. Thrombelastography (TEG) is a whole blood viscoelastic hemostatic assay with evidence that an elevated maximal amplitude (MA), a measure of clot strength, is predictive of VTE in orthopaedic trauma patients. The objective of this study was to compare the TEG MA parameter between patients with hip fracture who were more mobile post-operatively and discharged from hospital early to patients with hip fracture with reduced mobility and prolonged hospitalizations post-operatively. In this prospective cohort study, TEG analysis was performed in patients with hip fracture every 24-hours from admission until post-operative day (POD) 5, then at 2- and 6-weeks post-operatively. Hypercoagulability was defined by MA > 65. Patients were divided into an early (within 5-day) and late (after 5-day) discharge group, inpatient at 2-weeks group, and discharge to MSK rehabilitation (MSK rehab), and long term care (LTC) groups. Two-sample t-test was used to analyze differences in MA between the early discharge and less mobile groups. All statistical tests were two-sided, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. In total, 121 patients with a median age of 81.0 were included. Patients in the early discharge group (n=15) were younger (median age 64.0) and more likely to ambulate without gait aids pre-injury (86.7%) compared to patients in the late discharge group (n=105), inpatients at 2-weeks (n=48), discharged to MSK rehab (n=30), and LTC (n=20). At two weeks post-operative, the early discharge group was significantly less hypercoagulable (MA=68.9, SD 3.0) compared to patients in the other four groups. At 6-weeks post-operative, the early discharge group was the only group to demonstrate a trend towards mean MA below the MA > 65 hypercoagulable threshold (MA=64.4, p=0.45). Symptomatic VTE events were detected in three patients (2.5%) post-operatively. All three patients had hospitalizations longer than five days after surgery. In conclusion, our analysis of hypercoagulability secondary to reduced post-operative mobility demonstrates that patients with hip fracture who were able to mobilize independently sooner after hip fracture surgery, have a reduced peak hypercoagulable state. In addition, there is a trend towards earlier return to normal coagulation status as determined by the TEG MA parameter. Post-operative mobility status may play a role in determining individualized duration of thromboprophylaxis following hip fracture surgery. Future studies comparing TEG to clinically validated mobility tools may more closely evaluate the contribution of venous stasis due to reduced mobility on hypercoagulation following hip fracture surgery

The objective of this study was to quantify the burden of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on the Ontario health care system. Specifically, we examined the magnitude and costs of MSD-associated ambulatory physician care and hospital service use, considering different physician types (e.g. primary care, rheumatologists, orthopaedic surgeons) and hospital settings (e.g. emergency department (ED), day surgery, inpatient hospitalizations). Administrative health data were analyzed for fiscal year 2013/14 for adults aged 18+ years (N=10,841,302). Data sources included: Ontario Health Insurance Plan Claims History Database, which captures data on in- and out-patient physician services, Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Discharge Abstract Database, which records diagnoses and procedures associated with all inpatient hospitalizations, and CIHI National Ambulatory Care Reporting System, which captures data on all emergency department (ED) and day surgery encounters. Services associated with MSDs were identified using the single three digit International Classification of Diseases (ICD) version 9 diagnosis code provided on each physician service claim for outpatient physician visits and the “most responsible” ICD-10 diagnosis code recorded for hospitalizations, ED visits and day surgeries. Patient visit rates and numbers of patients and visits were tabulated according to care setting, patient age and sex, and physician specialty. Direct medical costs were estimated by care setting. Data were examined for all MSDs combined as well as specific diagnostic groupings, including a comprehensive list of both trauma and non-trauma related conditions. Overall, 3.1 million adult Ontarians (28.5%) made 8 million outpatient physician visits associated with MSDs in 2013/14. These included 5.6 million primary care visits, nearly 15% of all adult primary care visits in the province. MSDs accounted for 560,000, 12.3%, of all adult ED visits. Patient visit rates to the ED for non-trauma spinal conditions were the highest of all MSDs at 1032 per 100,000 population, accounting for 23% of all MSD-related ED visits. Osteoarthritis had the highest rate of inpatient hospitalization of all MSDs at 340 per 100,000 population, accounting for 42% of all MSD-related admissions. Total costs for MSD-related care were $1.6 billion, with 12.6% of costs attributed to primary care, 9.2% to specialist care, 8.6% to ED care, and 61.2% of total costs associated with inpatient hospitalizations. Costs due to ‘arthritis and related conditions’ as a group accounted for 40.1% of total MSD costs ($966 million). Costs due to non-trauma related spinal conditions accounted for 10.5% ($168 million) of total MSD costs. All trauma-related conditions (spine and non-spine combined) were responsible for 39.4% ($627 million) of total MSD costs. MSD-related imaging costs for patients who made physician visits for MSDs were $169 million. Including these costs yields a total of $1.8 billion. MSDs place a significant and costly burden on the health care system. As the population ages, it will be essential that health system planning takes into account the large and escalating demand for MSD care, both in terms of health human resources planning and the implementation of more clinically and cost effective models of care, to reduce both the individual and population burden

As Total Hip Replacement (THR) rates increase healthcare providers have sought to reduce costs, while at the same time improving patient safety and satisfaction. Up to 50% of patients may be appropriate for Day Case THR, and in appropriately selected patients’ studies show no increase in complication rate while affording a significant cost saving and maintaining a high rate of patient satisfaction. Despite the potential benefits, levels of adoption of Day Case THR vary. A common cause for this is the perception that doing so would require the adoption of new surgical techniques, implants, or theatre equipment. We report on a Day-Case THR pathway in centres with an established and well-functioning Enhanced Recovery pathway, utilising the posterior approach and standard implants and positioning. We prospectively collected the data on consecutive THRs performed by a single surgeon between June 2018 and July 2021. A standardised anaesthetic regimen using short acting spinal was used. Surgical data included approach, implants, operative time, and estimated blood loss. Outcome data included time of discharge from hospital, post operative complications, readmissions, and unscheduled health service attendance. Data was gathered on 120 consecutive DCTHRs in 114 patients. 93% of patients were successfully discharged on the day of surgery. Four patients required re-admission: one infection treated with DAIR, one dislocation, one wound ooze admitted for a day of monitoring, one gastric ulcer. One patient had a short ED attendance for hypertension. Our incidence of infection, dislocation and wound problems were similar to those seen in inpatient THR. Out data show that the widely used posterior approach using standard positioning and implants can be used effectively in a Day Case THR pathway, with no increase in failure of same-day discharge or re-admission to hospital

Obesity is associated with worse outcomes following total knee/hip arthroplasty (TKA/TKA). This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a dietitian-led low-inflammatory weight-loss program for people with obesity awaiting arthroplasty. Quasi-experimental pilot study enrolled people with obesity waitlisted for primary TKA/THA into ‘usual care’ (UC) or weight-loss (low-inflammatory diet) program (Diet). Recruitment occurred between July 2019 and February 2020 at Fairfield and Campbelltown Hospitals. Assessments at baseline, pre-surgery, time of surgery and 90-days following surgery included anthropometric measurements, patient-reported outcomes, serum biomarkers and 90-day postoperative complication rate. 97 people consented to the study (UC, n=47, mean age 67, BMI 37, TKA 79%; Diet, n=50, mean age 66, BMI 36, TKA 72%). Baseline characteristics indicated gross joint impairments and poor compliance with a low-inflammatory diet. Study feasibility criteria included recruitment rate (52%), proportion of diet patients that improved compliance to low-inflammatory diet by ≥10% (57%) and had ≥60% attendance of dietitian consultations (72%), proportion of patients who undertook serum biomarkers (55%). By presurgery assessments, the diet group had more patients who cancelled their surgery due to symptom improvement (4 vs 0), reduced waist-circumference measurements, increased compliance with the Low-Inflammatory diet and preservation of physical activity parameters. More usual care participants experienced at least one postoperative complication to 90-days (59% vs 47%) and were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (21% vs 11%). There was no difference in weight change, physical function, and patient-reported outcome measures from pre-surgery to 90-days post-surgery, and length of hospital stay. Using pre-determined feasibility criteria, conducting a definitive trial is not feasible. However, intervention audit demonstrated high intervention fidelity. Pilot data suggest our program may promote weight loss but the clinical effects for most are modest. Further research utilising a stronger intervention may be required to assess the effectiveness of a pre-arthroplasty weight-loss intervention

Distal radius fractures are the most common adult fractures, yet there remains some uncertainty surrounding optimal treatment modalities. Recently, the rate of operative treatment of these injuries has been increasing, however, predictors of outcomes in patients treated surgically remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate independent predictors of 30-day readmission and complications following internal fixation of distal radius fractures. Patients ≥18 years who underwent surgical intervention for distal radius fractures between 2005 and 2016 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) using procedural codes. Patient demographics, as well as 30-day readmission, complication, and mortality rates were ascertained. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of 30-day outcomes while adjusting for patient age, sex, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class, functional status, smoking status, comorbidities, and Body Mass Index (BMI). A total of 10,051 patients were identified (average age 58 ±16). All patients received open reduction and internal fixation with no cases of external fixation identified in the data set. Included fractures were 37% extraarticular and 63% intraarticular. Within 30-days of initial fixation 143 (1.42%) patients were readmitted to the hospital, 71 patients experienced a complication, and 18 (0.18%) patients died. After adjusting for relevant covariables, current smoking increased the odds of readmission by 1.73 (95%Confidence interval [95%CI] 1.15 – 2.50), ASA class III/IV vs. I/II increased the odds of readmission by 2.74 (95%CI 1.85 – 4.06), and inpatient surgery vs. outpatient surgery increased the odds of readmission by 2.10 (95%CI 1.46 – 3.03). Current smoking also increased the odds of complications by 2.26 (95%CI 1.32 – 3.87), while ASA class III/IV increased it by 2.78 (95%CI 1.60 – 4.85), inpatient surgery increased it by 2.26 (95%CI 1.37 – 3.74), and dependent functional status increased it by 2.55 (1.16 – 5.64). In conclusion, patients with severe systemic disease, current smokers and patients undergoing inpatient surgery are at risk for 30-day readmissions and complications following operative treatment of distal radius fractures. In addition, patients with dependent functional statuses are more likely to experience a complication within 30-days

In Canada, hip and knee replacements are each among the top three surgeries performed annually. In 2020, surgeries across the country were cancelled in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined the impact on these joint replacement surgeries throughout the year. Using the Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System, we developed a dataset of all 208,041 hip and knee replacements performed in Canada (except from Quebec) between January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. We compared patient and surgical characteristics (including sex, age, main diagnosis, and type of surgery (planned/urgent, primary/revision, inpatient/day surgery) in 2020 to 2019. In 2020, hip and knee replacements volumes decreased by 18.8% compared to 2019. In April and May 2020, hip and knee replacements fell by 69.4% and 93.8%, respectively, compared to the same period in 2019. During those months, 66.5% of hip replacements were performed to treat hip fracture versus 20.2% in April and May 2019, and 64.5% of knee replacements were primaries versus 93.0% in April and May 2019. Patterns by patient age group and sex were similar compared to 2019. These patterns were similar across all provinces. By the summer, planned surgeries resumed across the country and volumes mostly returned to pre-pandemic monthly levels by the end of the year. We also found that there was an increase in the proportion of hip and knee replacements done as day surgery, with 4% in 2020 versus 1% in 2019, and patients undergoing day surgery replacement for osteoarthritis were older, with a median age of 64 for hip patients and 65 for knee patients, versus 63 for both joints the previous year. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a notable drop in 2020 of hip and knee replacements performed in Canada. With the demand for joint replacements continuing to grow, the resulting backlog will have an immediate, significant impact on wait lists and patient quality of life. The shift to a greater proportion of joint replacements performed as day surgeries may have an effect on patient outcomes as well shifts in access to care. It will be important to continue monitor patient outcomes following day surgery and the impact on patients for which day surgery was not an option