Introduction. The rising incidence of metastatic bone disease (MBD) in the UK poses a significant management problem. Poorly defined levels of service provision have meant that improvements in patient prognosis have been mediocre at best. For that reason the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) in conjunction with the British Orthopaedic Oncology Society (BOOS) issued guidelines in 2002 on good practice in the management of MBD. Despite the availability of these standards, there is very little robust data available for audit. The aim of this study was to conduct a regional survey of how these guidelines are being used in the management of MBD. Methods. A questionnaire was designed with 9 multiple choice questions representing the most common MBD scenarios. This was posted to 106 Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeons in 12 NHS Trusts in the South East of England. Results. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 44%. There was considerable variation in the management of solitary femoral diaphyseal lesions, pathological subtrochanteric and intertrochanteric femoral neck fractures and vertebral metastases. Furthermore only 2 out of the 12 Trusts surveyed had a designated MBD lead as per the BOA/BOOS guidelines. Discussion. Our study reflects the variation in the management of MBD throughout the region, which may in turn be linked to poorer clinical outcomes. The results demonstrate the possibility of (i) inappropriate initial treatment, (ii) subsequent late tertiary referral and (iii) poor understanding of the biomechanical basis of orthopaedic implants, with the potential for inappropriate choice of prostheses and high failure rates. Streamlining cancer care will involve establishing regional MBD units within large centres where multidisciplinary services are available. Consequently all surrounding hospitals will need a designated MBD lead that can function as a conduit to this integrated care for selected patients

Background. The viability of any surgical practice relies on the income that practice generates for the parent NHS Trust. The OPCS codes are a key determinant of an NHS trust's tariff for an admission. These contribute to the HRG codes - the means the NHS uses to determine the value of a patient's treatment, including operations. The clinical knowledge of coders may not differentiate specialist practice, including circular frames. Methods. The OPCS and HRG codes generated by patient spells in one NHS trust were examined and reviewed retrospectively. The appropriateness of these codes were determined, and potential loss of income from inappropriate codes was calculated. Results. There was a significant difference between the OPCS codes chosen by the coders and the surgeons. In six months, amongst 25 patients, there was a loss of income of nearly £200,000, due to incorrect coding and comorbidities. Discussion. Coders do not have a clinical background and identify key phrases in an operation note and in patient stay that helps determine the OPCS codes. If these are not present, coders cannot presume a diagnosis or treatment. There is no homogeneity in the way that procedures are coded, and education is required to ensure that the appropriate codes are selected to generate the correct HRG tariff. Conclusion. Significant loss of income can occur without engagement with the clinical coding department, which may affect the viability of a frame service

Aims

Prior cost-effectiveness analyses on osseointegrated prosthesis for transfemoral unilateral amputees have analyzed outcomes in non-USA countries using generic quality of life instruments, which may not be appropriate when evaluating disease-specific quality of life. These prior analyses have also focused only on patients who had failed a socket-based prosthesis. The aim of the current study is to use a disease-specific quality of life instrument, which can more accurately reflect a patient’s quality of life with this condition in order to evaluate cost-effectiveness, examining both treatment-naïve and socket refractory patients.

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore current use of the Global Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) Minimum Common Dataset (MCD) within established national hip fracture registries, and to propose a revised MCD to enable international benchmarking for hip fracture care.

Blood tests including liver function tests (LFTs), C-reactive protein (CRP), coagulation screens and international normalising ratios (INR) are frequently requested investigations that complement the surgical and anaesthetic pre-operative assessment of patients. The paucity of guidance available for blood requesting in acute trauma and orthopaedic admissions can lead to inappropriate requesting practices and over investigation. Unnecessary tests place an economic burden on a hospital and repeated venepuncture is unpleasant for patients. We audited blood requesting practices and with multidisciplinary input developed guidelines to improve practice which were subsequently implemented. Admissions over a period of one month to Ninewells Hospital and Perth Royal Infirmary were audited retrospectively. The frequency and clinical indications for LFTs, coagulation screens/INR and CRP for the duration of the patient's admission were recorded. Re-audit was carried out for one month after the introduction of the guidelines. 216 patients were included in January and 236 patients in September 2014. Total no. of LFTs requested: January 895, September 336 (−62.5%). Total no of coagulation screens/INR requested: January 307, September 210 (−31.6%). Total number of CRPs requested: January 894, September 317 (−64.5%). No. of blood requests per patient: January (M=4.81, SD 4.75), September (M=3.60, SD = 4.70). A significant decrease was observed in admission requesting and subsequent monitoring (p<0.01) for LFTs, coagulation screens/INR, CRP when the guidance was introduced. The implementation of the bloods guidance resulted in a large reduction in admission requesting and subsequent monitoring without incident. The cost of investigation was significantly reduced, as were venepuncture rates

Freezing cold injuries (Frostnip and Frostbite) (FCI) have become uncommon in UK military personnel relative to non-freezing cold injuries (NFCI, ‘trench foot’). However if unidentified or inappropriately treated they may lead to avoidable medical downgrading or discharge. JSP 539 recommends delay or avoidance of surgical debridement where possible. An anonymised retrospective audit was performed of FMED7 medical reports of cases seen in the Institute of Naval Medicine Cold Injury Clinic (CIC) between July 2002 and January 2014 inclusive. In all 149 FCI cases were identified, 71 affected hands only of which 34 were bilateral, and 58 affected feet only, 34 of those being bilateral. A total of 17 patients had injured both hands and feet, with 10 bilateral. Royal Marines accounted for half of these cases, with the Army making up a further third, and the Royal Navy and RAF making up the remainder. Most FCI were found to have occurred in Norway, with Marine ranks being most commonly affected. Ten cases underwent surgery: aspiration of blisters, debridement of tissue, or amputation. Seven of these procedures took place prematurely, which appeared detrimental to recovery. No patients required fasciotomy. FCI are uncommon, but in arctic conditions their risk rises dramatically. The best treatment is conservative where possible following JSP 539 guidelines and consultation with CIC should occur at the earliest possibility. The Potential benefits of surgery must be weighed against problems of injured tissue healing and expert opinion should be obtained

Background. The mechanical disadvantage and detrimental effect to articular cartilage following meniscectomy has been well documented in the literature. Meniscal repair in the avascular (white on white zone) is controversial and would be deemed inappropriate by many. Methods. Prospective data collection on all meniscal repairs between 1999 and 2008. 423 patients underwent meniscal repair at our unit during this time. We identified 88 patients who underwent a meniscal repair of a non peripheral tear (white on white zone) where there was no co-existent ACL injury or instability. There were 74 males and 14 females with a mean age of 26 years (13-54). There were 50 medial meniscal tears and 38 lateral tears, all in the non peripheral area of the meniscus. The criterion for failure was any reoperation on the same meniscus requiring excision or re fixation. Results. The mean follow up was 44 months (5–106). Twenty nine patients required further surgery on their repaired meniscus. There were nine re-repairs and twenty partial menisectomies. Of the nine re-repairs only one has gone on to have a further procedure with meniscectomy. This represents a success rate of 67% (59/88). The mean pre-operative Lysholm score was 61 (4-88) which rose to 75 (12-100) postoperatively, (p=0.002). The mean pre-operative Tegner score was 6 (3-10) and this did not change significantly post operatively, mean 6 (0-10) (p=0.4). Conclusions. Isolated white on white avascular meniscal tears can be successfully repaired in the majority of cases with a good clinical and functional result

Introduction. The assessment of the accuracy of reduction of the ankle syndesmosis has traditionally been made using plain radiographic measurements. Recent studies have shown that computerized tomography (CT) scan is more sensitive than radiographs in detecting diastasis. The ethos has now therefore shifted towards CT scan assessment of the syndesmosis. There is however no validated method to scan the syndesmosis and measure it on the CT scans. This exposes the patient to significant radiation risk and also to anxiety from inappropriate interpretation from these scans. The objectives of this research project are to investigate the current practice of CT scanning the syndesmosis at a University Hospital and to devise a new CT protocol to reduce radiation exposure to patients and to assist surgeons in interpreting the observations. Methods. Research Ethics Committee approval was obtained. Current practice was evaluated. A new 5 cut CT protocol was devised. Starting at the level of the distal tibial plafond, 5 cuts were made proximally 0.5 cm apart. Accuracy of the syndesmosis reduction was assessed just above the distal tibial plafond. Both the injured and the normal sides were scanned 12 weeks post surgery. The normal side served as a control. Results. Current practice revealed that patients had on an average 620 cuts CT scan with radiation exposure of 0.2 mSv. 25 patients were prospectively recruited for the new 5 cut CT protocol. The radiation exposure with the new protocol was only 0.002 mSv. Comparison with the normal side revealed that 5 (20%) of syndesmosis had residual diastasis. The only difficulty with the new protocol was getting both the ankle joint lines at the same level for the first CT cut. Discussion and Conclusion. Our CT scan protocol has insignificant radiation risk, even lower than a single chest radiograph. Comparing the measurements between the fractured and the normal sides provides an accurate assessment of the reduction of the syndesmosis. Significance of the measurements on the CT scan will be correlated with functional scores

Recent advances in combat casualty care have enabled survival following battlefield injuries that would have been lethal in past conflicts. While some injuries remain beyond our current capability to treat, they have the potential to be future ‘unexpected’ survivors. The greatest threat to deployed coalition troops currently and for the foreseeable future is the improvised explosive device (IED) Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct an analysis of causes of death and injury patterns in recent explosive blast fatalities in order to focus research and mitigation strategies, to further improve survival rates. Since November 2007, UK Armed Forces personnel killed whilst deployed on combat operations undergo both a post mortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan and an autopsy. With the permission of the coroners, we analysed casualties with PMCTs between November 2007 and July 2010. Injury data were analysed by a pathology-forensic radiology-orthopaedic multidisciplinary team. Cause of death was attributed to the injuries with the highest AIS scores contributing to the NISS score. Injuries with an AIS < 4 were excluded. During the study period 227 PMCT scans were performed; 211 were suitable for inclusion, containing 145 fatalities due to explosive blast from IEDs. These formed the study group. 24 cases had such severe injuries (disruptions) that further study was inappropriate. Of the remaining 121, 79 were dismounted, and 42 were mounted (in vehicles). Leading causes of death were head CNS injury (47.6%), followed by intra-cavity haemorrhage (21.7%) in the mounted group, and extremity haemorrhage (42.6%), junctional haemorrhage (22.2%) and head CNS injury (18.7%) in the dismounted group. The severity of head trauma in both mounted and dismounted IED fatalites would indicate that prevention and mitigation of these injuries is likely to be the most effective strategy to decrease their resultant mortality. Two thirds of dismounted fatalities have haemorrhage implicated as a cause of death that may have been amenable to prehospital treatment strategies. One fifth of mounted fatalites have haemorrhagic trauma which currently could only be addressed surgically. Maintaining the drive to improve all haemostatic techniques for combat casualties from point of wounding to definitive surgical proximal control alongside development and application of novel haemostatics could yield a significant survival benefit

Over 200 high-velocity missile injuries treated in a low-technology environment were audited under the aegis of the International Committee of the Red Cross Hospitals in Afghanistan and Northern Kenya. Femoral fractures were treated either by traction or external fixation using a uniaxial frame. The results showed that patients treated by external fixation remained in hospital longer than those treated on traction. The positional outcome was identical in both groups. In tibial fractures the external fixator was only of extra benefit in those of the lower third when compared with simple plaster slabs unless more complex procedures such as flaps or vascular repair were to be performed. In complex humeral fractures, external fixation resulted in long stays in hospital and a large number of interventions when compared with simple treatment in a sling. We conclude therefore that in an environment where facilities are limited and surgeons have only general experience very careful initial wound excision is the most important factor determining outcome. The application of complex holding techniques was generally inappropriate

Aims

To explore staff experiences of a multicentre pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing intramedullary nails and circular frame external fixation for segmental tibial fractures.

Aims

Few studies have investigated potential consequences of strained surgical resources. The aim of this cohort study was to assess whether a high proportion of concurrent acute surgical admissions, tying up hospital surgical capacity, may lead to delayed surgery and affect mortality for hip fracture patients.

Aims

There is a lack of long-term data for minimally invasive acromioclavicular (AC) joint repair. Furthermore, it is not clear if good early clinical results can be maintained over time. The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of minimally invasive AC joint reconstruction (MINAR) and compare it to corresponding short-term data.

Aims

Distal radial fractures are the most common fracture sustained by the adult population. Most can be treated using cast immobilization without the need for surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a definitive trial comparing the commonly used fibreglass cast immobilization with an alternative product called Woodcast. Woodcast is a biodegradable casting material with theoretical benefits in terms of patient comfort as well as benefits to the environment.

Aims

The aim of this study was to develop a psychometrically sound measure of recovery for use in patients who have suffered an open tibial fracture.

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale, appropriately powered, randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing internal fracture fixation and distal femoral replacement (DFR) for distal femoral fractures in older patients.

Aims

The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of postoperatively restricted weight-bearing and its association with outcome in patients who undergo surgery for a fracture of the hip.

Objectives

A successful outcome following treatment of nonunion requires the correct identification of all of the underlying cause(s) and addressing them appropriately. The aim of this study was to assess the distribution and frequency of causative factors in a consecutive cohort of nonunion patients in order to optimise the management strategy for individual patients presenting with nonunion.

Aims

The aim of this paper is to review the evidence relating to the anatomy of the proximal femur, the geometry of the fracture and the characteristics of implants and methods of fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip.

Aims

Fracture clinics are often characterised by the referral of large numbers of unselected patients with minor injuries not requiring investigation or intervention, long waiting times and recurrent unnecessary reviews. Our experience had been of an unsustainable system and we implemented a ‘Trauma Triage Clinic’ (TTC) in order to rationalise and regulate access to our fracture service. The British Orthopaedic Association’s guidelines have required a prospective evaluation of this change of practice, and we report our experience and results.