Iliopsoas tendonitis occurs in up to 30% of patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and is a common reason for revision. The primary purpose of this study was to validate our novel computational model for quantifying iliopsoas impingement in HRA patients using a case-controlled investigation. Secondary purpose was to compare these results with previously measured THA patients. We conducted a retrospective search in an experienced surgeon's database for HRA patients with iliopsoas tendonitis, confirmed via the active hip flexion test in supine, and control patients without iliopsoas tendonitis, resulting in two cohorts of 12 patients. The CT scans were segmented, landmarked, and used to simulate the iliopsoas impingement in supine and standing pelvic positions. Three discrete impingement values were output for each pelvic position, and the mean and maximum of these values were reported. Cup prominence was measured using a novel, nearest-neighbour algorithm. The mean cup prominence for the symptomatic cohort was 10.7mm and 5.1mm for the asymptomatic cohort (p << 0.01). The average standing mean impingement for the symptomatic cohort was 0.1mm and 0.0mm for the asymptomatic cohort (p << 0.01). The average standing maximum impingement for the symptomatic cohort was 0.2mm and 0.0mm for the asymptomatic cohort (p << 0.01). Impingement significantly predicted the probability of pain in logistic regression models and the simulation had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 91%, and an AUC ROC curve of 0.95. Using a case-controlled investigation, we demonstrated that our novel simulation could detect iliopsoas impingement and differentiate between the symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts. Interestingly, the HRA patients demonstrated less impingement than the THA patients, despite greater cup prominence. In conclusion, this tool has the potential to be used preoperatively, to guide decisions about optimal cup placement, and postoperatively, to assist in the diagnosis of iliopsoas tendonitis

Iliopsoas tendonitis after total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be a considerable cause of pain and patient dissatisfaction. The optimal cup position to avoid iliopsoas tendonitis has not been clearly established. Implant designs have also been developed with an anterior recess to avoid iliopsoas impingement. The purpose of this cadaveric study was to determine the effect of cup position and implant design on iliopsoas impingement. Bilateral THA was performed on three fresh frozen cadavers using oversized (jumbo) offset head center revision acetabular cups with an anterior recess (60, 62 and 66 mm diameter) and tapered wedge primary stems through a posterior approach. A 2mm diameter flexible stainless steel cable was inserted into the psoas tendon sheath between the muscle and the surrounding membrane to identify the location of the psoas muscle radiographically. CT scans of each cadaver were imported in an imaging software. The acetabular shells, cables as well as pelvis were segmented to create separate solid models of each. The offset head center shell was virtually replaced with an equivalent diameter hemispherical shell by overlaying the outer shell surfaces of both designs and keeping the faces of shells parallel. The shortest distance between each shell and cable was measured. To determine the influence of cup inclination and anteversion on psoas impingement, we virtually varied the inclination (30°/40°/50°) and anteversion (10°/20°/30°) angles for both shell designs. The CT analysis revealed that the original orientation (inclination/anteversion) of the shells implanted in 3 cadavers were as follows: Left1: 44.7°/23.3°, Right1: 41.7°/33.8°, Left2: 40/17, Right2: 31.7/23.5, Left3: 33/2908, Right3: 46.7/6.3. For the offset center shells, the shell to cable distance in all the above cases were positive indicating that there was clearance between the shells and psoas. For the hemispherical shells, in 3 out of 6 cases, the distance was negative indicating impingement of psoas. With the virtual implantation of both shell designs at orientations 40°/10°, 40°/20°, 40°/30° we found that greater anteversion helped decrease psoas impingement in both shell designs. When we analyzed the influence of inclination angle on psoas impingement by comparing wire distances for three orientations (30°/20°, 40°/20°, 50°/20°), we found that the effect was less pronounced. Further analysis comparing the offset head center shell to the conventional hemispherical shell revealed that the offset design was favored (greater clearance between the shell and the wire) in 17 out of 18 cases when the effect of anteversion was considered and in 15 out of 18 cases when the effect of inclinations was considered. Our results indicate that psoas impingement is related to both cup position and implant geometry. For an oversized jumbo cup, psoas impingement is reduced by greater anteversion while cup inclination has little effect. An offset head center cup with an anterior recess was effective in reducing psoas impingement in comparison to a conventional hemispherical geometry. In conclusion, adequate anteversion is important to avoid psoas impingement with jumbo acetabular shells and an implant with an anterior recess may further mitigate the risk of psoas impingement

Pain following total hip arthroplasty is a relatively rare event. Several series place the incidence of some degree of pain post THA at approximately 5%. A systematic approach to determining etiology will direct treatment. Hip pain can be categorised as:. Extrinsic to the Hip. –. Spine +/− radiculopathy. –. Vascular disease. –. Metabolic (Paget's). –. Malignancy. Intrinsic to the Hip. Intracapsular/Implant. Loosening. Sepsis. Prosthetic failure. Osteolysis. Instability. Thigh pain. Stem tip pain. Hypersensitivity/ALVAL. Extracapsular. Iliopsoas tendonitis. Snapping Hip. Trochanter problems (bursitis). Heterotopic ossification. A full history and appropriate physical exam will direct the clinician. The use of routine radiographs, blood tests, and special tests (i.e., blood metal ions, advanced imaging techniques) will be discussed I detail