There remains confusion in the literature with regard to the spinopelvic relationship, and its contribution to ideal acetabular component position. Critical assessment of the literature has been limited by use of conflicting terminology and definitions of new concepts that further confuse the topic. In 2017, the concept of a Hip-Spine Workgroup was created with the first meeting held at the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Annual Meeting in 2018. The goal of this workgroup was to first help standardize terminology across the literature so that as a topic, multiple groups could produce literature that is immediately understandable and applicable. This consensus review from the Hip-Spine Workgroup aims to simplify the spinopelvic relationship, offer hip surgeons a concise summary of available literature, and select common terminology approved by both hip surgeons and spine surgeons for future research.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:808–816.

Aims

Excessive posterior pelvic tilt (PT) may increase the risk of anterior instability after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in PT occurring from the preoperative supine to postoperative standing position following THA, and identify factors associated with significant changes in PT.

Aims

Pelvic incidence (PI) is considered an important anatomical parameter for determining the sagittal balance of the spine. The contribution of an abnormal PI to hip osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between PI and hip OA, and the difference in PI between hip OA without anatomical abnormalities (primary OA) and hip OA with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH-OA).

Introduction. Understanding hip-spine relationships and accurate evaluation of the pelvis position are key- points for the optimization of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip surgeons know the importance of pelvic parameters and the adaptation mechanisms of pelvic and sub-pelvic areas. Literature about posture after THA remains controversial and adaptations are difficult to predict. One explanation can be the segmental analysis focused on pelvic parameters and local planning. In a significant number of patients a global analysis may be important as a cascade of compensatory mechanisms is implemented, the hip being only one of the links of this chain reaction. 3 parameters can be measured on full body images:. SVA (sagittal vertical axis) : horizontal distance between the vertical line through the center of C7 and the postero-superior edge of S1. T1 pelvic angle (TPA) : line from femoral heads to T1center and line from the femoral heads to S1center. TPA combines informations from both the sagittal vertical axis and pelvic tilt. Global Sagittal Angle (GSA) : line from the midpoint of distal femoral condyles to C7 center and line from the midpoint between distal femoral condyles to the postero-superior S1corner. The objective of this preliminary study is to report the post-operative evolution of posture after THA. Material and Method. 49 patients (28 women, 21 men, mean age 61 years) were enrolled for full-body standing EOS images before and after THA. The sterEOS software was used to measure pelvic parameters (sacral slope SS, pelvic incidence PI) and global postural parameters (TPA, GSA, SVA). Sub-analysis was made, grouping the sample by TPA (<14°, 14°–22°, >22°), by PI (<55°, 55°–65°, >65°) and by SS (<35°, 35°–45°, >45°). Paired t-test was used to compare differences between preoperative and postoperative parameters within each subgroup. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results. TPA, SVA and GSA may change independently following THA surgery. In the 2 groups with TPA< 19° and 14° <TPA< 22°, GSA and SVA decreased significantly after THA (p < 0.05). The difference was not significant in the group with TPA>22°. In the group with SS between 35° and 45°, the GSA and SVA decreased after THA (p < 0.05). In the group with SS > 45° only GSA decreased. In the group with PI < 55°, GSA and SVA decreased after THA. There was no significant change in the remaining subgroups. Discussion. This preliminary study confirms a decrease of GSA and SVA after THA. Some preoperative characteristics are observed in patients with significant global sagittal postural modifications: low to standard TPA, low PI or standard to high SS. Conclusion. Planning and prediction of sagittal postural changes after THA implantation is challenging. It is an important topic in patients with stiff and degenerative spine or in case of spinal fusion. In case of complex hipspine cases, the timing of the procedures can be a real concern. The combined analysis of SVA, TPA and GSA may open new perspectives for a more rationale planning of THA

Introduction. The combination of spinal fusion and THP is not exceptional. Disorders of the pelvic tilt and stiffness of the lumbosacral junction modify the adaptation options while standing or sitting. Adjusting the cup can be difficult and THP instability is a potential risk. This study reports an experience with EOS® simultaneous measurements on AP and lateral views of spine and hips in THP patients. Material and methods. 29 men and 45 women were included in this prospective study. 21cases had bilateral THP. Patients were separated into two groups: long fusions including the thoraco-lumbar junction (group 1) and shorter fusions below L1 (group 2). We analyzed the impact of the arthrodesis on the position of the pelvis by measuring variations of the sacral slope (SS) and APP angle. Cup position was defined by coronal inclination and functional anteversion in the horizontal plane standing and sitting. We compared the data to a previous series of 150 THP patients with asymptomatic and non fused spine. Results. Table1 reports the results of the fusion series. The overall analysis of all patients demonstrates that the values for the cup functional anteversion and coronal inclination are statistically different when comparing standing to sitting (respectively p <0.01and p <0.001). The same results are obtained for SS and APP. This difference is not significant for group 1 patients. The mean range of variation for cup anteversion and inclination is 5° and 7° in the fused cases. Table 2 reports the results of the non fusion series. SS, APP and cup orientation values are statistically significant between standing and sitting. All of the values are statistically different when compared to the fused patients. The mean range of variation for cup anteversion and inclination is 11,6° and 10°. Discussion. The population of THP patients is characterized by pelvic retroversion and a significant reduction of sagittal pelvic mobility when compared to young asymptomatic individuals. Patients combining THP and spine fusion showed significant reduction of adaptation possibilities due to low variations for SS and cup orientation angles. Conclusion. This preliminary study shows the importance of planning THP taking into account not only the orientation of the spine but also its mobility for adaptation in standing and sitting positions. This is a key issue because of the growing number of elderly THP patients whose spine is degenerative or fused. A particular attention must be drawn to the cases with long fusions. The interest of a global vision of the hip-spine relationship is evident in the prevention or in management of dislocations and subluxations, and especially for the indications of dual-mobility prostheses. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Understanding spinopelvic mechanics is important for the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite significant advancements in appreciating spinopelvic balance, numerous challenges remain. It is crucial to recognize the individual variability and postoperative changes in spinopelvic parameters and their consequential impact on prosthetic component positioning to mitigate the risk of dislocation and enhance postoperative outcomes. This review describes the integration of advanced diagnostic approaches, enhanced technology, implant considerations, and surgical planning, all tailored to the unique anatomy and biomechanics of each patient. It underscores the importance of accurately predicting postoperative spinopelvic mechanics, selecting suitable imaging techniques, establishing a consistent nomenclature for spinopelvic stiffness, and considering implant-specific strategies. Furthermore, it highlights the potential of artificial intelligence to personalize care.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(11):1206–1215.

Aims

It has been well documented in the arthroplasty literature that lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) contributes to abnormal spinopelvic motion. However, the relationship between the severity or pattern of hip osteoarthritis (OA) as measured on an anteroposterior (AP) pelvic view and spinopelvic biomechanics has not been well investigated. Therefore, the aim of the study is to examine the association between the severity and pattern of hip OA and spinopelvic motion.

Hip-spine relationships should be better investigated in THP as lumbo-sacral orientation in the sagittal plane plays a critical role in the function of the hip joints. Lateral X-rays showing spine and hips together in standing, sitting or squatting positions characterize the adaptations of the sagittal balance and the functionnal interactions between hips and spine. Acetabular cup implantation has to be planned for frontal inclination, axial anteversion, and sagittal orientation. The later refers to the sacro-acetabular angle, key-point in the spine – hip relationships, and that is redefined by the surgeon at the time of implantation. Usual standard CT-sections are biased for evaluating acetabular anteversion. The conventional CT procedure does not refer to the pelvic bony frame and. the measured anteversion is a projected angle on a transverse plane, depending on the pelvic adaptation in lying position. This measured angle is often considered as anatomical anteversion, leading to some confusion. Therefore this angle is only a “functional” supine anteversion, reflecting the anterior opening angle of the acetabulum in a specific position. According to the sagittal orientation of the pelvis, the true functional acetabular orientation can virtually be assessed in various postures from adjusted CT-scan sections. The EOS. ™. low irradiation 2D-3D X-ray scanner is an innovative technology already used for global evaluation of the spine. This technology allows simultaneously “full body” frontal and lateral X-rays with the patient in standing, sitting or squatting positions; a tridimensionnal patient specific bone recontruction can be performed and the cup anteversion can be directly assessed according to the position. We investigated the lumbo-pelvic parameters influencing the tridimensionnal orientation of the acetabulum. We compared the data obtained for real postural situations using the EOS. ™. system and the measures from plane X Rays and classical CT scan cuts replicating standing, and sitting positions.368 patients with cementless THP were involved in a prospective follow-up protocol. Sacral slope and pelvic tilt, incidence angle, acetabular frontal and sagittal inclination were evaluated on AP and lateral standard XRays. Functionnal anteversion of the cup has been measured using a previously described protocol with CTscan cuts oriented according to standing and sitting sacral slope. The mean difference between CTscan and EOS. ™. system was 4,4° with comparable accuracy and reproductibility. Sacral slope decrease in sitting position was linked to anteversion increase (38,8° SD 5,4°). Sacral slope increase in standing position was linked to lower ante-version (31,7° SD 5,6°). The anatomical acetabular anteversion, the frontal inclination, and the sagittal inclination were functional parameter which significantly varied between the standing, sitting, and lying positions. We noticed that the acetabular parameters in lying position highly correlated to the one in standing position, while poorly correlated with the one in sitting position. The difference between the lying and the sitting positions was about 10°, 25°, and 15° for the cup anteversion (CA) and the frontal and sagittal inclinations (FI,SI) respectively. The poor correlation between the lying and sitting positions suggests that the usual CT scan protocol is biased and not fully appropriate for investigating the cases of posterior THP dislocation and subluxation, which happen in sitting position. On the contrary, a strong correlation was observed between lying and standing measurements with all the acetabular parameters (CA,FI, SI), suggesting that the classical CT assessment of the cup anteversion remains an interesting source of information in case of anterior THP. Each patient is characterized by a morphological parameter, the incidence angle. High incidence angle is linked to low acetabular anteversion, increasing the instability risk and anterior impingement in sitting and squatting position; higher anteversion angles are observed in low incidence angle patients, leading to more internal rotation of the hip in any position. Lumbo-sacral orientation in the sagittal plane influences the tridimensionnal orientation of the acetabulum, especially for anteversion. Aging of the hip-spine complex is linked to progressive pelvic posterior extension. Impingement phenomenons, orientation of stripe wear zones and some instability situations can be interpreted according to those data. This study points out the opportunity to adjust the CT scan sections to the sacral slope in functional position for properly investigating the orientation of the acetabular cup, mainly in case of posterior dislocation. In addition, the mobility of the lumbo-sacral junction could be a crucial parameter in the mechanical functioning and the stability of a THP due to its impact on sacral slope and pelvic tilt. Therefore we also recommend doing dynamic lateral radiographs of the lumbo sacral junction in standing and sitting position for planning a THP implantation in order to detect stiff lumbosacral junction or sagittal pelvic malposition

Aims

Computer-assisted 3D preoperative planning software has the potential to improve postoperative stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Commonly, preoperative protocols simulate two functional positions (standing and relaxed sitting) but do not consider other common positions that may increase postoperative impingement and possible dislocation. This study investigates the feasibility of simulating commonly encountered positions, and positions with an increased risk of impingement, to lower postoperative impingement risk in a CT-based 3D model.

Aims

Pelvic tilt (PT) can significantly change the functional orientation of the acetabular component and may differ markedly between patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients with stiff spines who have little change in PT are considered at high risk for instability following THA. Femoral component position also contributes to the limits of impingement-free range of motion (ROM), but has been less studied. Little is known about the impact of combined anteversion on risk of impingement with changing pelvic position.

Aims

While previously underappreciated, factors related to the spine contribute substantially to the risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). These factors must be taken into consideration during preoperative planning for revision THA due to recurrent instability. We developed a protocol to assess the functional position of the spine, the significance of these findings, and how to address different pathologies at the time of revision THA.