Introduction. Various rehabilitation shoes are prescribed to protect the forefoot following surgery. Patients often complain of discomfort in other areas as a result of the postoperative shoe, including the knee, hip and lower back. This has never been quantified. This study aims to establish the effect on other joints using gait analysis. Methods: 11 healthy volunteers were investigated using various common types of postoperative shoe. They were studied with gait analysis equipment and the joint motion assessed with commercial software. The effect of commercial devices designed to minimise gait changes by lifting the contralateral foot were also evaluated. Results. There was a reduction in knee flexion and extension compared to the contralateral leg in all phases of the gait cycle. This was the case with both heel wedge shoes and inflatable air boots. There was also an increase in pelvic tilt during gait with both shoes, which was more pronounced with the air boot. The foot raise device for the contralateral foot which is designed to decrease these changes was effective in decreasing gait changes. Discussion. The use of rehabilitation shoes after forefoot surgery is almost universal. Patients are rarely counselled of the risk of joint pain or back pain as a result of the postoperative shoe. Patients with pre-existing back pain or
Van Nes rotationplasty may be used for patients
with congenital proximal focal femoral deficiency (PFFD). The lower
limb is rotated to use the ankle and foot as a functional knee joint
within a prosthesis. A small series of cases was investigated to
determine the long-term outcome. At a mean of 21.5 years (11 to
45) after their rotationplasty, a total of 12 prosthetic patients
completed the Short-Form (SF)-36, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, Harris
hip score, Oswestry back pain score and Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaires,
as did 12 age- and gender-matched normal control participants. A
physical examination and gait analysis, computerised dynamic posturography
(CDP), and timed ‘Up &
Go’ testing was also completed. Wilcoxon
Signed rank test was used to compare each PFFD patient with a matched
control participant with false discovery rate of 5%. There were no differences between the groups in overall health
and well-being on the SF-36. Significant differences were seen in
gait parameters in the PFFD group. Using CDP, the PFFD group had
reduced symmetry in stance, and reduced end point and maximum excursions. Patients who had undergone Van Nes rotationplasty had a high
level of function and quality of life at long-term follow-up, but
presented with significant differences in gait and posture compared
with the control group. Cite this article:
