Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXI | Pages 20 - 20
1 Jul 2012
Brox J Lange J Steen H
Full Access

Purpose. To evaluate comorbidity and health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Patients and methods. 496 patients treated with Boston brace for idiopathic scoliosis were invited for long-term follow-up. 361 women and 29 men responded. Mean age was 39.2 (4.6) years; mean follow-up time 23.4 (4.3) years. 28 patients had been operated. All patients had radiographs at baseline, brace weaning, and follow-up, and filled in validated self-report questionnaires for evaluation of health-related quality of life. Results. 122 patients had at least one comorbid condition at follow-up. The most commonly reported diseases were: asthma, n = 14; migraine, n = 13; lower extremity disorders, n = 10; anxiety/depression, n = 9; allergy, n = 9; cardiovasular disease, n = 8; lumbar disc herniation, n = 8; neck pain or injury, n = 8; and widespread pain, n = 8. Age at bracing and at menarche, compliance, curve sizes, and the number of patients operated were not different in patients with comorbidity. Mean EQ-5D was 0.74 with comorbidity and 0.85 (normal) without (p < 0.001). Global back rating was excellent or good in 61% with comorbidity versus 78% without (p < 0.000). Fifty-seven percent versus 86% worked full-time. Those with comorbidity had lower (p < 0.001) SRS-22 scores for pain, function, self-image, and mental health, but satisfaction with bracing was not different. Final major curve size was associated only with self-image. Conclusion. Health related quality of life and work were reduced in patients with idiopathic scoliosis reporting comorbidity at long-term


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 33 - 33
1 Oct 2014
Molloy S Butler J Patel A Bentom A Jassim S Sewell M Aftab S
Full Access

To assess the clinical and radiologic outcome of MM patients with thoracic spine involvement and concomitant pathologic sternal fractures with a resultant severe sagittal plane deformity. A prospective cohort study (n=391) was performed over a 7-year period at a national tertiary referral centre for the management of multiple myeloma with spinal involvement. Clinical, serological and pathologic variables, radiologic findings, treatment strategies and outcome measures were prospectively collected. Pre-treatment and post-treatment clinical outcome measures utilised included EQ-5D, VAS, ODI and RMD scoring systems. 13 MM patients presented with a severe symptomatic progressive sagittal plane deformity with a history of pathologic thoracic compression fractures and concomitant pathologic sternal fracture. All patients with concomitant sternal fractures displayed the radiographic features and spinopelvic parameters of positive sagittal malalignment and attempted clinical compensation. All patients had poor health related quality of life measures when assessed. Pathologic sternal fracture in a MM patient with thoracic compression fractures is a risk factor for the development of a severe thoracic kyphotic deformity and sagittal malalignment. This has been demonstrated to be associated with a very poor health related quality of life


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 39 - 39
1 Oct 2019
Schmidt A Foster N Laurberg T Schi⊘ttz-Christensen B Maribo T
Full Access

Purpose of the study and background. An integrated rehabilitation programme was developed and found feasible taking into account the existing evidence base, appropriate theories, and patient and public involvement. The integrated programme encompasses inpatient activities supported by a multidisciplinary team, and integration of knowledge, skills and behaviours in the patient's everyday life. The aim of this trial was to compare the effectiveness of an integrated rehabilitation programme with an existing rehabilitation programme in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods and Results. Comparison of two parallel rehabilitation programmes in a randomised controlled trial including 165 patients with CLBP. The integrated rehabilitation programme comprised an alternation of in total three weeks of inpatient stay and in total 11 weeks of home-based activities. The existing rehabilitation programme comprised a four-week inpatient stay. Primary outcome was changes in disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes were changes in pain, pain self-efficacy, health related quality of life and depression. Outcomes were collected at baseline and 26-week follow-up. Disability decreased −5.76 (95%CI; −8.31, −3.20) for the integrated programme and −5.64 (95%CI; −8.45, −2.83) for the existing programme. The adjusted difference between the two programmes was −0.28 (95%CI; −4.02, 3.45). No statistically significant difference was found in any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusion. The results of the trial were consistent, showing no significant differences in patients' outcomes when comparing an integrated rehabilitation programme with an existing programme. Conflicts of interest: None. Sources of funding: Aarhus University, The Danish Rheumatism Association and Familien Hede Nielsens Fond


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 29 - 29
1 Oct 2014
Molloy S Butler J Selvadurai S Whitman P
Full Access

To describe a staged surgical technique to correct significant progressive sagittal malalignment, without the need for 3-column osteotomy, in patients with prior long thoracolumbar instrumentation for scoliosis and to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcome from this surgical strategy. A small cohort study (n=6) of patients with significant sagittal malalignment following extensive thoracolumbar instrumented fusions for scoliotic deformity. Radiographic parameters analysed included pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis and sagittal vertical axis. Clinical outcome measures collected included EQ-5D, ODI, SRS 22 and VAS Pain Scores. 3 patients had 2-stage anterior release and instrumented fusion followed by a posterior instrumented fusion 3 patients with a large sagittal plane deformity had a 3-stage surgical technique. All patients achieved an excellent correction of sagittal alignment, with no surgical complications and excellent health related quality of life (HRQOL) outcome measures at follow-up. There was no symptomatic non-unions or implant failures including rod breakages. We present a safe and effective surgical strategy to treat the complex problem of progressive sagittal malalignment in the previously instrumented adult deformity patient, avoiding the need for 3-column osteotomies in the lumbar spine


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 34 - 34
1 Oct 2014
Molloy S Bruce G Butler J Benton A
Full Access

To examine the impact of a structured rehabilitation programme as part of an integrated multidisciplinary treatment algorithm for adult spinal deformity patients. A prospective cohort study was performed over a 2-year period at a major tertiary referral centre for adult spinal deformity surgery. All consecutive patients requiring 2-stage corrective surgery for sagittal malalignment were included (n=32). Details of physiotherapy initial evaluation, inpatient rehabilitation progress, details of bracing treatment and time to discharge were collected. Clinical outcome scores were measured preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. After second stage corrective surgery, the mean time to standing without assistance was 2.1 days, mean time to independent ambulation was 4.2 days, mean time to competent ascending and descending stairs was 5.6 days and mean time to moulded orthosis application 7.1 days. Successful progression through the structured rehabilitation programme was associated with high clinical outcome scores and improved health related quality of life (HRQOL). The introduction of this programme contributed to the development of an enhanced recovery pathway for patients having adult spinal deformity surgery, reducing inpatient length of stay and optimising clinical outcomes