Initially, all surgeons in Australia were generalists and those with an interest in the anatomy of the hand performed hand surgery. Early hand surgeons, such as Benjamin Rank, excelled and Rank and Wakefield's Textbook of Hand Surgery was widely used throughout the world. Eventually, groups of like-minded surgeons formed the Australian Hand Club in 1972, which subsequently became formalised as The Australian Hand Surgery Society (AHSS), in 2001. A very high standard of hand surgery has been achieved in Australia, with most hand surgeons having trained in either plastic surgery or orthopaedic surgery, and then further trained in Fellowships in Europe or North America. Bernard O'Brien and John Hueston achieved international recognition in the field of microsurgery and Dupuytren's surgery. Wayne Morrison has been responsible for pioneering work in toe–to–hand transfer and basic research. Tim Herbert changed the way fractures of the scaphoid are managed throughout the world. In 2007 the AHSS commenced a Travelling Fellowship Programme to facilitate an increased involvement in Australia in academic hand surgery and to foster contacts between hand surgeons of the future. At the present time, the AHSS is concentrating on education and training in order to raise the overall standard of management of hand surgery, particularly in relation to after hours' trauma. This is particularly necessary in rural and regional areas where hand surgery has traditionally been treated by occasional practitioners. There is a risk that hand surgery falls between the two stools of plastic surgery and orthopaedic surgery and the AHSS wishes to further formalise training and education within the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) as a single training stream in the future. There are potential threats both within and without, with safe working hours a particular threat in relation to reducing both the quantity and quality of training. The future will almost certainly involve greater emphasis on biomaterials and prosthetic compounds, but trying to ensure a uniformly high standard of hand surgery management throughout the country will remain as a primary focus

This study aims to determine the incidence of surgical site infection leading to reoperation for sepsis following minor hand procedures performed outside the main operating room using field sterility in the South African setting. The investigators retrospectively reviewed the records of 485 patients who had WALANT-assisted minor hand surgery outside a main operating theatre, a field sterility setting between March 2019 and April 2023. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of deep surgical site infection that required reoperation within four weeks. Cases included where elective WALANT minor hand procedures, a minimum age of 18 with complete clinical records. The patients were mostly female (54.8%), with a mean age of 56.35 years. The majority of cases were trigger finger and carpal tunnel release. An overall 485 cases were reviewed, the deep surgical site infection rate resulting in reoperation within 4 weeks post-operatively was 1.24% ((95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.0034 to 0.0237); p = 0.009). Minor hand procedures performed under field sterility using WALANT have a low surgical site infection rate. The current study's infection rates are comparable to international surgical site infection rates for similar surgeries performed in main operating rooms using standard sterilisation procedures. Field sterility is a safe and acceptable clinical practice that may improve work efficiency in public sector

Pediatric hand surgery in general requires special considerations and this is even more true when planning surgery in children with CP. It is important for the surgeon to realize that the functional problems these children exhibit have their cause in a brain damage which is not amenable to hand surgical treatment. Therefore it is crucial to carefully analyze each child’s impairment including the voluntary motor control and the child’s specific needs before endeavoring into surgery. Associated impairments, such as mental retardation, nutritional problems, epilepsy, dystonia or severe sensory deficits may influence decision-making, but the crucial factor is often the child’s own wish for an improved function. A child that completely neglects his or her extremity is usually not helped by surgery, at least not in an attempt to get a better hand function. Hand surgery in CP mainly comes down to three techniques: 1. Reducing strength in spastic muscles by release operation, either at the origin of the muscle, at the insertion or as a fractional lengthening at the musculo-tendinous junction, 2. Increasing strength in weak antagonists by tendon transfer or 3. Stabilizing joints through an arthrodesis or a tenodesis. Most often a combination of these techniques is used. Almost all hand surgeons in this field have acquired their personal choice of procedures and scientific support for the benefits of the different techniques is scarce. My personal arsenal will be described in the panel but includes biceps-brachialis muscle release at the elbow, pronator teres rerouting, flexor carpi ulnaris to extensor carpi radialis brevis (Green’s) transfer and adductor pollicis muscle release in the palm combined with extensor pollicis longus rerouting for the thumb-in-palm deformity. In my mind, it is not most important which tendon transfer that is selected, but the choice of which child to operate and at what age. It is also important to tension the tendon transfers exactly right and to plan the postoperative treatment properly. The surgeon should, of course, also make sure that the child’s and the parent’s expectations on the results are realistic. Botulinum toxin A has now been used for several years in the treatment of children with cerebral palsy and the drug has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing muscle tone both in the lower and the upper extremities. It has been more difficult to show effects on hand function especially in the long-term perspective. I will present our treatment protocol for botulinum toxin injections. In 1994, a population-based health care program for children with CP was started in Lund in southern Sweden. All children in our region with a diagnosis of CP, born after Jan 1st 1990 are invited to follow the program which includes regular measurements of range of motion in extremity joints, standardized radiographic examinations of the hip joints and registration of surgery and spasticity treatments. The program, called CPUP has been very successful in the prevention of spastic hip dislocation, wind swept position and contractures. Some early results from the upper extremity part of CPUP will be presented. We believe that the program in time will give us valuable information on the natural course of joint motion and impairment of hand function in children with CP

1. The modifications of standard Z-plasty technique that are necessary for its successful use in hand surgery are discussed with particular reference to the limiting factors imposed by the anatomical characteristics of the hand. 2. The use of the Z-plasty in Dupuytren's contracture and contracted scars is discussed

The use of regional anaesthesia for upper limb surgery has been increasing in popularity recently. It is safe, effective and has financial benefits. We report the activity in a tertiary hand surgery unit over one year. This department performs elective and trauma surgery between 8am and 7pm. Out of hours surgery is performed in main theatres. A total of 3335 cases were performed in Hand Surgery theatres between 1st August 2008 and 1st August 2009. Of these, 1791 had a regional block. The ages of these patients ranged from 13 to 92 years (Median = 46 years, Mean = 47 years). 1030 were male and 761 were female. 1011 regional block procedures were performed by a Consultant Anaesthetist, with 266 performed by a trainee and 472 by non-career grade. 646 procedures were for trauma surgery with 1145 for elective surgery. 87 procedures were arthroscopic. A vast range of surgery was safely performed under regional block. There were no significant complications. All regional nerve blocks were performed with the aid of ultrasound. Training of junior anaesthetists was benefited by performing the nerve blocks. Patients required very little time to recover following nerve block when compared to recovery after general anaesthesia, with resultant reduction in resource requirements. We conclude that the use of regional nerve block anaesthesia for hand surgery benefits both the patient and the hospital

Aims. Hand trauma, consisting of injuries to both the hand and the wrist, are a common injury seen worldwide. The global age-standardized incidence of hand trauma exceeds 179 per 100,000. Hand trauma may require surgical management and therefore result in significant costs to both healthcare systems and society. Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common following all surgical interventions, and within hand surgery the risk of SSI is at least 5%. SSI following hand trauma surgery results in significant costs to healthcare systems with estimations of over £450 per patient. The World Health Organization (WHO) have produced international guidelines to help prevent SSIs. However, it is unclear what variability exists in the adherence to these guidelines within hand trauma. The aim is to assess compliance to the WHO global guidelines in prevention of SSI in hand trauma. Methods. This will be an international, multicentre audit comparing antimicrobial practices in hand trauma to the standards outlined by WHO. Through the Reconstructive Surgery Trials Network (RSTN), hand surgeons across the globe will be invited to participate in the study. Consultant surgeons/associate specialists managing hand trauma and members of the multidisciplinary team will be identified at participating sites. Teams will be asked to collect data prospectively on a minimum of 20 consecutive patients. The audit will run for eight months. Data collected will include injury details, initial management, hand trauma team management, operation details, postoperative care, and antimicrobial techniques used throughout. Adherence to WHO global guidelines for SSI will be summarized using descriptive statistics across each criteria. Discussion. The Hand and Wrist trauma: Antimicrobials and Infection Audit of Clinical Practice (HAWAII ACP) will provide an understanding of the current antimicrobial practice in hand trauma surgery. This will then provide a basis to guide further research in the field. The findings of this study will be disseminated via conference presentations and a peer-reviewed publication. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(4):361–366

Compared with general anaesthesia, brachial plexus (BP) anaesthesia improves patient satisfaction and accelerates hospital discharge after ambulatory hand surgery; however, variable success rates and typical onset times up to 30 minutes have limited its widespread use. Increasing availability of high-resolution portable ultrasound has renewed interest in more proximal approaches to the BP, previously thought to carry unacceptable risk. The aim of this study was to compare the onset times of ultrasound guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular BP block in patients undergoing ambulatory hand surgery. With ethics committee approval, patients presenting for hand surgery were prospectively randomised to either supraclavicular (trunks/divisions) or infraclavicular (cords) BP block. A single experienced operator (MF) placed all blocks using ultrasound only guidance. A blinded observer (AP, SY) assessed pinprick sensory and motor block on 3-point scale (normal=2, reduced=1, absent=0) in the median, ulnar, radial and musculocutaneous nerve territories every five minutes, or until blocks were complete. A single general anaesthesia without influence from the unblended anaesthetist. Of the first 27 patients recruited, block placement details and Intraoperative data are presented in There was a trend to faster onset times and higher success in group infraclavicular, however, this did not reach statistical significance. Interim results are so far inconclusive for the superiority of one approach. Both techniques were well tolerated and had a high success rate for surgical anaesthesia

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the haemo-dynamic and blockade effects of 25 μg and of 200 μg adrenaline adding to 1.5% lidocaine under axillary brachial plexus blockade. Methods: Fifty patients presenting for hand surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Patients were received either 5 ml saline containing 25 μg adrenaline firstly and thereafter 35 ml 1.5% plain lidocaine in Group 1, and 5 ml saline alone firstly and thereafter 200 μg adrenaline adding to 35 ml 1.5% lidocaine in Group 2. Haemodynamic data were measured from 1st to 10th minute after axillary injection at 1 minute interval. After operation, time to first sensation of pain related to the surgical site and clinical recovery of motor block were recorded. Results: Complete anaesthesia in three nerves was achieved 85% of patients in Group 1 and 90% in Group 2. First analgesic request time was not different between the groups. Motor blockade duration time in Group 1 (124.6±12.1min) was significantly shorter than that of Group 2 (140.4±19.0 min) (p< 0.05). Conclusions: We consider that the lower of adrenaline added to 1.5% lidocaine technique offers better haemodynamy, and blockade properties. We suggest that the technique using lower adrenalin doses may be useful for especially cardiac patients if they need for forearm and hand surgery

Wrist fusion, ulna head resection and fusion of the MP or PIP joints are not anymore the only operations that can be offered to patients with RA. The modern medical treatment has changed the course of the disease and we are not anymore in front of patients with major joint destruction, very bad hand function and low demands. Young ladies with well controlled disease expect surgery to result in restitution of function which allows a life close to normal in terms of work and leisure time activities. If pain relief remains the main indication it has to be associated with reconstruction of function, preserving mobility and increasing grip strength. For these reasons it appears necessary to limit fusions and increase the use of joint implants. Accurate evaluation of the patients’ need and expectations will help in the choice of the appropriate surgical procedure to achieve the treatment goal.