Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 21 - 21
1 Feb 2016
Arnbak B Jurik A Jensen R Schi⊘ttz-Christensen B van der Wurff P Jensen T
Full Access

Purpose and background:. Sacroiliitis identified by MRI is considered as a keystone in the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis. To reduce the number of unnecessary MRI scans it would be ideal if sacroiliac (SI) joint pain provocation tests could be used to identify patients at risk of having sacroiliitis. The aim of the current study was to investigate the diagnostic value of three pain provocation SI-joint tests for sacroiliitis identified by MRI. Methods:. Patients (n=454, mean age 32 years, 54% women) without clinical signs of nerve root compression were selected from a cohort consisting of patients with persistent low back pain referred to an outpatient spine clinic. Data from the Gaenslen's Test, Thigh Thrust Test and Long Dorsal Sacroiliac Ligaments Test and sacroiliitis identified by MRI were analysed. Results:. The prevalence of SI-joints with sacroiliitis was 5%. In the whole study group, only the Thigh Trust Test was associated with sacroiliitis, ROC area 0.58 (95% CI 0.51–0.65), sensitivity 31% (18–47) and specificity 85% (82–87). In men, sacroiliitis was associated with all three SI joint tests and multitest regimens, with the greatest ROC area found for ≥ 1 positive out of 3 tests, (0.68 (0.56–0.80)), sensitivity 56% (31–79) and specificity 81% (77–85). In women, no significant associations were observed between the assessed SI joint tests and sacroiliitis. Conclusions:. Only in men were the performed SI-joint tests found to be associated with sacroiliitis identified by MRI. Although, the diagnostic value was limited, the results indicate that the use of SI joint tests for sacroiliitis may be optimised by gender-separated analyses


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 5 | Pages 627 - 631
1 May 2009
Khurana A Guha AR Mohanty K Ahuja S

We reviewed 15 consecutive patients, 11 women and four men, with a mean age of 48.7 years (37.3 to 62.6), who between July 2004 and August 2007 had undergone percutaneous sacroiliac fusion using hollow modular anchorage screws filled with demineralised bone matrix.

Each patient was carefully assessed to exclude other conditions and underwent pre-operative CT and MR scans. The diagnosis of symptomatic sacroiliac disease was confirmed by an injection of local anaesthetic and steroid under image intensifier control.

The short form-36 questionnaire and Majeed’s scoring system were used for pre- and post-operative functional evaluation. Post-operative radiological evaluation was performed using plain radiographs.

Intra-operative blood loss was minimal and there were no post-operative clinical or radiological complications. The mean follow-up was for 17 months (9 to 39). The mean short form-36 scores improved from 37 (23 to 51) to 80 (67 to 92) for physical function and from 53 (34 to 73) to 86 (70 to 98) for general health (p = 0.037). The mean Majeed’s score improved from 37 (18 to 54) pre-operatively to 79 (63 to 96) post-operatively (p = 0.014). There were 13 good to excellent results. The remaining two patients improved in short form-36 from a mean of 29 (26 to 35) to 48 (44 to 52). Their persistent pain was probably due to concurrent lumbar pathology.

We conclude that percutaneous hollow modular anchorage screws are a satisfactory method of achieving sacroiliac fusion.