Abstract

Background

Obesity has been linked with increased rates of knee osteoarthritis. Limited information is available on the survival and functional outcome results of rTKR in the obese patients. This registry-based study aimed to identify whether BMI is an independent risk factor for poorer functional outcomes and /or implant survival in rTKA.

Abstract

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) are associated with significant morbidity and healthcare requirements. The primary aim of this study is to report the patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after reconstructive surgery.

Patients undergoing surgery for MLKI between 2014 and 2018 in the single large-volume trauma centre were included. Electronic patient records were reviewed for demographic data, details of surgery and complications. PROMs collected were EQ-5D-5L, Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), UCLA Activity and Sport and patient satisfaction.

Thirty-five patients were included. Mean age was 31 years (range 16-66), and 71% were male. The most common mechanism of injury was sports-related (71%). Obesity was present in eight (23%) patients. No vascular injuries were recorded and four patients sustained nerve injuries. PROMs were available for 18 patients (51%) with a median follow up of 4.5 years. Median EQ-5D-5L was 0.78 (IQR 0.14). Median LKS was 84.5 (IQR 21) and there was no correlation with time to surgery (p=0.43). Grade of MLKI did not impact LKS (p=0.09). Fifteen patients (83%) saw a reduction in their activity level. All patients were satisfied with their surgical treatment. Recurrent instability was noted in four patients (11%). Three patients (8%) required further surgery (one revision reconstruction, one meniscectomy, one conversion to a hinged knee replacement.

This study demonstrates two groups of patients who sustain MLKI: the sporting population and obese patients. Health related quality of life, functional outcomes and satisfaction are high after surgery. Time to surgery did not impact on functional outcomes.

Abstract

Lisfranc injuries account for 0.2% of all fractures and have been linked to poorer functional outcomes, in particular resulting in post-traumatic arthritis, midfoot collapse and chronic pain. This study assesses the longitudinal functional outcomes in patients with low and high energy Lisfranc injuries treated both operatively and non-operatively.

Patients above 16 years with Lisfranc injuries from January 2008 and December 2017 were identified through the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes (VOTOR) registry. Follow-up performed at 6, 12 and 24 months through telephone interviews with response rate of 86.1%, 84.2% and 76.2% respectively. Longitudinal functional outcome data using Global Outcome Assessment, EQ-5D-5L, numerical pain scale, Short-Form 12, the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule and return to work status were collected. Univariate analysis was performed and variables showing a significant difference between groups (p < 0.25) were analysed with multivariable mixed effects regression model.

745 patients included in this retrospective cohort study. At 24 months, both the operative and non-operative groups demonstrated similar functional outcomes trending towards an improvement. Mixed effect regression models for the EQ items for mobility (OR 1.80, CI 0.91 – 3.57), self-care (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.09-3.49), usual activities (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.99-1.03), pain (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.61-1.89), anxiety (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.34) and pain scale (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.51 – 2.22) and return to work (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.56-2.91) between groups were very similar and not statistically significantly different.

We concluded that there was no statistically significant difference between operative and non-operative patients with low and high energy Lisfranc injuries. Current clinical practices in Lisfranc injury management are appropriate and not inadvertently causing any further harm to patients. Future research comparing fracture patterns, fixation types and corresponding functional outcomes can help determine gold standard Lisfranc injury management.

Ganz's studies made it possible to address joint deformities on both femoral and acetabular side brought by the Legg-Calvè-Perthes disease (LCPD). Femoral head reduction osteotomy (FHRO) was developed to improve joint congruency along with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The purpose of this study is to show the clinical and morphologic outcomes of the technique, and an implemented planning approach.

From 2015 to 2023, 13 FHROs were performed on 11 patients for LCPD, in two centers. 11 of 13 hips had an associated PAO. A specific CT and MRI-based protocol for virtual simulation of the corrections was developed. Outcomes were assessed with radiographic parameters (sphericity index, extrusion index, integrity of the Shenton's line, LCE angle, Tonnis angle, CCD angle) and clinical parameters (ROM, VAS, Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score, modified-HHS, EQ5D-5L). Early and late complications were reported.

The mean follow-up was 40 months. The mean age at surgery was 11,4 years. No major complications were recorded. One patient required a total hip arthroplasty. Femoral Head Sphericity increased from 45% to 70% (p < 0,001); LCE angle from 18° to 42,8° (p < 0,001); extrusion Index from 36,6 to 8 (p < 0,001); Tonnis Angle from 14,4° to 6,2° (p = 0.1); CCD Angle from 131,7 to 136,5° (p < 0,023). The VAS score improved from 3,25 to 0,75,(p = 0.06); Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score from 14.75 to 16 (p = 0,1); Modified-HHS from 65,6 to 89,05 (p = 0,02). The EQ 5D 5L showed significant improvements. ROM increased especially in abduction and extra-rotation.

FHRO associated with periacetabular procedures is a safe technique that showed improved functional, clinical and morphologic outcomes in LCPD. The newly introduced simulation and planning algorithm may help to further refine the technique.

Abstract

The influence of patient age on functional outcomes after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for acetabular dysplasia remains unclear, with previous studies utilising scores developed for older, arthritic patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of patient age on International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) scores, two years after PAO.

Eighty-six patients (72 female, 14 male; mean age 26.9 years) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon and had completed a minimum of two years follow up were identified. Patients were categorised into three groups according to age at the time of surgery: adolescent (11–20 years; n=29), young adult (21–30 years; n=29), and mature (≥31 years; n=28). The three groups were compared with respect to baseline variables and functional outcomes (iHOT-12, EQ-5D quality of life score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, pain visual analogue score (VAS)). Multivariate regression was undertaken to assess for independent predictors of two-year iHOT-12 score.

The adolescent group demonstrated a lower BMI (p=0.004) while the mature group had a greater American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) score (p=0.049). There were otherwise no significant differences in baseline variables between the three groups (all p>0.05).

The three groups demonstrated significant post-operative improvements across all functional outcome measures. There were no significant differences in two-year iHOT-12, EQ-5D, UCLA score or pain VAS between the three groups (all p>0.05). Regression modelling found that patient age at the time of surgery did not have an independent effect on two-year iHOT-12 score (p=0.878).

We found that patient age at the time of surgery did not influence functional outcomes two years after PAO. Our results suggest that patient age should not be considered in isolation as an indication or contraindication for PAO.

Abstract

Unicompartment knee replacement (UKR) has been an effective treatment of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA). There has been several studies which suggest that patellofemoral (PFJ) wear may not be a relative contraindication for UKR with no statistical difference in failure rates. There is currently conflicting evidence on the role of BMI.

We will review if BMI and PFJ wear impacts on the post operative functional scores following UKR.

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Data was collected between 26/6/2014 and 25/8/2022. 159 UKR procedures were identified. BMI and PFJ cartilage wear were collected. Oxford knee scores (OKS) were collected at > 2 years. PFJ wear was split into International Cartilage Research Society (ICRS) grades I&II and III&IV.

159 UKR procedures were identified, of these 115 had 2 year follow up. There were 77 who had OKS recorded at 2 years. For PFJ wear there was no statistical difference in the median OKS at 2 years 45 vs 43.5 (p=0.408). Assessing the BMI the median was 29kg/m², range 20–43kg/m². Spearman's rank was performed to assess the correlation between BMI and >2 year OKS, this demonstrated a moderately negative correlation p(df)=−0.339 (CI 95% −0.538, −0.104) p=0.004.

There is no statistically significant difference in >2 year OKS following UKR regardless of PFJ wear. There is a moderately negative correlation between BMI and >2 year OKS which was significant p=0.004. Therefore BMI is a more important consideration when counselling patients for UKR.

Purpose

To explore the relationship in terms of time scale between pre-operative expectations and postoperative outcomes and satisfaction after Hallux valgus surgery.

Abstract

The treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) in conjunction with anterior knee laxity is an issue of debate. Current treatment options include knee joint distraction, unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) or high tibial osteotomy with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction or total knee replacement. Bone-conserving options are preferred for younger and active patients with intact lateral and patello-femoral compartment. However, still limited experience exists in the field of combining medial UKR and ACL reconstruction

The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the results of combined fixed-bearing UKR and ACL reconstruction, specifically with regard to patient satisfaction, activity level, and postoperative functional outcomes.

The hypothesis was that this represents a safe and viable procedure leading to improved stability and functional outcome in patients affected by isolated unicompartmental OA and concomitant ACL deficiency.

Fourteen patients with ACL deficiency and concomitant medial compartment symptomatic osteoarthritis were treated from 2006 to 2010. Twelve of them were followed up for an average time of 7.8 year (range 6–10 years). Assessment included Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee score (OKS), American Knee Society scores (AKSS), WOMAC index of osteoarthritis, Tegner activity level, objective examination including instrumented laxity test with KT-1000 arthrometer and standard X-rays. Wilcoxon test was utilized to compare the pre-operative and follow-up status. Differences with a p value <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

KOOS score, OKS, WOMAC index and the AKSS improved significantly at follow-up (p < 0.05). There was no clinical evidence of instability in any of the knees as evaluated with clinical an instrumented laxity testing (p < 0.05). No pathologic radiolucent lines were observed around the components. In one patient a total knee prosthesis was implanted due to the progression of signs of osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment 3 years after primary surgery.

UKR combined with ACL reconstruction is a valid therapeutic option for young and active patients with a primary ACL injury who develop secondary OA and confirms subjective and objective clinical improvement up to 8 years after surgery.

Despite the current trend favoring surgical treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs), studies have not been able to demonstrate superior functional outcomes when compared to non-operative treatment. These fractures are notoriously difficult to reduce. Studies investigating surgical fixation often lack information about the quality of reduction even though it may play an important role in the success of this procedure. We wanted to establish if, amongst surgically treated DIACF, an anatomic reduction led to improved functional outcomes at 12 months.

From July 2011 to December 2020, at a level I trauma center, 84 patients with an isolated DIACF scheduled for surgical fixation with plate and screws using a lateral extensile approach were enrolled in this prospective cohort study and followed over a 12-month period. Post-operative computed tomography (CT) imaging of bilateral feet was obtained to assess surgical reduction using a combination of pre-determined parameters: Böhler's angle, calcaneal height, congruence and articular step-off of the posterior facet and calcaneocuboid (CC) joint. Reduction was judged anatomic when Böhler's angle and calcaneal height were within 20% of the contralateral foot while the posterior facet and CC joint had to be congruent with a step-off less than 2 mm. Several functional scores related to foot and ankle pathology were used to evaluate functional outcomes (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score - AOFAS, Lower Extremity Functional Score - LEFS, Olerud and Molander Ankle Score - OMAS, Calcaneal Functional Scoring System - CFSS, Visual Analog Scale for pain - VAS) and were compared between anatomic and nonanatomic DIAFCs using Student's t-test. Demographic data and information about injury severity were collected for each patient.

Among the 84 enrolled patients, 6 were excluded while 11 were lost to follow-up. Thirty-nine patients had a nonanatomic reduction while 35 patients had an anatomic reduction (47%). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. When we compared the injury severity as defined by the Sanders’ Classification, we did not find a significant difference. In other words, the nonanatomic group did not have a greater proportion of complex fractures. Anatomically reduced DIACFs showed significantly superior results at 12 months for all but one scoring system (mean difference at 12 months: AOFAS 3.97, p = 0.12; LEFS 7.46, p = 0.003; OMAS 13.6, p = 0.002, CFSS 7.5, p = 0.037; VAS −1.53, p = 0.005). Univariate analyses did not show that smoking status, worker's compensation or body mass index were associated with functional outcomes. Moreover, fracture severity could not predict functional outcomes at 12 months

This study showed superior functional outcomes in patients with a DIACF when an anatomic reduction is achieved regardless of the injury severity.

Functional outcomes are commonly reported in studies of musculoskeletal oncology patients undergoing limb salvage surgery; however, interpretation requires knowledge of the smallest amount of improvement that is important to patients – the minimally important difference (MID). We established the MIDs for the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Rating Scale (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) in patients with bone tumors undergoing lower limb salvage surgery.

This study was a secondary analysis of the recently completed PARITY (Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery) study. This data was used to calculate: (1) the anchor-based MIDs using an overall function scale and a receiver operating curve analysis, and (2) the distribution-based MIDs based on one-half of the standard deviation of the change scores from baseline to 12-month follow-up, for both the MSTS and TESS.

There were 591 patients available for analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients for the association between changes in MSTS and TESS scores and changes in the external anchor scores were 0.71 and 0.57, indicating “high” and “moderate” correlation. Anchor-based MIDs were 12 points and 11 points for the MSTS and TESS, respectively. Distribution-based calculations yielded MIDs of 16-17 points for the MSTS and 14 points for the TESS.

The current study proposes MID scores for both the MSTS and TESS outcome measures based on 591 patients with bone tumors undergoing lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstruction. These thresholds will optimize interpretation of the magnitude of treatment effects, which will enable shared decision-making with patients in trading off desirable and undesirable outcomes of alternative management strategies. We recommend anchor-based MIDs as they are grounded in changes in functional status that are meaningful to patients.

Despite the current trend favoring surgical treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs), studies have not been able to demonstrate superior functional outcomes when compared to non-operative treatment. These fractures are notoriously difficult to reduce. Studies investigating surgical fixation often lack information about the quality of reduction even though it may play an important role in the success of this procedure. We wanted to establish if, amongst surgically treated DIACF, an anatomic reduction led to improved functional outcomes at 12 months.

From July 2011 to December 2020, at a level I trauma center, 84 patients with an isolated DIACF scheduled for surgical fixation with plate and screws using a lateral extensile approach were enrolled in this prospective cohort study and followed over a 12-month period. Post-operative computed tomography (CT) imaging of bilateral feet was obtained to assess surgical reduction using a combination of pre-determined parameters: Böhler's angle, calcaneal height, congruence and articular step-off of the posterior facet and calcaneocuboid (CC) joint. Reduction was judged anatomic when Böhler's angle and calcaneal height were within 20% of the contralateral foot while the posterior facet and CC joint had to be congruent with a step-off less than 2 mm. Several functional scores related to foot and ankle pathology were used to evaluate functional outcomes (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score - AOFAS, Lower Extremity Functional Score - LEFS, Olerud and Molander Ankle Score - OMAS, Calcaneal Functional Scoring System - CFSS, Visual Analog Scale for pain – VAS) and were compared between anatomic and nonanatomic DIAFCs using Student's t-test. Demographic data and information about injury severity were collected for each patient.

Among the 84 enrolled patients, 6 were excluded while 11 were lost to follow-up. Thirty-nine patients had a nonanatomic reduction while 35 patients had an anatomic reduction (47%). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. When we compared the injury severity as defined by the Sanders’ Classification, we did not find a significant difference. In other words, the nonanatomic group did not have a greater proportion of complex fractures. Anatomically reduced DIACFs showed significantly superior results at 12 months for all but one scoring system (mean difference at 12 months: AOFAS 3.97, p = 0.12; LEFS 7.46, p = 0.003; OMAS 13.6, p = 0.002, CFSS 7.5, p = 0.037; VAS −1.53, p = 0.005). Univariate analyses did not show that smoking status, worker's compensation or body mass index were associated with functional outcomes. Moreover, fracture severity could not predict functional outcomes at 12 months.

This study showed superior functional outcomes in patients with a DIACF when an anatomic reduction is achieved regardless of the injury severity.

The results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions to correct leg length discrepancy (LLD) are not clear, with only two former limited series (< 25 patients). Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study of THA revisions for LLD to determine: 1) the change in LLD, 2) the function outcomes and whether obtaining equal leg lengths influenced function, 3) the complication and survival rates.

This multicenter study included 57 patients: 42 THA revisions for limb shortening and 15 revisions for limb lengthening. LLD was measured on conventional radiographs and EOS. The Oxford-12 and FJS outcome scores were collected and the number of patients achieving the Oxford-12 MCID.

The revisions were carried out a mean of 2.8 years after the index THA. The median LLD decreased from 7.5 mm (IQR: [5;12]) to 1 mm (IQR: [0.5;2.5]) at follow-up (p=0.0002). Overall, 55 of 57 patients (96%) had < 5 mm LLD at follow-up and 12 patients (21%) had equal leg lengths. The complication rate was 25%: 12 mechanical complications (8 periprosthetic femoral fractures, 2 stem loosening and 1 cup loosening, 1 dislocation) and 1 periprosthetic infection. The patient satisfaction was high with a median FJS of 79.2/100 and 77% of patients reached the Oxford-12 MCID. Lengthening procedures had significantly worst function than shortening (38% vs 91% of patients achieving the Oxford-12 MCID (p=0.0004)). Survivorship was 85% (95% CI: 77.9 – 92.5) at 2 years and 77% (95% CI: 66.3 – 87.1) at 4.6 years when using re-revision for any reason as the endpoint.

When LLD after THA does not respond to conservative management, revision THA should be considered. Although revision THA for LLD improved medium-term functional outcomes with a high patient satisfaction rate, especially for shortening procedures, the complication rate was high, particularly related to periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Our objective was to examine revision rates and patient reported outcome scores (PROMS) for cemented and uncemented primary total knee joint replacement (TKJR) at six months, one year and five years post-operatively. Patients and Methods: This matched cohort study involved secondary analyses of data collected as part of a large prospective observational study monitoring outcomes following knee replacement in Christchurch, New Zealand. Cemented and uncemented TKJR participants (n = 1526) were matched on age (± 5 years), sex and body mass index (BMI). From this larger sample, PROMS data, Oxford Knee Score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), out to five years post-operatively were analysed for a matched subset of participants (n = 252).

The average age of participants was 67.9 years (SD 9.4, range 38-94). There were no differences between cemented and uncemented cohorts on the basis of age, sex, BMI or comorbidities, revision rates or PROMS outcomes. Cemented procedures had greater skin to skin times than uncemented procedures (p < 0.01). Unadjusted outcomes comparing risk for revision across the two participant cohorts did not significantly differ. Overall rates for revision were low (cemented 3.2% v uncemented 2.7%, p=0.70). Propensity adjusted associations between baseline characteristics (age, sex, BMI, comorbidity, baseline Oxford and baseline WOMAC scores) also revealed no differences in risk for revision at any post-operative timepoint.

In this large multi-surgeon matched cohort study there were no significant differences in functional outcomes or revision rates, when outcomes following modern cemented and uncemented TKJR were compared out to 5-year follow up. Based on our findings, uncemented TKJR is predictable irrespective of patient's age, BMI or gender

Abstract

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been and continues to be the gold standard for treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis. With each year, implant characteristics are evolving to increase patient-reported outcomes and decrease complications. Purpose: to report minimum 2-year outcomes and complications in patients who underwent robotic-arm assisted THA using Corin versus Stryker-type implants.