Aim. Adequate debridement of necrotic bone is of paramount importance for eradication of infection in chronic osteomyelitis. Currently, no tools are available to detect the exact amount of necrotic bone in order to optimize surgical resection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of an intraoperative illumination method (VELscope. ®. ) and the correlation between intraoperative and pathohistological findings in surgically treated chronic fracture related infection patients. Method. Ten consecutive patients with chronic fracture related infections of the lower extremity were included into this prospectively performed case series. All patients had to be treated surgically for fracture related infections requiring bony debridement. An intraoperative illumination method (VELscope®) was used to intraoperatively differentiate between viable and necrotic bone. Tissue samples from the identified viable and necrotic bone areas were histopathologically examined and compared to intraoperative findings. Results. In all included patients, the intraoperative illumination was deemed helpful to differentiate between necrotic and viable bone tissues during bony debridement. The histopathological examination of the samples showed good correlation of the intraoperative illumination findings with histopathological signs of necrosis for areas deemed dead and histopathological signs of intact bone for areas deemed vital during illumination. Conclusions. The fluorescence-assisted, intraoperative detection of necrotic and viable bone using the VELscope. ®. is an easy-to-use procedure that can help surgeons to optimize intraoperative bone resection in chronic fracture related infections by unmasking viable from necrotic bone tissue. This may help to improve resection techniques and eventually treatment outcome in patients in the future

Background. Preoperative diagnosis of fracture related infections can be challenging, especially when confirmatory criteria such as sinus tract and purulent discharge are absent. Although serum parameters, such as CRP and white blood cell count (WBC), showed poor accuracy in the literature, they are still often used in clinical practice. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) defined evidence-based criteria for fracture related infection. Elevated serum inflammatory markers were regarded as suggestive criteria only, as the literature was of limited quality. This study assessed the diagnostic value of the serum parameters CRP, WBC and differential cell count in the diagnosis of fracture related infections defined by the EBJIS-criteria for fracture related infections. Methods. In this retrospective cohort study, 94 patients who underwent surgical treatment for suspected infected non unions after failed fracture fixation were included. Preoperatively, blood samples including serum inflammatory markers were taken. For this study, cut-offs of 5 mg/L for CRP, 10×10⁁9 cells/L for WBC, and >70% for the percentage of neutrophils were regarded as positive for infection. All patients had intraoperative samples taken for microbiology and histology. Analysis of diagnostic accuracy was based on the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC). Results. Based on the EBJIS criteria, 40 patients (43%) were diagnosed with a fracture related infection. 11/94 (12%) patients had an elevated serum WBC count, 13/94 (14%) an increased percentage of neutrophils, and 43/82 (52%) an elevated serum CRP. The mean values of CRP concentration, WBC count, and percentage of neutrophils in the infection group were 7.9 mg/L (IQR:6.4 – 9.7), 18.3 G/l (IQR: 3.9 – 24.9), and 63% (IQR: 58 – 67%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of serum WBC count were 20% (95% CI: 10 −35%), 94.4% (84 −99%), and 0.57 (0.50 – 0.64), respectively; of percentage of neutrophils 12.5% (5 – 27%), 85.2% (73 −93%), and 0.49 (0.42 – 0.56); and of serum CRP 67.6% (51 – 90%), 60.0% (45 – 73%), and 0.64 (0.53 – 0.74), respectively. A statistically significant difference between the AUCs of all three serum parameters and AUC of tissue culture as well as AUC of histology was shown (p <0.0001). A simple decision tree approach using only low WBC and CRP may allow identification of aseptic cases. Conclusion. Based on the standardized and evidence-based EBJIS criteria, the three inflammatory serum markers showed an insufficient accuracy for the diagnosis of fracture related infections. They also correlate poorly with culture or histological diagnosis. Therefore, they should not be used alone as a confirmatory test

Osteoarticular infections (OAI) are a common cause of morbidity in children, and as opposed to adults is usually caused by haematogenous spread. The bacteriology of OAI in children is not well described in the South African context, therefore this study was designed to determine the bacteriology of OAI in our population. All patients that underwent surgery for the treatment of OAI over a 3-year period were identified and those with positive cultures where organisms were identified from tissue, pus, fluid or blood were included. Duplicate cultures from the same patient were excluded if the organism and antibiotic susceptibility profile was the same. Patients were categorised according to age and class of infection (Septic arthritis, acute osteomyelitis, fracture related infection, post-operative sepsis and chronic osteomyelitis) and organisms were stratified according to these categories. We identified 132 organisms from 123 samples collected from 86 patients. Most cultured organisms were from children older than 3-years with acute haematogenous septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, or both. Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 56% (74/132) of organisms cultured. There were no cases of MRSA. The Enterobacterales accounted for 17% (22/132) of organisms cultured, mostly in the fracture related and post-operative infection groups. Of these, 6 each were extended spectrum B-lactamase producers and AmpC producers. There were no carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales. Kingella kingae was not isolated in any patient. Methicillin sensitive S. aureus is the most common infecting organism in paediatric OAI and an anti-staphylococcal penicillin such as cloxacillin or flucloxacillin is the most appropriate empiric treatment for haematogenous OAI in our environment. In fracture related or post-operative infections, Enterobacterales were more frequently cultured, and treatment should be guided by culture and susceptibility results

Fracture related infection, in particular chronic osteomyelitis, requires complex management plans. Meta analyses and systematic reviews have not found a gold standard of treatment for this disease. In 2017 an alternative treatment protocol was undertaken in our institution; whereby staged surgery with the use of cheaply manufactured tailored antibiotic cement rods was used in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis, secondary to traumatic long bone fractures. Short term outcomes for this protocol demonstrated a 75.7% microbiological resolution to a negative culture and a good clinical outcome of 84.2% overall was demonstrated in terms of sinus resolution, skin changes, pain and function. Our aim now was to assess the long term outcomes of this treatment strategy. A cross-sectional study of patients who had previously undergone the set treatment protocol was performed. Patient satisfaction, effects on activities of daily living, return to work and clinical improvement at 5 years following the intervention were assessed using a patient questionnaire and the validated AAOS lower limb score. The average AAOS lower limb score was 88 which was en par to other similar studies. 80% of patients had returned to some form of work. Ongoing mild pain was a persistent problem for 50% of the patients however 98% of the patients were overall satisfied with the treatment satisfaction at 5 years. Only 1 patient required further treatment. 8 patients could not be located for follow up. Chronic osteomyelitis remains a complex disease to treat. This treatment protocol demonstrates favourable microbiological, serological and clinical short term outcomes and favourable patient satisfaction and functional long term outcomes at 5 years. Our study highlights antibiotic targeted cement rods as a feasible treatment option in managing chronic osteomyelitis

Introduction. Fracture related infection (FRI) is a challenging complication to manage in an orthoplastic setting. Consensus guidelines have been created to standardise the diagnosis of FRI and comprise confirmatory and suggestive criteria. In this study, the aim is to assess the diagnostic criteria and management of FRI with a particular focus on soft tissue reconstruction. Materials & Methods. A retrospective study to identify the outcomes of FRI in the lower limb over a five year period at a Major Trauma Centre. Fracture specific information that was analysed includes: open versus closed, fractured bone(s) and site, initial fracture management, method of diagnosis and soft tissue management. Results. A total of 40 patients were identified, 80% of whom were male (n= 32). The mean age for FRI diagnosis was 54 years (range 18–83 years). In our patient cohort, 10% were immunosuppressed and another 12.5% had a formal diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. A diagnosis of acute FRI (i.e. < six weeks from time of injury) was made in 9 patients (22.5%). Chronic FRI was noted in 25 patients (62.5%). There was equal incidence of FRI in patients with closed fractures and open fractures (42.5%). Tibia and fibula fractures were most common (87.5%, n=35). Regardless of fractured bone(s), the more distal the fracture the higher the incidence of FRI (60% distal versus 12.5% proximal). Gram-positive cocci were the most commonly identified pathogens, identified in 25% of patients. Five patients underwent free flap reconstruction, two patients received pedicled muscle flaps and another two patients received split thickness skin grafts. Conclusions. The diagnosis of FRI can be confirmed through the presence of a combination of confirmatory and suggestive criteria. We advocate a staged approach in the management of FRI with radical wound excision and temporary coverage followed by definitive soft tissue reconstruction

Acetabulum fractures caused by civilian firearms represent a unique challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Treatment strategies should include the assessment of infection risk due to frequently associated abdominal injuries and maintenance of joint function. Still, internationally accepted treatment algorithms are not available. The aim of the study was to increase knowledge about civilian gunshot fractures of the acetabulum by describing their characteristics and management at a high-volume tertiary hospital. All adult patients admitted to our hospital between January 2009 and December 2022 with civilian gunshot fractures of the acetabulum were included in this descriptive retrospective study. In total our institution treated 301 patients with civilian gunshot fractures of the hip joint and pelvis during the observation period, of which 54 involved the acetabulum. Most patients were young males (88,9%) with a mean age of 29 years. Thirty patients (55,6%) had associated intraabdominal or urological injuries. Fracture patterns were mostly stable fractures with minor joint destruction amenable to conservative fracture treatment (n=48, 88,9%). Orthopaedic surgical interventions were performed in 21 patients (38,9%) with removal of bullets in contact with the hip joint via arthrotomy or surgical hip dislocation as most frequent procedures. Most patients received antibiotics on admission (n=49, 90,7%). Fracture related infections of the acetabulum were noted in six patients (11,1%) while the mortality in the study population was low with one demised patient (1,9%) due to the trauma burden. Most civilian acetabulum gunshot fractures are associated with intraabdominal or urological injuries. In comparison to the literature on extremity gunshot fractures, there is an increased risk of infection in our study population. The decision for surgical wash-out and bullet removal should be based on contamination and anticipated joint destruction, while osteosynthesis or primary arthroplasty are rarely necessary for these injuries

Introduction. A greater emphasis has been placed on fracture related infection (FRI) orthopaedic practice as a separate entity in recent years. Since the publication of the FRI consensus definition and guidelines, there has been an increase in the published literature on the topic and a move towards considering FRI as separate from general orthopaedic practice and as work that requires a more specialist approach. The aim of this study was to audit current FRI practice in the UK. Materials & Methods. Orthopaedic practice related to FRI in the UK was audited using a semi-structured questionnaire. Respondents were from a range of institutions, specialties and clinical roles to reflect the multi-disciplinary nature of treating FRI. The online tool SurveyMonkey was used to share the survey at the 2022 annual meeting of the British Limb Reconstruction Society. Twenty-one questions were asked in the following domains: scope of practice, theatre and clinic capacity, availability of the multidisciplinary team, renumeration for work and scope of FRI networks. Results. Of the 36 respondents, the majority (64%) worked in a major trauma centre. In the majority of cases, bone infection was managed by the limb reconstruction team (68%) although in most centres the wider team was often also involved including the general on call, the trauma team and the arthroplasty team. When referrals were made elsewhere, this was usually done to known individuals rather than established FRI networks. 80% of respondents said that there was a bone infection MDT in their unit and this usually met weekly. This usually included orthopaedics and microbiology but plastics in only 43% of cases and radiology in only 23% of cases. Most respondents said that the lack of funding and appropriate tariffs were the main barrier to FRI management locally (62%) and nationally (83%). Most respondents (83%) said that bone infection practice should be centralised. The overwhelming majority of this cohort (90%) said that patient outcomes would be improved by cases being managed in dedicated centres. Conclusions. There is variation in practice for the management of bone infection in the UK. This reflects the lack of clear national guidelines and the lack of established networks for management and onward referral. There is agreement that patient outcomes would be improved by more formal networks and specialised centres but also recognition that remuneration is a significant barrier to implementing change. This survey reflects practice in units with an interest in limb reconstruction and bone infection. Further work is needed to evaluate practice across district general hospitals in the UK and to build consensus around best practice and national strategies for improved care

Aim. The osteolytic process of osteomyelitis is, according to textbooks, caused by increased osteoclast activity due to RANKL production by osteoblasts. However, recent findings contradict this theory. Therefore, the aim was to investigate, in a porcine osteomyelitis model, how osteolysis is affected by massive inflammation and RANKL blocking, respectively. In parallel, patients with chronic osteomyelitis, diabetes, foot osteomyelitis, and fracture related infections (FRI) were included for advanced histological analysis of osteolysis. Methods. In pigs, a tibial implant cavity was created and inoculated with 10. 4. CFU of Staphylococcus aureus: Group A (n=7). Group B (n=7); + 1cm. 3. spongostan into the cavity. Group C (n=4); + systemic Denosumab treatment. Spongostan was used as an avascular material to support bacterial growth and thus increase the inflammatory response. Denosumab treatment was administrated to suppress osteoclast activity by RANKL inhibition (as in osteoporotic patients). The volume of osteolysis was accessed by CT scans. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies towards Cathepsin K was used to identify osteoclasts within the bone lesions. Briefly, the number of Cathepsin K positive cells, i.e., both precursors and bone resorbing osteoclasts, respectively, were counted in 10 high power fields (400x). In total, 50 bone infection patients were included (Herlev Hospital). From each patient five parried samples were taken for histology and microbiology, respectively. Histopathology, CT osteolysis volume estimation, and molecular expression of osteoclasts and inflammatory markers are ongoing. One FRI patient was osteoporotic and treated with Denosumab for 6 years. Results. All pigs were confirmed infected in the implant cavity. The volume (2.41 ± 1.29cm. 3. ) of osteolysis was significantly increased in the spongostan group in comparison to Group A (1.24 ± 0.59 cm. 3. ) (p=0.04). Thereby, the spongostan group had bacteria deeper into the bone from the inoculation point. Sufficient Denosumab treatment, i.e. reduced serum Ca was seen in 3 pigs. None of the Denosumab treated pigs showed reduced osteolysis in comparison to Group A (1.42 ± 0.63 cm. 3. ). The Cathepsin K score of Group C was 17 (15-23 IQR) of precursor osteoclasts and 2 (0-2 IQR) of osteoclasts in Howship lacunae. The Denosumab treated patient showed substantial osteolysis and histological analysis confirmed acute inflammatory. Conclusions. Application of spongostan, i.e., bacterial host optimization and massive inflammation promotes osteolysis and local bacterial dissemination. Osteoclast blocking with Denosumab showed no impact on osteolysis. Elucidation of the pathophysiology causing bone loss in osteomyelitis is fundamental. However, the widely accepted osteoclast-based theory might not be the only relevant

Aim. Debridement, Antibiotics, Irrigation, and implant Retention (DAIR) is a surgical treatment protocol suitable for some patients with fracture related infection (FRI). Clinically relevant pre-clinical models of DAIR are scarce and none have been developed in large animals. Therefore, this project aimed to develop a large animal model for FRI including a DAIR approach and compare outcomes after 2 or 5 weeks of infection. Method. Swiss Alpine sheep (n=8), (2–6 years, 50–80 kg) were included in this study. This study was approved by cantonal Ethical authorities in Chur, Switzerland. A 2 mm osteotomy was created in the tibia and fixed with a 10-hole 5.5 mm steel plate. Subsequently, 2.5 mL of saline solution containing 10. 6. CFU/mL of Staphylococcus aureus MSSA (ATCC 25923) was added over the plate. Sheep were observed for 2 (n=3) or 5 weeks (n=5) until revision surgery, during which visibly infected or necrotic tissues were removed, and the wound flushed with saline. All samples were collected for bacterial quantification. After revision surgery, the sheep were treated systemically for 2 weeks with flucloxacillin and for 4 weeks with rifampicin and cotrimoxazole. After 2 further weeks off antibiotics, the animals were euthanized. Bacteriological culture was performed at the end of the study. Bone cores were isolated from the osteotomy site and processed for Giemsa & Eosin and Brown and Brenn staining. A radiographical examination was performed every second week. Results. Bacteriological evaluation of the retrieved samples during revision surgery showed no significant difference between the 2 vs 5 weeks infection periods in term of total CFU counts. At the end of the study, radiographical examination showed callus formation over the osteotomy site in both groups, although the osteotomy was not completely healed in either group. At euthanasia, the 2 weeks infection group showed a higher soft tissue burden compared to the 5 weeks group, whereby the infection in the 5 weeks group was primarily located in the bone and bone marrow. Conclusions. The large animal model of FRI and DAIR was successfully established. Bacteriological outcomes highlight that the increasing duration of the infection does not change the outcome but the location of the infection from a predominantly soft tissue infection to a deeper bone and intramedullary (IM) channel infection. The debridement of the IM channel could potentially reduce the infection burden by eliminating those bacteria not easily reached by systemic antibiotics, though is not practical using conventional techniques

Aim. Differentiation of infected (INF) nonunion from aseptic (AS) nonunion is crucial for the choice of intra- and postoperative treatment. Preoperative diagnosis of infected nonunion is challenging, especially in case of low-grade infection lacking clinical signs of infection. Standard blood markers such as C-reactive protein or leucocyte count do not aid in preoperative diagnosis. Proteomic profiling has shown promising results for differentiation of numerous chronic disease states, and in this study was applied to preoperative blood samples of patients with nonunion in an attempt to identify potential biomarkers. Method. This prospective multicenter study enrolled patients undergoing revision surgery of femur or tibia nonunion. Patients with implant removal after regular fracture healing (HEAL) were included as a control-group. Preoperative blood samples, intraoperative tissue samples, sonication of osteosynthesis material and 1-year-follow-up questionnaire were taken. Nonunion patients were grouped into INF or AS after assessing bacterial culture and histopathology of retrieved samples. Diagnosis of infection followed the fracture related infection consensus group criteria, with additional consideration of healing one year after revision surgery. Targeted proteomics was used to investigate a predefined panel of 45 cytokines in preoperative blood samples. Statistical differences were calculated with Kruskal Wallis and Dunn's post hoc test. Cytokines with less than 80% of samples being above the lower limit of detection range (LLDR) were excluded for this study. Results. We recruited 62 AS, 43 INF and 32 HEAL patients. Patients in the two nonunion groups (INF and AS) did not differ concerning smoking, diabetes or initial open or closed fracture. Thirty-two cytokines were above LLDR in >80% of patients. INF patients showed a significant difference in expression of 8 cytokines compared to AS, with greatest differences observed for Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor 1 (MCSF-1) and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) (p<0.01). In comparing AS with HEAL patients, 9 cytokines displayed significant differences, including interleukin (IL)-6, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA), Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1). Comparison of INF with HEAL patients revealed significantly different expression of 20 cytokines, including. IL-6, IL-18, VEGFA or MMP-1. Conclusions. Our study revealed differences in plasma cytokine profile of blood samples from INF and AS patients. Although no single biomarker is sufficient to differentiate these patients preoperatively in isolation, future multivariant analysis of this cytokine data in combination with clinical characteristics may provide valuable diagnostic insights. Funded by German Social Accident Insurance (FF-FR 0276) and AO Trauma (AR2021_04)

Aim. We reviewed a cohort of individuals with recurrent orthopaedic infection to describe the relative rates of microbial persistence vs re-infection at recurrence surgery. Method. A cohort of 125 individuals with recurrent infection (prosthetic joint infection, fracture-related infection and osteomyelitis) from two centres in the UK between 2007 and 2021. Electronic patient records were reviewed to identify culture results from surgical samples at index surgery and the next operation for recurrent infection. Antibiotic sensitivity results were recorded as sensitive, intermediate or resistant according to contemporary sensitivity testing guidelines. Results. Among patients with recurrent infection, 78/125 (62.4%) were male, with a median age 64 years (IQR 51–73y). 76 had prosthetic joint infection, and 49 had fracture related infection or osteomyelitis. Culture results at index procedure showed the most frequently isolated species were Staphylococci (Table 1). A single species was isolated in 75/125 (60%) and mixed species in 36/125 (28.8%). No organisms were cultured in 14/125 (11.2%). At re-operation 48/125 (38.4%) individuals had an organism from the same species or group as at the index operation. In 49/125 (39.2%), none of the organisms isolated at re-operation were grown at first operation. In 28/125 (22.4%), re-operative cultures yielded no growth. For each species isolated at the index procedure, the proportion with the same, different or no organisms isolated at the next procedure were reviewed (Table 1). Staphylococci (including S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci) and Pseudomonas species showed the highest rate of persistence at the species level. Among coagulase-negative staphylococci, changes in antimicrobial sensitivity that make it unclear if these infections were truly persistent, or represented re-infection. Conclusions. Infection with different organisms was seen at similar rates (39.2% vs 38.4%) to persistent infection with the same species in this cohort. Staphylococcus aureus is the organism most likely to be persistently identified in recurrent infections

Aim. Fracture related infection (FRI) is classically defined as early (0–2 weeks), delayed (3–10 weeks) or late (>10 weeks). Treatment strategies reflect this, particularly with debridement and implant retention (DAIR), but there is little evidence to support this. This multinational study clarified the relationship between pathogens isolated and time from injury. Methods. All confirmed FRI cases, managed surgically, at three hospitals were included. Data were analyzed on patient demographics, time from injury and pathogens isolated. Patients who underwent DAIR were also analyzed separately. Results. 433 FRIs were studied, including 51 early cases (mean time from injury 1.6 weeks), 82 delayed cases (mean 5.5 weeks) and 300 late cases (mean 467.3 weeks, range 11-3432 weeks). 140 patients underwent DAIR (mean time since injury 56.8 weeks, range 0-946 weeks). Negative cultures were uncommon before 10 weeks but more frequent in late FRIs (4% vs 24%; p<0.0001). Over half of early and delayed FRIs were polymicrobial (59% and 56%) but only one quarter of late FRIs (26%; p=0.0004, p<0.0001). Cases treated with DAIR, at any time, had no difference in culture type (p=0.25). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent isolate. There was no significant difference in the range of bacterial species isolated in early, delayed or late infections (p=0.20) or in those patients who underwent DAIR (p=0.56). Conclusions. Bacterial species isolated in FRI do not change significantly over time. Up to 10 weeks, there was also no difference in the type of infection (polymicrobial, monomicrobial or culture negative). The increase in late culture negative FRIs may reflect more prolonged antibiotic use. Decisions on FRI treatment should not assume microbiological differences related to time from injury. We found no evidence of more virulent organisms in early infections with less virulent species presenting later. The clinical relevance of classifying FRI by time from injury remains unclear

Aim. To describe the histopathology of the first and last debrided bone tissue in chronic osteomyelitis and answer the following research question; is the last debrided bone tissue viable and without signs of inflammation?. Method. In total, 15 patients with chronic osteomyelitis were allocated to surgical treatment using a one stage protocol including extensive debridement. Suspected infected bone tissue eradicated early in the debridement procedure was collected as a clearly infected sample (S1). Likewise, the last eradicated bone tissue was collected as a suspected non-infected sample (S2), representing the status of the bone void. In all cases, the surgeon debrided the bone until visual confirmation of healthy bleeding bone. The samples were processed for histology, i.e. decalcification and paraffin embedding, followed by cutting and staining with Haematoxylin and Eosin. Immunohistochemistry with MAC-387 antibodies towards the calprotectin of neutrophil granulocytes (NGs) was also performed and used for estimation of a neutrophil granulocyte (NG) score (0, 1, 2 or 3), by the method described for fracture related infections (1). Results. For the S1 samples the median NG score was 3 which is considered confirmatory for infection. However, following debridement the median NG score was significantly (p = 0.032) reduced to 2. Often NGs were seen as single cells, but in seven S1 samples and in one S2 sample massive NG accumulations were observed. The S1 samples showed a mix of granulation tissue, fibrosis, viable bone, and bone necrosis. The S2 samples contained viable bone tissue and occasionally (10/15) small fragments of necrotic bone or bone debris were seen. Furthermore, a large number of erythrocytes were observed in most S2 samples. Conclusions. The present study shows that the inflammatory response still existents after debridement, although the response fades from the center of infection. Therefore, sampling of debrided bone tissue for histology must be performed initially during surgery, to avoid underestimation of the inflammatory response, i.e. the NG score. The last debrided bone tissue cannot by definition be considered completely viable and caution should be made to remove blood (rinse) before intraoperative evaluation of the viability of debrided cancellous bone. Remnant necrotic bone fragments or debris could represent low-vascular hiding places for leftover bacteria. Application of local antibiotics might have a central role in clearing of these small non-viable bone pieces at the bone void interface

Aim. In recent years, the number of victims of road traffic accidents (RTAs) and resulting surgeries have been on the rise in low income countries. Treatments are often long and costly; resources required to treat fracture related infections (FRI) continue to be a limiting factor in low income countries and standardized management protocols are lacking. This retrospective study reports our facility's experience of femoral FRI management in a low income country and evaluates the surgical outcomes with a minimum follow up of five years. Methods. The clinical and radiographic records of patients who underwent surgery for femoral FRI in our facility between 2005–2016 were analyzed. Twenty-six patients were included (15 males), with a median age of 29 years (range 4–71). The initial fracture was caused by RTA in 22 patients, gunshot in 2, accidental fall in 1 and acute osteomyelitis in 1. Polytrauma was observed in 10. All patients but one were referred for limb reconstruction from other institutions. Surgical treatment was instituted in all: site debridement (SD) alone was performed in 2 patients; SD and hardware removal in 4; SD and external fixation in 4; SD, hardware removal and external fixation in 16. In this latter group, complex treatments such as bone transport (BT) and vascularized fibula flap (VFF) were utilized in 4 and 3 patients respectively. Results. The mean follow-up was 8.4 years. Bone union was achieved in all cases with eradication of the infection in all but one. A total of 109 surgeries were carried out with an average of 4 surgeries per patient (range 1–13). The external fixation stayed in place for an average of 9.2 months (range 3–20). Complications were common at the last follow-up: limb length discrepancy (LLD) was observed in 18 patients; stiff knee was noted in 16; stiffness of ipsilateral knee and hip in 3; stiff hip in 1 and fused knee in 3. All patients ambulated without assistive devices. Conclusions. The treatment of femoral FRI is complex, long and often requires the combined effort of the orthopedic and plastic surgical teams. Despite limited resources, our institution achieved good long term surgical outcomes through a variety of methods. Further studies are required across multiple sites to better outline optimal management of femoral FRI in low income countries

Aim. Local antibiotic treatment for bone and joint infections offers direct delivery of high concentrations of antibiotics with reduced systemic exposure and favourable safety profile. However, the possibility of prolonged release of antibiotics at sub-therapeutic levels creates concern about the possible development of antimicrobial resistance. We investigated patients with recurrent bone and joint infection for evidence of antimicrobial resistance emerging from the use of local antibiotics. Method. 125 patients with recurrent infection (prosthetic joint infection, fracture related infection and osteomyelitis) in the UK between 2007 and 2021 were identified. Electronic patient records (including operative notes, pathology results and prescriptions) were reviewed to extract site of infection, date of surgery, the use of local antibiotics, culture results, empiric and definitive antibiotic therapy. All antibiotic sensitivity results were recorded as sensitive, intermediate or resistant according to contemporary guidelines (BSAC and EUCAST). Results. Local antibiotics were used in 74/125 (59.2%) of patients. Agents used were Gentamicin 53/125 (42.4%), Tobramycin 18/125 (14.4%), and vancomycin in 19/125 (15.2%). Combined gentamicin and vancomycin usage was seen in 16/125 patients (12.8%). Gentamicin non-sensitivity was common in this cohort with frequent aminoglycoside use. At index procedure, a Gentamicin non-sensitive organism was cultured in 51/125 patients (40.8%). At re-operation this proportion was lower: 40/125 (32%). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of Gentamicin resistance at reoperation comparing patients who previously received local aminoglycosides with those who had not (21/71, 29.8% vs 19/54, 35.2% p=0.6, chi-squared test). In 48/125 (38.4%) of patients, the same species was isolated during the index and recurrence surgery. We identified 7 cases with new aminoglycoside resistance arising at the second procedure. In 2/7 – S. aureus and E. faecalis - aminoglycoside resistance was the only change in antimicrobial sensitivity. In 5/7, there were at least 2 additional changes in observed antimicrobial sensitivity. 3/74 (4%) of cases who initially received local aminoglycoside cultured organisms with aminoglycoside resistance at recurrence. 4/51 (7.8%) of those who did not receive local or systemic aminoglycoside at index surgery cultured resistant organisms (chi square 0.82; p=0.365). Conclusions. As a group, patients whose treatment for orthopaedic infection included local antibiotics did not exhibit higher rates of specific antimicrobial resistance compared with those not treated with local antibiotics. However we did identify cases where Gram positive bacteria developed aminoglycoside resistance regardless of their initial antimicrobial therapy. This should be considered in antimicrobial choice during surgery for recurrence

Introduction. Fracture related infections (FRI) following intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures remain challenging to treat with associated high patient morbidity and healthcare costs. Recently, antibiotic-coated nails have been introduced as a strategy to reduce implant related infection rates in high-risk patients. We present the largest single-centre case series on ETN PROtect® outcomes reporting on fracture union, infection rates and treatment complications. Materials and Methods. 56 adult patients underwent surgery with ETN PROtect® between 01/09/17 and 31/12/20. Indications consisted of acute open fractures and complex revision cases (FRI, non-union surgery and re-fracture) with a mean of 3 prior surgical interventions. 51 patients had an open fracture as their index injury. We report on patient characteristics and outcomes including radiological/clinical union and deep infection. The one-year minimum follow-up rate was 87.5%. Results. One (1.8%) patient developed a deep surgical infection and associated non-union requiring further surgery. In addition, we identified three cases (5.4%) of aseptic non-union following facture treatment with ETN PROtect®. Of the 5 patients who underwent staged complex revision surgery for established FRI with ETN PROtect®, all had treatment failure with ongoing symptoms of deep infection requiring further treatment. Conclusions. Use of the ETN PROtect® nail in high-risk patients in the acute trauma setting demonstrates promising outcomes in the prevention of implant-related infection. In our limited series we have failed to observe any benefit over uncoated nails, when used in treating cases of established FRI/osteomyelitis and would therefore advise caution in their use, especially in view of the high cost

Aim. Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and fracture related infections (FRI) are the most challenging complications in orthopaedic surgery. An interdisciplinary approach is mandatory not only to correctly diagnose and treat major musculoskeletal infections but also to address the comorbidities and impairments these patients are not rarely suffering from. Since, little data exists on cardiac complications following PJI and FRI revision surgery, this study aimed to investigate the risk of perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) and mortality. Method. We prospectively included consecutive patients at high cardiovascular risk (defined as expected postoperative hospital stay of >24 hours PLUS age >45 years with pre-existing coronary, peripheral or cerebrovascular artery disease OR age >65 years) undergoing major orthopaedic surgery between 2014 and 2016. All patients received a systematic screening to reliably detect PMI, using serial measurements of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). All-cause mortality was assessed at 30 days and one year. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to compare incidence of PMI and mortality between patients undergoing septic revision surgery (for PJI/FRI) and patients receiving aseptic major bone and joint surgery. Results. In total 911 consecutive patients, with an overall PMI rate of 15.4% (n=140) were included. The PMI incidence in patients undergoing septic revision surgery was significantly higher compared to aseptic orthopaedic surgeries (29.2% vs 14.3%, p=0.001), also after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio 2.1, p=0.02). Mortality was higher at one year (16.9% vs. 8.3%, p=0.037) and numerically at 30 days (6.2% vs. 2.4%, p=0.085) in patients undergoing septic revision surgery. Virulence of the disease-causing pathogen showed no significant relationship with PMI incidence or mortality. Conclusions. Patients undergoing revision surgery for PJI or FRI were at a distinct higher risk of PMI and death compared to matched non-septic patients. In major bone and joint infections screening for PMI and treatment in specialized multidisciplinary units should be considered

Aim. Fracture related infection (FRI) remains a challenging diagnosis in orthopedic and trauma surgery. In addition to clinical signs and imaging, serum inflammatory markers are often used to estimate the probability of FRI. To what extent serum inflammatory markers can be used to rule out and diagnose FRI remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the diagnostic value of the serum inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocyte count (LC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in suspected fracture related infection. Method. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for all articles focusing on the diagnostic value of CRP, LC and ESR in FRI. Studies on other inflammatory markers or other types of orthopedic infection, such as periprosthetic and diabetic foot infections, were excluded. For each serum inflammatory marker, all reported sensitivity and specificity combinations were extracted and graphically visualized. Average estimates were obtained using bivariate mixed effects models. This study utilized the QUADAS-2 criteria and was reported following the PRISMA statement. Results. The search resulted in 8280 articles, of which seven were eligible for inclusion. One study was excluded after quality assessment. CRP was reported in all included studies, with sensitivity ranging from 60.0 to 100.0% and specificity from 34.3 to 85.7%. Five of these studies were pooled. The average pooled sensitivity and specificity of CRP were, respectively, 77.0% (95% CI 66.5–85.0%) and 67.9% (95% CI 38.7–87.6%). LC was reported in five studies. Sensitivity ranged from 22.9 to 72.6% and specificity from 73.5 to 85.7%. The results of four of these studies were pooled, resulting in a 51.7% (95% CI 27.2–75.5%) sensitivity and 67.1% (95% CI 19.3–50.2%) specificity. ESR was reported in five studies. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 37.1 to 100.0% and 59.0 to 85.0% respectively. Three of these studies were pooled, showing a 45.1% (95% CI 37.8–52.6%) sensitivity and 79.3% (95% CI 71.7–85.2%) specificity of ESR. Four studies analyzed the combined value of inflammatory markers, reporting an increased diagnostic accuracy. These results could not be pooled due to heterogeneity. Conclusions. The serum inflammatory markers CRP, LC and ESR are insufficiently accurate to diagnose FRI. These markers cannot rule out the presence of FRI, but they may be used as a suggestive sign in the diagnosis of FRI

Aim. Focused high energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy (fhESWT) is used to support fracture healing in non-union cases and has been shown to have antibacterial effects. We trialed fhESWT as an adjunct to conventional treatment in a clinically relevant rabbit model of fracture related infection. Method. A complete humeral osteotomy was performed in 31 rabbits and fixed with a 7-hole-LCP. A fracture-related infection (FRI) was established with Staphylococcus aureus. After two weeks, a revision surgery was performed with debridement, irrigation and implant retention. Rabbits then received: no further treatment (controls); shockwaves (at day 2 and 6 after revision, 4'000 Impulses each time with 23kV); systemic antibiotics (rifampin and nafcillin) over one week in weight adjusted dosages; or the combination of antibiotics and shockwaves. Treatments were applied over one week. Blood cultures were taken before and after shockwave sessions. After an additional week without treatment, rabbits were euthanized, and quantitative bacteriology was performed on implants and tissues to determine infection burden. Indicator organs (brain, heart, liver, lungs, kidneys and spleen) were cultured to assess possible bacteraemia due to fhESWT. Results. All rabbits were infected at revision surgery as determined by bacteriological culture of debrided materials. fhESWT in combination with antibiotic treatment lowered the bacterial burden at euthanasia hundredfold compared to antibiotic treatment alone in all samples (p=0.38). This effect was most prevalent for the implant sample (p=0.08). No significant effect was seen for fhESWT alone compared to untreated controls. No signs of bacteraemia occurred. Conclusions. The additon of systemic antibiotics had the biggest effect on reduction of bacteria. Although further lowering the bacterial burden in our model the effect of fhESWT as an adjunct was not big enough to be statistically secured in this in vivo rabbit model. In certain difficult-to-treat infections the addition of fhESWT might be beneficial. The method appears to be safe in this model of acute FRI as no signs of bacteremia occurred despite the high energy and impulse number. Further investigations are needed to identify the correct indication

Aims. Infective complications following implant related orthopaedic surgery or fracture related infection are associated with high costs and increased length of stay (LOS). However, the economic burden of disease before, during and after definitive osteomyelitis surgery is not well quantified. The Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database captures all admissions, outpatient appointments and emergency department attendances at NHS hospitals in England. We identified all patients with a diagnostic code of osteomyelitis and quantified the tariff costs associated with the surgical treatment of osteomyelitis. We also collected all recorded healthcare events related to osteomyelitis for two years preceding the initial osteomyelitis treatment procedure, as well as for two years after the procedure. We compared average osteomyelitis treatment costs in England against a dedicated specialist multidisciplinary bone infection centre. Methods. We interrogated the HES database for all patients given a diagnostic code of osteomyelitis (M86) between April 2013 and January 2017. We excluded all cases with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis and an index procedure of an amputation for diabetes or arterial disease. Of the remaining 104,622 patients there were 24,408 cases who had their index procedure for osteomyelitis in this time period. Of these we compared a subset of 575 cases treated in a specialist bone infection centre. Results. Index procedure costs were lower in specialist centres compared to national average (£4100.09 vs. 4835.59) equating to a potential saving of £4.67 million per year if all cases were treated in similar specialist centres. Average LOS for the index procedure was lower in the specialist centre (12.4 days) compared to the national average (17.3 days). Assuming a bed cost of £500 per day, treating all patients in similar specialist centres could save £15.95 million per year. The post procedure costs were lower for specialist centre patients compared to national average, equating to a potential saving of £7.42 million per year. The average post procedural LOS in the national cohort was 2.44 days longer than the specialist centre, equating to an additional 15,508 bed days per year. Conclusions. Although tariff costs do not reflect true costs this study demonstrates that osteomyelitis is a significant economic burden to the English health service. Treating infection in dedicated specialist multidisciplinary centres requires a lot of resources and costs a lot of money. However, treating infection outside this environment seems to cost more and results in longer inpatient stays and higher associated costs