The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) was developed in 2007 as a predictor of 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery following a neck of femur fracture. The National Hip Fracture Database is the standard used which calculated their own score using national data. The NHF score for 30-day mortality was calculated for 50 patients presenting with a fractured neck femur injury between January 2020 to March 2020. A score <5 was classified as low risk and >/=5 as high risk. Aim was to assess the accuracy in calculating the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score against the National Hip Fracture Database. To explore whether it should it be routinely included during initial assessment to aid clinical management?. There was an increase in the number of mortalities observed in patients who belonged to the high-risk group (>=5) compared to the low risk group. COVID-19 positive patients had worse outcomes with average 30-day mortality of 6.78 compared to the average of 6.06. GEH NHF score per month showed significant accuracy against the NHFD scores. The identification of high-risk groups from their NHF score can allow for targeted optimisations and elucidation of risk factors easily gathered at the point of hospitalisation. The NHFS is a valuable tool and useful predictor to stratify the risk of 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery. Inclusion of the score should be considered as mandatory Trust policy for neck of femur fracture patients to aid clinical management and improve patient safety overall

In absence of available quantitative measures, the assessment of fracture healing based on clinical examination and X-rays remains a subjective matter. Lacking reliable information on the state of healing, rehabilitation is hardly individualized and mostly follows non evidence-based protocols building on common guidelines and personal experience. Measurement of fracture stiffness has been demonstrated as a valid outcome measure for the maturity of the repair tissue but so far has not found its way to clinical application outside the research space. However, with the recent technological advancements and trends towards digital health care, this seems about to change with new generations of instrumented implants – often unfortunately termed “smart implants” – being developed as medical devices. The AO Fracture Monitor is a novel, active, implantable sensor system designed to provide an objective measure for the assessment of fracture healing progression (1). It consists of an implantable sensor that is attached to conventional locking plates and continuously measures implant load during physiological weight bearing. Data is recorded and processed in real-time on the implant, from where it is wirelessly transmitted to a cloud application via the patient's smartphone. Thus, the system allows for timely, remote and X-ray free provision of feedback upon the mechanical competence of the repair tissue to support therapeutic decision making and individualized aftercare. The device has been developed according to medical device standards and underwent extensive verification and validation, including an in-vivo study in an ovine tibial osteotomy model, that confirmed the device's capability to depict the course of fracture healing as well as its long-term technical performance. Currently a multi-center clinical investigation is underway to demonstrate clinical safety of the novel implant system. Rendering the progression of bone fracture healing assessable, the AO Fracture Monitor carries potential to enhance today's postoperative care of fracture patients

It is known that Osteoporosis is the pathology of bone mass and tissue loss resulting in an increase of fragility, risk of fracture occurrence, and risk of fracture recurrence. We noted there was no definitive pathway in our last audit, therefore recommended: availability of the Osteoporosis clinic referral form in an accessible place, the form be filled by the doctor reviewing the patient in the first fracture clinic, and a liaison nurse to ensure these forms were filled and sent to the Osteoporosis clinic. This second audit analyses our Trust's response to these recommendations and effect achieved in Osteoporosis care. We reviewed our local data base from the 7/27/2020 – 10/2/2021 retrospectively for distal radius fractures who were seen in fracture clinic. We analysed a sample size of 59 patients, excluding patients who had already commenced bone protection medications. 67.7% of our patients had neither been on bone protection medications nor recorded referrals and 13.5% were already on bone protection medications when they sustained the fragility fracture. Ten out of the 51 patients were offered referral to the osteoporosis clinic, and one refused. This makes 20% (10 out of 50) of the patients had completed referrals. In comparison, in our first audit, 11% had already been on bone protection medications and 18% had completed referrals. The second cycle showed a slight increase in compliance. Majority of the referrals were completed by Orthopaedic Consultants in both audits and ana awareness increase noted among non-consultants in starting the referral process. Based on our analysis, our Trust has a slight improvement in commencing bone protection medications, associated with slight improvement in completing referrals to the Osteoporosis clinic. Despite our recommendations in the first audit, there is still no easily accessible definitive pathway to ensure our Trust's patients have timely access to bone protection and continued care at the Osteoporosis clinic. We recommend streamlining our recommendations to have a more effective approach in ensuring our Trust meets national guidelines. We will implement a Yes or No question assessment for patients visiting clinic in our electronic database which should assist in referral completions

The British Orthopedic Association recommends that patients referred to fracture clinic are reviewed within 72 hours. With the increase in referrals and limited clinic capacity it is becoming increasingly difficult to see every referral with in a 72 hour time frame. Some patients are waiting 2 weeks or more before they can be seen in a fracture clinic. With the aim of improving care by seeking to meet BOAST 7 target, waiting times for fracture clinic appointments at the Homerton University Hospital were audited prospectively against this national guideline, before virtual fracture clinic was implemented and 6 weeks after the implementation of virtual fracture clinic at our hospital. Virtual fracture clinic is where an Orthopedic consultant reviews a patients x-rays and A&E documentation and decides if that patients needs to be seen in a face to face fracture clinic to discuss operative vs. non-operative management of their injury or if a treatment plan can be delivered without the patient having to come back to hospital. The study was conducted as a prospective closed-loop audit in which the second cycle took place after the implementation of the new virtual fracture clinic service. The first cycle showed a non-compliant waiting time with only 18% of patients being seen within 72 hours. Following the implementation of virtual fracture clinic, 84% of all patients were reviewed within 72 hours. Virtual fracture clinic delivered a significant reduction in waiting times. Virtual fracture clinic has only just been implemented at the Homerton University Hospital and hopefully at the next audit we will be 100% compliant with the BOA BOAST 7 Guideline. We would recommend that virtual fracture clinics being rolled out in Orthopedic departments in all hospitals which have Orthopedic services

Determine the prevalence, etiologies, and risk factors of unplanned return to the OR (UROR) in adult orthopaedic trauma patients. Retrospective review of a trauma prospective registry from 2014 – 2019 at a Level 1 academic hospital. An UROR was defined as a patient returning to OR unexpectedly following a planned definitive surgery to either readdress the presenting diagnosis or address a complication arising from the index procedure. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed comparing those patients with an UROR versus those without. A total of 1568 patients were reviewed. The rate of UROR was 9.8% (153 patients). Symptomatic implant was the leading cause of UROR (60%). Other significant UROR causes were infection (15%) and implant failure (9%). The median time between index procedure and UROR was 301 days. For the univariate and multivariate analysis, open fracture (p< 0.05), fracture complexity (p<0.01), and weekend procedure (p< 0.01) were all associated with increased risk of UROR. All other variables were not statistically significant for any associations. Those patients with an UROR for reasons other than symptomatic implants were more likely to have polyorthopaedic injuries (p < 0.05), ISS > 15 (p < 0.05), osteoporosis (p < 0.01), ICU status (p < 0.05), psychiatric history (p < 0.05), compartment syndrome (p < 0.05), neurovascular injury (p < 0.01), open fracture (p < 0.05), and fracture complexity (p < 0.05). The rate of UROR in the orthopaedic trauma patient population is 10%. Most of these cases are due to implant-related issues. UROR for reasons other than symptomatic implants tend to be polytraumatized patients with higher-energy injuries, multiple complex fractures, and associated soft tissue injuries. Future focus on improved implant development and treatments for polytraumatized patients with complex fractures is warranted to decrease a relatively high UROR rate in orthopaedic trauma

Osteoporosis is a disease when bone mass and tissue is lost, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and increase susceptibility to develop fracture. The osteoporosis prevalence increases markedly with age, from 2% at 50 years to more than 25% at 80 years. 1. in women. The vast majority of distal radius fractures (DRFs) can be considered fragility fractures. The DRF is usually the first medical presentation of these fractures. With an aging population, all fracture clinics should have embedded screening for bone health and falls risk. DRF is the commonest type of fracture in perimenopausal women and is associated with an increased risk of later non-wrist fracture of up to one in five in the subsequent decade. 2. . According to the national guidelines in managing the fragility fractures of distal radius with regards the bone health review, we, as orthopedic surgeons, are responsible to detect the risky patients, refer them to the responsible team to perform the required investigations and offer the treatment. We reviewed our local database (E-trauma) all cases of fracture distal radius retrospectively during the period from 01/08/2019 to 29/09/2019. We included total of 45 patients who have been managed conservatively and followed up in fracture clinic. Our inclusion criteria was: women aged 65 years and over, men aged 75 years and over with risk factors, patients who are more than 50 years old and sustained low energy trauma whatever the sex is or any patient who has major risk factor (current or frequent recent use of oral or systemic glucocorticoids, untreated premature menopause or previous fragility fracture). We found that 96% of patients were 50 years old or more and 84% of the patients were females. 71% of patients were not referred to Osteoporosis clinic and 11% were already under the orthogeriatric care and 18% only were referred. Out of the 8 referred patients, 3 were referred on 1st appointment, 1 on the 3rd appointment, 1 on discharge from fracture clinic to GP again and 3 were without clear documentation of the time of referral. We concluded that we as trust are not compliant to the national guidelines with regards the osteoporosis review for the DRF as one of the first common presentations of fragility fractures. We also found that the reason for that is that there is no definitive clear pathway for the referral in our local guidelines. We recommended that the Osteoporosis clinic referral form needs to be available in the fracture clinic in an accessible place and needs to be filled by the doctor reviewing the patient in the fracture clinic in the 1st appointment. A liaison nurse also needs to ensure these forms have been filled and sent to the orthogeriatric team. Alternatively, we added a portal on our online database (e-trauma), therefore the patient who fulfils the criteria for bone health review should be referred to the orthogeriatric team to review

Odontoid fracture of the second cervical vertebra (C2) is the most common spinal fracture type in elderly patients. However, very little is known about the biomechanical fracture mechanisms, but could play a role in fracture prevention and treatment. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical competence and fracture characteristics of the odontoid process. A total of 42 human C2 specimens (14 female and 28 male, 71.5 ± 6.5 years) were scanned via quantitative computed tomography, divided in 6 groups (n = 7) and subjected to combined quasi-static loading at a rate of 0.1 mm/s until fracturing at inclinations of −15°, 0° and 15° in sagittal plane, and −50° and 0° in transverse plane. Bone mineral density (BMD), specimen height, fusion state of the ossification centers, stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, and fracture type according to Anderson and d'Alonzo were assessed. While the lowest values for stiffness, yield, and ultimate load were observed at load inclination of 15° in sagittal plane, no statistically significant differences could be observed among the six groups (p = 0.235, p = 0.646, and p = 0.505, respectively). Evaluating specimens with only clearly distinguishable fusion of the ossification centers (n = 26) reveled even less differences among the groups for all mechanical parameters. BMD was positively correlated with yield load (R² = 0.350, p < 0.001), and ultimate load (R² = 0.955, p < 0.001), but not with stiffness (p = 0.070). Type III was the most common fracture type (23.5%). These biomechanical outcomes indicate that load direction plays a subordinate role in traumatic fractures of the odontoid process in contrast to BMD which is a strong determinant of stiffness and strength. Thus, odontoid fractures appear to result from an interaction between load magnitude and bone quality

Our study seeks to determine whether characteristics of radiographs taken post-reduction of a forearm fracture can indicate future risk of refracture or loss of reduction. We hypothesize that reducing forearm fractures too precisely may be counterproductive and provide less benefit than reductions left slightly offset prior to cast immobilization. We conducted a retrospective review of 1079 pediatric patients treated for forearm fractures between January 2014 and September 2021 in a 327 bed regional medical center. Percent fracture displacement, location, orientation, comminution, fracture line visibility and angle of angulation were determined by AP and lateral radiographs. Percent fracture displacement was derived by: (Displacement of Bone Shafts / Diameter) x 100% = %Fracture Displacement. Patients treated with closed reduction were reduced from a mean displacement of 29.26±36.18% at an angulation of 22.67±16.57 degrees to 7.88±9.07% displacement and 3.89±6.68 degrees angulation post-reduction. Patients developing complications including a loss of reduction or refracture were found to have post-operative radiographs with a lower percent displacement (0.50±1.12) than those not developing complications (8.65±9.21)(p=0.0580). Post-reduction angulation (p=1.000), average reduction in angulation (p=1.000) and average reduction in displacement percent(p=0.2102) were not significantly associated with development of complications. Percent displacement of radial shafts was seen to be the most important metric to monitor in post-operative radiographs for patients undergoing closed reduction of a forearm fracture. We theorize a slight displacement provides greater surface area for osteoblastic expansion and callus formation leading to a decreased risk of refracture or loss of reduction. While our sample size precludes our ability to measure the ideal amount of post-reduction displacement for optimal healing, our results demonstrate that some degree of shaft displacement is required for optimal healing conditions

Abstract. Objectives. Osteoporotic fractures tend to be more challenging than fractures in healthy bone and the efficacy of metal screw fixation decreases with decreasing bone mineral density making it more difficult for such screws to gain purchase. This leads to increased complication rates such as malunion, non-union and implant failure (1). Bioresorbable polymer devices have seen clinical success in fracture fixation and are a promising alternative for metallic devices but are rarely used in the osteoporotic population. To address this, we are developing a system that may allow osteoporotic patients to avail of bioresorbable devices (2) but it is important to establish if patients have any reservations about having a plastic resorbable device instead of a metal one. Therefore the aim of this study was to explore the acceptability of bioresorbable fracture fixation devices to people with osteoporosis. Methods. A cross sectional descriptive study was conducted in a UK wide population using convenience sampling. An online survey comprising nine survey questions and nine demographic questions was developed in Microsoft Teams and tested for face validity in a small pilot study (n=6). Following amendments and ethical approval, the survey was distributed by the Royal Osteoporosis Society on their website and social media platforms. People were invited to take part if they lived in the UK, were over 18 years old and had been diagnosed with osteoporosis. The survey was open for three weeks in May 2023. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results. There were 112 responses. Eight participants had not been diagnosed with osteoporosis and therefore did not meet the study criteria. Of the remaining 104, 102 were female and 2 were male and 102 were white (2 chose not to disclose their ethnicity). The majority of participants were aged 55–64 (34.6%) or 65–74 (37.5%), were college/university educated (38.5%) and had previously sustained a fragility fracture (52.9%). Only 3.9% of participants had heard of bioresorbable fracture fixation devices compared to 62.5% for metal devices. Most people were unsure if they would trust one type of device over the other (58.7%) and would ask for more information if their surgeon were to suggest using a bioresorbable device to fix their fracture (61.5%). The most commonly reported concerns were about device safety and efficacy: toxicity of the degradation products and the device breaking down too early before the fracture had healed. Two participants cited environmental concerns about increased use of plastics as a reason they would decline such a device. Conclusions. As expected, participants had little to no knowledge of bioresorbable polymer fixation devices. In general, they were willing to be guided by their surgeon but would require supporting information on the safety and efficacy of their long-term use. The results of this study show that it will be important to have relevant and understandable information to give patients when recommending these devices as treatments to ensure and support a shared-decision approach to patient care. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Standard fixation for intra-articular distal humerus fracture is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). However, high energy fractures of the distal humerus are often accompanied with soft tissue injuries and or vascular injuries which limits the use of internal fixation. In our report, we describe a highly complex distal humerus fracture that showed promising healing via a ring external fixator. A 26-year-old man sustained a Gustillo Anderson Grade IIIB intra-articular distal humerus fracture of the non-dominant limb with bone loss at the lateral column. The injury was managed with aggressive wound debridement and cross elbow stabilization via a hinged ring external fixator. Post operative wound managed with foam dressing. Post-operatively, early controlled mobilization of elbow commenced. Fracture union achieved by 9 weeks and frame removed once fracture united. No surgical site infection or non-union observed throughout follow up. At 2 years follow up, flexion - extension of elbow is 20°- 100°, forearm supination 65°, forearm pronation 60° with no significant valgus or varus deformity. The extent of normal anatomic restoration in elbow fracture fixation determines the quality of elbow function with most common complication being elbow stiffness. Ring fixator is a non-invasive external device which provides firm stabilization of fracture while allowing for adequate soft tissue management. It provides continuous axial micro-movements in the frame which promotes callus formation while avoiding translation or angulation between the fragments. In appropriate frame design, they allow for early rehabilitation of joint where normal range of motion can be allowed in controlled manner immediately post-fixation. Functional outcome of elbow fracture from ring external fixation is comparable to ORIF due to better rehabilitation and lower complications. Ring external fixator in our patient achieved acceptable functional outcome and fracture alignment meanwhile the fracture was not complicated with common complications seen in ORIF. In conclusion, ring external fixator is as effective as ORIF in treating complex distal humeral fractures and should be considered for definitive fixation in such fractures

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients present an increased medical risk; however, few studies analyze the outcomes of these patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. This study aimes to determine the incidence of hip fracture in SOT patients and to compare the outcomes of SOT patients with matched non-SOT controls after hip fracture fixation. A retrospective review identified 20 SOT patients with hip fracture at a single center from 2016 to 2021 and were matched (1:1) with a cohort of 20 patients with hip fracture without SOT. Patient outcomes, mortality/survival and clinical outcomes were compared between two groups. The incidence of hip fracture in SOT patients was 20/1787, 1.1%. There were significant differences in mortality rate (73.3% SOT group vs. 26.7% non-SOT group; p<0.05). There were no differences in survival time (p=0.746). There were no differences in time to surgery (5.0 days SOT group vs. 3.1 days non-SOT group; p=0.109), however, there were significant differences in the hospital length of stay (14 days SOT group vs. 8.6 days non-SOT group; p=0.018). There were no differences regarding the complication rate between the two groups (9/20, 45% vs. 6/20, 30% in the SOT and non-SOT groups, respectively). SOT patients with associated hip fracture required longer hospital length of stay than non-SOT patients. SOT patients did not show greater clinical complications; however, they presented higher mortality rate compared to non-SOT patients

Introduction. Being challenging, multifragmentary proximal tibial fractures in patients with severe soft tissue injuries and/or short stature can be treated using externalized locked plating. A recent finite element study, investigating the fixation stability of plated unstable tibial fractures with 2-mm, 22-mm and 32-mm plate elevation under partial and full weight-bearing, reported that from a virtual biomechanical point of view, externalized plating seems to provide appropriate relative stability for secondary bone healing under partial weight-bearing during the early postoperative phase. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of using a LISS plate as a definitive external fixator for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal tibial fractures. Methods. Following appropriate indirect reduction, externalized locked plating was performed and followed up in 12 patients with multifragmentary proximal tibial fractures with simple intraarticular involvement and injured soft tissue envelope. Results. Among all patients, the average follow up period was 22 months (range14–48 months), revealing uneventful healing in all of them. Time to fracture union was 21.8 weeks on average (range 16–28weeks). The mean HSS knee score was 87 (range 72–98) at 4 weeks postoperatively and 97 (range 88–100) at the final follow up. The average AOFAS score was 92 (range 84–100) at 4 weeks postoperatively and 98 (range 94–100) at the final follow up. Conclusions. Externalized locked plating seems to be a successful surgical alternative treatment in selected cases with unstable proximal tibial fractures and severe soft tissue injury, following appropriate indirect fracture reduction

Open limb fractures are typically due to a high energy trauma. Several recent studied have showed treatment's superiority when a multidisciplinary approach is applied. World Health Organization reports that isolate limb traumas have an incidence rate of 11.5/100.000, causing high costs in terms of hospitalization and patient disability. A lack of experience in soft tissue management in orthopaedics and traumatology seems to be the determining factor in the clinical worsening of complex cases. The therapeutic possibilities offered by microsurgery currently permit simultaneous reconstruction of multiple tissues including vessels and nerves, reducing the rate of amputations, recovery time and preventing postoperative complications. Several scoring systems to assess complex limb traumas exist, among them: NISSSA, MESS, AO and Gustilo Anderson. In 2010, a further scoring system was introduced to focus open fractures of all locations: OTA-OFC. Rather than using a single composite score, the OTA-OFC comprises five components grades (skin, arterial, muscle, bone loss and contamination), each rated from mild to severe. The International Consensus Meeting of 2018 on musculoskeletal infections in orthopaedic surgery identified the OTA-OFC score as an efficient catalogue system with interobserver agreement that is comparable or superior to the Gustilo-Anderson classification. OTA-OFC predicts outcomes such as the need for adjuvant treatments or the likelihood of early amputation. An orthoplastic approach reconstruction must pay adequate attention to bone and soft tissue infections management. Concerning bone management: there is little to no difference in terms of infection rates for Gustilo-Anderson types I–II treated by reamed intramedullary nail, circular external fixator, or unreamed intramedullary nail. In Gustilo-Anderson IIIA-B fractures, circular external fixation appears to provide the lowest infection rates when compared to all other fixation methods. Different technique can be used for the reconstruction of bone and soft tissue defects based on each clinical scenario. Open fracture management with fasciocutaneous or muscle flaps shows comparable outcomes in terms of bone healing, soft tissue coverage, acute infection and chronic osteomyelitis prevention. The type of flap should be tailored based on the type of the defect, bone or soft tissue, location, extension and depth of the defect, size of the osseous gap, fracture type, and orthopaedic implantation. Local flaps should be considered in low energy trauma, when skin and soft tissue is not traumatized. In high energy fractures with bone exposure, muscle flaps may offer a more reliable reconstruction with fewer flap failures and lower reoperation rates. On exposed fractures several studies report precise timing for a proper reconstruction. Hence, timing of soft tissue coverage is a critical for length of in-hospital stay and most of the early postoperative complications and outcomes. Early coverage has been associated with higher union rates and lower complications and infection rates compared to those reconstructed after 5-7 days. Furthermore, early reconstruction improves flap survival and reduces surgical complexity, as microsurgical free flap procedures become more challenging with a delay due to an increased pro-thrombotic environment, tissue edema and the increasingly friable vessels. Only those patients presenting to facilities with an actual dedicated orthoplastic trauma service are likely to receive definitive treatment of a severe open fracture with tissue loss within the established parameters of good practice. We conclude that the surgeon's experience appears to be the decisive element in the orthoplastic approach, although reconstructive algorithms may assist in decisional and planification of surgery

BMP-1 is the major procollagen-C-peptidase activating, besides fibrillar collagen types I-III, several enzymes and growth factors involved in the generation of extracellular matrix. This study investigated the effect of adding and inhibiting BMP-1 directly post fracture. Standardised femoral fractures were stabilized by an intramedullary nail in 12 week-old female C57Bl/6J mice. We injected either 20 µL recombinant active BMP-1, activity buffer or the BMP-1 specific inhibitor “sizzled”. After 7, 14 and 28 days, mice were sacrificed. Femurs were dissected and paraffin slides were prepared. Callus composition was divided into soft tissue, mineralized and cartilaginous callus. Murine MC3T3 pre-osteoblastic cells were kept in culture adding BMP-1 and sizzled during osteoblastic differentiation. Putative cytotoxicity was determined using MTT-vitality assay. Cell calcification, collagen deposition, and BMP-2 and myostatin protein quantity were characterized. Adding BMP-1 displayed a weak positive effect on the outcome. After 7 days, more mineralised callus was present, meanwhile the cartilaginous callus was apparently remodelled at higher rate. In the case of BMP-1 inhibition, we observed more cartilaginous callus, which may indicate reduced stability. In cell culture, we could observe a high interference with mineralisation capabilities depending on the stage of osteoblastic development when adding BMP-1 or inhibiting it. Addition and inhibition impaired myostatin (anti-osteogen) and BMP-2 (pro-osteogen) expression. Interfering with BMP-1 homeostasis in this early stage of fracture repair seems to have rather negative effects. Inhibition apparently yields lower callus quality while the addition of BMP-1 does not significantly accelerate the healing outcome. Cell culture experiments show that BMP-1 application after 7 days of healing leads to higher collagen output but has no effect on mineralisation. This may suggest that BMP-1 application at a later time-point may lead to more pronounced beneficial effects on fracture repair

Ankle fractures are among the most common types of fractures. If surgery is not performed within 12 to 24 hours, ankle swelling is likely to develop and delay the operative fixation. This leads to patients staying longer in the ward waiting and increased hospital occupancy. This prolonged stay has significant financial implication as well as it is frustrating for both patients and health care professionals. The aim was to formulate a pathway for the ankle fracture patients coming to the emergency department, outpatients and planned for operative intervention. To identify whether pre-operative hospital admissions of stable ankle fracture patients are reduced with the implementation of the pathway. We formulated an ankle fracture fixation pathway, which was approved for use in December 2020. A retrospective analysis of 6 months hospital admissions of ankle fracture patients in the period between January to June 2020. The duration from admission to the actual surgery was collected to review if some admissions could have been avoided and patients brought directly on the surgery day. A total of 23 patients were included. Mean age was 60.5 years and SD was 17years. 94% of patients were females. 10 patients were appropriately discharged.7 Patients were appropriately admitted. 6 Patients were unnecessarily admitted. These 6 patients were admitted on presentation to ED. Retrospective analysis of this audit showed that this cohort of patients met the safe discharge criteria and could have been discharged. Duration of unnecessary stay ranged from 1 to 11 days (21 days in total). Total saving could have been £6300. Standards were met in 74% of cases. Preoperative hospital admission could be reduced with the proposed pathway. It is a valuable tool to be used and should be implemented to reduce unnecessary hospital admissions

Majority of osteoporosis related fractures are treated surgically using metallic fixation devices. Anchorage of fixation devices is sometimes challenging due to poor osteoporotic bone quality that can lead to failure of the fracture fixation. Using a rat osteoporosis model, we employed neutron tomography and histology to study the biological effects of implant augmentation using an isothermally setting calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite (CaS/HA) biomaterial with synthetic HA particles as recruiting moiety for systemically administered bisphosphonates. Using an osteoporotic sawbones model, we then provide a standardized method for the delivery of the CaS/HA biomaterial at the bone-implant interface for improved mechanical anchorage of a lag-screw commonly used for hip fracture fixation. As a proof-of-concept, the method was then verified in donated femoral heads and in patients with osteoporosis undergoing hip fracture fixation. We show that placing HA particles around a stainless-steel screw in-vivo, systemically administered bisphosphonates could be targeted towards the implant, yielding significantly higher peri-implant bone formation compared to un-augmented controls. In the sawbones model, CaS/HA based lag-screw augmentation led to significant increase (up to 4 times) in peak extraction force with CaS/HA performing at par with PMMA. Micro-CT imaging of the CaS/HA augmented lag-screws in cadaver femoral heads verified that the entire length of the lag-screw threads and the surrounding bone was covered with the CaS/HA material. X-ray images from fracture fixation surgery indicated that the CaS/HA material could be applied at the lag-screw-bone interface without exerting any additional pressure or risk of venous vascular leakage.: We present a new method for augmentation of lag-screws in fragile bone. It is envisaged that this methodcould potentially reduce the risk of fracture fixation failure especially when HA seeking “bone active” drugs are used systemically

To create a comprehensive, user-friendly, database that facilitates selection of optimized animal models for fracture research. Preclinical testing using research animal models can expedite effective and safe interventions for clinical fracture patients but ethical considerations (e.g., adherence to 3R humane principles) and failure to meet critical review (e.g., clinical translation, reproducibility) currently complicate the model selection process. English language publications (1980-2021) were derived from PubMed® using the search-term ‘bone and fracture and animal’. Clinical cases, reviews, and cadaver studies were excluded. Qualifying papers reporting use of fracture models had the following data transcribed: Author, journal, abstract, summary data, animal data, bone, focus (e.g., allograft) and model (e.g., articular fracture). Publications were quantitatively scored (1 star [very poor] – 5 stars [excellent]) for reproducibility, clinical translation and animal welfare. 4602 papers were derived from 677 journals from 177 publishers. Number of annual publications progressively increased from 18 (1980), peaking in 2015 (250) before substantially declining in 2020 (121) and 2021 (51). Descriptors (low to high) included 15 species (frog [1]–rat [1586]), 24 bones (phalanx [1]–femur [1646]), 134 research foci (bioprinting [4]–fracture healing [3533]), and 37 fracture models (avulsion [4]–diaphyseal [2113]). Percent of total publications scoring 1 or more stars for reproducibility, clinical translation and animal welfare ranged from: 1.0–5.8% (1 star), 5.9–30.6% (2 star), 21.3–42.8% (3 star), 19.2–44.4% (4 stars), and 1.3–26.7% (5 stars). FRAMD provides a dedicated resource that enhances selection of animal models that pertain to researchers’ fracture focus while being clinically relevant, reproducible and humane. FRAMD will help improve scientific data, reduce unnecessary use of animals, heighten workplace efficiency, and reduce cost by avoiding ill-suited or outdated models. FRAMD may particularly benefit grant writers and organizations seeking ‘best-practice’ assurance (e.g., funding agencies, academic research societies, CROs)

The lateral wall thickness (LWT) in trochanteric femoral fractures is a known predictive factor for postoperative fracture stability. Currently, the AO/OTA classification uses a patient non-specific measure to assess the absolute LWT (aLWT) and distinguish stable A1.3 from unstable A2.1 fractures based on a threshold of 20.5 mm. This approach potentially results in interpatient deviations due to different bone morphologies and consequently variations in fracture stability. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore whether a patient-specific measure for assessment of the relative LWT (rLWT) results in a more precise threshold for prediction of unstable fractures. Part 1 of the study evaluated 146 pelvic radiographs to assess left-right symmetry with regard to caput-collum-angle (CCD) and total trochanteric thickness (TTT), and used the results to establish the rLWT measurement technique. Part 2 reevaluated 202 patients from a previous study cohort to analyze their rLWT versus aLWT for optimization purposes. Findings in Part 1 demonstrated a bilateral symmetry of the femur regarding both CCD and TTT (p ≥ 0.827) allowing to mirror bone's morphology and geometry from the contralateral intact to the fractured femur. Outcomes in Part 2 resulted in an increased accuracy for the new determined rLWT threshold (50.5%) versus the standard 20.5 mm aLWT threshold, with sensitivity of 83.7% versus 82.7% and specificity 81.3% versus 77.8%, respectively. The novel patient-specific rLWT measure can be based on the contralateral femur anatomy and is a more accurate predictor of a secondary lateral wall fracture in comparison to the conventional aLWT. This study established the threshold of 50.5% rLWT as a reference value for prediction of fracture stability and selection of an appropriate implant for fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures

To test and evaluate the effectiveness of local injection of autologous fat-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into fracture site to prevent non-union in a clinically relevant model. 5 male Wistar rats underwent the same surgical procedure of inducing non-union. A mid-shaft tibial osteotomy was made with 1mm non-critical gap. Periosteum was stripped around the two fracture ends. Then, the fracture was fixed by ante-grade intramedullary nail. The non-critical gap was maintained by a spacer with minimal effect on the healing surface area. At the same surgical time, subcutaneous fat was collected from the ipsilateral inguinal region and stem cells were isolated and cultured in vitro. Within three weeks postoperatively, the number of expanded stem cells reached 5×10. 6. and were injected into the fracture site. Healing was followed up for 8 weeks and the quality was measured by serial x-rays, microCT, mechanical testing and histologically. Quality of healing was compared with that of previously published allogenic, xenogeneic MSCs and Purified Buffered Saline (PBS) controls. All the five fractures united fully after 8 weeks. There was a progressive increase in the callus radiopacity during the eight-week duration, the average radiopacity in the autologous fat-MSC injected group was significantly higher than that of the allogeneic MSCs, xenogeneic MSCs and the control group, P < 0.0001 for treatment, time after injection, and treatment-time interaction (two-way repeated measure ANOVA). MicroCT, mechanical testing and histology confirmed radiological findings. The autologous fat-MSCs are effective in prevention of atrophic non-union by stimulation of the healing process leading to a solid union. The quality and speed of repair are higher than those of the other types of cell transplantation tested

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is a promising tool to estimate bone structure characteristics and predict fragile fracture. The aim of this pilot cross-sectional study was to evaluate the performance of a multi-channel residual network (MResNet) based on ultrasonic radiofrequency (RF) signal to discriminate fragile fractures retrospectively in postmenopausal women. Methods. RF signal and speed of sound (SOS) were obtained using an axial transmission QUS at one‐third distal radius for 246 postmenopausal women. Based on the involved RF signal, we conducted a MResNet, which combines multi-channel training with original ResNet, to classify the high risk of fragility fractures patients from all subjects. The bone mineral density (BMD) at lumber, hip and femoral neck acquired with DXA was recorded on the same day. The fracture history of all subjects in adulthood were collected. To assess the ability of the different methods in the discrimination of fragile fracture, the odds ratios (OR) calculated using binomial logistic regression analysis and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) were analyzed. Results. Among the 246 postmenopausal women, 170 belonged to the non-fracture group, 50 to the vertebral group, and 26 to the non-vertebral fracture group. MResNet was discriminant for all fragile fractures (OR = 2.64; AUC = 0.74), for Vertebral fracture (OR = 3.02; AUC = 0.77), for non-vertebral fracture (OR = 2.01; AUC = 0.69). MResNet showed comparable performance to that of BMD of hip and lumbar with all types of fractures, and significantly better performance than SOS all types of fractures. Conclusions. the MResNet model based on the ultrasonic RF signal can significantly improve the ability of QUS device to recognize previous fragile fractures. Moreover, the performance of the proposed model modified by age, weight, and height is further optimized. These results open perspectives to evaluate the risk of fragile fracture applying a deep learning model to analyze ultrasonic RF signal