Introduction. Many methods are available for distal anchoring of spine-based and rib-based growing rod systems for early-onset scoliosis. One of these methods, pelvic S-hooks, was initially recommended for patients with spina bifida or for those with severe thoracolumbar curves. No study has yet analysed the clinical and radiographic effects of S-hooks on patients with rib-based instrumentation. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively review the results of S-hook pelvic fixation in patients with rib-based instrumentation. Methods. A multicentre, retrospective study, approved by the institutional review board, was undetaken in all patients treated with rib-based constructs using S-hooks for pelvic fixation. Preoperative and postoperative clinical variables, radiological measurements, and the incidence and management of complications were evaluated in patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Results. 44 patients, 26 of whom were girls, were studied and had a mean age at surgery of 71 months. The most common surgical indication was progressive neuromuscular scoliosis. The average preoperative Cobb angle was 64° and at most recent follow-up (mean 45 months) was 53°. The most common construct was dual rods resting over the iliac crest without suture to the iliac crest extending from T3/T4 ribs to the pelvis using domino connectors. 45% of the patients had complications, of which S-hook migration after the initial procedures was the most common. S-hook migration was corrected at the next lengthening with repositioning of the hook to the iliac crest. No correlation was detected between the complication rates and the clinical, radiographic, and surgical technique variables evaluated. Conclusions. Control of spinal deformities without fusion presents several challenges. S-hooks can migrate off the iliac crest, requiring repositioning of implants during subsequent lengthening. This finding highlights the need to explore different fixation techniques with a stronger attachment to the iliac crest

Aims

It is uncertain whether instrumented spinal fixation in nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis should finish at L5 or be extended to the pelvis. Pelvic fixation has been shown to be associated with up to 30% complication rates, but is regarded by some as the standard for correction of deformity in these conditions. The incidence of failure when comparing the most caudal level of instrumentation, either L5 or the pelvis, using all-pedicle screw instrumentation has not previously been reported. In this retrospective study, we compared nonambulatory patients undergoing surgery at two centres: one that routinely instrumented to L5 and the other to the pelvis.

To describe a modification of the existing technique for C2 translaminar screw fixation that can be used for salvage in difficult cases. Bilateral crossing C2 laminar screws have recently become popular as an alternative technique for C2 fixation. This technique is particularly useful in patients with anomalous anatomy, as a salvage technique where other modes of fixation have failed or as a primary procedure. However, reported disadvantages of this technique include breach of the dorsal lamina and spinal canal, early hardware failure and difficulty in bone graft placement due to the position of the polyaxial screw heads. To address some of these issues, a modified technique is described. In this technique, the upper part of the spinous process of C2 is removed and the entry point of the screw is in the base of this removed spinous process. From October 2008 to March 2009, 6 patients underwent insertion of unilateral translaminar screws using our technique. The indications were: basilar invagination(three cases), C1/C2 fracture (two cases), tumour (one case). Age varied from 22 to 81 years (mean 48 years). All patients had post-operative x-ray and CT scan to assess position of the screws. Mean follow-up was 6 months. The screw position was satisfactory in all patients. There were no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. Our modification enables placement of bone graft on the C2 lamina and is also less likely to cause inadvertent cortical breach. Because of these advantages, it is especially suitable for patients with advanced rheumatoid arthritis with destruction of the lateral masses of C2 or as part of a hybrid construct in patients with unilateral high riding vertebral artery. This technique is not suitable for bilateral translaminar screw placement

We reviewed the outcome of a retrospective case series of eight patients with atlantoaxial instability who had been treated by percutaneous anterior transarticular screw fixation and grafting under image-intensifier guidance between December 2005 and June 2008.

The mean follow-up was 19 months (8 to 27). All eight patients had a solid C1–2 fusion. There were no breakages or displacement of screws. All the patients with pre-operative neck pain had immediate relief from their symptoms or considerable improvement. There were no major complications. Our preliminary clinical results suggest that percutaneous anterior transarticulation screw fixation is technically feasible, safe, useful and minimally invasive when using the appropriate instruments allied to intra-operative image intensification, and by selecting the correct puncture point, angle and depth of insertion.

In a prospective observational study we compared the two-year outcome of lumbar fusion by a simple technique using translaminar screws (n = 57) with a more extensive method using transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and pedicular screw fixation (n = 63) in consecutive patients with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Outcome was assessed using the validated multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index. Blood loss and operating time were significantly lower in the translaminar screw group (p < 0.01). The complication rates were similar in each group (2% to 4%). In all, 91% of the patients returned their questionnaire at two-years. The groups did not differ in Core Outcome Measures Index score reduction, 3.6 (sd 2.5) (translaminar screws) vs 4.0 (sd 2.8) (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) (p = 0.39); ‘good’ global outcomes, 78% (translaminar screws) vs 78% (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) (p = 0.99) or satisfaction with treatment, 82% (translaminar screws) vs 86% (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) (p = 0.52).

The two fusion techniques differed markedly in their extent and the cost of the implants, but were associated with almost identical patient-orientated outcomes.

Extensive three-point stabilisation is not always required to achieve satisfactory patient-orientated results at two years.

We describe the results of a prospective case series of patients with spondylolysis, evaluating a technique of direct stabilisation of the pars interarticularis with a construct that consists of a pair of pedicle screws connected by a U-shaped modular link passing beneath the spinous process. Tightening the link to the screws compresses bone graft in the defect in the pars, providing rigid intrasegmental fixation. We have carried out this procedure on 20 patients aged between nine and 21 years with a defect of the pars at L5, confirmed on CT. The mean age of the patients was 13.9 years (9 to 21). They had a grade I or less spondylolisthesis and no evidence of intervertebral degeneration on MRI. The mean follow-up was four years (2.3 to 7.3). The patients were assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). At the latest follow-up, 18 patients had an excellent clinical outcome, with a significant (p < 0.001) improvement in their ODI and VAS scores. The mean ODI score at final follow-up was 8%. Assessment of the defect by CT showed a rate of union of 80%. There were no complications involving the internal fixation.

The strength of the construct removes the need for post-operative immobilisation.