Aims

To compare the outcomes for trochanteric fractures treated with a sliding hip screw (SHS) or a cephalomedullary nail.

Introduction. To determine if elite athletes can return to professional sport after MCL or posterolateral (PLC) reconstruction using LARS ligaments. The secondary aims are to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of LARS by reporting sport longevity, subsequent surgeries, and complications. Methods. A retrospective review of all extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions, utilising a LARS synthetic ligament, by 3 sports knee surgeons between 2013 and 2020 was undertaken. All elite athletes aged over 16 years and a minimum of 2 years post reconstruction were included. No LARS were used for ACL reconstructions, and they were excluded if a LARS ligament was used for a PCL reconstruction. Return to play (RTP) was defined as competing at professional level or national/ international level in amateur sport. Results. Sixty-four (84.2%) MCL reconstructions and 12 (15.8%) PLC reconstructions were included. 52 (68.4%) underwent concomitant autograft cruciate(s) reconstruction including 6 (7.8%) bicruciate reconstructions. The mean age was 25.1 years (SD +/− 4.50). 35 (46.1%) were footballers and 35 (46.1%) were rugby players. Sixty-seven athletes (88.2%) returned to elite sport, 7 (9.2%) did not RTP and RTP status was unknown for 2 (2.6%) (Figure 1). 65 out of 67 (97.0%) RTP at the same/higher Tegner level. 56 (83.6%) and 20 (57.1%) were still playing at 2- and 5-years post-surgery Six (7.9%) players required further surgery due to irritation from the metal fixation implants. One had an inflammation adjacent to the synthetic material at the femoral end and the other cases involved the tibial staples. All six cases were able to RTP. One athlete, following bicruciate /MCL surgery had the LARS removed due to laxity. There was one MCL re-rupture, sustained while jumping, 4 years after returning to football. Conclusions. Utilising LARS in extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions allows 88.2% of athletes with a variety of knee ligament injuries to return to elite sport. The results compare well regarding RTP, complication, and revision rates with the published evidence for other types of MCL and PLC grafts. This, coupled with 57% of athletes still playing 5 years post-surgery suggests the LARS is safe and effective in these cases. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Aims

Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest.

Aims

Hip fractures in patients < 60 years old currently account for only 3% to 4% of all hip fractures in England, but this proportion is increasing. Little is known about the longer-term patient-reported outcomes in this potentially more active population. The primary aim is to examine patient-reported outcomes following isolated hip fracture in patients aged < 60 years. The secondary aim is to determine an association between outcomes and different types of fracture pattern and/or treatment implants.

Introduction. An important factor in the internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures is the ability to maintain postoperative reduction. Excessive postoperative sliding of the lag screw or blade may result in reduction loss. We retrospectively analyzed the relationship between postoperative reduction and sliding. Methodology. From Oct. 2009 to Sept. 2011, we treated pertrochanteric fractures using J-PFNA (Synthes) and InterTAN (Smith & Nephew) in 91 cases and 82 cases, respectively. We used postoperative radiographs to classify its reduction. Fractures were classified for its interfragmentary contact using the calcar femorale as a reference on the A-P plane while using the anterior cortex as a reference on the M-L plane. Results. PFNA cases showed greater postoperative sliding than InterTAN cases. Both demonstrated greater sliding when the proximal fragment was positioned inside the medullary canal on the M-L plane than when positioned outside or anatomically. Conclusion. Although the InterTAN can maintain greater initial stability necessary for early weight-bearing, both implants demonstrate the loss of interfragmentary contact when the proximal fragment is positioned inside the medullary canal on the M-L plane resulting in greater risk of reduction loss. In order to maintain postoperative reduction, either anatomical reduction or reducing the proximal fragment outside the medullary canal is advised; no matter what type of internal fixation implants are used

Introduction. Debate still exists as to the optimum method of fixation for subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Meta-analysis of studies comparing cephalocondylic nails with extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures have suggested that further investigation is required in this area. We present the outcome of the largest series to date of subtrochanteric fractures treated by both methods and with a minimum of one year follow-up. Methods. 244 patients with a subtrochanteric femur fracture were treated at one centre over a 21 year period were prospectively studied. 75 were treated with an extramedullary fixation implant and 168 with an intramedullary nail. Surviving patients were followed up till one year from injury. Results. The mean age of patients was 74 and 71% were female. Fixation failure requiring revision surgery occurred in 4% of those treated with an extramedullary implant and 6% of those treated with an intramedullary nail, a difference that was not statistically significant. Length of surgery was similar for both operations but transfusion requirements were less for those treated by the intramedullary nail (p<0.0001). No notable differences in other outcomes were found. Discussion. In summary both intramedullary and extramedullary fixation produce comparable outcomes for this fracture

Aims

Dual plating of distal femoral fractures with medial and lateral implants has been performed to improve construct mechanics and alignment, in cases where isolated lateral plating would be insufficient. This may potentially compromise vascularity, paradoxically impairing healing. This study investigates effects of single versus dual plating on distal femoral vascularity.

Hip fracture treatment strategies continue to evolve with the goal of restoring hip fracture victims to Pre-injury Functional levels. Strategies for improved treatment have focused on fracture exposure, reduction, provisional fixation and definitive fixation with implant designs optimised for fracture union with minimal implant failure as originally proposed by Lambotte. Multiple implant designs have been conceived based on perceived inadequacies of previous generational designs. To better understand this evolutionary process, it is necessary to review the predecessors of modern fracture treatment and understand their design concepts and results. It is interesting that the modern era of surgical treatment of hip fractures actually began in 1902, when Dr Royal Whitman advocated the necessity of a closed reduction of adult hip fractures under general anesthesia and stabilisation by hip spica cast. Dr Whitman predicted the evolution of stabilisation by internal fixation and commented on this in his 1932 JBJS editorial emphasising the importance of surgical treatment of fractures. Dr Smith-Peterson, also from New York, in 1925 developed the 1st commercially successful hip implant, a tri–flanged nail. These first surgeries were performed with an open reduction, through a Smith-Petersen approach without radiographic control. This nail device was rapidly modified in the 1930's to permit insertion over a guide wire with a radiographic controlled insertion technique, a minimally invasive procedure. Nail penetration and implant failure in pertrochanteric fractures led to the rapid development of side-plates and a refocus on reduction stability. This led to a period of primary corrective osteotomies for enhanced stability, but fell out of failure after the sliding hip screw concept took hold. Originally conceived by Godoy-Moreira and Pohl independently in the 1940s, it became rapidly accepted as a method to avoid nail penetration and implant failure, unfortunately at the expense of accepting malunion and collapse of the fracture. Even the importance of rotational stability was discarded as insignificant by Holt in 1963. The concept of reduction of the Antero-Medial cortex was forgotten in favour of the Tip-apex distance as the only important variable in reduction to avoid implant cut-out. The concept of malunion of pertrochanteric fractures was simply deleted from consideration with disregard for the possible association of impaired functional recovery. Several recent papers that improved functional recovery is possible when these new implants are coupled with successful reduction strategies. Further studies are needed to identify the correct choice of implant for the appropriate fracture configuration, which may lead to a revision of our current fracture classification systems and our concepts of stability

Introduction. The combined incubation of a composite scaffold with bone marrow stromal cells in a perfusion bioreactor could make up a novel hybrid graft material with optimal properties for early fixation of implant to bone. The aim of this study was to create a bioreactor activated graft (BAG) material, which could induce early implant fixation similar to that of allograft. Two porous scaffold materials incubated with cells in a perfusion bioreactor were tested in this study. Methods and Materials. Two groups of 8 skeletally mature female sheep were anaesthetized before aspiration of bone marrow from the iliac crest. For both groups, mononuclear cells were isolated, and injected into a perfusion bioreactor (Millenium Biologix AG, Switzerland). Scaffold granules Ø∼900–1500 μm, ∼88% porosity) in group 1, consisted of hydroxyapatite (HA, 70%) with -tricalcium-phosphate (−TCP, 30%) (Danish Technological Institute, Denmark). The granules were coated with poly-lactic acid (PLA) 12%, in order to increase the mechanical strength of the material (Phusis, France). Scaffold granules Ø∼900–1400 μm, 80% porosity) in group 2 consisted of pure HA/-TCP (Fin Ceramica, Italy). For both groups, cells were incubated in the bioreactor for 2 weeks. Fresh culture medium supplemented with dexamethasone and ascorbic-acid was added every third or fourth day. Porous titanium alloy implants with diameter=length=10mm (Biomet, USA) were inserted bilaterally in each of the distal femurs of the sheep; thus 4 implants in each sheep. The concentric gap (2 mm) surrounding the implant was filled with 1) BAG (autogenous), 2) granules, 3) granules+bone marrow aspirate (BMA, autologous) or 4) allograft. The sheep were euthanized after 6 weeks. Distal femurs were removed and implant-bone samples were divided in two parts. The superficial part was used for mechanical testing and micro-CT scanning, and the profound part for histomorphometry. Push-out tests were performed on an 858 Bionix MTS hydraulic materials testing machine. Shear mechanical properties between implant and newly generated bone were calculated to assess implant fixation. Results were assessed by One-way ANOVA. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results. One sheep in group 1 had to be euthanized after 4 weeks (excluded). One implant in each group was loosened and could not undergo push-out test (excluded). Group 1: No significant differences regarding failure energy (kJ/m2, p=0.44) or ultimate shear strength (MPa, p=0.17) could be seen. Shear stiffness (MPa) was significantly higher for the allograft group (p=0.04). Group 2: No significant differences regarding failure energy (p=0.11) or shear stiffness (p=0.52) could be seen. Ultimate shear strength was significantly higher for allograft (p=0.04). Results from μ-CT scanning and histomorphometry are pending. Discussion and Conclusion. The present study shows a possible effect of bioreactor activated bone substitute on early implant fixation. We are currently working on bone microarchitecture surrounding implant and histomorphometry. These results will aid in determining if BAG could make up a promising alternative for allograft as bone graft material

In the time since Letournel popularised the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures, more than 25 years ago, there have been many changes within the field, related to patients, surgical technique, implants and post-operative care. However, the long-term outcomes appear largely unchanged. Does this represent stasis or have the advances been mitigated by other negative factors? In this article we have attempted to document the recent changes within the surgery of patients with a fracture involving the acetabulum, outline contemporary management, and identify the major problem areas where further research is most needed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1125–31

Objectives

The PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial has recently demonstrated that surgery is non-superior to non-operative treatment in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures. The objective of this study was to assess current surgical practice in the context of the PROFHER trial in terms of patient demographics, injury characteristics and the nature of the surgical treatment.

Introduction

The objective of this study was to determine if a synthetic bone substitute would provide results similar to bone from osteoporotic femoral heads during in vitro testing with orthopaedic implants. If the synthetic material could produce results similar to those of the osteoporotic bone, it could reduce or eliminate the need for testing of implants on bone.

Objectives

Osteochondral injuries, if not treated adequately, often lead to severe osteoarthritis. Possible treatment options include refixation of the fragment or replacement therapies such as Pridie drilling, microfracture or osteochondral grafts, all of which have certain disadvantages. Only refixation of the fragment can produce a smooth and resilient joint surface. The aim of this study was the evaluation of an ultrasound-activated bioresorbable pin for the refixation of osteochondral fragments under physiological conditions.

Objectives

The use of two implants to manage concomitant ipsilateral femoral shaft and proximal femoral fractures has been indicated, but no studies address the relationship of dynamic hip screw (DHS) side plate screws and the intramedullary nail where failure might occur after union. This study compares different implant configurations in order to investigate bridging the gap between the distal DHS and tip of the intramedullary nail.

There have been recent reports linking alendronate and a specific pattern of subtrochanteric insufficiency fracture. We performed a retrospective review of all subtrochanteric fractures admitted to our institution between 2001 and 2007. There were 20 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 12 of whom were on long-term alendronate. Alendronate-associated fractures tend to be bilateral (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.018), have unique radiological features (p < 0.0005), be associated radiologically with a pre-existing ellipsoid thickening of the lateral femoral cortex and are likely to be preceded by prodromal pain. Biomechanical investigations did not suggest overt metabolic bone disease. Only one patient on alendronate had osteoporosis prior to the start of therapy. We used these findings to develop a management protocol to optimise fracture healing. We also advocate careful surveillance in individuals at-risk, and present our experience with screening and prophylactic fixation in selected patients.