Abstract. Purpose The aim of this study was investigate the relationship between version and torsional abnormalities of the acetabulum, femur and tibia in patients with symptomatic FAI. Methods A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using the EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. Original research articles evaluating the described version and torsional parameters in FAI were included. The MINORS criteria was used to appraise study quality and risk of bias. Mean version and torsion values were displayed using forest plot and the estimated proportion of hips displaying abnormalities in version/torsion were calculated. Results. A total of 1206 articles were identified from the initial search, with 43 articles, involving 8,861 hips, meeting the inclusion criteria. All studies evaluating femoral or acetabular version in FAI reported ‘normal’ mean version values (10. 0. to 25. 0. ). However, distribution analysis revealed that an estimated 31% and 51% of patients with FAI displayed abnormal central acetabular and femoral version respectively. Conclusion. Up to 51% of patients presenting with symptomatic FAI show an abnormal femoral version, whilst up to 31% demonstrate abnormal acetabular version. This high percentage of version abnormalities highlights the importance of evaluating these parameters routinely during assessment of patients with FAI, in order to guide clinical decision making

Introduction. Patellofemoral pain and instability can be quantified by using the tibial tuberosity to trochlea groove (TT-TG) distance with more than or equal to 20mm considered pathological requiring surgical correction. Aim of this study is to determine if knee joint rotation angle is predictive of a pathological TT-TG. Methods. One hundred limbs were imaged from the pelvis to the foot using Computer Tomography (CT) scans in 50 patients with patellofemoral pain and instability. The TT-TG distance, femoral version, tibial torsion and knee joint rotation angle ((KJRA) were measured. Limbs were separated into pathological and non-pathological TT-TG. Significant differences in the measured angles between the pathological and non-pathological groups were estimated using the t test. The inter- and intraobserver variability of the measurement was performed. Logistic regression analysis was used to find the best combination of rotational angle predictors for a pathological TT-TG. Results. The intraclass correlation coefficients for inter- and intraobserver variability of the measured parameters was higher than 0.94 for all measurements. A statistically significant difference (P=0.024) was found between the KJRA between the pathological (mean=10.6, SD=7.79 degrees) and the non-pathological group (mean=6.99, SD=5.06 degrees). Logistic regression analysis showed that both femoral version (P=0.03, OR = 0.95) and KJRA (P=0.004, OR=1.15) were, in combination, significant predictors of an abnormal TT-TG. Tibial torsion was not a significant predictor. Conclusion. The KJRA can be used as an alternative measurement when the TT-TG distance cannot be measured as in cases of severe trochlea dysplasia and may act as a surrogate for pathological TT-TG

Malpositioning of the trochanteric entry point during the introduction of an intramedullary nail may cause iatrogenic fracture or malreduction. Although the optimal point of insertion in the coronal plane has been well described, positioning in the sagittal plane is poorly defined.

The paired femora from 374 cadavers were placed both in the anatomical position and in internal rotation to neutralise femoral anteversion. A marker was placed at the apparent apex of the greater trochanter, and the lateral and anterior offsets from the axis of the femoral shaft were measured on anteroposterior and lateral photographs. Greater trochanteric morphology and trochanteric overhang were graded.

The mean anterior offset of the apex of the trochanter relative to the axis of the femoral shaft was 5.1 mm (sd 4.0) and 4.6 mm (sd 4.2) for the anatomical and neutralised positions, respectively. The mean lateral offset of the apex was 7.1 mm (sd 4.6) and 6.4 mm (sd 4.6), respectively.

Placement of the entry position at the apex of the greater trochanter in the anteroposterior view does not reliably centre an intramedullary nail in the sagittal plane. Based on our findings, the site of insertion should be about 5 mm posterior to the apex of the trochanter to allow for its anterior offset.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1274–81.

Dislocation remains a major concern after total hip replacement, and is often attributed to malposition of the components. The optimum position for placement of the components remains uncertain. We have attempted to identify a relatively safe zone in which movement of the hip will occur without impingement, even if one component is positioned incorrectly. A three-dimensional computer model was designed to simulate impingement and used to examine 125 combinations of positioning of the components in order to allow maximum movement without impingement. Increase in acetabular and/or femoral anteversion allowed greater internal rotation before impingement occurred, but decreases the amount of external rotation. A decrease in abduction of the acetabular components increased internal rotation while decreasing external rotation. Although some correction for malposition was allowable on the opposite side of the joint, extreme degrees could not be corrected because of bony impingement.

We introduce the concept of combined component position, in which anteversion and abduction of the acetabular component, along with femoral anteversion, are all defined as critical elements for stability.