Background. The femoral head center shift on reduction time in total hip arthroplasty (THA) causes alteration of the muscle tension around the hip joint. Many studies about the shift of the femoral head in the cranio-caudal direction or medio-lateral direction on coronal plane have been reported. It has been known widely that the shift on these directions influence tension of the abductor muscle around the hip joint. Nevertheless few studies about the three-dimensional shift including the antero-posterior direction have been reported. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the three-dimensional shift of the femoral head center in THA using three-dimensional THA templating software. Subjects & Methods. The subjects of this study were 156 primary THA cases of 143 patients. Using CT-based three-dimensional THA templating software ZedHip® (LEXI, Tokyo Japan), simulation of optimal implantation was performed on each THA case. On case which has over anteverted or less anteverted femoral neck, a stem which has modular neck system was selected to adjust anteversion of the femoral neck. The three-dimensional shift of the femoral head center on reduction time was calculated with ZedHip®. The three-dimensional shift was resolve into cranio-caudal, medio-lateral and antero-posterior direction (Fig. 1). Furthermore the correlation between the amount of the shift and hip joint deformity was investigated. Results. The average amount of the shift on cranio-caudal direction was 9.9mm to caudal side, on medio-lateral direction was 3.1mm to medial side and on antero-posterior direction was 2.6mm to posterior side. The average total amount of three-dimensional shift was 12.9mm (Fig. 2). On Crowe type 1 hips in 88 cases, the average shift to posterior side was 3.2mm, on Crowe type 2 in 20 cases was 3.7mm and on Crowe type 3 in 13 cases was 4.0mm. Among them there was no significant difference (Fig. 3). Conclusion. At THA surgery, the femoral head center shifted three-dimensionally and the maximum amount of shift on antero-posterior direction was 16.6mm to posterior side. There was no correlation between these amounts of the shift on antero-posterior direction and anatomical deformity of the hip joint. It is important to understand the shift of the femoral head center for predicting the alteration of muscle tension around the hip joint. The shift on antero-posterior direction influences the tension of iliopsoas muscle and there is a possibility that the shift to posterior side causes anterior iliopsoas impingement after THA surgery

Aims. Hip arthroplasty aims to accurately recreate joint biomechanics. Considerable attention has been paid to vertical and horizontal offset, but femoral head centre in the anteroposterior (AP) plane has received little attention. This study investigates the accuracy of restoration of joint centre of rotation in the AP plane. Methods. Postoperative CT scans of 40 patients who underwent unilateral uncemented total hip arthroplasty were analyzed. Anteroposterior offset (APO) and femoral anteversion were measured on both the operated and non-operated sides. Sagittal tilt of the femoral stem was also measured. APO measured on axial slices was defined as the perpendicular distance between a line drawn from the anterior most point of the proximal femur (anterior reference line) to the centre of the femoral head. The anterior reference line was made parallel to the posterior condylar axis of the knee to correct for rotation. Results. Overall, 26/40 hips had a centre of rotation displaced posteriorly compared to the contralateral hip, increasing to 33/40 once corrected for sagittal tilt, with a mean posterior displacement of 7 mm. Linear regression analysis indicated that stem anteversion needed to be increased by 10.8° to recreate the head centre in the AP plane. Merely matching the native version would result in a 12 mm posterior displacement. Conclusion. This study demonstrates the significant incidence of posterior displacement of the head centre in uncemented hip arthroplasty. Effects of such displacement include a reduction in impingement free range of motion, potential alterations in muscle force vectors and lever arms, and impaired proprioception due to muscle fibre reorientation. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(3):180–188

Purpose: Localisation of the femoral head is essential during total knee arthroplasty for assessing the overall alignment of the leg. The purpose of this study is to describe and report the accuracy a clinical method of estimating the centre of the femoral head. Method: A line is drawn joining the anterior superior iliac spine and the pubic tubercle on the patient lying supine on the operating table. The point where femoral artery crosses this line is estimated. The Femoral head centre is marked 1.5 cm lateral to this point. This point was marked with an ECG electrode which has a radiopaque and prominent centre that is easily felt through the drapes. A radiograph was then made with the tube at 1 metre from the plate and centred over the hip marker. The error in the hip marker placement is measured as the transverse mm (corrected for magnification) of the marker from the centre of the head, which is located on the radiograph using a template of concentric. The potential angle of error in coronal alignment of the associated knee replacement is calculated trigonometrically from femoral and tibial lengths. Patients: The study group was comprised of 73 consecutive patients (100 knees) who underwent primary Total knee replacement. There were 36 males and 37 females. Results: The average error was 8 mm (Range 0–30 mm). It was lateral to the femoral head in 47 patients and medial in 53 patients. The error was significantly greater in female patients (7mm:10mm, p < .05). The calculated potential error in coronal alignment was < 20 in 84% of patients and < 30 in 99% of the knees. Conclusion: This is a clinically useful method of locating the centre of the femoral head for surgeons who find + 3 degrees of error in coronal alignment acceptable. For those striving for greater accuracy a preoperative hip marked radiograph may be more helpful

Introduction

Alignment and positioning of implants is important in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Identifying the femoral hip center (FHC) without fluoroscopy or computer navigation is considered difficult. The Complete Compass system (CoCo) is a femoral extramedullary guidance system designed to identify the FHC. This apparatus provides an accurate representation of the femoral functional axis in the coronal plane without a computer navigation system. We compared postoperative implant alignment of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty between CoCo and intraoperative computer navigation.

Summary Statement

Corin has developed bone conserving prosthesis (MiniHip™) to better replicate the physiological load distribution in the femur. This study assessed whether the MiniHip™ prosthesis can better match the pre-osteoarthritic head centre for patient demographics when compared to contemporary long stem devices.

Introduction:

Leg length and offset discrepancy resulting from Total Hip Replacement (THR) is a major cause of concern for the orthopaedic community. The inability to substitute the proximal portion of the native femur with a device that suitably mimics the pre-operative offset and head height can lead to loss of abductor power, instability, lower back pain and the need for orthodoses (1). Contemporary devices are manufactured based on predicate studies (2–4) to cater for the variations within the patient demographic. Stem variants, modular necks and heads are often provided to meet this requirement. The number of components and instruments that manufacturers are prepared to supply however is limited by cost and an unwillingness to introduce unnecessary complexity. This can restrict their ability to achieve the pre-osteoarthritic head centre for all patient morphologies. Corin has developed bone conserving prosthesis (MiniHip™) to better replicate the physiological load distribution in the femur. This study assesses whether the MiniHip™ prosthesis can better match the pre-osteoarthritic head centre for patient demographics when compared to contemporary long stem devices.

Restoration of leg length and offset is an important goal in total hip replacement. This paper reports a calliper-based technique to help achieve these goals by restoring the location of the centre of the femoral head. This was validated first by using a co-ordinate measuring machine to see how closely the calliper technique could record and restore the centre of the femoral head when simulating hip replacement on Sawbone femur, and secondly by using CT in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Results from the co-ordinate measuring machine showed that the centre of the femoral head was predicted by the calliper to within 4.3 mm for offset (mean 1.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 2.8)) and 2.4 mm for vertical height (mean -0.6 (95% CI -1.4 to 0.2)). The CT scans showed that offset and vertical height were restored to within 8 mm (mean -1 (95% CI -2.1 to 0.6)) and -14 mm (mean 4 (95% CI 1.8 to 4.3)), respectively.

Accurate assessment and restoration of the centre of the femoral head is feasible with a calliper. It is quick, inexpensive, simple to use and can be applied to any design of femoral component.

Aims. Refobacin Bone Cement R and Palacos R + G bone cement were introduced to replace the original cement Refobacin Palacos R in 2005. Both cements were assumed to behave in a biomechanically similar fashion to the original cement. The primary aim of this study was to compare the migration of a polished triple-tapered femoral stem fixed with either Refobacin Bone Cement R or Palacos R + G bone cement. Repeated radiostereometric analysis was used to measure migration of the femoral head centre. The secondary aims were evaluation of cement mantle, stem positioning, and patient-reported outcome measures. Methods. Overall, 75 patients were included in the study and 71 were available at two years postoperatively. Prior to surgery, they were randomized to one of the three combinations studied: Palacos cement with use of the Optivac mixing system, Refobacin with use of the Optivac system, and Refobacin with use of the Optipac system. Cemented MS30 stems and cemented Exceed acetabular components were used in all hips. Postoperative radiographs were used to assess the quality of the cement mantle according to Barrack et al, and the position and migration of the femoral stem. Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, Forgotten Joint Score, and University of California, Los Angeles Activity Scale were collected. Results. Median distal migration (y-axis) at two years for the Refobacin-Optivac system was -0.79 mm (-2.01 to -0.09), for the Refobacin-Optipac system was -0.75 mm (-2.16 to 0.20), and for the Palacos-Optivac system was -1.01 mm (-4.31 to -0.29). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups. Secondary outcomes did not differ statistically between the groups at the two-year follow-up. Conclusion. At two years, we found no significant differences in distal migration or clinical outcomes between the three groups. Our data indicate that Refobacin Bone Cement R and Palacos R + G are comparable in terms of stable fixation and early clinical outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5):435–441

Aims. Although the Fitmore Hip Stem has been on the market for almost 15 years, it is still not well documented in randomized controlled trials. This study compares the Fitmore stem with the CementLeSs (CLS) in several different clinical and radiological aspects. The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in outcome between stems. Methods. In total, 44 patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis were recruited from the outpatient clinic at a single tertiary orthopaedic centre. The patients were operated with bilateral one-stage total hip arthroplasty. The most painful hip was randomized to either Fitmore or CLS femoral component; the second hip was operated with the femoral component not used on the first side. Patients were evaluated at three and six months and at one, two, and five years postoperatively with patient-reported outcome measures, radiostereometric analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and conventional radiography. A total of 39 patients attended the follow-up visit at two years (primary outcome) and 35 patients at five years. The primary outcome was which hip the patient considered to have the best function at two years. Results. At two and five years, more patients considered the hip with the CLS femoral component as superior but without a statistically significant difference. There were no differences in clinical outcome, magnitude of femoral component migration, or change of bone mineral density at five years. At three months, the Fitmore femoral component had subsided a median -0.71 mm (interquartile range (IQR) -1.67 to -0.20) and the CLS femoral component -0.70 mm (IQR -1.53 to -0.17; p = 0.742). In both groups the femoral head centre had migrated posteriorly (Fitmore -0.17 mm (IQR -0.98 to -0.04) and CLS -0.23 mm (IQR -0.87 to 0.07; p = 0.936)). After three months neither of the femoral components showed much further migration. During the first postoperative year, one Fitmore femoral component was revised due to aseptic loosening. Conclusion. Up to five years, we found no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the Fitmore and the CLS femoral components. The slightly worse outcomes, including one revised hip because of loosening, speaks against the hypothesis that the Fitmore femoral component should be advantageous compared to the CLS if more patients had been recruited to this study. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(5):306–314

Introduction. Conventional hip radiographs allow surgeons, during preoperative planning, to make important decisions. Size and location of implants are routinely measured by overlaying schematics of the implanted components onto preoperative radiographs. Most currently available planning tools are in two-dimensions (2D), using X-ray images and 2D templates of the implants. Determination of the ideal component size requires two radiographic views of the femur: the anterior-posterior (AP) and the lateral direction. The surgeon uses this information to determine component sizes. Even though this approach has been used for many years leading to very good results, this manual process potentially carries multiple shortcomings. The biggest issue with the AP X-ray image is the fact that it is 2D in nature while the measurement's objective is to obtain three-dimensional (3D) parameters. Objective. The objective of this study is to derive a methodology to automatically select correct THA implant sizes while keeping the anatomical center of each specific patient within a forward solution model (FSM) that predicts post-operative outcomes. Methods. The femoral components in our process contain five parameters: stem length, neck offset, neck length, neck shaft angle, and component width. There are many steps to measure the morphologic parameters of a femoral component. (1)Preparation of training implant database, (2)defining multi-plane intersection, (3)determining circumcircles for all intersected femoral component contours, (4)finding centers and radii of circumcircles, (5)measuring distances from each circumcircle to the femoral component head center, and (6)determining the stem shaft axis. The FSM fits specific femoral canal using a 3D mesh model of the femur. The femoral component and canal morphology of a femur model are compared to the training femoral component database. For each femoral component morphology, the algorithm determines how far distally the femoral component fits within the canal before collision between the stem and cortical bone. Once the defined position is confirmed, the relative distance from the anatomical femoral head center to the femoral component head center is calculated. This process is repeated for all femoral component morphology. The best fitting femoral component is determined when the distance from its head center to the femoral head center is minimized, Figure 1. Results. Three intensive validation tools have been developed: (1) cross-sectional analysis, (2) slice analysis, and (3) contact map analysis. Cross-sectional analysis is a graphic interaction program where users can freely view the anatomy at any orientation, Figure 2. The slice analysis enhances the user visualization by providing a static view of the fit between chosen femoral component and femoral canal, Figure 3. Finally, the contact map analysis allows for visualization of contact area through the bone-stem interface. Conclusion and Discussion. This is a powerful tool with the FSM that allows surgeons to get a “best fit” implant in 3D, based on canal fit and distance from anatomical femoral head center. Surgeons may want to manually size up or down, but the program will pick best fit sizes based on anatomical morphology. Future iterations will consider the reaming depth each surgeon uses to improve implant selection for each surgeon's technique. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Unknown femur orientation during X-ray imaging may cause inaccurate radiographic measurements. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of 3D femur orientation during radiographic imaging on the measurement of greater trochanter to femoral head centre (GT-FHC) distance. Three-dimensional femoral shapes (n=100) of unknown gender were generated using a statistical shape model based on a training data of 47 CT segmented femora. Rotations in the range of 0° internal to 50° external and 50° of flexion to 0° of extension (at 10 degree increments) were applied to each femur. A ray tracing algorithm was then used to create 2D images representing radiographs of the femora in known 3D orientations. The GT-FHC distance was then measured automatically by identifying the femoral head, shaft axis and tip of greater trochanter. Uniaxial rotations had little impact on the measurement with mean absolute error of 0.6 mm and 3.1 mm for 50° for pure external rotation and 50° pure flexion, respectively. Combined flexion and external rotation yielded more significant errors with 10° around each axis introducing a mean error of 3.6 mm and 20° showing an average error of 8.8 mm (Figure 1.). In the cohort we studied, when the femur was in neutral orientation, the tip of greater trochanter was never below the femoral head centre. Greater trochanter to femoral head centre measurement was insensitive to rotations around a single axis (i.e. flexion or external rotation). Modest combined rotations caused the tip of greater trochanter to appear more distal in 2D and led to deviation from the true value. This study suggests that a radiograph with the greater trochanter appearing below femoral head centre may have been acquired with 3D rotation of the femur. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly by clicking on ‘Info & Metrics’ above to access author contact details

Aims. The localization of necrotic areas has been reported to impact the prognosis and treatment strategy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Anteroposterior localization of the necrotic area after a femoral neck fracture (FNF) has not been properly investigated. We hypothesize that the change of the weight loading direction on the femoral head due to residual posterior tilt caused by malunited FNF may affect the location of ONFH. We investigate the relationship between the posterior tilt angle (PTA) and anteroposterior localization of osteonecrosis using lateral hip radiographs. Methods. Patients aged younger than 55 years diagnosed with ONFH after FNF were retrospectively reviewed. Overall, 65 hips (38 males and 27 females; mean age 32.6 years (SD 12.2)) met the inclusion criteria. Patients with stage 1 or 4 ONFH, as per the Association Research Circulation Osseous classification, were excluded. The ratios of anterior and posterior viable areas and necrotic areas of the femoral head to the articular surface were calculated by setting the femoral head centre as the reference point. The PTA was measured using Palm’s method. The association between the PTA and viable or necrotic areas of the femoral head was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis (median PTA 6.0° (interquartile range 3 to 11.5)). Results. We identified a negative correlation between PTA and anterior viable areas (rho −0.477; p = 0.001), and no correlation between PTA and necrotic (rho 0.229; p = 0.067) or posterior viable areas (rho 0.204; p = 0.132). Conclusion. Our results suggest that residual posterior tilt after FNF could affect the anteroposterior localization of necrosis. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(5):394–400

Introduction. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis relies primarily on image-based analyses. X-ray, CT, and MRI can be used to evaluate various features associated with OA including joint space narrowing, deformity, articular cartilage integrity, and other joint parameters. While effective, these exams are costly, may expose the patient to ionizing radiation, and are often conducted under passive, non-weightbearing conditions. A supplemental form of analysis utilizing vibroarthrographic (VAG) signals provides an alternative that is safer and more cost-effective for the patient. The objective of this study is to correlate the kinematic patterns of normal, diseased (pre-operative), and implanted (post-operative) hip subjects to their VAG signals that were collected and to more specifically, determine if a correlation exists between femoral head center displacement and vibration signal features. Methods. Of the 28 hips that were evaluated, 10 were normal, 10 were diseased, and 8 were implanted. To collect the VAG signal from each subject, two uniaxial accelerometers were placed on bony landmarks near the joint; one was placed on the greater trochanter of the femur and the other along the anterior edge of the iliac crest. The subjects performed a single cycle gait (stance and swing phase) activity under fluoroscopic surveillance. The CAD models of the implanted components were supplied by the sponsoring company while the subject bone models were created from CT scans. 3D-to-2D registration was conducted on subject fluoroscopic images to obtain kinematics, contact area, and femoral center head displacement. The VAG signals were trimmed to time, passed with a denoise filter and wavelet decomposition. Results. When comparing the femoral head displacement to the vibration signals with respect to the normal hips, insignificant magnitudes of vibration were present (0.05 volts). For the diseased hips, greater magnitudes were seen (0.2 volts). For the implanted subjects, the overall vibration features were small (0.05 volts) much like the signals from the normal hips except for spikes that correlated to features within the gait cycle. Therefore, grinding sounds were heard from the degenerative hips, but not present for the normal or implanted hips in this study. Discussion. In regards to the normal hip subjects, the lesser magnitude of volts correlated well with the kinematic results showing no separation of the femoral head center (1 mm). For the diseased hips, the instances of greater feature quantity occurred at moments where the subjects experienced higher values of head center displacement (1 mm). These subjects also had an overall increase in average voltage magnitude likely due to the loss of cartilage about the articulating surface resulting in a rougher surface for the accelerometers to record. For the implanted subjects, due to no head center displacement and a smoother surface for joint articulation, the vibration signals were smaller than the diseased case but showed better correlation with features within the gait cycle. No exact quantification has been determined between separation and accelerometer voltage output, further studies and testing will need to be carried out in order to reach such a conclusion. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Since 1989 we have been using custom lateral-flare stems. Using this stem, its lateral flare can produce high proximal fit and less fit in distal part. Applying this automatic designing software to the average femoral geometries, we can make off the shelf high proximal fit stem (Revelation ®). Putting the off the shelf stem, the original center of the femoral heads were well reproduced. But in DDH cases, severe deformities around hip sometimes make complicated difficulty for better functional reconstruction. They are high hip center such as Crowe II-IV, shortening of the femoral neck, high anteversion etc. DDH cases are well known to have higher anteversion than non DDH cases. There would be no definite explanations for it. The high anteversion would not always be harmful for the preoperative patients. But in some cases, osteophytes are observed at posterior side of the femoral head which make another sphere with different centre. We can guess that the patient's biomechanics had not been matched with the original anteversion. Then posterior osteophytes can correct inappropriate anteversion (self-reduction.) (Fig.1) In those patients, reduction of the anteversion by putting stems twisted into the canal or using modular stems are sometimes done by the surgeons' decision. Younger DDH cases can also be treated with THA, because of the complicated deformities or biomechanical disorders. Short stems are expected to reduce operative invasion and stress shielding then can reserve bone quality and quantity. From these point of view to improve the understanding of the characteristics of the DDH anteversion, and design a DDH oriented short stem could be one of good solution for those cases. Method. For the better understanding of the high anteversion 57 femora (mean anteversion: 34.4 deg.) were analyzed slice by slice. The direction of femoral head centre, lesser trochanter (LTR), linea aspera (aspera) just below LTR, aspera in the middle of the femur and aspera between the last 2 sections. All of the directions were assessed from PC line. To clarify the meaning of the head osteophytes, 35 operated cases were analyzed the extent of the head osteophytes. According to the results, a DDH oriented short stem was designed. Results. Even with the different anteversion, femoral head centres and LTRs were located within limited angle (51.4 +/−7.9 deg.) But aspera just below the LTR had no relation to the LTR direction, but always kept within limited angle (102.0 +/− 4.5) to the PC line. This means that DDH cases have proximal femurs of normal shape. But they are only twisted around the level just below the LTR. From this result, stems for DDH cases can have the same shape with normal stem inside the canal. The posterior osteophytes had reduced 4.6+/− 3.0 degree in average independently to the extent of anteversion. There was no tendency that higher anteversion cases have higher self-reduction angle. the stems were give the same shape inside the canal with stems for non DDH cases but its femoral head center was located with 5 degrees less anteversion

This study aimed to assess the effect of flexion and external rotation on measurement of femoral offset (FO), greater trochanter to femoral head centre (GT-FHC) distance, and neck shaft angle (NSA). Three-dimensional femoral shapes (n=100) were generated by statistical shape modelling from 47 CT-segmented right femora. Combined rotations in the range of 0–50° external and 0–50° flexion (in 10° increments) were applied to each femur after they were neutralised (defined as neck and proximal shaft axis parallel with detector plane). Each shape was projected to create 2D images representing radiographs of the proximal femora. As already known, external rotation resulted in a significant error in measuring FO but flexion alone had no impact. Individually, neither flexion nor external rotation had any impact on GT-FHC but, for example, 30° of flexion combined with 50°of external rotation resulted in an 18.6mm change in height. NSA averaged 125° in neutral with external rotation resulting in a moderate increase and flexion on its own a moderate decrease. However, 50° degrees of both produced an almost 30 degree increase in NSA. In conclusion, although the relationship between external rotation and FO is appreciated, the impact of flexion with external rotation is not. This combination results in apparent reduced FO, a high femoral head centre and an increased NSA. Femoral components with NSAs of 130° or 135° may historically have been based on X-ray misinterpretation. This work demonstrates that 2D to 3D reconstruction of the proximal femur in pre-op planning is a challenge

The condylopatellar notch (CPN) represents the border between the patellofemoral articulation and the tibiofemoral articulation [Pao, 2001]. This could be a valuable landmark for establishing the boundaries of unicompartmental knee replacements. Its location on the distal femur has been described radiographically, but it has not, to our knowledge, been quantified with respect to anatomic landmarks [Hoffelner, 2015]. This study seeks to leverage a large database of computed tomography (CT) scans to quantify the location of the CPN with respect to well established anatomic landmarks of the knee. The analysis presented here used the custom CT based program SOMA (SOMA V.4.3.3, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ). SOMA contains a large database of 3D models created from CT scans. Anatomic analysis and implant fitting tools were also integrated into SOMA to perform morphometric analyses. 986 healthy distal femurs were analyzed. A coordinate system was established from the femoral head center, the intercondylar notch, and a morphological flexion axis (MFA). The MFA was created by iteratively fitting circles to the posterior condyles and creating and axis through the circles' centers. The sagittal plane was created normal to this axis and through the notch. A plane was created from the femoral head center and the flexion axis. A coronal plane was created from this plane and a point on the anterior cortex sulcus. Points were placed on a template bone model in the medial and lateral extents of the surface depressions of both the medial and lateral aspect of the CPN, where the depression of the CPN is most distinct. These points were then mapped to each of the 986 femoral specimens via a shape correspondence model. A line is created between the pairs of points representing the medial and lateral CPN's. The coordinates of the points are measured with respect to sagittal and coronal planes (Figure 1). Means and standard deviations of the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) coordinates of the CPN points are calculated. The mean coordinates for the lateral CPN line are (4.8±1.6, −33.6±6.8) and (29.1±5.4, −18.7±4.8). The mean coordinates for the lateral CPN are (−20.7±3.8, −2.2±4.4) and (−6.5±1.6, −29.7±3.2). The means with error bars representing two standard deviations are plotted on a scatter plot (Figure 2). Boxes representing the location of the CPN line for 95% of the population are included on the plots. Until now, the location of this anatomic feature of the knee has not been quantified with respect to known anatomical landmarks. The location of the CPN could serve as a valuable landmark for determining the border between the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral articulations. This data can be used to locate the CPN and inform the planning and design of compartmental knee replacements. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA) [Van der List, 2015; Dy, 2011]. Some indications for revision include mechanical failure, patellar mal-tracking, implant malalignment, disease progression and persistent pain or stiffness [Dy, 2011; Turktas, 2015]. Implant mal-positioning can lead to decreased patient satisfaction and increased revision rates [Turktas, 2015]. Morphological variability may increase the likelihood of implant mal-positioning. This study quantifies the morphological variability of the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) aspects of the patellofemoral compartment using a database of computed tomography (CT) scans. The analysis presented here used the custom CT based program SOMA (SOMA V.4.3.3, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ). SOMA contains a large database of 3D models created from CT scans. Anatomic analysis and implant fitting tools are also integrated into SOMA to perform morphometric analyses. A coordinate system is established from the femoral head center, the intercondylar notch, and a morphological flexion axis (MFA). The MFA is created by iteratively fitting circles to the posterior condyles and creating and axis through the circles' centers. The sagittal plane is created normal to this axis and through the notch. A coronal plane is created from the femoral head center and the flexion axis. The AP measurement is taken normal to the coronal plane from the anterior cortex sulcus to the intercondylar notch (Figure 1). A 5°-flexed anterior resection is created to run-out at the anterior cortex sulcus. The ML measurement is taken normal to the sagittal plane from the most medial to the most lateral points of the anterior resection (Figure 1). The ML measurements are broken down into medial and lateral components divided by a sagittal plane through the trochlea. Means and standard deviations of the AP and ML measurements are calculated. The mean and standard deviation for the AP measurement are 24.9mm and 2.8mm, respectively. The data predicts that 99.7% of the population will have an AP measurement between 16.5mm and 33.3mm. The mean and standard deviation for the ML measurement are 54.6 mm and 5.5mm, respectively. The data predicts that 99.7% of the population will have an ML measurement between 38.1mm and 71.1mm A Pearson Correlation value of 0.134 was calculated for AP/ML indicating a very weak positive correlation between the measures. The correlation value and the large measurement ranges indicate that there is high variability between the AP and ML measurements. A scatterplot was created to graphically represent the high variability between the AP and ML width measurements (Figure 2). A Pearson Correlation value of −0.649 was calculated for the medial and lateral components of ML (Figure 3). The results of this study suggest that patellofemoral morphology is highly variable with respect to the AP and ML dimensions. This variability may impact implant fit and positioning and should be taken into consideration in the design and use of prostheses for PFA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Several studies have reported the assessment of the femoral head coverage on plane radiograph and CT data in supine position, though young patients with the dysplastic hip often have symptoms during activities such as standing, walking, and running. On the other hand, some investigators have used a method of CT which allows standardization of the femoral head coverage against an anterior pelvic plane based on the anterior superior iliac spines and the pubic tubercle. We believe both the weight-bearing position and the standardized position to be more relevant for diagnosis and preoperative surgical assessment. So, we show the femoral head coverage in standardized position using 3D-CT method and in weight-bearing position using the plane radiograph and the three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system before and after Curved periacetabular osteotomy (CPO). Especially the covered volume of the femoral head, a new concept, using the three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system which differs from the affected area and is measured by the ratio of the covered area in the medial part of the line connecting the anterior point of the acetabulum with the posterior to the femoral head area in each axial slice, superior slices than the slice passing through the femoral head center, obtained from the reproduced 3D model of the pelvis and the femur in standing position allows us to integrate various measurements reported by past researchers. We studied the consecutive 16 patients treated with CPO. In standardized position the sagittal sectional angles on the slice passing through the femoral head center using 3D-CT method gave us how the anterior, lateral, and posterior coverage was lack compared with normal subjects and whether the adequate transfer of the rotated fragment was performed after operation. The covered volume of the femoral head decides generally the deficiency or the adequateness. In standing position, though the pelvic tilt changes, the femoral head coverage on plane radiograph, representation by the CE angle, the VCA angle, AHI and ARO, was significantly improved, and the covered volume of the femoral head was significantly improved from 25.7% preoperatively to 51.1% postoperatively. Our study showed the improvement of the femoral head coverage, including the covered volume of the femoral head as a new concept, after CPO in weight-bearing and standardized position. The morphological and functional assessment of the femoral head coverage on both pre- and post-CPO should be performed because we can obtain the objective information in standardized position and the femoral head coverage in standing position is closely connected with the pain

Introduction: Leg length and offset restoration are known to improve function after total hip arthroplasty, and to minimize the risk of dislocation and limp. Anatomic data of the hip are needed to determine specifications for prosthesis design that restore patient hip anatomy more closely. Furthermore, femoral off-set values calculated on X-Rays may be inaccurate in case of external rotational contracture or high femoral ante-version. The goal of this study was to determine three-dimensional morphological data of the hip in case of primary osteoarthritis, especially for femoral off-set. Material and Method: 223 hips with primary osteoarthritis have been analysed using a CT-scan and a specific software (HIP-PLAN. ®. ) that allows image post-processing for re-orienting the pelvis or the femur to a standardized orientation. Femoral and acetabular anteversions were measured. The planar (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) values of femoral offset were determined. 3D values were measured as the distance between the femoral head centre and the diaphyseal femur axis; 2D values were calculated as the projection of this distance on the frontal plan. Results: Measurements precision was good with correlation scores ranging between 0.91 and 0.99. Mean acetabular anteversion angle was 26° +/−6.6° when measured in the Anterior Pelvic Plane and 21.9° +/−6.6° in the frontal plane according to the method of Murray. Mean femoral anteversion was 21.9° +/−9.4 according to the method of Murphy. The Sum of acetabular and femoral anteversion was found to be out of the safe zone regarding dislocation risk in 47% of patients. Mean 3D femoral off-set was found to be 42.2 mm+/− 5, significantly increased by 3.5 mm +/− 2.5 when compared to the 2D femoral off-set values. Femoral off-set was above 45mm in 31% of cases and higher than 50 mm in 12% of cases. The tip of the great trochanter was located higher than the femoral head centre, at a mean distance of about 9 mm. Discussion: When measured on X-rays, femoral off-set may be significantly under-estimated. This error is probably due to the external rotational contracture of the hip induced by osteoarthritis. If the implants are positioned using the anatomical preoperative anteversion angles, 47% of patients would not be in the safe zone regarding posterior dislocation risk. Conclusions: Planar measurement using X-Rays underestimates significantly the femoral off-set. Neck and head modularity may be useful to achieve simultaneous restoration of femoral off-set and leg length in 12 to 31% of cases

Introduction: Patellofemoral complications are one of the major causes for revision surgery. In the prosthetic knee, the main determinant within the patellofemoral mechanism is said to be the design of the groove (Kulkarni et al., 2000). Other studies characterising the native trochlear groove used indirect methods such as photography, plain radiographs and measurements using probes and micrometer. The aim of this study was to define the 3-dimensional geometry of the femoral trochlear groove. We used CT scans to describe the geometry of the trochlear groove and its relationship to the tibiofemoral joint in terms of angles and distances. Materials and Methods: CT scans of 45 normal femurs were analysed using custom designed imaging software. This enabled us to convert the scans to 3D and measure distances and angles. The flexion axis of the tibiofemoral joint was found to be a line connecting the centres of the spheres fitted to posterior femoral condyles. These two centres and the femoral head centre form a frame of reference for reproducible femoral alignment. The trochlear geometry was defined by fitting circles to cross sectional images and spheres to 3D surfaces. Axes were constructed through these centres. The deepest points on the trochlear groove were identified using quad images and Hounsfield units. After aligning the femur using different axes, the location of the groove was examined in relation to the mid plane between the centres of flexion of the condyles. Results: The deepest points on the trochlear groove can be fitted to a circle with a radius of 23mm (S.D. 4mm) and an R.M.S error of 0.3mm. The groove is positioned laterally (especially in its mid portion) in relation to the femoral mechanical and anatomical axes. It was also lateral to the perpendicular bisect of the transcondylar axes. After aligning the anatomical axis in screen the trochlear groove can be described on average to be linear with less than 2 mm medial/lateral translation. In the sagital view, the centre of the circle is offset by 21mm (S.D.3mm) at an angle of 67° (S.D. 7°) from a line connecting the midpoint between the centres of the femoral condyles and the femoral head centre. On either end of this line, the articular surface of the trochlea can be fitted to spheres of radius 30mm (S.D. 6mm) laterally and 27mm (S.D. 5mm) medially, with an rms of 0.4mm. Discussion: The location and configuration of the inter-condylar groove of the distal femur is clinically significant in the mechanics and pathomechanics of the patellofemoral articulation. This investigation has allowed us to characterise the trochlear groove. This can be of use in planning and performing joint reconstruction and have implications for the design of patello-femoral replacements and the rules governing their position