Recently, there is ongoing evidence regarding rapid recovery after orthopaedic surgery, with advantages for the patient relative to post operative pain, complications and functional recovery. The aim of this study is to present our experience in rapid recovery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the last 2 years.

Retrospective study of 36 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, (age range 11 to 18 years) treated with spinal thoraco-lumbar posterior fusion with rapid post-operative recovery, compared with a similar group, treated with traditional protocol.

We found a statistically significant difference in terms of length-of-stay, patient-controlled-analgesia and use of oppioid and post operative blood transfusions. There was no difference in post operative infection rate.

Our experience shows better functional recovery, satisfactory controlled analgesia and reduction in costs of hospitalization with the use of ERAS protocols.

Introduction: Physical activity is a major outcome in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and discharge criterion. Increasing immediate post-op activity may accelerate discharge, enable fast track surgery and improve general rehabilitation. Preliminary evidence (O'Halloran P.D. et al. 2015) shows that feedback via motivational interviewing can result in clinically meaningful improvements of physical activity. It was the aim of this study to use wearable sensor activity monitors to provide and study the effect of biofeedback on THA patients' activity levels. It was hypothesized that biofeedback would increase in-hospital and post-discharge activity versus controls. Methods: In this pilot study, 18 patients with osteoarthritis receiving elective primary THA followed by a rapid recovery protocol with discharge on day 3 after surgery (day 0) were randomized to the feedback group (n=9, M/F: 4:5, age 63.3 ± 5.9 years, BMI 26.9 ± 5.1) or a non-feedback control group (n=9, M/F: 0:9, age 66.9 ± 5.1 years, BMI 27.1 ± 4.0). Physical activity was measured using a wearable sensor and parameters (Time-on-Feet (ToF), steps, sit-stand-transfers (SST), mean cadence (steps/min)) were calculated using a previously validated algorithms (Matlab). For the in-hospital period data was calculated twice daily (am, ca. 8–13:00h and pm, ca. 13–20:00h) of day 1 (D1) and 2 (D2). The feedback group had parameters reported back twice (morning, lunch) using bar charts comparing visually and numerically their values (without motivational instructions) to a previously measured reference group (n=40, age 71 ±7 years, M:F 16:24) of a conventional discharge protocol (day 4/5). Activity measures continued from discharge (D3) until day 5 (D5) at home. Results: Randomization resulted in matched groups regarding age and BMI, but not gender. The first post-op activity assessment (D1am) was identical between groups. Also thereafter similar values with no significant differences in any parameter were seen, e.g. the time-on-feet at D2PM was 59.2 ±31.7min (feedback) versus 62.9 ±39.2min (controls). Also on the day of discharge and beyond, no effect from the in-hospital feedback was measured. For both groups the course of activity recovery showed a distinct drop on day 4 following a highly active day of discharge (D3). On day 5, activity levels only recovered partially. For both groups, all quantitative activity parameters were significantly higher than the reference values used for feedback. Only cadence as a qualitative measure was the same like reference values. Discussion: Biofeedback using activity values from a body-worn monitor did not increase in-hospital or immediate post-op home activity levels compared to a control group when using the investigated feedback protocol. In general, while the day of discharge steeply boosts patient activity, the day after at home results in an activity drop to near in-patient levels before discharge. In a fast track surgery protocol, it may be of value to avoid this drop via patient education or home physiotherapy. Biofeedback using activity monitors to increase immediate post-op activity for fast track surgery or improved recovery may only be effective when feedback goals are set higher, are personalised or have additional motivational context

Frail patients with neck of femur fracture, amongst other medical problems, are frequently fast-tracked to orthopaedic wards to meet government A&E waiting time targets. This is a second cycle of audit since 2008 examining the safety of fast-tracking following individual critical incidents. Data was collected prospectively between March and June 2011 by the first on-call orthopaedic doctor. 56 patients (12 male), average age 81.2y (50–97) were fast tracked. 52 were correctly referred as intra/extracapsular fracture, however 4 did not have a neck of femur fracture. 9 patients were transferred with no verbal referral to the receiving orthopaedic doctor. On arrival to the ward, 8 patients were found to have abnormal observations and acute medical problems requiring immediate review from the physicians. There were a total of 150 omissions from a total of 456 points from the fast track protocol. Vital observations of patients fast-tracked after 2100h were worse (MEWS range 0 to 11) when compared with those fast-tracked prior to 2100h (MEWS range 0 to 3). This occurs at a time when medical staff support is minimal. Fast-tracking is a common practice amongst many district-general and some teaching hospitals in Scotland. These data support concerns from orthopaedic surgeons highlighting a need for more complete initial assessment and management in A&E prior to transfer to the ward. Recent evidence suggests medical optimisation of the multiple acute and chronic medical comorbidities common amongst patients with neck of femur fracture is the main facilitator of early surgery which significantly reduces post-operative mortality