We present the histological findings of an
Aims. Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) facilitates surgical exposure and protects the extensor mechanism during revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of bony union, complications, and reoperations following TTO during rTKA, to assess the functional outcomes of rTKA with TTO at two years’ minimum follow-up, and to identify the risk factors of failure. Methods. Between January 2010 and September 2020, 695 rTKAs were performed and data were entered into a prospective database. Inclusion criteria were rTKAs with concomitant TTO, without
Disruption of the extensor mechanism in total
knee arthroplasty may occur by tubercle avulsion, patellar or quadriceps
tendon rupture, or patella fracture, and whether occurring intra-operatively
or post-operatively can be difficult to manage and is associated
with a significant rate of failure and associated complications.
This surgery is frequently performed in compromised tissues, and
repairs must frequently be protected with cerclage wiring and/or
augmentation with local tendon (semi-tendinosis, gracilis) which
may also be used to treat soft-tissue loss in the face of chronic
disruption. Quadriceps rupture may be treated with conservative
therapy if the patient retains active extension. Component loosening
or loss of active extension of 20° or greater are clear indications
for surgical treatment of patellar fracture. Acute patellar tendon
disruption may be treated by primary repair. Chronic extensor failure
is often complicated by tissue loss and retraction can be treated
with medial gastrocnemius flaps, achilles tendon
Obtaining solid implant fixation is crucial in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) to avoid aseptic loosening, a major reason for re-revision. This study aims to validate a novel grading system that quantifies implant fixation across three anatomical zones (epiphysis, metaphysis, diaphysis). Based on pre-, intra-, and postoperative assessments, the novel grading system allocates a quantitative score (0, 0.5, or 1 point) for the quality of fixation achieved in each anatomical zone. The criteria used by the algorithm to assign the score include the bone quality, the size of the bone defect, and the type of fixation used. A consecutive cohort of 245 patients undergoing rTKA from 2012 to 2018 were evaluated using the current novel scoring system and followed prospectively. In addition, 100 first-time revision cases were assessed radiologically from the original cohort and graded by three observers to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the novel radiological grading system.Aims
Methods
Although the vast majority of patients that undergo
total knee replacement have satisfactory outcomes with a generally
low complication rate, occasionally a patient will be encountered
that has had multiple failed surgeries, and now reaches a crossroad
as to whether limb salvage will be acceptable or not. Cite this article:
