Aim:. An assessment of the relationship between pathological Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) and Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV). Introduction:. Traditional UK guidelines consider abnormalities of the foot to be a risk factor for DDH. 1,2. Currently, there is controversy whether congenital foot abnormalities are true risk factors for pathological DDH. 3,4. There is a relationship between CTCV and hip dysplasia though the relationship between CTEV and pathological DDH is less clear. 5. In a previous 11 year prospective longitudinal study no case of Graf Types III, IV or irreducible hip dislocation were associated with CTEV. 5. Subsequent correspondence and case histories have challenged this view. 6. Methods:. In order to clarify this issue, a 20-year prospective longitudinal observational study was undertaken. All cases of fixed CTEV (Harold & Walker types 1 to 3) referred to the sub-regional Paediatric Orthopaedic clinic at the Royal Blackburn Hospital were evaluated, the feet and hips clinically assessed (Ortolani & Barlow manoeuvres) and the hips ultra-sounded by the senior author (RWP). Modified Graf and Harcke hip ultrasound classification systems were employed. Graf Type III, IV and irreducible hip dislocation were considered pathological. Results:. The incidence of CTEV was 1.46 per 1000 live births (nationally quoted incidence of 1 to 2 per 1000 live births. 7. ). There was one case of Graf Type III dysplasia with no cases of clinical hip instability. Currently, the clinical significance of this type of dysplasia is uncertain. There were no cases of Graf Type IV dislocations or radiological irreducible hip dislocation. Conclusion:. Fixed CTEV should not be considered as a risk factor for pathological DDH and routine sonographic hip screening of CTEV should not be advocated. This is supportive evidence for the current English NIPE guidelines in which the only risk factors screened are family history and breech presentation. Level of evidence: II

Aim. Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV) has been excluded from the standards set by the NHS fetal anomaly screening programme (NHS FASP) for the 18. +0. –20. +6. week fetal ultrasound scan (USS). Whilst adhering to NHS FASP guidelines, the antenatal ultrasound department at our centre performs “incidental screening” for CTEV; parents are informed if CTEV is noted incidentally during the scan and referral made to the fetal medicine department. Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of incidental antenatal screening for structural CTEV. Method. The database of the antenatal ultrasound department was interrogated for all suspected cases of CTEV on the 18. +0. –20. +6. week USS, between August 2006 and June 2012. Terminations, stillbirths and outside referrals were excluded. Our Ponseti-service database was searched to identify all patients treated for structural CTEV between January 2007 and November 2012. Cases were excluded if the mother did not receive antenatal-care at our centre. Results from the two searches were cross-referenced, and statistical analysis performed. Results. 30077 18. +0. –20. +6. week USS were performed on 24282 patients, with CTEV diagnosed in 74 patients. After exclusions, there were 39 patients. 54 patients were treated for structural CTEV with 37 patients (54 feet, CTEV-incidence 0.001) after exclusions; 25 (67.5%) diagnosed pre-natally (15 unilateral, 10 bilateral), and 12 (32.5%) diagnosed post-natally (5 unilateral, 7 bilateral). Sensitivity of screening for CTEV was 67.5%, specificity 99.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) 64.1% and negative predictive value 99.9%. The proportion of cases detected antenatally has reduced since introduction of NHS-FASP. Conclusion. This data is important and necessary to comprehensively counsel our patients. We are unable to find similar contemporary data from other units within the NHS for comparison. NHS-FASP guidelines seem to have reduced the efficacy of antenatal detection of CTEV at our unit, and further prospective study is required to determine the value of screening for patients

Aim

Kite manipulation and casting for congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) was noted to require a subsequent posteromedial release (PMR) in almost all of the children treated, with variable outcomes including overcorrection and stiffness. Introduction of the Ponseti serial manipulation and casting technique dramatically reduced the need for PMR. This study assesses the medium term outcomes in these two treatment groups.

Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV) is one of the most common congenital limb deformities. We reviewed the records of infants who had received treatment for structural CTEV between 1 January 2007 and 30 November 2012. This was cross-referenced with the prenatal scans of mothers over a corresponding period of time. We investigated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the fetal anomaly scan for the detection of CTEV and explored whether the publication of Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme guidelines in 2010 affected the rate of detection. During the study period there were 95 532 prenatal scans and 34 373 live births at our hospital. A total of 37 fetuses with findings suggestive of CTEV were included in the study, of whom 30 were found to have structural CTEV at birth. The sensitivity of screening for CTEV was 71.4% and the positive predictive value was 81.1%. The negative predictive value and specificity were more than 99.5%. There was no significant difference between the rates of detection before and after publication of the guidelines (p = 0.5). We conclude that a prenatal fetal anomaly ultrasound screening diagnosis of CTEV has a good positive predictive value enabling prenatal counselling. The change in screening guidance has not affected the proportion of missed cases. This information will aid counselling parents about the effectiveness and accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in diagnosing CTEV. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:984–8

Most children with spastic hemiplegia have high levels of function and independence but fixed deformities and gait abnormalities are common. The classification proposed by Winters et al is widely used to interpret hemiplegic gait patterns and plan intervention. However, this classification is based on sagittal kinematics and fails to consider important abnormalities in the transverse plane. Using three-dimensional gait analysis, we studied the incidence of transverse-plane deformity and gait abnormality in 17 children with group IV hemiplegia according to Winters et al before and after multilevel orthopaedic surgery.

We found that internal rotation of the hip and pelvic retraction were consistent abnormalities of gait in group-IV hemiplegia. A programme of multilevel surgery resulted in predictable improvement in gait and posture, including pelvic retraction. In group IV hemiplegia pelvic retraction appeared in part to be a compensating mechanism to control foot progression in the presence of medial femoral torsion. Correction of this torsion can improve gait symmetry and function.