Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in unilateral Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis (SUFE) persists as a source of debate with the majority of surgeons selecting this option in a proportion of patients whom they regard as at increased risk of a subsequent slip. Universal prophylactic pinning was introduced in our region in 2005 after an audit of ten years local practice identified 25% of unilateral cases presented with a subsequent slip. This study reports our experience between 2005 and 2020. In this prospective study, 44 patients presented with 55 affected hips compared with 60 patients with 67 affected hips in the original study. Two patients were excluded as their initial slip had not been treated in our unit. Of the 42 hips seven were bilateral, 34 of the 35 unilateral hips underwent prophylactic pinning. The one exception subsequently underwent prophylactic pinning due to developing pain. Consistent with our original series, at a minimum follow up of 13 months there have been no complications of infection, fracture, chondrolysis or avascular necrosis subsequent to prophylactic pinning. Over 25 years 70 patients have undergone prophylactic pinning without complication. On the premise that 25% of our unpinned hips presented with subsequent slips before instituting our policy we estimate that we have prevented 17 subsequent slips over 25 years including the consequences which can be significant. We continue to advocate universal prophylactic pinning as an effective and safe practice in the management of SUFE

Historically avoidance of avascular necrosis (AVN) has been the primary objective in the management of an acute unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE). When achieved through pinning in situ it was invariably associated with significant malunion. With increasing appreciation of the consequences of femoroacetabular impingement, modern techniques aim to correct deformity and avoid AVN.

Exactly what constitutes an acute unstable SUFE is a source of debate but should represent 5–10% of all cases.

This audit reviewed cases over the past 25 years treated in one region. Of 89 patients with 113 slips, 21 hips were recorded as unstable. During this period the management has evolved from closed reduction and stabilization through pinning in situ, to open reduction.

Radiographic outcomes following these three treatment methods were compared with record of any subsequent surgery in the form of osteotomy or total hip arthroplasty.

Currently the lowest reported incidence of AVN in patients with an acute unstable slip is associated with the Parsch technique which combines open arthrotomy, digital reduction and screw fixation. Early outcomes with this technique are in accordance with those reported in the literature and represents a significant improvement in outcome when compared to earlier techniques used in the management of the severe unstable SUFE.

Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in cases of unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains contentious. Our senior author reported a 10 year series in 2006 that identified a rate of subsequent contralateral slip of 25percnt; when prophylactic fixation was not performed. This led to a change in local practice and employment of prophylactic fixation as standard. We report the 10 year outcomes following this change in practice.

A prospective study of all patients who presented with diagnosis of SCFE between 2004 and 2014 in our region. Intra-operative complication and post-operative complication were the primary outcomes. 31 patients presented during the study period: 16 male patients and 15 female patients. The mean age was 12.16 (8–16, SD 2.07). 25 patients had stable SCFE and 5 had unstable SCFE. Stability was uncertain in 1 patient. 25 patients had unilateral SCFE and 6 had bilateral SCFE. 24 patients who had unilateral SUFE had contralateral pinning performed. 1 unilateral SCFE did not have contralateral pinning performed as there was partial fusion of physis on contralateral side.

In the hips fixed prophylactically there was 1 cases of transient intraoperative screw penetration into the joint and 1 case of minor wound dehiscence. There were no cases or chondrolysis or AVN. There were no further contralateral slips. This change in practice has been adopted with minimal complication. The fixation of the contralateral side is not without risk but by adopting this model the risk of subsequent slip has been reduced from 25percnt; to 0percnt;.

The initial management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) can determine the occurrence of longterm disability due to complications. Previous surveys have concentrated on orthopaedic surgeons with a specialist paediatric interest. In many units in Scotland, the initial responsibility for management may be an admitting trauma surgeon with a different subspecialty interest.

All Orthopaedic surgeons in Scotland participating in acute admitting were invited to complete a web based survey to ascertain current practice in the initial management of adolescents presenting with SUFE.

92/144 (64%) of surgeons approached responded. When faced with a severe stable slip, 53% of respondents were happy to pin in situ, whilst 47% would refer either to a colleague or specialist paediatric unit. With an unstable slip of similar magnitude, 38% would self-treat, 18% refer to a colleague and 44% refer to a paediatric orthopaedic unit. Of those treating, 58% stated their treatment was selected irrespective of timing of presentation. 79% of respondents had treated 5 or less cases in the preceding 5 years with 7% more than 10 cases. Universal prophylactic pinning was supported in 29%, selective in 62% and never in 9%.

The responses obtained confirm the variance in management of SUFE that exists amidst acute admitting units in Scotland. Management of a stable slip is uncontroversial except possibly in severe cases. This contrasts with the acute unstable slip, in which various factors are thought to influence the outcome, such as instability and the issue of timing, which are not universally appreciated.

Twenty-three patients with thirty hips of slipped capital femoral epiphysis were treated in our department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore between 1997 and 2005. Except one patient lost of follow-up, twenty-four SCFEs with more than 2 years (25 to 73 months, average 38.5 months) follow-up were reviewed. This study is to evaluate the effectiveness and outcome of our protocol: Russell traction followed by gentle manipulative reduction with a single screw fixation & spica cast immobilization (for acute-on-chronic cases with unstable and reducible SCFE). In this series, there were 13 boys & 5 girls, mean age 12 year old ranging from 10 to 14 years. Among them 7 were Chinese, 6 Malays & 5 Indians. There were 12 unilateral cases (8 on the left & 4 right, 67%) & 6 bilateral cases (33%), including 2 patients found contralateral SCFE subsequently 1 year postoperatively. Acute-on-chronic SCFE were 16 & chronic SCFE 8. 16 were Grate I & 8 Grate II. Russell traction was on preoperatively with an average of 6 days. Gentle manipulative reduction under general anesthesia was performed in 20 SCFEs (12 GI & 8 GII) and 17 of them were successful. Fixation with a single screw was used for all cases except one hip with 2 screws. Average follow-up was 38.5 months. Good results achieved. All patient were symptom free with good function. No complications of AVN, chondrolysis, screw loosening and reslipping of the affective hips. Our protocol of management for SCFE has been largely successful in term of manipulative reduction and fixation.

Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in the treatment of slipped upper femoral epiphysis has been shown to be safer than continued observation of the contralateral hip. This treatment remains controversial due to the potential for harm caused to an apparently unaffected hip. There is evidence that pinning of an already slipped epiphysis causes growth disturbance of the proximal femur, however Hagglund showed that there is not necessarily growth arrest at the physis after pinning, as the slip occurs at the hypertrophic layer of the growth plate with no damage to the germative layer. This was confirmed by Guzzanti who confirmed that a single screw provided epiphyseal stability and preserved potential for growth. We conducted a pilot study to determine whether prophylactic pinning affects subsequent growth of the unaffected hip.

In order to determine the effect of prophylactic pinning we compared radiographs skeletally mature patients who had either undergone the procedure (group 1), not undergone the procedure but had pinning of the affected side (group 2), and adults with no history of SUFE (group 3). We measured the articulo-trochanteric distance and calculated the ratio of the trochanteric-trochanteric distance to articulo-trochanteric distance. These measures have been used in previous studies and shown to be reliable indicators of disturbed proximal femoral growth. As this was a pilot study we recruited 8 to each group.

The absolute sum of the ATDs were 219mm (average 27.3mm) Group 1, 213mm (average 26.6mm) Group2 and 258mm (average 32.5mm). The average trochanter-trochanter: ATD ratio in group 1 was 2.7 (1.9 - 3.8) compared to 2.7 (2.3 - 3.2) and 2.3 (1.9 - 2.7) in groups 2 and 3 respectively.

Our results suggest no difference in subsequent growth between hips that are prophylactically pinned and those that are not. They also show that unpinned hips go on to grow abnormally when compared to normal hips suggesting perhaps sub-clinical SUFE.

These results have prompted expansion of the study to include much a higher number of patients.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysiolysis (SCFE) is a rare condition with a unknown aetiopathogenesis. An early diagnosis and treatment is essential to minimize premature degeneration of the joint. The authors reviewed the cases treated between 1980 and 2005 in our institution. This study was aimed at evaluating patients with hip epiphysiolysis surgically treated by canullated screws or pinning and previously controlled by short-term follow-up, in order to evaluate radiographic medium/ long term evolution, looking for evidence of degenerative arthritis or femoroacetabular impingement.

We performed a retrospective review of the clinical notes and radiographs of all patients with slipped upper femoral epiphysis who were surgically treated at our institution between January 1980 and December 2005. These patients performed radiographs to detect evidence of osteonecrosis, chondrolysis, degenerative arthritis or femoroacetabular impingment. To grade the radiological osteoarthritic changes the grading system of Kellgren and Lawrence was used. These changes were correlated with the existence of femoroacetabular impingement. The radiological results were correlated with the Loder'sclassification of stability and the morphological classification.

43 patients were reviewed, corresponding to 47 treated hips. AP and Lowenstein x-ray views were taken in all patients. The alfa angle and the head-shaft angle were measured in the Lowenstein view (frog-leg).

Of 16 patients with impingement only 1 patient didn't present pistol grip deformity. 4 contralateral hips also presented the deformity. The mean alfa angle was 99,4.

43% of the patients with unstable hips have impingment. In stable hips this percentage is of 35%.

The Patrick test was positive in 30% of the hips with SCFE and only 17% of the unafected hips. The Kellgren and Lawrence scale was very diferent between trhe SCFE and control groups, with 43% grade 2, 17% grade 3 and 6% grade 4, versus 30% grade 2, 6% grade 3 and 0% grade 4.

Some patients show bilateral pistol grip deformity and clinical signs of impingment, despite only having one hip with SCFE