The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis (megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs). This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018.Aims
Methods
Sixty eight consecutive patients underwent proximal humeral replacement with a fixed fulcrum massive endoprosthesis for tumour between 1997 and 2007. The mean age was 46 years (7-87). Ten patients were lost to follow up and 16 patients died. The 42 surviving patients were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) Score and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). The mean MSTS score was 72.3 % and the mean TESS was 77.2 %. Four of 42 patients received a new constrained humeral liner to reduce the risk of dislocation. This sub group of 4 patients had a mean MSTS score of 77.7 % and a mean TESS of 80.0%. Endoprosthetic replacement for tumour of the proximal humerus using this prosthesis is a reliable operation yielding good functional results without the documented problems of unconstrained prostheses. The performance of this prosthesis is expected to improve further with the new constrained humeral liner.
Primary bone tumours of the distal radius are rare, while it remains the third commonest site for primary lesions and recurrences of Giant Cell Tumours (GCT). The functional demands on the hand make reconstruction of the wrist joint following the excision of distal radius, particularly challenging. A single-centre retrospective study, reporting the functional and oncological outcomes of six patients (4 males, 2 females - mean age of 53 (22 to 79)) who underwent a custom-made endoprosthetic replacement of the distal radius with arthrodesis at our institution, during 1999 - 2010. Five patients were diagnosed with primary bone sarcoma of the distal radius (4 GCTs, 1 osteosarcoma) and another had a metastatic lesion from a primary renal cell carcinoma. The diagnosis was confirmed by needle biopsy in all cases. We assessed the patients' functional outcomes using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society scoring system (MSTS) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS).Introduction
Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome, complications and survival of the three most commonly used surgical reconstructions of the proximal humerus in adult patients after trans-articular tumour resection. Between1985 and 2005 thirty-eight consecutive proximal humeral reconstructions using either, allograft-prosthesis composite (n=10), osteoarticular allograft (n=13) or a modular tumour prosthesis (n=14), were performed in our clinic. Their mean follow-up was ten years (nine months to 25 years). Of these, twenty-seven were disease free at latest follow-up (Mean follow-up 16.8 years) and ten had died of disease (4.2 years). Complications and implant survival with revision surgery as end-point are presented for the total group of patients, functional scores for surviving patients only. The endoprosthetic group presented the smallest complication rate of 21%, compared to 40% in the allograftprosthesis- composite and 62% in the osteoarticular allograft group. Only one revision was performed in the endoprosthetic group, in a case of shoulder instability. Infection after revision (n=3), pseudoarthrosis (n=2), fracture of the allograft (n=3), and shoulder instability (n=4) were major complications of allograft use in general. Kaplan-Meier-analysis showed a significantly better implant survival for the endoprosthetic group (log-rank p=0.002). At final follow-up the MusculoSkeletal Tumour Society scores averaged at; 72% for the allograft-prosthetic-composite (n=7, mean follow-up 19 years), 76% for the osteoarticular allograft (n=3, 16 years), and 77% for the endoprosthetic reconstruction (n=10, 6 years) groups.Method
Results
Several methods have been used for proximal humeral reconstruction following tumour resection. None of these modalities allow the patient to regain his normal shoulder range of motion. Moreover, every modality has its advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of 2 reconstructive modalities that we are using in our institution for proximal humeral reconstruction; endoprosthesis and shoulder arthrodesis using a vascularised autograft This study included 48 patients diagnosed with malignant or benign aggressive tumours that required resection of their proximal humerus. They were divided into 2 groups according to the method of reconstruction. Group 1 included 22 patients with an average age of 20 years were reconstructed by shoulder arthrodesis using a free vascularised fibular graft (6) or a pedicled scapular crest graft (16). Group 2 included 26 patients with an average age of 26 years were reconstructed with an endoprosthesis. In group 1 the average follow up period was 88 months (range 12 to 184 months). The average functional outcome (according to the MSTS scoring system) was 25 points (range 19 – 28). The average abduction and forward flexion range of motion (scapulothoracic) was 40 degrees (range 20 -60). Complications included failed fixation (2), non union (1), infection (1) and temporary radial nerve palsy (2). In group 2 the average follow up period was 36 months (range 12 – 110). The average functional outcome was 24 points (range 20 – 27). The average abduction and forward flexion range of motion was 40 (range 30 –70). Complications included sublaxation (2), loosening (1) and infection (1). Reconstruction of the proximal humerus by arthrodesis or endoprosthesis yield similar functional outcome. Although endoprosthesis is a much more expensive modality, it does not provide any superior functional outcome over shoulder arthrodesis.
Instability of the hip is the most common mode of failure after
reconstruction with a proximal femoral arthroplasty (PFA) using
an endoprosthesis after excision of a tumour. Small studies report
improved stability with capsular repair of the hip and other techniques,
but these have not been investigated in a large series of patients.
The aim of this study was to evaluate variables associated with
the patient and the operation that affect post-operative stability.
We hypothesised an association between capsular repair and stability. In a retrospective cohort study, we identified 527 adult patients
who were treated with a PFA for tumours. Our data included demographics,
the pathological diagnosis, the amount of resection of the abductor
muscles, the techniques of reconstruction and the characteristics
of the implant. We used regression analysis to compare patients
with and without post-operative instability.Aims
Patients and Methods
We aimed to examine the long-term mechanical survivorship, describe the modes of all-cause failure, and identify risk factors for mechanical failure of all-polyethylene tibial components in endoprosthetic reconstruction. This is a retrospective database review of consecutive endoprosthetic reconstructions performed for oncological indications between 1980 and 2019. Patients with all-polyethylene tibial components were isolated and analyzed for revision for mechanical failure. Outcomes included survival of the all-polyethylene tibial component, revision surgery categorized according to the Henderson Failure Mode Classification, and complications and functional outcome, as assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score at the final follow-up.Aims
Methods
Aseptic loosening is a major cause of failure in cemented endoprosthetic reconstructions. This paper presents the long-term outcomes of a custom-designed cross-pin fixation construct designed to minimize rotational stress and subsequent aseptic loosening in selected patients. The paper will also examine the long-term survivorship and modes of failure when using this technique. A review of 658 consecutive, prospectively collected cemented endoprosthetic reconstructions for oncological diagnoses at a single centre between 1980 and 2017 was performed. A total of 51 patients were identified with 56 endoprosthetic implants with cross-pin fixation, 21 of which were implanted following primary resection of tumour. Locations included distal femoral (n = 36), proximal femoral (n = 7), intercalary (n = 6), proximal humeral (n = 3), proximal tibial (n = 3), and distal humeral (n = 1).Aims
Patients and Methods
The use of a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis in the management
of primary bone tumours in children is well established. However,
the efficacy of such a prosthesis in those requiring a revision
procedure has yet to be established. The aim of this series was
to present our results using extendable prostheses for the revision
of previous endoprostheses. All patients who had a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis inserted
at the time of a revision procedure were identified from our database.
A total of 21 patients (seven female patients, 14 male) with a mean
age of 20.4 years (10 to 41) at the time of revision were included.
The indications for revision were mechanical failure, trauma or infection
with a residual leg-length discrepancy. The mean follow-up was 70
months (17 to 128). The mean shortening prior to revision was 44 mm
(10 to 100). Lengthening was performed in all but one patient with
a mean lengthening of 51 mm (5 to 140).Aims
Patients and Methods
Following the resection of an extensive amount of bone in the
treatment of a tumour, the residual segment may be insufficient
to accept a standard length intramedullary cemented stem. Short-stemmed
endoprostheses conceivably have an increased risk of aseptic loosening.
Extra-cortical plates have been added to minimise this risk by supplementing
fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate the survivorship
of short-stemmed endoprostheses and extra-cortical plates. The study involved 37 patients who underwent limb salvage surgery
for a primary neoplasm of bone between 1998 and 2013. Endoprosthetic
replacement involved the proximal humerus in nine, the proximal
femur in nine, the distal femur in 13 and the proximal tibia in
six patients. There were 12 primary (32%) and 25 revision procedures (68%).
Implant survivorship was compared with matched controls. The amount
of bone that was resected was >
70% of its length and statistically
greater than the standard control group at each anatomical site.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aims of this retrospective study were to report the feasibility
of using 3D-printing technology for patients with a pelvic tumour
who underwent reconstruction. A total of 35 patients underwent resection of a pelvic tumour
and reconstruction using 3D-printed endoprostheses between September
2013 and December 2015. According to Enneking’s classification of
bone defects, there were three Type I lesions, 12 Type II+III lesions,
five Type I+II lesions, two Type I+II+III lesions, ten type I+II+IV
lesions and three type I+II+III+IV lesions. A total of three patients
underwent reconstruction using an iliac prosthesis, 12 using a standard
hemipelvic prosthesis and 20 using a screw-rod connected hemipelvic
prosthesis.Aims
Patients and Methods
Massive endoprostheses rely on extra-cortical bone bridging (ECBB)
to enhance fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate the
role of selective laser sintered (SLS) porous collars in augmenting
the osseointegration of these prostheses. The two novel designs of porous SLS collars, one with small pores
(Ø700 μm, SP) and one with large pores (Ø1500 μm, LP), were compared
in an ovine tibial diaphyseal model. Osseointegration of these collars
was compared with that of a clinically used solid, grooved design
(G). At six months post-operatively, the ovine tibias were retrieved and
underwent radiological and histological analysis.Aims
Materials and Methods
The aim of this study was to establish what happens to patients
in the long term after endoprosthetic replacement for a primary
malignant tumour of bone. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained
database to identify all patients who had undergone an endoprosthetic
replacement more than 25 years ago and who were still alive. Their
outcomes were investigated with reference to their complications and
need for further surgery. A total of 230 patients were identified.
Their mean age at diagnosis was 20.7 years (five to 62). The most
common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (132). The most common site was
the distal femur (102). Aims
Patients and Methods
Peri-acetabular tumour resections and their subsequent
reconstruction are among the most challenging procedures in orthopaedic
oncology. Despite the fact that a number of different pelvic endoprostheses
have been introduced, rates of complication remain high and long-term
results are mostly lacking. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the outcome
of reconstructing a peri-acetabular defect with a pedestal cup endoprosthesis
after a type 2 or type 2/3 internal hemipelvectomy. A total of 19 patients (11M:8F) with a mean age of 48 years (14
to 72) were included, most of whom had been treated for a primary
bone tumour (n = 16) between 2003 and 2009. After a mean follow-up
of 39 months (28 days to 8.7 years) seven patients had died. After
a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (4.3 to 10.5), 12 patients were alive,
of whom 11 were disease-free. Complications occurred in 15 patients.
Three had recurrent dislocations and three experienced aseptic loosening.
There were no mechanical failures. Infection occurred in nine patients,
six of whom required removal of the prosthesis. Two patients underwent
hindquarter amputation for local recurrence. The implant survival rate at five years was 50% for all reasons,
and 61% for non-oncological reasons. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor
Society score at final follow-up was 49% (13 to 87). Based on these poor results, we advise caution if using the pedestal
cup for reconstruction of a peri-acetabular tumour resection. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to assess whether
the use of a joint-sparing technique such as curettage and grafting was
successful in eradicating giant cell tumours of the proximal femur,
or whether an alternative strategy was more appropriate. Between 1974 and 2012, 24 patients with a giant cell tumour of
the proximal femur were treated primarily at our hospital. Treatment
was either joint sparing or joint replacing. Joint-sparing treatment
was undertaken in ten patients by curettage with or without adjunctive
bone graft. Joint replacement was by total hip replacement in nine patients
and endoprosthetic replacement in five. All 11 patients who presented
with a pathological fracture were treated by replacement. Local recurrence occurred in five patients (21%): two were treated
by hip replacement, three by curettage and none with an endoprosthesis.
Of the ten patients treated initially by curettage, six had a successful
outcome without local recurrence and required no further surgery.
Three eventually needed a hip replacement for local recurrence and
one an endoprosthetic replacement for mechanical failure. Thus 18
patients had the affected joint replaced and only six (25%) retained
their native joint. Overall, 60% of patients without a pathological
fracture who were treated with curettage had a successful outcome. Cite this article:
Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic bone
disease (MBD) have been available to the orthopaedic community for
more than a decade, with little improvement in service provision
to this increasingly large patient group. Improvements in adjuvant
and neo-adjuvant treatments have increased both the number and overall
survival of patients living with MBD. As a consequence the incidence
of complications of MBD presenting to surgeons has increased and
is set to increase further. The British Orthopaedic Oncology Society
(BOOS) are to publish more revised detailed guidelines on what represents
‘best practice’ in managing patients with MBD. This article is designed
to coincide with and publicise new BOOS guidelines and once again
champion the cause of patients with MBD. A series of short cases highlight common errors frequently being
made in managing patients with MBD despite the availability of guidelines.Objectives
Methods
We first sought to compare survival for patients treated surgically for solitary and multiple metastases in the appendicular skeleton, and second, to explore the role of complete and incomplete resection (R0 and R1/R2) in patients with a solitary bony metastasis in the appendicular skeleton. We conducted a retrospective study on a population-based cohort of all adult patients treated surgically for bony metastases of the appendicular skeleton between January 2014 and December 2019. We excluded patients in whom the status of bone metastases and resection margin was unknown. Patients were followed until the end of the study or to their death. We had no loss to follow-up. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis (with log-rank test) to evaluate patient survival. We identified 506 operations in 459 patients. A total of 120 operations (in 116 patients) were for solitary metastases and 386 (in 345 patients) for multiple metastases. Of the 120 operations, 70 (in 69 patients) had no/an unknown status of visceral metastases (solitary group) and 50 (in 49 patients) had visceral metastases. In the solitary group, 45 operations (in 44 patients) were R0 (resections for cure or complete remission) and 25 (in 25 patients) were R1/R2 (resections leaving microscopic or macroscopic tumour, respectively). The most common types of cancer in the solitary group were kidney (n = 27), lung (n = 25), and breast (n = 20).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to describe the use of 3D-printed sacral endoprostheses to reconstruct the pelvic ring and re-establish spinopelvic stability after total We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients who underwent TES in our hospital between January 2015 and December 2017. We divided the patients into three groups on the basis of the method of reconstruction: an endoprosthesis group (n = 10); a combined reconstruction group (n = 14), who underwent non-endoprosthetic combined reconstruction, including anterior spinal column fixation; and a spinopelvic fixation (SPF) group (n = 8), who underwent only SPF. Spinopelvic stability, implant survival (IS), intraoperative haemorrhage rate, and perioperative complication rate in the endoprosthesis group were documented and compared with those of other two groups.Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to report the long-term results of extendable endoprostheses of the humerus in children after the resection of a bone sarcoma. A total of 35 consecutive patients treated with extendable endoprosthetic replacement of the humerus in children were included. There were 17 boys and 18 girls in the series with a median age at the time of initial surgery of nine years (interquartile range (IQR) 7 to 11).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to identify any progression between
benign osteofibrous dysplasia (OFD), OFD-like adamantinoma and malignant
adamantinoma, and to investigate the rates of local recurrence,
metastases and survival, in order to develop treatment algorithms
for each. A single institution retrospective review of all patients presenting
with OFD, OFD-like adamantinoma and adamantinoma between 1973 and
2012 was undertaken. Complete data were available for 73 patients
(42 with OFD; ten with an OFD-like adamantinoma and 21 with an adamantinoma).
The mean follow-up was 10.3 years (3 to 25) for OFD, 9.2 years (3.0
to 26.3) for OFD-like and 11.6 years (0.25 to 33) for adamantinoma.Aims
Patients and Methods
