INTRODUCTION. Ceramic-on-metal hip replacements (COM, where the head is a Biolox Delta ceramic and liner is Co Cr alloy), have demonstrated reduced wear under standard conditions in vitro compared to metal-on-metal (MOM) [1]. Early clinical results are also encouraging [2]. Recently concerns have been raised regarding the poor clinical performance of MOM hip resurfacings [3], particularly when cups are steeply inclined. Laboratory hip simulator testing has been used to replicate edge loading, also demonstrating elevated wear [4]. Therefore, a range of conditions to replicate sub-optimal use clinically to better predict in vivo performance should be used. The aim of this study was to compare the wear rates of MOM and COM under adverse edge loading conditions in an in vitro hip simulator test. METHODS. Ceramic-on-metal (n=3) and metal-on-metal (n=3) 36mm hip prostheses (supplied by DePuy International Ltd, UK) were tested in the Leeds Physiological Anatomical Hip Joint Simulator. Liners were mounted to provide a clinical angle of 45o, and stems positioned anatomically. A simplified gait cycle and microseparation was applied as previously described [5] for two million cycles in 25% new born calf serum. Gravimetric analysis was completed every million cycles and wear volumes calculated. RESULTS. The overall mean volumetric wear rate of COM bearings was 0.36 ± 0.55mm3 per million cycles, this was significantly less than the MOM bearing wear (1.32 ± 0.91mm3 per million cycles). For both COM and MOM bearings wear under these edge loading conditions was significantly greater if compared to previously reported wear under standard conditions [1]. DISCUSSION. The reduced wear of COM has been attributed to the differential hardness decreasing adhesive wear and reduced corrosive wear [6]. Wear under the harsh edge-loading conditions in this study is also reported to be significantly less in COM bearings compared to MOM. In MOM bearings in edge contact conditions, the wear zone becomes starved of lubrication, this elevates wear and increases damage at the edge of the cup. In COM bearings the harder head does not become damaged when there is lubricant starvation and hence wear does not accelerate in the same way. In conclusion, COM bearings show reduced wear compared to MOM bearings under standard and adverse conditions and there is some early evidence to support this finding clinically. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. Supported by DePuy International Ltd. SW is supported by a Royal Academy of Engineering/EPSRC (UK) fellowship

INTRODUCTION. The introduction of hard-on-hard bearings and the consequences of increased wear due to edge-loading have renewed interest in the importance of acetabular component orientation for implant survival and functional outcome following hip arthroplasty. Some studies have shown increased dislocation risk when the cup is mal-oriented which has led to the identification of a safe-zone1. The aims of this prospective, multi-centered study of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) were to: 1. Identify factors that influence cup orientation and 2. Describe the effect of cup orientation on clinical outcome. METHODS. In a prospective study involving seven UK centers, patients undergoing primary THA between January 1999 and January 2002 were recruited. All patients underwent detailed assessment pre-operatively as well as post-op. Assessment included data on patient demographics, clinical outcome, complications and further surgery/revision. 681 primary THAs had adequate radiographs for inclusion. 590 hips received cemented cups. The primary functional outcome measure of the study was the change between pre-operative and at latest follow up OHS (OHS). Secondary outcome measures included dislocation rate and revision surgery. EBRA was used to determine acetabular inclination and version. The influence of patient's gender, BMI, surgeon's grade and approach on cup orientation was examined. Four different zones tested as possibly ± (Lewinnek Zone, Callanan's described zone and zones ± 5 and ±10 about the study's mean inclination and anteversion) for a reduced dislocation risk and an optimal functional outcome. RESULTS. There were 21 dislocations (3.1%) and 8 (1.2%) patients required revision at a mean follow up of 7 years. Experienced surgeons (2=0.047) and those operating with the patient in the lateral decubitus position (p=0.04) were more likely to achieve a cup orientation within any of the tested zones. Surgical approach (2=0.14) and patient's BMI (2=0.93) had no influence on whether a cup was within or outside any zone. There was no difference in dislocation rate between the posterior and anterio-lateral approaches (2=0.88). None of the zones tested had a significantly reduced dislocation risk (2=0.13), nor revision risk (2=0.55). OHS was not different for patients with cups within or outside any of the zones tested (p=0.523). DISCUSSION. There was a wide variation in cup orientation. Despite the wide scatter in cup orientation, no safe zone could be identified that would reduce dislocation and revision rate, nor improve patient reported outcome (OHS). Hence, these data suggest that acetabular component orientation should not be considered predictive of patients' early/mid-term complication/revision rate and outcome following THA