Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are one of the most devastating complications of joint replacement surgery. They are associated with significant patient morbidity and carry a significant economic cost to treat. The management of PJI varies from antibiotic suppression, debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedures through to single/multiple stage revision procedures. Concerns have been raised recently in relation to the rising number of revision arthroplasty procedures that are being undertaken in relation to infection. This database aims to collect data on all PJIs that have been managed in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) region. This will allow us to investigate the microbial trends, outcomes of surgical intervention and patient outcomes within our local population. This database will incorporate diagnostic, demographic, microbiological and treatment information in relation to local PJI cases. The data will be collated from the local infectious diseases database, hospital medical records, and where available the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Data. The first 100 cases of PJI were assessed. 76% were defined as being acute. 56% of the patients received antibiotics prior to their diagnosis however only 3% were culture negative. 89% were monomicrobial and 11% polymicrobial. The intended management strategy was a DAIR in 38% of patients and a 2-stage revision in 12% of cases. The intended management strategy was successful in 46% of the patients. The ACT is uniquely placed to analyze and create a local PJI database. This will allow us to guide further treatment and local guidelines in terms of management of these complex patients

Chronic osteomyelitis is a challenging problem and a growing burden for the National Health Service. Conventional method of treatment is 2 stage surgery, with debridement and prolonged courses of antibiotics. Recently single stage treatment of chronic osteomyelitis is gaining popularity due decreased patient morbidity and cost effectiveness. Dead space management in single stage treatment is accomplished by either a muscle / myocutaneous or antibiotic loaded calcium sulphate beads. We analysed the cost effectiveness of two dead space management strategies in single stage treatment of osteomyelitis. Study is designed to analyse the health economics at 2 time points; 45 days post surgery and 2 years post surgery. We report preliminary results at 45 days post surgery. Setting – Level 1 trauma centre and university hospital. Approval – Ethics committee approved study. 10 patients in each group were retrospectively analysed through patient records. Each group was identified for standard demographics, duration of procedure, hospital stay, type and duration of postoperative antibiotics, number of out patient visits in first 45 days and recurrence of infection. Table attached details the results of both groups. In health technology assessment four quadrant model, CSB appears in quadrant II suggesting that it is more cost effective. Based on small data set and on assessment only evaluating cost, at 45 days assessment, antibiotic calcium sulphate beads from a Health Economic Cost Effectiveness Analysis offers a better economic outcome. This is holding constant the morbidity of the patients and effectiveness, assuming both treatments are standards of care, which is best evaluated at 24 months. Acknowledgements. Biocomposites for funding the cost of health economist

We examined the rates of infection and colonisation by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) between January 2003 and May 2004 in order to assess the impact of the introduction of an MRSA policy in October 2003, which required all admissions to be screened. Emergency admissions were treated prophylactically and elective beds ring-fenced. A total of 5594 admissions were cross-referenced with 22 810 microbiology results. The morbidity, mortality and cost of managing MRSA-carrying patients, with a proximal fracture of the femur were compared, in relation to age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade and residential status, with a group of matched controls who were MRSA-negative. In 2004, we screened 1795 of 1796 elective admissions and MRSA was found in 23 (1.3%). We also screened 1122 of 1447 trauma admissions and 43 (3.8%) were carrying MRSA. All ten ward transfers were screened and four (40%) were carriers (all p < 0.001). The incidence of MRSA in trauma patients increased by 2.6% per week of inpatient stay (r = 0.97, p < 0.001). MRSA developed in 2.9% of trauma and 0.2% of elective patients during that admission (p < 0.001). The implementation of the MRSA policy reduced the incidence of MRSA infection by 56% in trauma patients (1.57% in 2003 (17 of 1084) to 0.69% in 2004 (10 of 1447), p = 0.035). Infection with MRSA in elective patients was reduced by 70% (0.56% in 2003 (7 of 1257) to 0.17% in 2004 (3 of 1806), p = 0.06). The cost of preventing one MRSA infection was £3200. Although colonisation by MRSA did not affect the mortality rate, infection by MRSA more than doubled it. Patients with proximal fractures of the femur infected with MRSA remained in hospital for 50 extra days, had 19 more days of vancomycin treatment and 26 more days of vacuum-assisted closure therapy than the matched controls. These additional costs equated to £13 972 per patient. From this experience we have been able to describe the epidemiology of MRSA, assess the impact of infection-control measures on MRSA infection rates and determine the morbidity, mortality and economic cost of MRSA carriage on trauma and elective orthopaedic wards

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common causes of knee pain in the aging population and presents with higher odds with increased BMI. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become the standard of care for the treatment of OA. Over “719,000 TKA's were performed in 2010 in the USA alone, with dramatic economic burden- costing 16,000 USD per TKA” (CDC 2012). Over the past two decades, this cost was compounded by the unknown increasing rate of primary TKA and cannot be explained by the expanding population or worldwide obesity epidemic. These facts raise two key questions: are patients' quality of life expectations higher and driving the TKA rate up, or have surgeons changed their indications and started to operate on less disabled people? Our study aimed to determine the average functional profile for patients undergoing TKA using patient reported Outcome Measure (SF-36), to document if preoperative SF-36 scores have changed over the past two decades, and lastly to asses if patient pre-operative SF-36 scores are lower in in the USA vs the rest of the world. A literature search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed extracting data from publishing year 1966 to 2016 with a search date of Dec 12, 2016. Two independent reviewers revised the abstracts and excluded articles with: no TKA, revision TKA, no pre-op SF-36, no SF-36 reported, incomplete scores to calculate SF-36, duplicates, review article, meta-analysis, letter to the editor, conference proceeding or abstract, disagreements were resolved with a third reviewer. All languages were included to maximize the catchment of data. All remaining articles were independently read and excluded if they did not provide data required for our study. Included articles were analyzed for data including: for year of patient enrollment, location (USA vs. non-USA), pre-operative SF-36 mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component summary, level of evidence. Recorded data was compared post completion to assess inter-observer accuracy as per PRISMA guidelines for meta-analysis. After applying all the exclusion criteria on 923 selected abstracts, a total of 136 articles of which 30 were randomized control trials, were completely reviewed and included in our study. A total of 56,713 patients' physical component scores were analyzed and revealed an overall pre-operative SF-36 physical component score 31.93. When stratifying the data, it was revealed that patients operated in the USA had an average score of 32.3 whereas Non-US countries were 31.7, with no statistical significance. No statistical difference between SF36 scores was seen over time amongst studies of all nations. Based on the results of this study, we have shown that orthopaedic surgeons are performing TKA universally at the same pre-operative scores, independent of country of origin or year of surgery. The indications thus have remained consistent for two decades regardless of the advances in technology. Functional profiles of patients appear similar among US and Non-US countries. Further, we infer that based on pre-operative SF-36 PCS scores, the optimal time to undergo a TKA is when PCS is 31.9 +/−3

Periprosthetic infection involving TKR has been projected to rise as the burden of implanted TKR continues to grow. A study by Kurtz et al. found a significant increase in the annual incidence of TKR infection, 2001 (2.05%) to 2.18% in 2009. Thus, deep prosthetic infection around a TKR remains a significant problem that has not been solved, even as technologies improve and the operation is more commonly performed. The economic hospital cost of periprosthetic TKR infection is approximately $100,000 US for a two-stage removal and reimplantation; by the year 2020, it is estimated that 48,000 of these operations will be necessary. The total annual hospital cost for PJI treatment is expected to be over $1 billion by 2020, and does not include the doctor, pharmacologic, and physical therapy fees. Many factors have been found to be associated with an increased risk of PJI. This lecture will focus upon the peri-, intra-, and post-operative factors that have been found historically to carry an increased or decreased risk of infection. Preoperative factors that have been found to affect the risk of infection include: perioperative administration of intravenous antibiotics, patient nutrition, weight, and hemoglobin A1C in diabetic patients. Intraoperative factors include the duration of surgery, the use of antibiotic impregnated cement, and the use of dilute povidone/iodine solution irrigation. Postoperatively, wound care with antimicrobial agents, and a resistance to transfusing blood seem to lower the risk of infection. Yang et al. found that diabetes mellitus carried a 1.6x greater risk of TKR infection, in a meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies. In a registry study of over 32,000 TKA, increasing BMI from 25 kg/m2 to 35 kg/m2 was found to be associated with a greater risk of wound infection in TKR patients, increasing from 3 to 4.1%. Preoperative colonization with MRSA has been found by several investigators to be a risk for surgical site infection, despite attempts at eradication. Operatively, a wash of the surgical site for 3 minutes with a dilute solution of betadine has been found by Brown et al. to have decreased the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection from 0.97% to 0.15%. Postoperatively, the type of dressing placed over the incision may play a role; Grosso et al. found a significantly reduced rate of PJI (0.33% vs. 1.58%) when a silver impregnated, antimicrobial, dressing was used as compared to standard xeroform gauze. Finally, patients who received an allogeneic blood transfusion were found to have a higher risk of PJI (1.67%) than those who did not (0.72%)