Introduction. Although femoral neck fractures remain a concern in short term failures for hip resurfacing, acetabular component position and fixation are increasingly being recognized as causes of mid term failures for hip resurfacing. This study aimed to evaluate the migration pattern of a cobalt chrome, beaded acetabular component for a metal on metal hip resurfacing. Methods. 130 patients underwent metal on metal hip resurfacing: 66 hips in 60 patients had sufficient films to be included in this analysis. Forty-eight patients were male and 12 were female, with a mean age of 50 (range, 32–66). Ninety-five percent of the procedures were performed for osteoarthritis. In all cases acetabular migration was measured both vertically and horizontally, on serial radiographs using the computer-assisted Ein Bild Röntgen Analyse method. A minimum of three comparable radiographs is necessary for calculating the migration curves. We scored medial migration as negative horizontal movement. Results. At a mean follow up 25.3 months (24–36 months), each hip had an average of 5.1 radiographs for analysis. 12.5% of the cups showed more than 1 mm migration in the medial-lateral axis and 45.3% more than 1 mm in the vertical axis. 23% of the cups showed a combined migration of greater than 2 mm in the observation period. Two of these cases required revision for aseptic loosening at 34 months. Discussion and Conclusion. Previous studies have shown EBRA to have an excellent sensitivity and positive predictive value for mid to long term cup failure. This data raises concern about the initial stability if this acetabular component. Continued follow-up is needed to monitor the longer term survival of this implant

Introduction. Primary stability of the Burch-Schneider ring (BSR) in case of acetabular revision is discussed controversial. In a retrospective two centre cohort study we analyzed the influence of the mode of screw fixation and the restoration of the center of rotation on migration, loosening and other radiographic parameters. Material/Methods. Patients with a minimal radiographical follow-up of 2 years and suitable for EBRA analysis were included. In group 1 (46 patients) screws were placed through the cranial spherical part of the ring and covered by cement and cup, in group 2 (40 patients) screws were placed through the cranial flange. Preoperative bone defects were classified, the postoperative centre of rotation was determined. Changes of screws were recorded, migration exceeding >1mm was seen as significant. Results. Demographic data and size of bone defect were comparable in both groups. No cups in group 1 and in group 2 were re-revised. In group 1 the centre of rotation was medialized mean 5.5 (SD 8.2) mm, in group 2 it was lateralised mean 11.0 (SD 10.3) mm (p<.001). Screw changes were observed in 5 (10.9%) patients in group 1 and 14 (35%) patients in group 2 (p=.009). Migration at 2 years was observed for 17 (37%) patients in group 1, mean migration was 1.0 (SD 1.0) mm. In group 2 21 (52.5%) patients showed migration at 2 years (p=.193), mean migration was 1.6 (SD 1.7) mm (p=.031). Conclusion. Medialization of the implant and screw fixation with compression of the ring against the acetabular roof reduces migration and screw changes. The improved stability might be due to better osteointegration of the BSR and angular stability of the screws which are additionally fixed with cement

INTRODUCTION. Although simulation studies have shown superior wear properties of metal-on-metal articulations, increased concern exists regarding the excess in-vivo wear of a small number of Metal-on-Metal-Hip-Resurfacing (MoMHRA) implants. Serum ion levels of Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co) are surrogate markers of wear. Risk factors associated with increased wear include female gender, small components, dysplasia, cup orientation outside safe zone and femoral head downsize during surgery with an associated decrease in Head-Neck-Ratio (HNR). However, these factors are interlinked. This study aims to identify the factors that are most important for subsequent wear of MoMHRA, by performing a multivariate analysis. METHODS. 206 patients (124M: 82F) with unilateral MoMHRA were included in this study. The average follow up was 3.3 years. All patients had Cr/Co levels measured at follow up. Inclination and anteversion of each cup were measured using EBRA. Cups were analysed as being within or outside the previously defined optimum-zone. HNR measurements were made from pre-operative (HNRpre) and post-operative (HNRpost) radiographs. The immediate changes in HNR (downsize/upsize of femoral head) as a result of the operation were expressed as:. HNRprepost=HNRpost–HNRpre. Multivariate linear regression modelling was used to explore the association between measures of ions with the following predictor variables (gender, age, diagnosis, femoral component size, orientation of the acetabular component, head/neck ratio and position of femoral stem). Analyses were carried out separately for each outcome (Cr and Co). Classification and Regression Tree (CART) models were fitted as a complimentary approach to regression modelling. RESULTS. Articular surface downsize followed by cup orientation within/outside optimum zone, followed by cup anteversion followed by gender were the strongest predictors of ion levels. A percentage decrease in HNRartpost, predicted an increase in Cr ion level by 5% (and 6% for Co). If the cup was within the optimum zone this was associated with decreased levels of Cr and Co ions. As acetabular component anteversion increased, levels of ions increased. Gender had a strong effect on ion levels. Adjusting for other variables, the effect of gender was attenuated due to a confounding effect of component size and the amount of femoral head downsize. Predictors identified as important in regression analyses were similar to those produced in the CART model, where the highest levels of ions were seen in patients with a percentage decrease in pre-operative HNR −11.3. DISCUSSION. This analysis shows that (surgical) factors, such as amount of femoral head downsize at operation and whether the cup was orientated within the optimum zone, explained the majority of the variability in ion levels in MoMHRA

INTRODUCTION. The introduction of hard-on-hard bearings and the consequences of increased wear due to edge-loading have renewed interest in the importance of acetabular component orientation for implant survival and functional outcome following hip arthroplasty. Some studies have shown increased dislocation risk when the cup is mal-oriented which has led to the identification of a safe-zone1. The aims of this prospective, multi-centered study of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) were to: 1. Identify factors that influence cup orientation and 2. Describe the effect of cup orientation on clinical outcome. METHODS. In a prospective study involving seven UK centers, patients undergoing primary THA between January 1999 and January 2002 were recruited. All patients underwent detailed assessment pre-operatively as well as post-op. Assessment included data on patient demographics, clinical outcome, complications and further surgery/revision. 681 primary THAs had adequate radiographs for inclusion. 590 hips received cemented cups. The primary functional outcome measure of the study was the change between pre-operative and at latest follow up OHS (OHS). Secondary outcome measures included dislocation rate and revision surgery. EBRA was used to determine acetabular inclination and version. The influence of patient's gender, BMI, surgeon's grade and approach on cup orientation was examined. Four different zones tested as possibly ± (Lewinnek Zone, Callanan's described zone and zones ± 5 and ±10 about the study's mean inclination and anteversion) for a reduced dislocation risk and an optimal functional outcome. RESULTS. There were 21 dislocations (3.1%) and 8 (1.2%) patients required revision at a mean follow up of 7 years. Experienced surgeons (2=0.047) and those operating with the patient in the lateral decubitus position (p=0.04) were more likely to achieve a cup orientation within any of the tested zones. Surgical approach (2=0.14) and patient's BMI (2=0.93) had no influence on whether a cup was within or outside any zone. There was no difference in dislocation rate between the posterior and anterio-lateral approaches (2=0.88). None of the zones tested had a significantly reduced dislocation risk (2=0.13), nor revision risk (2=0.55). OHS was not different for patients with cups within or outside any of the zones tested (p=0.523). DISCUSSION. There was a wide variation in cup orientation. Despite the wide scatter in cup orientation, no safe zone could be identified that would reduce dislocation and revision rate, nor improve patient reported outcome (OHS). Hence, these data suggest that acetabular component orientation should not be considered predictive of patients' early/mid-term complication/revision rate and outcome following THA