Introduction. The main postoperative complications in fixation of ulna shaft fractures are non-union and implant irritation using currently recommended 3.5-mm locking compression plates. An alternative approach using a combination of two smaller plates in orthogonal configuration has been proposed. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a single 3.5-mm locking compression plate versus double plating using one 2.5-mm and one 2.0-mm mandible plate in a human ulna shaft fracture model. Method. Eight pairs human ulnar specimens with a standardized 10-mm fracture gap were pairwise assigned for instrumentation with either a single 3.5-mm plate placed posteriorly, or for double plating using a 2.5-mm and a 2.0-mm mandible plate placed posteriorly under the flexor muscles and laterally under the extensor muscles. All constructs were initially non-destructively biomechanically tested in axial compression, torsion, and bending, which was followed by cyclic torsional loading to failure. Interfragmentary movements were monitored by means of optical motion tracking. Result. There were no significant differences between the two plating techniques for axial stiffness (p=0.335), torsional stiffness in supination (p=0.462), torsional stiffness in pronation (p=0.307), medio-lateral bending stiffness (p=0.522), and antero-posterior bending stiffness (p=0.143). During cyclic torsional loading over the first 3000 cycles, there were no significant differences between the two plating techniques for shear displacement across the fracture gap, p=0.324. The numbers of cycles until clinically relevant failure of 5° angular deformation were 1366±685 for double plating and 2024±958 for single plating, which was statistically non-significantly different, p>0.05. The constructs treated with both plating techniques failed due to bone breakage at the most distal screw. Conclusion. From a biomechanical perspective double plating of ulna shaft fractures using a 2.5-mm and a 2.0-mm locking mandible plate demonstrated equivalent fixation strength as conventional plating using a single 3.5-mm locking compression plate

Introduction and Objective. Plating of geriatric distal femoral fractures with Locking Compression Plate Distal Femur (LCP–DF) often requires augmentation with a supplemental medial plate to achieve sufficient stability allowing early mobilization. However, medial vital structures may be impaired by supplemental medial plating using a straight plate. Therefore, a helically shaped medial plate may be used to avoid damage of these structures. Aim of the current study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of augmented LCP–DF plating using a supplemental straight versus helically shaped medial plate. Materials and Methods. Ten pairs of human cadaveric femora with poor bone quality were assigned pairwise for instrumentation using a lateral anatomical 15-hole LCP–DF combined with a medial 14-hole LCP, the latter being either straight or manually pre-contoured to a 90-degree helical shape. An unstable distal femoral fracture AO/OTA 33–A3 was simulated by means of osteotomies. All specimens were biomechanically tested under non-destructive quasi-static and destructive progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading in internal rotation, with monitoring by means of optical motion tracking. Results. Initial axial stiffness and torsional stiffness in internal and external rotation for straight double plating (548.1 ± 134.2 N/mm, 2.69 ± 0.52 Nm/° and 2.69 ± 0.50 Nm/°) was significantly higher versus helical double plating (442.9 ± 133.7 N/mm, 2.07 ± 0.32 Nm/° and 2.16 ± 0.22 Nm/°), p≤0.04. Initial interfragmentary axial displacement and flexural rotation under 500 N static loading were significantly smaller for straight plating (0.11 ± 0.14 mm and 0.21 ± 0.10°) versus helical plating (0.31 ± 0.14 mm and 0.68 ± 0.16°), p<0.01. However, initial varus deformation under this loading remained not significantly different between the two fixation methods (straight: 0.57 ± 0.23°, helical: 0.75 ± 0.34°), p=0.08. During dynamic loading, within the course of the first 4000 cycles the movements of the distal fragment in flexion were significantly bigger for helical over straight plating (1.03 ± 0.33° versus 0.40 ± 0.20°), p<0.01. However, no significant differences were observed between the two fixation methods in terms of varus, internal rotation, axial and shear displacements at the fracture site, and number of cycles to failure. Conclusions. Augmented lateral plating of unstable distal femoral fractures with use of supplemental helically shaped medial plate was associated with more elastic bone-implant construct behavior under static and dynamic loading compared to straight double plating. Both fixation methods resulted in comparable number of cycles to failure. From a biomechanical perspective, the more elastic helical double plating may be considered as useful alternative to straight plating, potentially reducing stress risers at the distal bone-implant interface due to its ameliorated damping capacities

Introduction. The incidence of distal femoral fractures in the geriatric population is growing and represents the second most common insufficiency fracture of the femur following fractures around the hip joint. Fixation of fractures in patients with poor bone stock and early mobilisation in feeble and polymorbide patients is challenging. Development of a fixation approach for augmentation of conventional LISS (less invasive stabilization system) plating may result in superior long-term clinical outcomes and enhance safe weight bearing. Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of two different techniques of augmented LISS plating for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur in comparison to conventional LISS plating. Materials & methods. Unstable distal femoral fracture AO/OTA 33-A3 was set in artificial femora with low density simulating osteoporotic bone. Three study groups, consisting of 10 specimens each, were created for instrumentation with a 9-hole LISS plate, a LISS plate with an additional 3D-printed polyactide cylindrical intramedullary graft, as well as a LISS plate plus a medial 3.5mm LCP (locking compression plate) - double plating. All specimens were non-destructively tested under axial (20–150N) and torsional (0–4Nm) quasi-static loading. Each construct was tested with two different working length (WL) configurations (long and short) of the LISS plate. Relative movements between the most medial superior and inferior osteotomy aspects were investigated via three-dimensional motion tracking analysis. Results. Interfragmentary displacement along the femur axis (mm) under 150N axial loading was 2.03±0.23/1.65±0.27 for LISS with long/short WL, 0.18±0.06/0.18±0.04 for double plating with long/short WL, and 0.40±0.05/0.30±0.05 for LISS plus graft with long/short WL. Shear interfragmentary displacement (mm) under 4Nm torsional loading in internal rotation was 1.16±0.17/0.92±0.11 for LISS with long/short WL, 0.40±0.10/0.43±0.07 for double plating with long/short WL, and 1.09±0.13/0.82±0.11 for LISS plus graft with long/short WL. Double plating revealed significantly smaller longitudinal and shear displacement compared to the other two techniques for long and short WL, respectively (P≤0.010). In addition, LISS plus graft fixation was with significantly less longitudinal displacement in comparison to conventional LISS plating for long and short WL, respectively (P≤0.001). Long WL resulted in significantly higher longitudinal and shear displacement compared to short WL for LISS and LISS plus graft (P≤0.032), but not for double plating (P=1.000). Conclusion. Intramedullary grafting resulted in significantly increased fracture stability under axial loading in comparison to conventional LISS plating. However, it was not efficient enough to achieve comparable stability to double plating

We have evaluated four different fixation techniques for the reconstruction of a standard Mason type-III fracture of the radial head in a sawbone model. The outcome measurements were the quality of the reduction, and stability.

A total of 96 fractures was created. Six surgeons were involved in the study and each reconstructed 16 fractures with 1.6 mm fine-threaded wires (Fragment Fixation System (FFS)), T-miniplates, 2 mm miniscrews and 2 mm Kirschner (K-) wires; four fractures being allocated to each method using a standard reconstruction procedure.

The quality of the reduction was measured after definitive fixation. Biomechanical testing was performed using a transverse plane shear load in two directions to the implants (parallel and perpendicular) with respect to ultimate failure load and displacement at 50 N.

A significantly better quality of reduction was achieved using the FFS wires (Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001) than with the other devices with a mean step in the articular surface and the radial neck of 1.04 mm (sd 0.96) for the FFS, 4.25 mm (sd 1.29) for the miniplates, 2.21 mm (sd 1.06) for the miniscrews and 2.54 mm (sd 0.98) for the K-wires. The quality of reduction was similar for K-wires and miniscrews, but poor for miniplates.

The ultimate failure load was similar for the FFS wires (parallel, 196.8 N (sd 46.8), perpendicular, 212.5 N (sd 25.6)), miniscrews (parallel, 211.8 N (sd 47.9), perpendicular, 208.0 N (sd 65.9)) and K-wires (parallel, 200.4 N (sd 54.5), perpendicular, 165.2 N (sd 37.9)), but significantly worse (Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001) for the miniplates (parallel, 101.6 N (sd 43.1), perpendicular, 122.7 N (sd 40.7)). There was a significant difference in the displacement at 50 N for the miniplate (parallel, 4.8 mm (sd 2.8), perpendicular, 4.8 mm (sd 1.7)) vs FFS (parallel, 2.1 mm (sd 0.8), perpendicular, 1.9 mm (sd 0.7)), miniscrews (parallel, 1.8 mm (sd 0.5), perpendicular, 2.3 mm (sd 0.8)) and K-wires (parallel, 2.2 mm (sd 1.8), perpendicular, 2.4 mm (sd 0.7; Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001)).

The fixation of a standard Mason type-III fracture in a sawbone model using the FFS system provides a better quality of reduction than that when using conventional techniques. There was a significantly better stability using FFS implants, miniscrews and K-wires than when using miniplates.