Standard fixation for intra-articular distal humerus fracture is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). However, high energy fractures of the distal humerus are often accompanied with soft tissue injuries and or vascular injuries which limits the use of internal fixation. In our report, we describe a highly complex distal humerus fracture that showed promising healing via a ring external fixator. A 26-year-old man sustained a Gustillo Anderson Grade IIIB intra-articular distal humerus fracture of the non-dominant limb with bone loss at the lateral column. The injury was managed with aggressive wound debridement and cross elbow stabilization via a hinged ring external fixator. Post operative wound managed with foam dressing. Post-operatively, early controlled mobilization of elbow commenced. Fracture union achieved by 9 weeks and frame removed once fracture united. No surgical site infection or non-union observed throughout follow up. At 2 years follow up, flexion - extension of elbow is 20°- 100°, forearm supination 65°, forearm pronation 60° with no significant valgus or varus deformity. The extent of normal anatomic restoration in elbow fracture fixation determines the quality of elbow function with most common complication being elbow stiffness. Ring fixator is a non-invasive external device which provides firm stabilization of fracture while allowing for adequate soft tissue management. It provides continuous axial micro-movements in the frame which promotes callus formation while avoiding translation or angulation between the fragments. In appropriate frame design, they allow for early rehabilitation of joint where normal range of motion can be allowed in controlled manner immediately post-fixation. Functional outcome of elbow fracture from ring external fixation is comparable to ORIF due to better rehabilitation and lower complications. Ring external fixator in our patient achieved acceptable functional outcome and fracture alignment meanwhile the fracture was not complicated with common complications seen in ORIF. In conclusion, ring external fixator is as effective as ORIF in treating complex distal humeral fractures and should be considered for definitive fixation in such fractures

Advancements in treating distal humerus fractures. We will review and discuss approaches to the elbow to treat different types of fractures. We will discuss the role of soft tissue structures and how they affect elbow function. During this session, we will review the latest techniques for treating the complex articular fractures of the distal humerus to include capitellar and trochlear fractures. Techniques presented will address fixation, reconstruction, and salvaging of complex distal humerus fractures

Abstract. Objectives. Operative management of distal humerus fractures is challenging. In the past, plates were manually contoured intraoperatively, however this was associated with high rates of fixation failure, nonunion and metalwork removal. Anatomically pre-contoured distal humerus locking plates have since been developed. Owing to the rarity of distal humeral fractures, literature regarding outcomes of anatomically pre-contoured locking plates is lacking and patient numbers are often small. The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of these patients. Methods. We retrospectively identified patients with distal humeral fractures treated at our institution from 2009–2018. Inclusion criteria were patients with a distal humeral fracture, who underwent two-column plate fixation with anatomically pre-contoured locking plates. Clinical records and radiographs were reviewed to elicit outcome measures, including range of motion, complications and reoperation rate. Results. We identified 50 patients with mean age of 55 years (range 17–96 years). Mean length of follow up was 5.2 years. AO fracture classification Type A occurred most frequently (46%), followed by Type B (22%) and Type C (32%). Low energy mechanisms of injury predominated in 72% of patients. Mean time from injury to fixation was seven days. Mean range of motion at the elbow was 13–123o postoperatively. The overall reoperation rate was 22%, the majority of which required subsequent removal of prominent metalwork (18%). The incidence of nonunion, heterotopic ossification, deep infection and neuropathy requiring decompression was 2% each. Fixation failure occurred in only one patient however the fracture went on to heal. Conclusions. Previously reported reoperation rates with manually contoured plates were as high as 44%, which is twice our reported rate. Modern locking plates are no longer subject to implant failure (previously 27% reported metalwork failure rate). Likewise, heterotopic ossification and non-union have also reduced, highlighting that modern plates have significantly improved overall patient outcomes. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. Primary Total Elbow Replacement (TER) is gaining popularity as a primary treatment option for osteoporotic fractures of the elbow, particularly in patients with low demand. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional efficacy of TER as a primary treatment for comminuted distal humerus fractures in the elderly. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed twenty-three patients (22 females and 1 male) who were treated with primary total elbow replacement for complex, intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly between March 2000 and January 2010. The average age of the patients was seventy-five years (ranging from 66 to 94 years). Postoperative elbow function was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. The radiological assessment was performed using antero-posterior and lateral radiographs done at follow-up appointments. Results. The average duration of follow up was 6 years. Overall, the mean Mayo elbow performance score was 93 points out of 100. The arc of flexion averaged at 94.3degrees. One patient developed blisters at her arm postoperatively but resolved with dressings. Two patients (8.6%) had mild pain at two years post surgery but there was no evidence of implant loosening or evidence of infection. One patient developed superficial infection which was treated with antibiotics. Nineteen (82%) of the twenty-three elbows had neither a complication nor further surgery from the time of TER to the recent follow up. Conclusions. Our review suggests that total elbow replacement as a primary treatment for comminuted distal humerus fractures in the elderly can give good to excellent results both in the short and the long term basis. When osteosynthesis is not a feasible option, especially in older patients who place lower demands on the joint, total elbow replacement can be considered a the primary treatment