Aims

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after elbow trauma and can cause severe upper limb disability. Although multiple prognostic factors have been reported to be associated with the development of post-traumatic HO, no model has yet been able to combine these predictors more succinctly to convey prognostic information and medical measures to patients. Therefore, this study aimed to identify prognostic factors leading to the formation of HO after surgery for elbow trauma, and to establish and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of HO formation in such particular injuries.

The fingers and thumb are the second most common site for dislocation of joints following injury (3.9/10,000/year). Unlike fractures, the pattern and patient reported outcomes following dislocations of the hand have not previously been reported.

All patients presenting with a dislocation or subluxation of the fingers or thumb were included in this cohort study (November 2008 and October 2009). Patient demographic and injury data were obtained and dislocation pattern confirmed on radiographs. Patient reported outcomes were obtained using the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ).

There were 202 dislocations/subluxations recorded. MHQ scores were obtained at 3–5 years for 74percnt; patients. The average age at injury was 40 years, 76percnt; (146) patients were male and 11percnt; (23) injuries were open. 50percnt; (101) of the dislocations were dorsal, 28percnt; (57) were associated with fractures and 4percnt; (9) were recurrent.

There were significant associations between: 1, Direction of dislocation and finger involved (p=0.03); 2, Joint and mechanism of dislocation (p=0.001); 3, Mechanism and direction of dislocation (p=0.008). Older patients had significantly worse outcomes (p<0.001).

This is the first study to assess the epidemiology and patient reported outcomes following dislocation of the fingers and thumb allowing us to better understand these injuries.

Glenohumeral dislocation is complicated with a greater tuberosity fracture in 16% of cases. Debate regarding the safety of closed reduction in the emergency department exists, with concerns over fracture propagation during the reduction manoeuvre. The study aim was to report the results of closed reduction, identify complications and define outcome for these injuries.

188 consecutive glenohumeral dislocations with a tuberosity fracture were identified from a prospective database from 2014–2017. 182 had an attempted closed reduction under appropriate sedation using standard techniques, five were manipulated in theatre due to contra-indications to sedation. Clinical, radiographic and patient reported outcomes, in the form of the QuickDASH and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), were collected.

A closed reduction in the emergency department was successful in 162 (86%) patients. Two iatrogenic fractures of the proximal humerus occurred, one in the emergency department and one in theatre, representing a 1% risk. 35 (19%) of patients presented with a nerve lesion due to dislocation. Surgery was performed in 19 (10%) cases for persistent or early displacement (< 2 weeks) of the greater tuberosity fragment. Surgery resulted in QuickDASH and OSS scores comparable to those patients in whom the tuberosity healed spontaneously in an anatomical position (p=0.13). 18 patients developed adhesive capsulitis (10%).

Glenohumeral dislocation with greater tuberosity fracture can be safely treated by closed reduction within the emergency department with a low risk of humeral neck fracture. Persistent or early displacement of the tuberosity fragment will occur in 10% of cases and is an indication for surgery.

Counter-insurgency warfare in recent military operations has been epitomised by the use of Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) against coalition troops. Emerging patterns of skeletal fractures, limb amputations and organ injuries, which are caused by these weapons have been described over recent years. This paper describes a retrospective case series of knee dislocations caused by IEDs in recent conflict.

Data was obtained about military personnel from 2006 to 2011, who had sustained a knee dislocation while serving in Afghanistan from a prospectively gathered database, the Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR), maintained by the Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine. The diagnosis of knee dislocation and its associated skeletal injuries was assessed by review of all relevant plain radiographs, computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance images. The mechanism of injury, incidence of vascular injuries and other skeletal injuries was recorded.

During the study period, 23 casualties sustained a knee dislocation caused by an IED. Four casualties had an associated popliteal vascular injury. Eleven injuries were caused in enclosed spaces, and 10 injuries caused by IEDs out in the open. Anterior dislocations were common in the group caused in enclosed spaces. 19/20 patients had at least one other skeletal fracture.

Knee dislocations represent an uncommon but important diagnosis in modern warfare. Urgent and careful assessment for any associated vascular injuries or other skeletal injuries may help ensure timely treatment and promote future recovery. Mitigation against knee dislocation may be possible in the enclosed environment because of the predictable pattern of injury.

This prospective, randomized, controlled trial compares patient outcome after non-operative care versus open reduction and tunneled suspension device fixation (ORTSD) for grade III or IV acromioclavicular joint disruptions.

Sixty patients aged between sixteen and thirty-five years with an acute grade III or IV AC joint disruption were randomized to receive ORTSD fixation or non-operative treatment. Functional assessment was conducted at six weeks, three months, six months, and one year using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hands (DASH), Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) and Short Form (SF-12). Reduction was evaluated using radiographs. Complications were recorded, and an economic evaluation performed.

There was no significant difference in DASH or OSS at one year between non-operative and ORTSD groups (DASH score, 4.67 versus 5.63; OSS, 45.72 versus 45.63). Patients undergoing surgery had inferior DASH scores at 6 weeks (p<0.01). Five patients who failed non-operative management subsequently received surgery. Overall cost of treatment was significantly greater after ORTSD fixation (£796.22 vs £3359.73 (p<0.01)).

ORTSD fixation confers no functional benefit over non-operative treatment at one year. While patients managed non-operatively generally recover faster, a significant group remain dissatisfied following non-operative treatment requiring delayed surgical reconstruction.

Introduction

Acromioclavicular dislocation (ACD) is frequent, at 8% of all shoulder traumas. Management in grade III lesions remains controversial. The present study assessed objective and subjective results at medium-term follow-up (mean, 60 months; range, 12—120 mo) in 27 patients managed by Ligastic® ligament reconstruction for acute dislocation.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the potentially increased risk of dislocation in patients with neurological disease who sustain a femoral neck fracture, as it is unclear whether they should undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA). A secondary aim was to investgate whether dual-mobility components confer a reduced risk of dislocation in these patients.

Aims

This study describes and compares the operative management and outcomes in a consecutive case series of patients with dislocated hemiarthroplasties of the hip, and compares outcomes with those of patients not sustaining a dislocation.

Aims

Hip hemiarthroplasty is a standard treatment for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in the frail elderly. In this study we have explored the implications of early return to theatre, within 30 days, on patient outcome following hip hemiarthroplasty.

Fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) joints are frequently overlooked or misdiagnosed at initial presentation. This is a comparative cohort study over a period of five years comparing primary open reduction and internal fixation in 22 patients (23 feet) with secondary corrective arthrodesis in 22 patients (22 feet) who presented with painful malunion at a mean of 22 months (1.5 to 45) after injury. In the first group primary treatment by open reduction and internal fixation for eight weeks with Kirschner-wires or screws was undertaken, in the second group treatment was by secondary corrective arthrodesis. There was one deep infection in the first group. In the delayed group there was one complete and one partial nonunion.

In each group 20 patients were available for follow-up at a mean of 36 months (24 to 89) after operation. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot score was 81.4 (62 to 100) after primary treatment and 71.8 (35 to 88) after corrective arthrodesis (t-test; p = 0.031).

We conclude that primary treatment by open reduction and internal fixation of tarsometatarsal fracture-dislocations leads to improved functional results, earlier return to work and greater patient satisfaction than secondary corrective arthrodesis, which remains a useful salvage procedure providing significant relief of pain and improvement in function.

We aimed to identify variables associated with clinical and radiological outcome following fractures of the acetabulum associated with posterior dislocation of the hip. Using a prospective database of 1076 such fractures, we identified 109 patients with this combined injury managed operatively within three weeks and followed up for two or more years. The patients had a mean age of 42 years (15 to 79), 78 (72%) were male, and 84 (77%) had been involved in motor vehicle accidents. Using multivariate analysis the quality of reduction of the fracture was identified as the only significant predictor of radiological grade, clinical function and the development of post-traumatic arthritis (p < 0.001). All patients lacking anatomical reduction developed arthritis whereas only 25.5% (24 patients) with an anatomical reduction did so (p = 0.05).

The quality of the reduction of the fracture is the most important variable in forecasting the outcome for patients with this injury. The interval to reduction of the dislocation of the hip may be less important than previously described.