Objectives. There remains a lack of data on the reliability of methods to estimate tibial coverage achieved during total knee replacement. In order to address this gap, the intra- and interobserver reliability of a three-dimensional (3D) digital templating method was assessed with one symmetric and one asymmetric prosthesis design. Methods. A total of 120 template procedures were performed according to specific rotational and over-hang criteria by three observers at time zero and again two weeks later. Total and sub-region coverage were calculated and the reliability of the templating and measurement method was evaluated. Results. Excellent intra- and interobserver reliability was observed for total coverage, when minimal component overhang (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.87) or no component overhang (ICC = 0.92) was permitted, regardless of rotational restrictions. Conclusions. Measurement of tibial coverage can be reliable using the templating method described even if the rotational axis selected still has a minor influence

We aimed to determine the reliability, accuracy and the clinical role of digital templating in the pre-operative work-up for total knee replacement. Initially a sample of ten pre-operative digital radiographs were templated by four independent observers to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the process. Digital templating was then performed on the radiographs of 40 consecutive patients undergoing total knee replacement by a consultant surgeon not involved with the operation, who was blinded to the size of the implant inserted. The Press Fit Condylar Sigma Knee system was used in all the patients. The size of the implant as judged by templating was then compared to that of the size used. Good inter- and intra-observer agreement was demonstrated for both femoral and tibial templating. However, the correct size of the implant was predicted in only 48% of the femoral and 55% of the tibial components. Albeit reproducible, digital templating does not currently predict the correct size of component often enough to be of clinical benefit

Abstract. Introduction. Osteotomy is a recognised surgical option for the management of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. The effectiveness of the surgery is correlated with the accuracy of correction obtained. Overcorrection can potentially lead to excess load through the healthy cartilage resulting in accelerated wear and early failure of surgery. Despite this past studies report this accuracy to be as low as 20% in achieving planned corrections. Aim. Assess the effectiveness of adopting modern osteotomy techniques in improving surgical accuracy. Methodology. A prospective cohort study. Patients were identified who had undergone osteotomy surgery for unicompartmental knee OA using a standardised technique. The surgical techniques adopted to ensure accuracy included digital templating software (Orthoview), Precision saw(Stryker), bone wedge allograft and plate osteosynthesis (Tomofix). Pre and post operative analysis of standardised long leg X-rays was performed and the intended (I) and achieved(A) corrections were calculated. Results. A total of 94 (35F/59M) patients with a mean age of 52 years were identified who fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the study. 62 patients were treated with a tibial osteotomy, 21 with femoral and 11 with a double level osteotomy. Using a 10% acceptable range (AR) for error, in 89% of cases (84 of 94) the target Mikulicz point was achieved. Potential risk factors for overcorrection included female sex and osteotomy type, with a higher incidence of over correction observed with double level osteotomies (27%). Conclusion. This study demonstrates that meticulous digital software planning and surgical technique ensures accurate surgical correction in periarticular knee osteotomy surgery

Introduction. This study investigates and compares the accuracy of pre-operative templating from the AP and lateral radiographs in total knee arthroplasty. Methods. Pre-operative radiographs from 478 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty from September 2006 to April 2009 were reviewed. 154 had digital templating performed on both the AP and lateral radiograph The sizes templated for both the femoral and tibial components were recorded from the PACS archive. These were compared aginst the implanted femoral and tibial sizes taken from the theatre record. A Z-score for two proportions was used to determine the level of significance of any difference in accuracy between the AP and lateral views for each component. Results. The femoral component was templated accurately in 56 cases (36.4%) on the lateral view and in 48 (31.2%) on the AP. It was accurate to within 1 size for the femoral component in 125 cases (81.2%) from both the AP and lateral views. The tibial component was template accurately in 70 cases (45.5%) on the lateral view and in 78 (50.6%) on the AP. It was accurate to within 1 size in 139 cases (90.3%) on the lateral view and in 142 (92.2%) on the AP. The same size was templated for the femoral component in 111 cases (72.1%) and in 83 cases (53.9%) for the tibial component. There was no statistical difference between the AP and lateral templating for either femoral or tibial component. The tibial component was templated significantly more accurately than the femoral component for the exact size (p= 0.016) and to within 1 size (p= 0.007). Conclusions. There is a tendency for greater accuracy of femoral templating on the lateral radiograph and for tibial templating on the AP. Tibial templating is significantly more accurate than femoral templatin

Aims

To perform an incremental cost-utility analysis and assess the impact of differential costs and case volume on the cost-effectiveness of robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (rUKA) compared to manual (mUKA).

Aims

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a bone-preserving treatment option for osteoarthritis localized to a single compartment in the knee. The success of the procedure is sensitive to patient selection and alignment errors. Robotic arm-assisted UKA provides technological assistance to intraoperative bony resection accuracy, which is thought to improve ligament balancing. This paper presents the five-year outcomes of a comparison between manual and robotically assisted UKAs.

Aims

Once knee arthritis and deformity have occurred, it is currently not known how to determine a patient’s constitutional (pre-arthritic) limb alignment. The purpose of this study was to describe and validate the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) algorithm as a straightforward method for preoperative planning and intraoperative restoration of the constitutional limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

As part of the national initiative to reduce waiting times for joint replacement surgery in Wales, the Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust referred 224 patients to the NHS Treatment Centre in Weston-Super-Mare for total knee replacement (TKR). A total of 258 Kinemax TKRs were performed between November 2004 and August 2006. Of these, a total of 199 patients (232 TKRs, 90%) have been followed up for five years. This cohort was compared with 258 consecutive TKRs in 250 patients, performed at Cardiff and Vale Orthopaedic Centre (CAVOC) over a similar time period. The five year cumulative survival rate was 80.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74.0 to 86.0) in the Weston-Super-Mare cohort and 95.0% (95% CI 90.2 to 98.2) in the CAVOC cohort with revision for any reason as the endpoint. The relative risk for revision at Weston-Super-Mare compared with CAVOC was 3.88 (p < 0.001). For implants surviving five years, the mean Oxford knee scores (OKS) and mean EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores were similar (OKS: Weston-Super-Mare 29 (2 to 47) vs CAVOC 29.8 (3 to 48), p = 0.61; EQ-5D: Weston-Super-Mare 0.53 (-0.38 to 1.00) vs CAVOC 0.55 (-0.32 to 1.00), p = 0.79). Patients with revised TKRs had significantly lower Oxford knee and EQ-5D scores (p < 0.001).

The results show a higher revision rate for patients operated at Weston-Super-Mare Treatment Centre, with a reduction in functional outcome and quality of life after revision. This further confirms that patients moved from one area to another for joint replacement surgery fare poorly.