Reverse total shoulder replacement (RTSR) depends on adequate deltoid function for a successful outcome. However, the anterior deltoid and/or axillary nerve may be damaged due to prior procedures or injury. The purpose of this study was to determine the compensatory muscle forces required for scapular plane elevation following RTSR when the anterior deltoid is deficient. The soft tissues were removed from six cadaver shoulders, except for tendon attachments. After implantation of the RTSR, the shoulders were mounted on a custom-made shoulder simulator to determine the mean force in each muscle required to achieve 30° and 60° of scapular plane elevation. Two conditions were tested: 1) Control with an absent supraspinatus and infraspinatus; and 2) Control with anterior deltoid deficiency. Anterior deltoid deficiency resulted in a mean increase of 195% in subscapularis force at 30° when compared with the control (p = 0.02). At 60°, the subscapularis force increased a mean of 82% (p < 0.001) and the middle deltoid force increased a mean of 26% (p = 0.04). Scapular plane elevation may still be possible following an RTSR in the setting of anterior deltoid deficiency. When the anterior deltoid is deficient, there is a compensatory increase in the force required by the subscapularis and middle deltoid. Attempts to preserve the subscapularis, if present, might maximise post-operative function

Aims. Resection of the proximal humerus for the primary malignant bone tumour sometimes requires en bloc resection of the deltoid. However, there is no information in the literature which helps a surgeon decide whether to preserve the deltoid or not. The aim of this study was to determine whether retaining the deltoid at the time of resection would increase the rate of local recurrence. We also sought to identify the variables that persuade expert surgeons to choose a deltoid sparing rather than deltoid resecting procedure. Patients and Methods. We reviewed 45 patients who had undergone resection of a primary malignant tumour of the proximal humerus. There were 29 in the deltoid sparing group and 16 in the deltoid resecting group. Imaging studies were reviewed to assess tumour extension and soft-tissue involvement. The presence of a fat rim separating the tumour from the deltoid on MRI was particularly noted. The cumulative probability of local recurrence was calculated in a competing risk scenario. Results. There was no significant difference (adjusted p = 0.89) in the cumulative probability of local recurrence between the deltoid sparing (7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1 to 20) and the deltoid resecting group (26%, 95% CI 8 to 50). Patients were more likely to be selected for a deltoid sparing procedure if they presented with a small tumour (p = 0.0064) with less bone involvement (p = 0.032) and a continuous fat rim on MRI (p = 0.002) and if the axillary nerve could be identified (p = 0.037). Conclusion. A deltoid sparing procedure can provide good local control after resection of the proximal humerus for a primary malignant bone tumour. A smaller tumour, the presence of a continuous fat rim and the identification of the axillary nerve on pre-operative MRI will persuade surgeons to opt for a deltoid resecting procedure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1244–9

Background. Supination-external rotation (SER) injuries make up 80% of all ankle fractures. SER stage 2 injuries (AITFL and Weber B) are considered stable. SER stage 3 injury includes disruption of the posterior malleolus (or PITFL). In SER stage 4 there is either medial malleolus fracture or deltoid injury too. SER 4 injuries have been considered unstable, requiring surgery. The deltoid ligament is a key component of ankle stability, but clinical tests to assess deltoid injury have low specificity. This study specifically investigates the role of the components of the deep deltoid ligament in SER ankle fractures. Aim. To investigate the effect of deep deltoid ligament injury on SER ankle fracture stability. Methods. Four matched pairs (8 specimens) were tested using a standardised protocol. Specimens were sequentially tested for stability when axially loaded with a custom rig with up to 750N. Specimens were tested with: ankle intact; lateral injury (AITFL and Weber B); additional posterior injury (PITFL); additional anterior deep deltoid; additional posterior deep deltoid; lateral side ORIF. Clinical photographs and radiographs were recorded. In addition, dynamic stress radiographs were performed after sectioning the deep deltoid and then after fracture fixation to assess tilt of the talus in eversion. Results. All specimens with an intact posterior deep deltoid ligament were stable when loaded and showed no talar tilt on dynamic assessment. Once the posterior deep deltoid ligament was sectioned there was instability in all specimens. Surgical stabilisation of the lateral side prevented talar shift but not talar tilt. Conclusion. If the posterior deep deltoid ligament is intact SER fractures may be managed without surgery in a plantigrade cast. Without immobilisation the talus may tilt, risking deltoid incompetence

Ankle fractures are the fourth most common fracture requiring surgical management. The deltoid ligament is considered the primary stabilizer of the ankle against a valgus force. The management of the deltoid ligament in ankle fractures is currently a controversial topic no consensus exists regarding repair in the setting of ankle fractures. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the role and indications for deltoid ligament repair in ankle fractures. A systematic database search was conducted with Medline, Pubmed and Embase for relevant studies discussing patients with ankle fractures involving deltoid ligament rupture and repair. The papers were screened independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. Study quality was evaluated using the MINORs criteria. Data extraction included post-operative outcomes, pain, range of motion (ROM), function, medial clear space (MCS), syndesmotic malreduction and complication rates. Following title, abstract and full text screening, 10 eligible studies published between 1987 and 2017 remained for data extraction (n = 528). The studies include 325 Weber B and 203 Weber C type fractures. Malreduction rate in studies with deltoid ligament repair was 7.4% in comparison to those without repair at 33.3% (p < 0.05). Eleven (4%) of deltoid ligament repair patients returned for re-operation to have implants removed in comparison to eighty three (42%) of those without repair (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference for pain, function, ROM, MCS and complication rates (p < 0.05). The mean operating time of deltoid ligament repair groups was 20 minutes longer than non-repair groups(p < 0.05). Deltoid ligament repair offers significantly lower syndesmotic malreduction rates and reduced re-operation rates for hardware removal when performed instead of transsyndesmotic screw fixation. When compared to non-repair groups, there are no significant differences in pain, function, ROM, MCS and complication rates. Deltoid ligament repair should be considered for ankle fracture patients with syndesmotic injury, especially those with Weber C. Other alternative syndesmotic fixation methods such as suture button fixation should be explored. A large multi-patient randomized control trial is required to further examine the outcomes of ankle fracture patients with deltoid ligament repair

Despite the expansion of arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder, the open deltopectoral approach to the shoulder is still frequently used, for example in fracture fixation and shoulder replacement. However, it is sometimes accompanied by unexpected bleeding. The cephalic vein is the landmark for the deltopectoral interval, yet its intimate relationship with the deltoid artery, and the anatomical variations in that structure, have not previously been documented. In this study the vascular anatomy encountered during 100 consecutive elective deltopectoral approaches was recorded and the common variants described. Two common variants of the deltoid artery were encountered. In type I (71%) it crosses the interval and tunnels into the deltoid muscle without encountering the cephalic vein. However, in type II (21%) it crosses the interval, reaches the cephalic vein and then runs down, medial to and behind it, giving off several small arterial branches that return back across the interval to the pectoralis major. Several minor variations were also seen (8%). These variations in the deltoid artery have not previously been described and may lead to confusion and unexpected bleeding during this standard anterior surgical approach to the shoulder. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:657–9

Aims. The eccentric glenosphere was principally introduced into reverse shoulder arthroplasty to reduce the incidence of scapular notching. There is only limited information about the influence of its design on deltoid power and joint reaction forces. The aim of our study was to investigate how the diameter and eccentricity of the glenosphere affect the biomechanics of the deltoid and the resultant joint reaction forces. . Methods. Different sizes of glenosphere and eccentricity were serially tested in ten cadaveric shoulders using a custom shoulder movement simulator. Results. Increasing the diameter of the glenosphere alone did not alter the deltoid moment arm. However, using an eccentric glenosphere increased the moment arm of the deltoid, lowered the joint reaction force and required less deltoid force to generate movement. Conclusion. Eccentricity is an independent variable which increases deltoid efficiency and lowers joint reaction forces in a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:218–23

The indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) continue to be expanded. Associated impairment of the deltoid muscle has been considered a contraindication to its use, as function of the RSA depends on the deltoid and impairment of the deltoid may increase the risk of dislocation. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the functional outcome and risk of dislocation following the use of an RSA in patients with impaired deltoid function. Between 1999 and 2010, 49 patients (49 shoulders) with impairment of the deltoid underwent RSA and were reviewed at a mean of 38 months (12 to 142) post-operatively. There were nine post-operative complications (18%), including two dislocations. The mean forward elevation improved from 50° (. sd. 38; 0° to 150°) pre-operatively to 121° (. sd . 40; 0° to 170°) at final follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean Constant score improved from 24 (. sd. 12; 2 to 51) to 58 (. sd. 17; 16 to 83) (p < 0.001). The mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score was 71 (. sd. 17; 10 to 95) and the rate of patient satisfaction was 98% (48 of 49) at final follow-up. . These results suggest that pre-operative deltoid impairment, in certain circumstances, is not an absolute contraindication to RSA. This form of treatment can yield reliable improvement in function without excessive risk of post-operative dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1106–13

Aims. In patients with a rotator cuff tear, tear pattern and tendon involvement are known risk factors for the development of pseudoparalysis of the shoulder. It remains unclear, however, why similar tears often have very different functional consequences. The present study hypothesizes that individual shoulder anatomy, specifically the moment arms (MAs) of the rotator cuff (RC) and the deltoid muscle, as well as their relative recruitment during shoulder abduction, plays a central role in pseudoparalysis. Materials and Methods. Biomechanical and clinical analyses of the pseudoparalytic shoulder were conducted based on the ratio of the RC/deltoid MAs, which were used to define a novel anatomical descriptor called the Shoulder Abduction Moment (SAM) index. The SAM index is the ratio of the radii of two concentric spheres based on the centre of rotation of the joint. One sphere captures the humeral head (numerator) and the other the deltoid origin of the acromion (denominator). A computational rigid body simulation was used to establish the functional link between the SAM index and a potential predisposition for pseudoparalysis. A retrospective radiological validation study based on these measures was also undertaken using two cohorts with and without pseudoparalysis and massive RC tears. Results. Decreased RC activity and improved glenohumeral stability was predicted by simulations of SAM indices with larger diameters of the humeral head, being consequently beneficial for joint stability. Clinical investigation of the SAM index showed significant risk of pseudoparalysis in patients with massive tears and a SAM < 0.77 (odds ratio (OR) 11). Conclusion. The SAM index, which represents individual biomechanical characteristics of shoulder morphology, plays a determinant role in the presence or absence of pseudoparalysis in shoulders with massive RC tears

Introduction. Recent literature has shown that RSAs successfully improve pain and functionality, however variability in range of motion and high complication rates persist. Biomechanical studies suggest that tensioning of the deltoid, resulting from deltoid lengthening, improves range of motion by increasing the moment arm. This study aims to provide clinical significance for deltoid tensioning by comparing postoperative range of motion measurements with deltoid length for 93 patients. Methods. Deltoid length measurements were performed radiographically for 93 patients. Measurements were performed on both preoperative and postoperative x-rays in order to assess deltoid lengthening. The deltoid length was measured as the distance from the infeolateral tip of the acromion to the deltoid tuberosity on the humerus for both pre- and post- x-rays. For preoperative center of rotation measurements, the distance extended from the center of humeral head (estimated as radius of best fit circle) to deltoid length line. For postoperative measurements, the distance was from the center of glenosphere implant to deltoid length line. Forward flexion and external rotation was measured for all patients. Results. The average preoperative deltoid length was 154.25 mm while the average postoperative deltoid measurements was 178.93 mm. The average preoperative center of rotation as 21.33 mm and the average postoperative center of rotation measurement was 46.75 mm. There was low correlation between deltoid length and center of rotation with either forward flexion or external rotation or outcome scores. Discussion. Our results suggest that deltoid lengthening does not significantly influence optimizing clinical outcomes for RSAs. Further research is required to determine design parameters and implants positioning to improve RSAs

Reverse Total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become an increasingly used solution to treat osteoarthritis and cuff tear arthropathy. Though successful there are still 10 to 65% complication rates reported for RTSA. Complication rates range over different reverse shoulder designs but a clear understanding of implant design parameters that cause complications is still lacking within the literature. In efforts to reduce complication rates (Implant fixation, range of motion, joint stiffness, and fracture) and improve clinical/functional outcomes having to do with proper muscle performance we have employed a computational approach to assess the sensitivity of muscle performance to changes in RTSA implant geometry and surgical placement. The goal of this study was to assess how changes in RTSA joint configuration affect deltoid performance. An approach was developed from previous work to predict a patient's muscle performance. This approach was automated to assess changes in muscle performance over 1521 joint configurations for an RTSA subject. Patient-specific muscle moment arms, muscle lengths, muscle velocities, and muscle parameters served as inputs into the muscle prediction scheme. We systematically varied joint center locations over 1521 different perturbations from the in vivo measured surgical placement to determine muscle activation and normalized operating region for the anterior, lateral and posterior aspects of the deltoid muscle. The joint center was varied from the RTSA subject's nominal surgical position ±4 mm in the anterior/posterior direction, ±12mm in the medial/lateral direction, and −10 mm to 14 mm in the superior/inferior direction. Overall muscle activity varied over 1521 different implant configurations for the RTSA subject. For initial elevation the RTSA subject showed at least 25% deltoid activation sensitivity in each of the directions of joint configuration change(Figure 1). Posterior deltoid showed a maximal activation variation of 84% in the superior/inferior direction(Figure 1c). Deltoid activation variations lie primarily in the superior/inferior and anterior/posterior directions. An increasing trend was seen for the anterior, lateral and posterior deltoid outside of the discontinuity seen at 28°(Figure 1). Activation variations were compared to subject's experimental data. Reserve actuation for all samples remained below 4Nm(Figure 2). The most optimal deltoid normalized operating length was implemented by changing the joint configuration in the superior/inferior and medial/lateral directions(Figure 3). Current shoulder models utilize cadaver information in their assessment of generic muscle strength. In adding to this literature we performed a sensitivity study to assess the effects of RTSA joint configurations on deltoid muscle performance in a single patient-specific model. For this patient we were able to assess the best joint configuration to improve the patients muscle function and ideally their clinical outcome. With this information improvements can be made to the surgical placement and design of RTSA on a patient-specific basis to improve functional/clinical outcomes while minimizing complications. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an increasingly common treatment for osteoarthritic shoulders with irreparable rotator cuff tears. Although very successful in alleviating pain and restoring some function, there is little objective information relating geometric changes imposed by the reverse shoulder and arm function, particularly the moment generating capacity of the shoulder muscles. Recent modeling studies of reverse shoulders have shown significant variation in deltoid muscle moment arms over a typical range of humeral offset locations in shoulders with RTSA. The goal of this study was to investigate the sensitivity of muscle moment arms as a function of varying the joint center and humeral offset in three representative RTSA subjects that spanned the anatomical range from our previous study cohort. We hypothesized there may exist a more beneficial joint implant placement, measured by muscle moment arms, compared to the actual surgical implant configuration. A 12 degree of freedom, subject-specific model was used to represent the shoulders of three patients with RTSA for whom fluoroscopic measurements of scapular and humeral kinematics during abduction had been obtained. The computer model used subject-specific in vivo abduction kinematics and systematically varied humeral offset locations over 1521 different perturbations from the surgical placement to determine moment arms for the anterior, lateral and posterior aspects of the deltoid muscle. The humeral offset was varied from its surgical position ±4 mm in the anterior/posterior direction, ±12mm in the medial/lateral direction, and −10 mm to 14 mm in the superior/inferior direction. The anterior deltoid moment arm varied up to 20 mm with humeral offset and center of rotation variations, primarily in the medial/lateral and superior/inferior directions. Similarly, the lateral deltoid moment arm demonstrated variations up to 20 mm, primarily with humeral offset changes in the medial/lateral and anterior/posterior directions. The posterior deltoid moment arm varied up to 15mm, primarily in early abduction, and was most sensitive to changes of the humeral offset in the superior/inferior direction. The goal of this study was to assess the sensitivity of the deltoid muscle moment arms as a function of joint configuration for existing RTSA subjects. High variations were found for all three deltoid components. Variation over the entire abduction arc was greatest in the anterior and lateral deltoid, while the posterior deltoid moment arm was mostly sensitive to humeral offset changes early in the abduction arc. Moment arm changes of 15–20 mm represent a significant amount of the total deltoid moment arm. This means there is an opportunity to dramatically change the deltoid moment arms through surgical placement of the joint center of rotation and humeral stem. Computational models of the shoulder may help surgeons optimize subject-specific placement of RTSA implants to provide the best possible muscle function, and assist implant designers to configure devices for the best overall performance

Reverse Total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become an increasingly used solution to treat osteoarthritis and cuff tear arthropathy. Though successful there are still 10 to 65% complication rates reported for RTSA. Complication rates range over different reverse shoulder designs but a clear understanding of implant design parameters that cause complications is still lacking within the literature. In efforts to reduce complication rates (Implant fixation, range of motion, joint stiffness, and fracture) and improve clinical/functional outcomes having to do with proper muscle performance we have employed a computational approach to assess the sensitivity of muscle performance to changes in RTSA implant geometry and surgical placement. The goal of this study was to assess how changes in RTSA joint configuration affect deltoid performance. An approach was developed from previous work to predict a patient's muscle performance. This approach was automated to assess changes in muscle performance over 1521 joint configurations for an RTSA subject. Patient-specific muscle moment arms, muscle lengths, muscle velocities, and muscle parameters served as inputs into the muscle prediction scheme. We systematically varied joint center locations over 1521 different perturbations from the in vivo measured surgical placement to determine muscle activation and normalized operating region for the anterior, lateral and posterior aspects of the deltoid muscle. The joint center was varied from the RTSA subject's nominal surgical position ±4 mm in the anterior/posterior direction, ±12mm in the medial/lateral direction, and −10 mm to 14 mm in the superior/inferior direction. Overall muscle activity varied over 1521 different implant configurations for the RTSA subject. For initial elevation the RTSA subject showed at least 25% deltoid activation sensitivity in each of the directions of joint configuration change(Figure 1A–C). Posterior deltoid showed a maximal activation variation of 84% in the superior/inferior direction(Figure 1C). Deltoid activation variations lie primarily in the superior/inferior and anterior/posterior directions(Figure 1). An increasing trend was seen for the anterior, lateral and posterior deltoid outside of the discontinuity seen at 28°(Figur 1A–C). Activation variations were compared to subject's experimental data (Figure 1). Reserve actuation for all samples remained below 4Nm. The most optimal deltoid normalized operating length was implemented by changing the joint configuration in the superior/inferior and medial/lateral directions. Current shoulder models utilize cadaver information in their assessment of generic muscle strength. In adding to this literature we performed a sensitivity study to assess the effects of RTSA joint configurations on deltoid muscle performance. With this information improvements can be made to the surgical placement and design of RTSA to improve functional/clinical outcomes while minimizing complications

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an increasingly common treatment for osteoarthritic shoulders with irreparable rotator cuff tears. Although very successful in alleviating pain and restoring some function there is little objective information relating geometric changes imposed by the reverse shoulder and the moment generating capacity of the shoulder muscles. Recent modeling studies of reverse shoulders have shown significant variation in deltoid muscle moment arms over varied joint centers for shoulders with RTSA. The goal of this study was to investigate the sensitivity of muscle moment arms as a function of varying the joint center in one representative RTSA subject. We hypothesized there may exist a more beneficial joint implant placement, measured by muscle moment arms, compared to the actual surgical implant placement. A 12 degree of freedom, subject-specific model was used to represent the shoulder of a patient with RTSA for whom fluoroscopic measurements of scapular and humeral kinematics during abduction had been obtained. The computer model used these abduction kinematics and systematically varied joint center locations over 1521 different perturbations from the surgical placement to determine moment arms for the anterior, lateral and posterior aspects of the deltoid muscle. The joint center was varied from its surgical position ±4 mm in the anterior/posterior direction, 0–24 mm in the medial/lateral direction, and −10 mm to 14 mm in the superior/inferior direction. The anterior deltoid moment arm varied up to 16mm with center of rotations variations, primarily in the medial/lateral and superior/inferior directions (Figure 2, Table 1(Figure 1)). Similarly, the lateral deltoid moment arm demonstrated variations up to 13 mm, primarily with joint center changes in the anterior/posterior and superior/inferior directions. The posterior deltoid moment arm varied up to 10mm, primarily in early abduction, and was most sensitive to changes of the joint center in demonstrated a sensitivity of 6 mm corresponding to variations in the superior/inferior directions (Figure 2). The goal of this study was to assess the sensitivity of the deltoid muscle moment arms as a function of joint configuration for an existing RTSA subject. High variations were found for all three deltoid components. Variation over the entire abduction arc was greatest in the anterior and lateral deltoid, while the posterior deltoid moment arm was mostly sensitive to joint center changes early in the abduction arc. Moment arm changes of 10–16mm represent a significant amount of the total deltoid moment arm. This means there is an opportunity to dramatically change the deltoid moments arms through surgical placement of the joint center of rotation. Computational models of the shoulder may help surgeons optimize subject-specific placement of RTSA implants to provide the best possible muscle function, and assist implant designers to configure devices for the best overall performance

After establishing anatomical feasibility, functional reconstruction to replace the anterolateral part of the deltoid was performed in 20 consecutive patients with irreversible deltoid paralysis using the sternoclavicular portion of the pectoralis major muscle. The indication for reconstruction was deltoid deficiency combined with massive rotator cuff tear in 11 patients, brachial plexus palsy in seven, and an isolated axillary nerve lesion in two. All patients were followed clinically and radiologically for a mean of 70 months (24 to 125). The mean gender-adjusted Constant score increased from 28% (15% to 54%) to 51% (19% to 83%). Forward elevation improved by a mean of 37°, abduction by 30° and external rotation by 9°. The pectoralis inverse plasty may be used as a salvage procedure in irreversible deltoid deficiency, providing subjectively satisfying results. Active forward elevation and abduction can be significantly improved

Reverse Total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become an increasingly used solution to treat osteoarthritis and cuff tear arthropathy. Though successful there are still 10 to 65% complication rates reported for RTSA. Complication rates range over different reverse shoulder designs but a clear understanding of implant design parameters that cause complications is still lacking within the literature. In efforts to reduce complication rates (Implant fixation, range of motion, joint stiffness, and fracture) and improve clinical/functional outcomes having to do with proper muscle performance we have employed a computational approach to assess the sensitivity of muscle performance to changes in RTSA implant geometry and surgical placement. The goal of this study was to assess how changes in RTSA joint configuration affect deltoid performance. An approach was developed from previous work to predict a patient's muscle performance. This approach was automated to assess changes in muscle performance over 1521 joint configurations for an RTSA subject. Patient-specific muscle moment arms, muscle lengths, muscle velocities, and muscle parameters served as inputs into the muscle prediction scheme. We systematically varied joint center locations over 1521 different perturbations from the in vivo measured surgical placement to determine muscle normalized operating region for the anterior, lateral and posterior aspects of the deltoid muscle. The joint center was varied according to previous published work from the RTSA subject's nominal surgical position ±4 mm in the anterior/posterior direction, ±12mm in the medial/lateral direction, and −10 mm to 14 mm in the superior/inferior direction (Walker 2015 et al. Table 2). Overall muscle normalized operating length varied over 1521 different implant configurations for the RTSA subject. Ideal muscle normalized operating length variations were found to be in all the fundamental directions that the joint was varied. The anterior deltoid normalized operating length was found to be most sensitive with joint configurations changes in the anterior/posterior medial/lateral direction. It lateral deltoid normalized operating length was found to be most sensitive with joint configurations changes in the medial/lateral direction. It posterior deltoid normalized operating length was found to be most sensitive with joint configurations changes in the medial/lateral direction. Reserve actuation for all samples remained below 1 Nm. The most optimal deltoid normalized operating length was implemented by changing the joint configuration in the superior/inferior and medial/lateral directions. Current shoulder models focus on predicting muscle moment arms. Although valuable it does not allow me for active understanding of how lengthening the muscle will affect its ability to generate force. Our study provides an understanding of how muscle lengthening will affect the force generating capacity of each of the heads of the deltoid. With this information improvements can be made to the surgical placement and design of RTSA to improve functional/clinical outcomes while minimizing complications. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

We studied the origin of the anterior deltoid from the lateral third of the clavicle and the leading anterior edge of the acromion in 18 cadaver shoulders by anatomical and histological methods. The main origin of the deltoid was from the superior surface of the anterior acromion, but muscle and tendinous attachments were also seen on the entire anterior surface of the acromion, its anteroinferior surface and on the whole width of the anterior surface of the clavicle. Mock arthroscopic acromioplasty was shown to detach deltoid fibres from the anterior surfaces, leaving the superior attachment in continuity. Potentially, arthroscopic subacromial and clavicular resection can detach deltoid fibres originating from the anterior and anteroinferior surfaces of the acromion and clavicle and thus weaken the anterior deltoid

Background:. An upper extremity model of the shoulder was developed from the Stanford upper extremity model (Holzbaur 2005) in this study to assess the muscle lengthening changes that occur as a function of kinematics for reverse total shoulder athroplasty (RTSA). This study assesses muscle moment arm changes as a function of scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) during abduction for RTSA subjects. The purpose of the study was to calculate the effect of RTSA SHR on the deltoid moment arm over the abduction activity. Methods:. The model was parameterized as a six degree of freedom model in which the scapula and humeral rotational degrees of freedom were prescribed from fluoroscopy. The model had 15 muscle actuators representing the muscles that span the shoulder girdle. The model was then uniformly scaled according to reflective markers from motion capture studies. An average SHR was calculated for the normal and RTSA cohort set. The SHR averages were then used to drive the motion of the scapula and the humerus. Lastly 3-dimensional kinematics for the scapula and humerus from 3d-2d fluoroscopic image registration techniques were used to drive the motion of model. Deltoid muscle moment arm was calculated. Results:. Muscle moment arms were calculated for the anterior, lateral and posterior heads of the deltoid. Significant changes (>1 mm) were only found in comparing the anterior deltoid muscle moment arm predictions between the normal and RTSA group. The anterior deltoid for RTSA had a moment arm range from −12.5–20.6 mm over the max abduction arc. The anterior deltoid for normal group had a moment arm range from −14.5–22.6 mm over the max abduction arc. There is a difference of 2 mm between the normal and RTSA anterior deltoid moment arm that converges to 0 at 45° of elevation. The 2 mm difference is also seen again as the difference diverges again (Figure 1). There were no significant differences found between normal and RTSA groups for the lateral and posterior deltoid. The most significant difference between moment arm calculations for the RTSA and normal group was found in the Anterior deltoid. (Figure 1). Conclusion:. It was found that the muscle moment arms in the RTSA group were significantly different than in the normal group for the anterior deltoid. No other significant differences were found. In the initial 40° of elevation there is a 2 mm difference in anterior deltoid muscle moment arm between the normal and RTSA group. This difference is also found is seen from 60°–90° of elevation. From 35° −55° there is no difference between RTSA and normal groups. SHR for the RTSA (1.8: 1) is significantly lower than in the normal (2.5: 1) group. Differences found in muscle moment arms over the abduction arc between RTSA and normal groups point to the significant change of the anterior deltoid after RTSA. This study primary objective was to assess the differences in muscle moment arms as a function of SHR (Kinematic differences). Significant differences found may improve implant design, surgical technique, and rehabilitative strategies for reverse shoulder surgery

The Delto-pectoral approach is the workhorse of the shoulder surgeon, but surprisingly the common variants of the cephalic vein and deltoid artery have not been documented. The vascular anatomy encountered during one hundred primary elective delto-pectoral approaches was documented and common variants described. Two common variants are described. A type I (71%), whereby the deltoid artery crosses the interval and inserts directly in to the deltoid musculature. In this variant the surgeon is unlikely to encounter any vessels crossing the interval apart from the deltoid artery itself. In a type II pattern (21%) the deltoid artery runs parallel to the cephalic vein on the deltoid surface and is highly likely to give off medial branches (95%) that cross the interval, as well as medial tributaries to the cephalic vein (38%). Knowledge of the two common variants will aid the surgeon when dissecting the delto-pectoral approach and highlights that these vessels crossing the interval are likely to be arterial, rather than venous. This study allows the surgeon to recognize these variations and reproduce bloodless, safe and efficient surgery

Physiological studies have revealed that the central nervous system controls groups of muscle fibers in a very efficient manner. Within a single skeletal muscle, the central nervous system independently controls individual muscle segments to produce a particular motor outcome. Mechanomyographic studies on the deltoid muscle have revealed that the deltoid muscle, commonly described as having three anatomical segments, is composed of at least seven functional muscle segments, which all have the potential to be at an important level independently coordinated by the central nervous system.[. 1. ] In this study we tried to anatomically describe and quantify these different functional segments within the deltoid muscle, based on the branching out pattern of the axillary nerve. Forty-four deltoids of 22 embalmed adult cadavers, were analyzed. The axillary nerve was carefully dissected together with his anterior and posterior branch upon invasion into the muscle. According to the pattern of fiber distribution and their fascial embalmment, we then carefully splitted the deltoid muscle into different portions each being innervated by a major branch of the axillary nerve. The position and volume of each segment in relation to the whole muscle was derived. In 3 cases the axillary nerve branched out in 8 major divisions. In 22 out of 44 cases (50%), the axillary nerve branched out in 7 principal parts. A branching out pattern of 6 major divisions occurred in 14 out of 44 cases. Finally we found a division in 5 major branches in 5 of the specimens. In general, both posterior and anterior peripheral segments seemed to have the largest volume. In nearly all (93%) cases, the central segments were smaller in weight and volume compared to the more peripheral segments. Based on the innervation pattern of the deltoid muscle a segmentation in 5 up to 8 major segments seem to be found. This confirms from anatomical point of view earlier reports of functional differentiation within the deltoid muscle

The surgical technique for treatment of massive rotator cuff tears, more than 5 cm, with loss of substance and tendon retraction, is still not well defined by the international orthopaedic community. A specific rehabilitation regimen or arthroscopic débridement may be insufficient in active patients who continue to suffer from pain and muscular fatigue in active forward elevation. We treated 20 patients, 14 men and 6 women, with an average age of 52 years (range 40–69) with the surgical technique consisting in acromion decompression, stabilisation of the cuff lesion with anchors, application of a prolene membrane and using a deltoid muscular flap as reinforcement. Deltoid flap is created by splitting the deltoid muscular fibres in front of the anterior border of the acromion. The inferior part of deltoid is sutured to the tendon above the synthetic membrane. The mean patient follow-up was 24 months. The pain was completely relieved in 85% of subjects, The joint mobility increased significantly in flexion, abduction and external rotation; however, the internal rotation did not improve. We propose this surgical technique as the procedure of choice for treating retracted ruptures of the supraspinatus associated with lesions of the supra- and the infra-spinatus