Aims. To establish our early clinical results of a new total knee arthroplasty (TKA) tibial component introduced in 2013 and compare it to other designs in use at our hospital during the same period. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 166 (154 patients) consecutive cemented, fixed bearing, posterior-stabilized (PS) TKAs (ATTUNE) at one hospital performed by five surgeons. These were compared with a reference cohort of 511 knees (470 patients) of other designs (seven manufacturers) performed at the same hospital by the same surgeons. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, or follow-up times between the two cohorts. The primary outcome was revision performed or pending. Results. In total, 19 (11.5%) ATTUNE study TKAs have been revised at a mean 30.3 months (SD 15), and loosening of the tibial component was seen in 17 of these (90%). Revision is pending in 12 (7%) knees. There was no difference between the 31 knees revised or with revision pending and the remaining 135 study knees in terms of patient characteristics, type of bone cement (p = 0.988), or individual surgeon (p = 0.550). In the reference cohort, there were significantly fewer knees revised (n = 13, 2.6%) and with revision pending (n = 8, 1.5%) (both p < 0.001), and only two had loosening of the tibial component as the reason for revision. Conclusion. This new TKA design had an unexpectedly high early rate of revision compared with our reference cohort of TKAs.
At our national explant retrieval unit, we identified an unusual pattern of backside-deformation on polyethylene (PE) inserts of contemporary total-knee-replacements (TKRs). The PE backside's margins were inferiorly deformed in TKRs with central-locking trays. We reported that this backside-deformation appeared to be linked to tray debonding. Moreover, recent studies have shown high-rate of tray debonding in PS NexGen TKRs. Therefore, we hypothesised that backside deformation on PS inserts may be more than on CR inserts. We used peer-reviewed techniques to analyse changes in the bearing (wear rate) and backside surfaces (deformation) of PE inserts using coordinate measuring machines [N=61 NexGen (CR-39 and PS-22) TKRs with non-augmented-trays]. Multiple regression was used to determine which variable had the greatest influence on backside-deformation. The amount of cement cover on trays was quantified as a %of the total surface using Image-J software.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
The purpose of this study was to assess mid-term survivorship following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with Optetrak Logic components and identify the most common revision indications at a single institution. We identified a retrospective cohort of 7,941 Optetrak primary TKAs performed from January 2010 to December 2018. We reviewed the intraoperative findings of 369 TKAs that required revision TKA from January 2010 to December 2021 and the details of the revision implants used. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine survivorship. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the impact of patient variables and year of implantation on survival time.Aims
Methods
Background. There are case series of debonding of the ATTUNE® tibial component introduced in 2013. We studied the early clinical results of this total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and compared it to other designs at one hospital. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 223 consecutive, non-randomized, cemented fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized ATTUNE® TKAs at one hospital by 5 surgeons from 2013 through 2017. We excluded 4 knees with early infection and 53 with follow-up less than 6 months. Of 166 TKAs reviewed, the mean patient age was 63.8 years, mean BMI 32, and mean follow-up 25 months. We compared this to a “control” cohort of 511 TKAs of other manufacturers performed at the same hospital. The endpoints were revision performed and revision pending. Results. Nineteen (11.5%) ATTUNE® knees have been revised and revision is pending in 12 (7%) knees, at a mean of 30 months. Tibial component loosening was seen in 17 (90%) revised knees. There was no difference between knees revised or revision pending and unrevised knees in patient demographics, cement used (p=0.84), or attending surgeon (p=0.55). In the “control” cohort, there were 13 (2.6%) knees revised (p<0.0001) and revision pending in 8 (1.5%) (p<0.0001), and only 2 had tibial loosening as the reason for revision. Conclusion. This cemented TKA design had an unexpected high early rate of revision.
