Abstract. Objectives. Total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most successful and cost-effective interventions in orthopaedic surgery. Dislocation is a debilitating complication of THR and managing an unstable THR constitutes a significant clinical challenge. Stability in THR is multifactorial and is influenced by surgical, patient and implant related factors. It is established that larger diameter femoral heads have a wider impingement-free range of movement and an increase in jump distance, both of which are relevant in reducing the risk of dislocation. However, they can generate higher frictional torque which has led to concerns related to increased wear and loosening. Furthermore, the potential for taper corrosion or trunnionosis is also a potential concern with larger femoral heads, particularly those made from cobalt-chrome. These concerns have meant there is hesitancy among surgeons to use larger sized heads. This study presents the comparison of clinical outcomes for different head sizes (28mm, 32mm and 36mm) in primary THR for 10,104 hips in a single centre. Methods. A retrospective study of all consecutive patients who underwent primary THR at our institution between 1st April 2003 and 31st Dec 2019 was undertaken. Institutional approval for this study was obtained. Demographic and surgical data were collected. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for dislocation, and all-cause revision excluding dislocation. Continuous descriptive statistics used means, median values, ranges, and 95% confidence intervals where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate time to revision.
The price per total knee replacement (TKR) performed is fixed but the subsequent length of hospital stay (LOS) is variable. The current national average for LOS following TKR is six days. LOS is an important marker of resource consumption, has implications in patient satisfaction, and is used as a marker of hospital quality. The aim of this study was to describe the temporal change in demographics between 2004 and 2009, and to identify intra-operative factors and patient characteristics associated with a prolonged LOS that could be addressed to improve clinical practice. We performed a retrospective cohort review of 184 patients (2004 n=88, 2009 n=96) who underwent primary TKRs at Chorley District General Hospital. The median LOS in 2009 was eight days compared to ten days in 2004, an average of 3.5 days less (p < 0.001). Patients were significantly younger (p < 0.001) in 2009 (median 66 years) compared to 2004 (median 74 years), with both years having a similar female predominance. There was no significant change in the BMI or American Society of Anesthesiologists score between 2004 and 2009. This data suggests that block contracts with the private sector has not influenced the demographics of patients being treated in the NHS. Intra-operative factors including the use of a peripheral nerve block, the surgeon grade, the day of the week the operation was performed, the operation length, and the change in pre- to post-operative haemoglobin were not found to significantly increase the LOS (p = 0.058, p = 0.40, p = 0.092, p = 0.50, p = 0.43 respectively). Cemented TKRs had a median LOS of nine days compared to eight for uncemented implants (p = 0.015). However, patients with a cemented implant were on average 6.2 years older than patients with an uncemented implant (p < 0.001). Using
