Methods

A retrospective review of 80 patients with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis from 1998–2012 was undertaken to determine the outcome of the unaffected hip. All patients were treated with either prophylactic single Richards screw fixation or observation of the uninvolved hip and were followed up for at least 12 months. The unaffected hip of 44 patients (mean age 12.6 years, range 9–17) had simultaneous prophylactic fixation and 36 patients (mean age 13.4 years, range 9–17.4) were managed with observation.

Abstract. Objective. To assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis using both validated radiological signs and CT-angle measurements. Methods. A retrospective review of all cases involving surgical management for acute SUFE presenting to the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne were assessed from 2012–2018. Pre-operative plain radiographs were assessed for slip angle, validated radiological signs of retroversion (post wall/crossover/ischial spine sign) and standardised post-operative CT Scans were used to assess cranial and mid-acetabular version. Results. 116 SUFEs presented in 107 patients who underwent surgical intervention; 47 females and 60 boys, with an average age of 12.7 years (range 7.5–16.6 years). Complete radiological data was available for 91 patients (99 hips) with adequate axial CT imaging of both hips. 82% patients underwent pinning in situ (PIS) with subcapital realignment surgery (SRS) performed in 18% (slip angles >75°). Contralateral prophylactic hip PIS was performed in 72 patients (87%). On the slip side, 68% of patients had 1 or more radiological signs of retroversion in the slipped hip, with 60% on the contralateral side. The mean cranial and mid-acetabular version measurements were −8°(range −30 – 8°) and 10.5°(range −10 – 25°), respectively. Conclusions. Acetabular retroversion is rare in the normal population with studies reports ranging from 0–7%. This study showed an increased prevalence of 68% in SUFE patients, which is likely to be a primary anatomical abnormality, subsequently increasing the shear forces across the proximal femoral growth plate due to superior over-coverage. The resulting CAM lesion from SUFE in combination with the pincer lesion due to retroversion can lead to premature hip impingement and degeneration. Further larger studies are required to assess if acetabular retroversion is a true risk factor, and its role in helping guide management including prophylactic pinning. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The high risk and the associated high mortality of secondary, contralateral hip fractures [1,2] could justify internal, invasive prophylactic reinforcement of the osteoporotic proximal femur to avoid these injuries in case of a low energy fall. Previous studies have demonstrated high potential of augmentation approaches [3,4,5], but to date there has no ideal solution been found. The development of optimized reinforcement strategies can be aided with validated computer simulation tools that can be used to evaluate new ideas. A validated non-linear finite element (FE) simulation tool was used here to predict the yield and fracture load of twelve osteoporotic or osteopenic proximal femora in sideways fall based on high resolution CT images. Various augmentation strategies using bone cement or novel metal implants were developed, optimized and virtually performed on the bone models. The relative strengthening compared to the non-augmented state was evaluated using case-specific FE analyses. Strengthening effect of the cement-based augmentation was linearly proportional to cement volume and was significantly affected by cement location. With the clinically acceptable 12.6 ± 1.2 ml volume and optimized location of the cement cloud, compared to the non-augmented state, 71 ± 26% (42 – 134%) and 217 ± 166% (83 – 509%) increase in yield force and energy was reached, respectively. These were significantly higher than previously published experimental results using the “central” cement location [5], which could be well predicted by our FE models. The optimized metal implant could provide even higher strengthening effect: 140 ± 39% (76 – 194%) increase in yield force and +357 ± 177% (132 – 691%) increase in yield energy. However, for metal implants, a higher risk of subcapital fractures was indicated. For both cement and metal, the originally weaker bones were strengthened exponentially more compared to the stronger ones. The ideal solution for prophylactic augmentation should provide an appropriate balance between the requirements of being clinically feasible, ethically acceptable and mechanically sufficient. Even with the optimized location, the cement-based approach may not provide enough strengthening effect and adequate reproducibility of the identified optimal cement cloud position may not be achieved clinically. While the metal implant based strategy appears to be able to deliver the required strengthening effect, the ethical acceptance of this more invasive option is questionable. Further development is therefore required to identify the ideal, clinically relevant augmentation strategy. This may involve new cement materials, less invasive metal implants, or a combination of both. The FE simulation approach presented here could help to screen the potential ideas and highlight promising candidates for experimental evaluation

Fragility fractures are an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. Their association with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is well documented. It is a reasonable assumption that hip fracture severity is linked to the magnitude of bone loss, (the lower the BMD, the more severe the fracture), however it is not known whether this correlation exists. Our aim therefore was to investigate the relationship between BMD and hip fracture severity. We reviewed 142 patients, 96 females and 46 males, mean age 74 years (49-92), who had sustained a hip fracture following a simple ground level fall. All had subsequently undergone DEXA bone scanning of the contralateral hip and lumbar spine. Fractures were classified as intra-capsular, extra-capsular or subtrochanteric, then sub-classified using the Garden, Jensen and Seinsheimer classifications respectively. They were grouped into simple (stable) or comminuted (unstable) fracture patterns. Risk factors for osteoporosis were recorded. A low hip BMD (<2.5) was associated with an increased risk of extra-capsular fracture (p=0.025). However, no association with fracture type (extra vs. intra-capsular, p>0.05) was identified with the following variables; age, gender, BMI <25, smoking, and excess alcohol intake. We did not find any statistically significant associations between fracture severity and the nine principle variables tested for: age; gender; smoking; BMI < 25; alcohol excess and low hip or lumbar BMD T or Z score <-2.5. Although the association between BMD and risk of fragility fractures is well documented, the results of this study would suggest that severity of hip fractures does not follow this correlation. Therefore, no assumption can be made about BMD of the proximal femur based on the severity of fracture observed on plain radiographs alone

Introduction. Patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) often tell us that they put extra load on the joints of the opposite leg as they walk. Multiple joint OA is common and has previously been related to gait changes due to hip OA (Shakoor et al 2002). The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with medial compartment knee OA have abnormal biomechanics of the unaffected knee and both hips during normal level gait. Methods. Twenty patients (11 male, 9 female), with severe medial compartment knee OA and no other joint pain were recruited. The control group comprised 20 adults without musculoskeletal pain. Patients were reviewed, x-rays were examined and WOMAC and Oxford knee scores were completed. A 12 camera Vicon (Vicon, Oxford) system was used to collect kinematic data (100Hz) on level walking and the ground reaction force was recorded using three AMTI force plates (1000Hz). Surface electrodes were placed over medial and lateral quadriceps and hamstrings bilaterally to record EMG data (1000Hz). Kinematics and kinetics were calculated using the Vicon ‘plug-in-gait’ model. A co-contraction index was calculated for the EMG signals on each side of the knee, representing the magnitude of the combined readings relative to their maximum contraction during the gait cycle. Statistical comparisons were performed using t-tests with Bonferroni's correction for two variables and ANOVA for more than two variables (SPSS v16). Results. The mean age of the patients was 69 (SD 8.8). Mean gait speed was 0.95m/s (study group) and 1.44m/s (control group). Peak adduction moments for the OA group [OA Knee; Unaffected Knee; Ipsilateral Hip; Contralateral Hip; in Nm/Kg(±95% CI)] were: 0.55(0.06); 0.47(0.06); 0.73(0.09); 0.73(0.08). Control values for peak moments were 0.64 (0.06) for the knee and 0.81(0.07) at the hip. Mid-stance adduction moments for the OA group (listed as before) were: 0.44(0.08); 0.33(0.06); 0.64(0.06); 0.61(0.08). Control values for mid-stance moments were 0.14(0.03) and 0.40(0.04). [OA group vs. Controls: p=NS for peak moments at all 4 joints; p<0.01 for mid-stance moments at all joints]. Co-contraction indices for hamstrings and quads, [OA knee medial; and lateral; unaffected knee medial; and lateral; control medial; and lateral; 0<X. Discussion. Although the affected subjects all had only single joint OA, abnormal moments were present in the hips and knees of both legs during normal level gait, despite the reduced gait speed of the OA cohort. Abnormal hamstring and quadriceps co-contraction occurs bilaterally in patient with single joint OA. Increased trunk sway is a recognised compensation in knee OA and may be the cause of the abnormal hip and contra-lateral knee loading found in this study. Further investigation is warranted and may lead to improvements in the long term outcome for these patients. Acknowledgement. The study was funded by the North Wales NHS Trust

Aims

Second-generation metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA) were introduced in order to reduce wear-related complications. The current study reports on the serum cobalt levels and the clinical outcome at a minimum of 20 years following THA with a MoM (Metasul) or a ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearing.

Financial and human cost effectiveness is an increasing evident outcome measure of surgical innovation. Considering the human element, the aim is to restore the individual to their “normal” state by sparing anatomy without compromising implant performance. Gait lab studies have shown differences between different implants at top walking speed, but none to our knowledge have analysed differing total hip replacement patients through the entire range of gait speed and incline to show differences. The purpose of this gait study was to 1) determine if a new short stem femoral implant would return patients back to normal 2) compare its performance to established hip resurfacing and long stem total hip replacement (THR) implants. 110 subjects were tested on an instrumented treadmill (Kistler Gaitway, Amherst, NY), 4 groups (short-stem THR, long-stem THR, hip resurfacing and healthy controls) of 28, 29, 27, and 26 respectively. The new short femoral stem patients (Furlong Evolution, JRI) were taken from the ongoing Evolution Hip trial that have been tested on the treadmill with minimum 12months postop. The long stem total hip replacements and hip resurfacing groups were identified from out 800 patient gait database. They were only chosen if they were 12 months postop and had no other joint disease or medical comorbidities which would affect gait performance. All subjects were tested through their entire range of gait speeds and incline after having a 5 minute habituation period. Speed intervals were at 0.5kms increments until maximum walking speed achieved and inclines at 4kms for 5, 10, 15%. At all incremental intervals of speed, the vertical component of the ground reaction forces, center of pressure and temporal measurements were collected for both limbs with a sampling frequency of 100Hz. Body weight scaling was applied to correct for mass differences and a symmetry index to compare the implanted hip to the contralateral normal hip. All variables for each subject group were compared to each other using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post hoc test with significance set at α=0.05. The four experimental groups were reasonably matched for demographics and the implant groups for PROMs. Hip resurfacing had a clear top walking speed advantage, but when assessing the symmetry index on all speeds and incline, all groups were not significantly different. Push-off and step length was statistically less favourable for the short/long THR group (p=0.005–0.05) depending on speed/incline. The primary aim of this study was determine if implant design affected gait symmetry and performance. Interestingly, irrespective of implant design, symmetry with regards to weight acceptance, impulse, push-off and step length was returned to normal when comparing to healthy controls. However individual implant performance on the flat and incline, showed inferior (p<0.05) push-off force and step length in the short stem and long stem THR groups when compared to controls. Age and gender may have played a part for the short stem group. It appears that the early gait outcomes for the short stem device are promising. Assessment at the 3 year mark should be conclusive

Objectives

Intramedullary fixation is considered the most stable treatment for pertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur and cut-out is one of the most frequent mechanical complications. In order to determine the role of clinical variables and radiological parameters in predicting the risk of this complication, we analysed the data pertaining to a group of patients recruited over the course of six years.

In order to evaluate the relationship between acetabular and proximal femoral alignment in the initiation and evolution of osteoarthritis of the dysplastic hip, the acetabular and femoral angles were calculated geometrically from radiographs of 62 patients with pre-arthrosis and early osteoarthritis. The sum of the lateral opening angle of the acetabulum and the neck-shaft angle was defined as the lateral instability index (LII), and the sum of the anterior opening angle of the acetabulum and the anteversion angle of the femoral neck as the anterior instability index (AII). These two indices were compared in dysplastic and unaffected hips. A total of 22 unilateral hips with pre-arthrosis were followed for at least 15 years to determine whether the two indices were associated with the progression of osteoarthritis.

The LII of the affected hips (197.4 (sd 6.0)) was significantly greater than that of the unaffected hips (1830 (sd 6.9)). A follow-up study of 22 hips with pre-arthrosis showed that only the LII was associated with progression of the disease, and an LII of 196 was the threshold value for this progression.

Post-mortem retrieval of canine, cemented femoral components was analysed to assess the performance of these implants in the dog as a model for human total hip replacement (THR). Mechanical testing and radiological analysis were performed to determine the stability of the implant and the quality of the cement. Thirty-eight implants from 29 dogs were retrieved after time intervals ranging from 0.67 to 11.67 years. The incidence of aseptic loosening was 63.2%, much higher than in human patients (6% in post-mortem studies). Failure of the femoral implants began with debonding at the cement-metal interface, similar to that in implants in man. The incidence of aseptic loosening was much lower in bilateral than in unilateral implants. Significant differences were observed for three different designs of implant. While the dog remains the animal model of choice for THR, results from this study provide insight into interspecies differences in the performance of implants. For example, the performance of THR in dogs should be compared with that in young rather than in elderly human patients.