Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 9 | Pages 884 - 886
1 Sep 2024
Brown R Bendall S Aronow M Ramasamy A


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 5
1 Jan 2022
Rajasekaran RB Ashford R Stevenson JD Pollock R Rankin KS Patton JT Gupta S Cosker TDA


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1133 - 1134
1 Sep 2007
Haddad FS Ashby E Konangamparambath S

Due to economic constraints, it has been suggested that joint replacement patients can be followed up in primary care. There are clinical, ethical and academic reasons why we must ensure that our joint replacements are appropriately clinically and radiologically followed up to minimise complications. This Editorial discusses this


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1271 - 1273
1 Oct 2020
Scott CEH Simpson AHRW Pankaj P


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 4 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Aug 2020
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 5 | Pages 547 - 549
1 May 2020
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 10 | Pages 469 - 471
1 Oct 2019
Evans CH


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 7_Supple_C | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jul 2019
Haddad FS Springer BD


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 5 | Pages 325 - 326
1 May 2018
Clement ND Deehan DJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 3 | Pages 289 - 290
1 Mar 2015
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 151
1 Feb 2016
Haddad FS McLawhorn AS

Health economic evaluations potentially provide valuable information to clinicians, health care administrators, and policy makers regarding the financial implications of decisions about the care of patients. The highest quality research should be used to inform decisions that have direct impact on the access to care and the outcome of treatment. However, economic analyses are often complex and use research methods which are relatively unfamiliar to clinicians. Furthermore, health economic data have substantial national, regional, and institutional variability, which can limit the external validity of the results of a study. Therefore, minimum guidelines that aim to standardise the quality and transparency of reporting health economic research have been developed, and instruments are available to assist in the assessment of its quality and the interpretation of results.

The purpose of this editorial is to discuss the principal types of health economic studies, to review the most common instruments for judging the quality of these studies and to describe current reporting guidelines. Recommendations for the submission of these types of studies to The Bone & Joint Journal are provided.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:147–51.