To investigate the relationship between age and the Constant score: A formula to correct for age. Method and results Healthy volunteers from the King’s College Hospital population with no previous shoulder disease were assessed using the constant score.270 healthy shoulders were tested. The subjects’ ages ranged from 16 to 83 with a mean age of 44.3. The scores ranged from 60 to 100 with a mean score of 82.3. Pearson correlation analysis gave us a trend or slope of −0.1. Corrected score= actual score −[(age-44)( −0.1)]. Conclusion We concluded that the constant score decreases with age at a rate of one point per decade and that in order to compare subjects’ scores in a standardised way this correction should be applied

Introduction: This study was designed to investigate which parameters of the Constant Score are most influenced by the presence of a Rotator Cuff Tear (RCT). Methods: 28 patients attending the Shoulder Clinic took part in this study for which Ethics approval had been obtained. Strength measurements were assessed in three ways: 1) maximum force using a fixed spring balance (FSB) 2) maximum force using the Nottingham Mecmesin Myometer 3) mean force during 2nd to 4th seconds using Nottingham Myometer. The CS assessor was blind to the volunteer’s history and state of their rotator cuff. Ultrasonography was used to establish the presence of a full-thickness RCT. Results: The CS values for the left and right shoulders were analysed separately. No statistically significant difference (p> 0.05) was found between shoulders with a RCT and without a RCT in the pain, ADL and ROM parameters. Left shoulders with a RCT scored significantly different strength scores to those without (p< 0.05) but this significance was not seen in the right shoulders (p> 0.05). Shoulder strength measurements were highest with the FSB and lowest when measured using the mean force. Discussion: The results obtained so far suggest that a shoulder with a full-thickness tear of the RC may obtain a significantly lower strength score than a normal shoulder. It does not suggest that any of the other three parameters of the CS can indicate the presence of a tear. Conclusion: A reduction of shoulder strength alone might be a good indicator of a full-thickness RCT. However, this study indicates the importance of standardising the method of shoulder strength assessment for the Constant Score

Introduction The Constant-Murley Score is the functional score currently recommended by the British Shoulder and Elbow Society and by the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow. Normal Values for shoulder assessment are imperative for the diagnosis of pathology and measurement of treatment outcome. Normal values for the UK are currently not known. Several techniques have been described for the assessment for strength and measurement of this paraemeter differs between published series. Patients and method 122 patients over 50 (62 male) attended a GP surgery for a Constant Score measurement. Constant Score was assessed using three techniques for strength measurement: maximum strength with myometer (Mmax), mean strength with myometer (Mmean) and maximum strength with fixed spring balance (FSB). Results Maximum strength values measured by myometer or fixed spring balance were very similar with a mean difference of 0.5 (less than the calibration of a spring balance). Mean strength measurements were consistently lower than maximum strength measurements with a mean difference of 3 points. Age and sex both significantly affected Constant Score (P< 0.001, P< 0.001). Constant Score falls by 0.4 points per year over 50. Males have a score 8 points greater than females. Conclusions Constant Score decreases predictably with age in the UK. Methods of strength assessment are not the same. A uniform method of shoulder strength assessment or correction for method is required to allow meaningful comparisons between series

Introduction: The Constant Score Functional Assessment (CS) is now the standard method of assessing shoulder disability in Europe. Previous studies have indicated that the CS values associated with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear (RCT) are lower than for normal shoulders. This study was designed to investigate which parameters of the CS were most influenced by the presence of a RCT. As ultrasonograpy has now been shown to have a high accuracy for diagnosing full-thickness RCTs it was used to establish the diagnosis. Methods: 28 patients attending the Shoulder Clinic were invited to take part in this study for which Local Ethics Committee approval had been obtained. The majority of patients had a painful shoulder on at least one side. All patients had a CS carried out with the “Strength” measurement made in 3 ways – 1) maximum force using a fixed spring balance – FSB(max); 2) maximum force using a commercial myometer – M(max); 3) mean force from 2 to 4 seconds using a commcercial Myometer – M(mean). The CS was measured with no knowledge of the patient’s history or diagnosis and blinded to the state of the rotator cuff. The patients were then assessed using ultrasonograpy of the shoulder (Diasus with an 8–16MHz head) to establish the presence of a full-thickness RCT. Results: The CS Values for the left and right shoulders have been analysed separately. The results have also been analysed for each part of the Constant Score – Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Range of Movement and Strength and these will be presented. Discussion: It was anticipated that subjects with a RCT would be found to be weaker and have a reduced CS in an affected shoulder. This was found to be the case for the left shoulder but not for the right. The reasons for this will be discussed. The abnormally low CS for the normal right shoulders (Group 1) will also be explored. Conclusion: The CS may be a valuable method of identifying those patients with a RCT. This study indicates that a more careful evaluation of “Strength” measurements still needs to be undertaken

The Constant score is widely used as a measure of assessing outcome from surgery. The pre and post-operative Scores are usually compared to assess outcome. The expected Scores for an age-matched population however are not known. Patients attending fracture and general orthopaedic clinics with lower limb problems only were assessed. Age, handedness, occupation and Constant Score results were recorded. The score for differing sections of the Constant score were reviewed and analysed in combination with the above parameters. The overall Constant Score decreased with age, as one would expect. However the decrease in the strength measurement was out of all proportion to that of the remainder of the Score-79% of total strength in the under 40 year age group compared with 11.2% of total strength in the over 80 year age group. This compared with a percentage of 97.8% for the remainder of the Score in the under 40 year group compared to 70.4% in the over 80 year age group. If one is using the Constant Score as a measure of surgical outcome one should be aware of the expected age-matched figures and in particular the poor strength measurements in the older populations. We suggest that a more useful measurement would be one without strength and just score out of 75

Introduction: The Constant Score Functional Assessment (CS) is now the standard method of assessing shoulder disability in Europe. It has been observed that CS values decrease with age and attempts have been made in Canada (Constant, 1986), Germany (Tempelhof, 1999), Switzerland (Gerber, 1992) and US (Romeo, 2002) to produce national norms. Unfortunately the methods used for measuring the “Strength” category of the CS have varied. This study aimed to establish UK norms. Methods: 200 patients stratified for age over 50 were invited to take part in this study for which Local Ethics Committee approval had been obtained. Of these 200, 46 patients (21 males) attended and all attendees had a CS carried out with the “Strength” measurement made in 3 ways – 1) maximum force using a fixed spring balance – FSB(max); 2) maximum force using a Nottingham myometer – M(max); 3) mean force from 2 to 4 seconds using a Nottingham myometer – M(mean). Results: The results for the 25 females and 21 males using M(mean) show a general trend of decreasing Constant Score with increasing age for the left and right shoulders of both the male and female subjects. There were some outliers, particularly in the female results, which were reflected in widened 95% confidence intervals. Paired student t-tests found statistically significant differences between M(mean) and FSB (max) results (left, p< 0.01; right, p=0.013) and M(mean) and M(max) (left, p< 0.01; right, p< 0.01). Discussion: The results confirm deterioration in the CS with age in both men and women. Constant Score values from our study differ from previous studies, with up to 15 points difference between our results and those from Romeo 2002. Significant differences were identified between the 3 methods of “Strength” measurement, highlighting the need for a uniform method of carrying out the CS. Conclusion: The UK pattern of deteriorating CS with age mirrors that seen in other countries but the values are different. These differences are significant and make it necessary to reconsider the use of the corrected CS. It is probably wiser to use the uncorrected CS but refer to normal values as a guide for the expected CS at different ages

Introduction: The Constant Score Functional Assessment (CS) is now the standard method of assessing shoulder disability in Europe. It has been observed that the CS values decrease with age and attempts have been made in Canada (Constant, 1986), Germany (Tempelhof, 1999), Switzerland (Gerber, 1992) and US (Romeo, 2002) to produce national norms against which the subject’s Constant Score might be compared. Unfortunately the methods used for measuring the “Strength” category of the CS have varied and thus the results are not uniformly comparable. This study has used three methods of evaluating “Strength” for the CS in a randomised group of subjects aged over 50 in order to establish the UK norms. Methods: 200 patients stratified for age over 50 were invited to take part in this study for which Local Ethics Committee approval had been obtained. Of these 200, 46 patients (21 males) attended and all attenders had a CS carried out with the “Strength” measurement made in 3 ways – 1) maximum force using a fixed spring balance – FSB(max); 2) maximum force using a commercial myometer – M(max); 3) mean force from 2 to 4 seconds using a commercial Myometer – M(mean). The CS values have been plotted for age and sex. Results: The results for the 25 females and 21 males using M(mean) are shown below. The middle line represents the linear regression with the 95% Confidence Intervals above and below. Discussion: The results confirm that there is a deterioration in the CS with age in both men and women. The outliers in three of the four graphs will be discussed and the analysis represented after removal of outliers for which there is a justification for exclusion. The differences between the left and right shoulders will be discussed. Significant differences were identified between the 3 methods of “Strength” measurement, highlighing the need for a uniform method of carrying out the CS. Conclusion: The UK pattern of deteriorating CS with age mirrors that seen in other countries but the values are different. These differences are significant and make it necessary to reconsider the use of the corrected CS. It is probably wiser to use the uncorrected CS but refer to normal values as a guide for the expected CS at different ages

Aim: As the shoulder and elbow joints share a common objective – spatial positioning of the hand – can the Modified Constant Score of shoulder function be applied to function at the elbow?. Method & Results: All patients with isolated elbow pathology over an eighteen-month period were assessed. Acute fractures and patients with shoulder and/or wrist pathology were excluded. Upper limb function was assessed using the Modified Constant Score and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index. A total of 48 patients with a variety of elbow pathologies were assessed. The mean patient age was 47.8 years, and 26 patients were male. The correlation between the two scoring systems was highly significant (correlation 0.91, t = < 0.001). Conclusion: The Modified Constant Score may be used as an assessment of both shoulder and elbow function

Introduction: Scoring systems for assessment of shoulder function are invaluable tools in determining changes in a patient’s condition. We utilised two commonly used assessment tools in patients with conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures to establish their behaviour in this patient group. Methods: OSS and Constant Scores were collected prospectively at 3 and 12 months post injury, for 103 consecutive patients treated conservatively for proximal humeral fractures. Comparison of the scores was undertaken by creating scattergraphs, calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient and producing Bland and Altman plots. Sensitivity to change was calculated using paired t-tests. Linear regression analysis was finally performed to predict Constant Score from the OSS. Results: 177 sets of scores were collected. The scores correlated well with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.84 (p< 0.001,n=177). This relationship was equally strong at 3 (r=0.77 (p< 0.001,n=94)) and 12 months (r=0.87 (p< 0.001,n=83)) and demonstrated a clear relationship between the scoring systems. Bland and Altman plots showed good agreement between the scores. Both scores were sensitive to change over time (OSS (t(81)=6.14,p< 0.001), Constant (t(80)=−10.27,p< 0.001)). Regression analysis produced a regression equation (R2=0.70) of: Constant Score=99.3-(1.67 times OSS). This level of model fit was statistically significant (F(1,175)=412.8,(p< 0.001)). Conclusion: This study provides information about the behaviour of two frequently used functional scoring systems in patients with proximal humeral fractures. Based on our finding we feel that these scores are appropriate assessment tools in these patients. The OSS may also be considered as an alternative for assessing longer term follow up as, being solely subjective, it is easier to administer and correlates well with the Constant Score

Our aim was to compare the outcome of arthroscopic release for frozen shoulder in patients with and without diabetes. We prospectively compared the outcome in 21 patients with and 21 patients without diabetes, two years post-operatively. The modified Constant score was used as the outcome measure. The mean age of the patients was 54.5 years (48 to 65; male:female ratio: 18:24), the mean pre-operative duration of symptoms was 8.3 months (6 to 13) and the mean pre-operative modified Constant scores were 36.6 (standard deviation (. sd. ) 4.6) and 38.4 (. sd. 5.7) in the diabetic and non-diabetic groups, respectively. The mean modified Constant scores at six weeks, six months and two years post-operatively in the diabetics were 55. 6 (. sd. 4.7), 67. 4 (. sd. 5.6) and 84. 4 (. sd. 6.8), respectively; and in the non-diabetics 66.8 (. sd. 4.5), 79.6 (. sd. 3.8) and 88.6 (. sd. 4.2), respectively. A total of 15 (71%) of diabetic patients recovered a full range of movement as opposed to 19 (90%) in the non-diabetics. There was significant improvement (p < 0.01) in the modified Constant scores following arthroscopic release for frozen shoulder in both groups. The results in diabetics were significantly worse than those in non-diabetics six months post-operatively (p < 0.01) with a tendency towards persistent limitation of movement two years after operation. These results may be used when counselling diabetic patients for the outcome after arthroscopic treatment of frozen shoulder. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1355–8

Aims. This is a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the functional outcomes of plate fixation and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of completely displaced mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle in the active adult population. Patients and Methods. We prospectively recruited 123 patients and randomised them to either plate fixation or ESIN. Patients completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at one to six weeks post-operatively. They were followed up at six weeks, three and six months and one year with radiographs, and their clinical outcome was assessed using both the DASH and the Constant Score. Results. Plate fixation provided a faster functional recovery during the first six months compared with ESIN, but there was no difference after one year. The duration of surgery was shorter for ESIN (mean 53.4 minutes, 22 to 120) than for plate fixation (mean 69.7 minutes, 35 to 106, p < 0.001). The recovery after ESIN was slower with increasing fracture comminution and with open reduction (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Both methods return the patients to their pre-injury functional levels, but plate fixation has a faster recovery period in comminuted fractures than ESIN. ESIN has a shorter operative time and lower infection and implant rates of failure when using 2.5 mm nails or wider, suggesting that this is the preferred method in mid-shaft fractures with no comminution, whereas plate fixation is the superior method in comminuted fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1095–1101

This study describes the epidemiology and outcome of 637 proximal humeral fractures in 629 elderly (≥ 65 years old) patients. Most were either minimally displaced (n = 278, 44%) or two-part fractures (n = 250, 39%) that predominantly occurred in women (n = 525, 82%) after a simple fall (n = 604, 95%), who lived independently in their own home (n = 560, 88%), and one in ten sustained a concomitant fracture (n = 76, 11.9%). The rate of mortality at one year was 10%, with the only independent predictor of survival being whether the patient lived in their own home (p = 0.025). Many factors associated with the patient’s social independence significantly influenced the age and gender adjusted Constant score one year after the fracture. More than a quarter of the patients had a poor functional outcome, with those patients not living in their own home (p = 0.04), participating in recreational activities (p = 0.01), able to perform their own shopping (p < 0.001), or able to dress themselves (p = 0.02) being at a significantly increased risk of a poor outcome, which was independent of the severity of the fracture (p = 0.001). A poor functional outcome after a proximal humeral fracture is not independently influenced by age in the elderly, and factors associated with social independence are more predictive of outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:970–7

We have compared three different methods of treating symptomatic non-traumatic tears of the supraspinatus tendon in patients above 55 years of age. A total of 180 shoulders (173 patients) with supraspinatus tendon tears were randomly allocated into one of three groups (each of 60 shoulders); physiotherapy (group 1), acromioplasty and physiotherapy (group 2) and rotator cuff repair, acromioplasty and physiotherapy (group 3). The Constant score was assessed and followed up by an independent observer pre-operatively and at three, six and twelve months after the intervention. Of these, 167 shoulders were available for assessment at one year (follow-up rate of 92.8%). There were 55 shoulders in group 1 (24 in males and 31 in females, mean age 65 years (55 to 79)), 57 in group 2 (29 male and 28 female, mean age 65 years (55 to 79)) and 55 shoulders in group 3 (26 male and 29 female, mean age 65 years (55 to 81)). There were no between-group differences in the Constant score at final follow-up: 74.1 (. sd. 14.2), 77.2 (. sd. 13.0) and 77.9 (. sd. 12.1) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.34). The mean change in the Constant score was 17.0, 17.5, and 19.8, respectively (p = 0.34). These results suggest that at one-year follow-up, operative treatment is no better than conservative treatment with regard to non-traumatic supraspinatus tears, and that conservative treatment should be considered as the primary method of treatment for this condition. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:75–81

Our primary objective was to compare healing rates in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for degenerative tears, with and without bone channeling. Our secondary objectives were to compare disease-specific quality of life and patient reported outcomes as measured by the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Constant score between groups. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at three sites were randomized to receive either bone channeling augmentation or standard repair. Healing rates were determined by ultrasound at 6 and 24 months post operatively. WORC, ASES, and Constant scores were compared between groups at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively. One hundred sixty-eight patients were recruited and randomized between 2013 to 2018. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from pre-operative to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p < 0 .0001). Intention to treat analysis revealed no statistical differences in healing rates between the two interventions at 24 months post-operative. No differences were observed in WORC, ASES or Constant scores at any time-point. This trial did not demonstrate superiority of intra-operative bone channeling in rotator cuff repair surgery at 24 months post-operative. Healing rates and patient-reported function and quality of life measures were similar between groups

Aims. There is a lack of long-term data for minimally invasive acromioclavicular (AC) joint repair. Furthermore, it is not clear if good early clinical results can be maintained over time. The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of minimally invasive AC joint reconstruction (MINAR) and compare it to corresponding short-term data. Methods. We assessed patients with a follow-up of at least five years after minimally invasive flip-button repair for high-grade AC joint dislocation. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the Constant score and a questionnaire. Ultrasound determined the coracoclavicular (CC) distance. Results of the current follow-up were compared to the short-term results of the same cohort. Results. A total of 50 patients (three females, 47 males) were successfully followed up for a minimum of five years. The mean follow-up was 7.7 years (63 months to 132 months). The overall Constant score was 94.4 points (54 to 100) versus 97.7 points (83 to 100) for the contralateral side showing a significant difference for the operated shoulder (p = 0.013) The mean difference in the CC distance between the operated and the contralateral shoulder was 3.7 mm (0.2 to 7.8; p = 0.010). In total, 16% (n = 8) of patients showed recurrent instability. All these cases were performed within the first 16 months after introduction of this technique. A total of 84% (n = 42) of the patients were able to return to their previous occupations and sport activities. Comparison of short-term and long-term results revealed no significant difference for the Constant Score (p = 0.348) and the CC distance (p = 0.974). Conclusion. The clinical outcome of MINAR is good to excellent after long-term follow-up and no significant differences were found compared to short-term results. We therefore suggest this is a reliable technique for surgical treatment of high-grade AC joint dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):918–924

To analyse the efficacy and safety of cellular therapy utilizing Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) in the management of rotator cuff(RC) tears from clinical studies available in the literature. We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on August 2021 for studies analyzing the efficacy and safety of cellular therapy (CT) utilizing MSCs in the management of RC tears. VAS for pain, ASES Score, DASH Score, Constant Score, radiological assessment of healing and complications and adverse events were the outcomes analyzed. Analysis was performed in R-platform using OpenMeta [Analyst] software. RESULTS:. 6 studies involving 238 patients were included for analysis. We noted a significant reduction in VAS score for pain at 3 months (WMD=-2.234,p<0.001) and 6 months (WMD=-3.078,p<0.001) with the use of CT. Concerning functional outcomes, utilization of CT produced a significant short-term improvement in the ASES score (WMD=17.090,p<0.001) and significant benefit in functional scores such as Constant score (WMD=0.833,p=0.760) at long-term. Moreover, we also observed a significantly improved radiological tendon healing during the long-term follow-up (OR=3.252,p=0.059). We also noted a significant reduction in the retear rate upon utilization of CT in RC tears both at short- (OR=0.079,p=0.032) and long-term (OR=0.434,p=0.027). We did not observe any significant increase in the adverse events as compared with the control group (OR=0.876,p=0.869). Utilization of CT in RC tear is safe and it significantly reduced pain severity, improved functional outcome, enhanced radiological tendon healing, and mitigated retear rates at short- and long-term follow-up

Abstract. Background. Fractures Proximal humerus account for nearly 10 % of geriatric fractures. The treatment options varies. There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment, with almost all modalities giving functionally poor outcomes. Hence literature recommends conservative management over surgical options. MULTILOC nail with its design seems to be a promising tool in treating these fractures. We hereby report our early experience in the treatment of 37 elderly patients. Objectives. To evaluate the radiological outcome with regards to union, collapse, screw back out/cut through, implant failures, Greater tuberosity migration. To evaluate the functional outcome at the end of 6 months using Constant score. Study Design & Methods. All patients aged >65 years who underwent surgery for 3,4-part fracture proximal humerus using the MULTILOC nail were included in the study after consent. Pre – existing rotator cuff disease were excluded. Within the time frame, a total of 39 patients underwent the said surgery. 2 patients were lost to follow up. All the measurements were taken at the end of 6 months and results tabulated and analysed. Results. Union was achieved in all the 37 patients. There were no varus collapse or screw backout/cut through seen in any of the patients. There was Greater tuberosity migration in 1 patient who underwent revision surgery at 6 weeks. All the patients got a minimum of 70 degrees of abduction and forward flexion. We had 29 excellent, 6 good, 2 fair and none poor results as per Constant scoring system. Study done in Tejasvini Hospital & SSIOT Mangaluru India

Aim. Studies have shown that retention of antibiotic cement spacer in selected elderly patients with low functional demand represents a viable option for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) treatment. 1,2. . The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy in infection treating among modular taylored preformed and hand-made antibiotic spacers. Our hypothesis is that modular tailored preformed spacer provides a better rate of infection resolution, better radiological and functional outcomes compared to hand-made spacers. Materials and methods. We identified 48 patients treated with antibiotic cement spacer for shoulder chronic infection between 2015 and 2021 in our institution; (13 hand-made spacers and 35 modular tailored preformed spacers). We collected data about comorbidities, associated microorganism, infection resolution, clinical and radiographic evaluation. Results. The mean age at surgery was 63.2 years, (45.8% female − 54.2% male), mean BMI 28.3. The mean time of infection diagnosis after first surgery was 30 months; (31.2% infection after ORIF in proximal humeral fractures, 68.8% PJI after shoulder arthroplasty). The main pathogens were Propionibacterium Acnes (37.5%), Staphylococcus Epidermidis (29.2%), Staphylococcus Aureus (16.7%), negative intraoperative coltures (14.6%), Enterococcus (4.17%), Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (4.17%). The mean time of antibiotic spacer retention was 18 months: 23 patients (47.9%) underwent second stage surgery for prosthesis implantation; 2 removed the spacer because of spacer dislocation, 2 died during follow up; while 21 patients still hold the antibiotic spacer (17 patients in treatment with prefabricated spacers and 4 with self-constructed spacer). The mean value for clinical assessment for patients with modular tailored preformed spacer were: Constant Score 34 – QuickDASH 40 – SST 33 – ASES Score 66 – VAS 2. Patients treated with hand-made spacer registered the following scores: Constant Score 20 – QuickDASH 51 – SST 25 – ASES Score 38 – VAS 6. Two patients presented fracture of the spacer (one hand-made spacer and one tailored preformed). Conclusions. According to our data patients treated with modular tailored preformed antibiotic spacer show better functional outcomes. Patients are more likely to retain the spacer as a permanent implant, avoiding the risks of a second stage surgery in those low-demanding patients, achieving a reasonable satisfying quality of shoulder motion without pain

Aims. Despite recent advances in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, re-tear rates remain high. New methods to improve healing rates following rotator cuff repair must be sought. Our primary objective was to determine if adjunctive bone marrow stimulation with channelling five to seven days prior to arthroscopic cuff repair would lead to higher Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) scores at 24 months postoperatively compared with no channelling. Methods. A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients were randomized to receive either a percutaneous bone channelling of the rotator cuff footprint or a sham procedure under ultrasound guidance five to seven days prior to index surgery. Outcome measures included the WORC, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant scores, strength, ultrasound-determined healing rates, and adverse events. Results. Overall, 94 patients were randomized to either bone channelling or a sham procedure. Statistically significant improvements in all clinical outcome scores occurred in both groups from preoperative to all timepoints (p < 0.001). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no statistical differences in WORC scores between the two interventions at 24 months postoperatively (p = 0.690). No differences were observed in secondary outcomes at any timepoint and healing rates did not differ between groups (p = 0.186). Conclusion. Preoperative bone channelling one week prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was not associated with significant improvements in WORC, ASES, Constant scores, strength, or ultrasound-determined healing rates. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):123–130

Aims. Both anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA) provide functional improvements. A reported benefit of aTSA is better range of motion (ROM). However, it is not clear which procedure provides better outcomes in patients with limited foward elevation (FE). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of aTSA and rTSA in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), an intact rotator cuff, and limited FE. Methods. This was a retrospective review of a single institution’s prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database for TSAs undertaken between 2007 and 2020. A total of 344 aTSAs and 163 rTSAs, which were performed in patients with OA and an intact rotator cuff with a minimum follow-up of two years, were included. Using the definition of preoperative stiffness as passive FE ≤ 105°, three cohorts were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and follow-up: stiff aTSAs (85) to non-stiff aTSAs (85); stiff rTSAs (74) to non-stiff rTSAs (74); and stiff rTSAs (64) to stiff aTSAs (64). We the compared ROMs, outcome scores, and complication and revision rates. Results. Compared with non-stiff aTSAs, stiff aTSAs had poorer passive FE and active external rotation (ER), whereas there were no significant postoperative differences between stiff rTSAs and non-stiff rTSAs. There were no significant differences in preoperative function when comparing stiff aTSAs with stiff rTSAs. However, stiff rTSAs had significantly greater postoperative active and passive FE (p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively), and active abduction (p = 0.001) compared with stiff aTSAs. The outcome scores were significantly more favourable in stiff rTSAs for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California, Los Angeles score, and the Constant score, compared with stiff aTSAs. When comparing the proportion of stiff aTSAs versus stiff rTSAs that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, stiff rTSAs achieved both at greater rates for all measurements except active ER. The complication rate did not significantly differ between stiff aTSAs and stiff rTSAs, but there was a significantly higher rate of revision surgery in stiff aTSAs (p = 0.007). Conclusion. Postoperative overhead ROM, outcome scores, and rates of revision surgery favour the use of a rTSA rather than aTSA in patients with glenohumeral OA, an intact rotator cuff and limited FE, with similar rotational ROM in these two groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(12):1303–1313