Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are an increasing public health problem. Recently, randomised controlled trials on the use of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treatment of these fractures have been published, but no definitive conclusions have been reached on the role of these interventions. The major problem encountered when trying to perform a meta-analysis of the available studies for the use of cementoplasty in patients with a VCF is that conservative management has not been standardised. Forms of conservative treatment commonly used in these patients include bed rest, analgesic medication, physiotherapy and bracing. . In this review, we report the best evidence available on the conservative care of patients with osteoporotic VCFs and associated back pain, focusing on the role of the most commonly used spinal orthoses. Although orthoses are used for the management of these patients, to date, there has been only one randomised controlled trial published evaluating their value. Until the best conservative management for patients with VCFs is defined and standardised, no conclusions can be drawn on the superiority or otherwise of cementoplasty techniques over conservative management

Optimal management of acute patellar dislocation is still a topic of debate. Although, conventionally it has been managed by non-operative measures, recent literature recommends operative treatment to prevent re-dislocations. Our study recommends that results of non-operative measures comparable to that of operative management. Our study is the retrospective with 46 consecutive patients (47 knees) of first time patellar dislocation managed between 2012 and 2014. The study methodology highlighted upon the etiology, mechanism of injury and other characteristics of first time dislocations and also analysed outcomes of conservative management including re-dislocation rates. The duration of follow up ranged from 1 to 4 years. Average age at first-time dislocation was 23 years (Range 10–62 years). Male:Female ratio was 30:17. Twisting injury was the commonest cause. 1 patient required open reduction but all others relocated spontaneously or had successful closed reduction. Medial Patello-Femoral Ligament injury was frequent associated feature. 11 knees (24%) re-dislocated during follow up. Age was the significant risk factor for re-dislocations. All patients with re-dislocation were less than 30 years old. Maximum redislocations happened between 6 months to 1 year after index dislocation. Skeletal abnormality was the commonest pathology in re-dislocators. Only 4 patients (8.6%) finally required surgical intervention. One patient had persistent knee pain as a complication. Conservative management of primary patellar dislocation is successful in majority of patients. Surgery should be reserved for the carefully selected patients with specific indications

Aims. The primary aim of this study is to quantify and compare outcomes following a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius in elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) who are managed conservatively versus with surgical fixation (open reduction and internal fixation). Secondary aims are to assess and compare upper limb-specific function, health-related quality of life, wrist pain, complications, grip strength, range of motion, radiological parameters, healthcare resource use, and cost-effectiveness between the groups. Methods. A prospectively registered (ISRCTN95922938) randomized parallel group trial will be conducted. Elderly patients meeting the inclusion criteria with a dorsally displaced distal radius facture will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to either conservative management (cast without further manipulation) or surgery. Patients will be assessed at six, 12, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks post intervention. The primary outcome measure and endpoint will be the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at 52 weeks. In addition, the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire, pain score (visual analogue scale 1 to 10), complications, grip strength (dynamometer), range of motion (goniometer), and radiological assessments will be undertaken. A cost-utility analysis will be performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of surgery. We aim to recruit 89 subjects per arm (total sample size 178). Discussion. The results of this study will help guide treatment of dorsally displaced distal radial fractures in the elderly and assess whether surgery offers functional benefit to patients. This is an important finding, as the number of elderly distal radial fractures is estimated to increase in the future due to the ageing population. Evidence-based management strategies are therefore required to ensure the best outcome for the patient and to optimize the use of increasingly scarce healthcare resources. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(10):920–928

The best management for acute rupture of the Achilles tendon remains controversial. An unacceptably high re-rupture rate following conservative management has been quoted as a reason for surgical management, however, many of these studies do not stand up to critical scrutiny. Since 1989 I have personally treated over 1600 consecutive patients with acute rupture of the tendo-achilles using a conservative functional management protocol. This protocol was developed in the light of experience over a number of years. I will present an independent review of 1044 consecutive patients presenting to my tendo-achilles clinic between 1996 and 2008. After examination, 975 patients were found to have an acute tendon rupture, the rest being gastrocnemius muscle tears, painful Achilles tendonopathy or mis-referrals. Of these 975 patients 29 were late presenters in whom the tendon ends did not approximate well on plantar flexion. These patients were therefore treated surgically. One patient was too obese to be included in the standard protocol, although he was still treated conservatively. With a minimum follow up of two years, the overall re-rupture rate was 2.9%. The re-rupture rate using this management protocol is similar to or better than the published operative re-rupture rates. The protocol, complications and outcome will be discussed and I recommend a well defined and tested non operative functional management protocol for treatment of acute tendo-achilles rupture. This protocol is suitable for all ages including those with significant sporting demands. It is essential that patients have assessment and follow up carried out by a senior and experienced surgeon

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of pain and disability in elder people. The prevalence of radiographic OA in a population aged 35–74 years is 5–15% and about one third of involved people complain of symptoms. In the „Ulm Osteoarthritis Study“ patients undergoing total knee replacement reported a mean duration of knee pain of 10 years prior to surgery. Multiple genetic, constitutional and environmental factors contribute to the development of OA. Initial cartilage degradation leads to joint space narrowing and early osteophyte formation which can be observed radiographically. Whether elevated subchondral bone mineral density is contributing to manifestation of the disease or just a secondary reaction process is still under debate. OA finally involves not only cartilage and subchondral bone but also soft tissues in and around the joint (synovial membrane, ligaments and muscles), which often results in painful effusions, muscular shortening and stiffness. Many conservative treatment options have been developed in the past to relief these symptoms and to slow down or even stop the cartilage degradation process. Evidence to support the effectiveness of individual treatments, however, is variable. Recently the EULAR Committee for Clinical Trials determined an approach for the development of evidence based guidelines for conservative treatment of knee OA (. Pendleton et al, . Ann Rheum Dis. 2000. ;. 59. :. 936. –944. ). Through a process of quality assessment of available publications and determination of expert consensus employing a Delphi approach propositions relating to a rationale conservative management could be made:. Treatment of knee OA must be tailored to individual patients, taking into account factors such as age, comorbidity and the presence of inflammation. Optimal management requires a combination of non-pharmacological treatment modalities (regular education, exercise, appliances and weight reduction) and pharmacological approaches. Paracetamol generally is the preferred analgesic and there is enough evidence to support its application, as the pain controlling effects are comparable to NSAIDS and long term application is safe enough. NSAIDS (oral or even topical) can be considered in patients with effusion. Although some studies found NSAIDS to have better efficacy than paracetamol in the treatment of painful knee OA, the gastrointestinal side effects limit their long-term application. Therefore most experts consider their application only in patients unresponsive to paracetamol and in major effusions. In such situations long-acting steroids can be injected intra-articularly as well. While the effects of steroids in knee OA have been assessed in a number of studies, the predictors of response are still somewhat unclear and further investigations are necessary. Recent data seems to support the theory that some symptomatic slow acting drugs (glucosamine sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, diacerein and hyaluronic acid) may possess structure modifying properties. Further studies, however, are necessary to determine the pharmacoeconomic aspects of that treatment and to define the indications more precisely. Education should be an integral part in the management of knee OA. Several large randomised controlled trials have shown benefits of different educational techniques in reducing pain and increasing coping skills. Function can reliably be improved by quadriceps strengthening exercises and there is enough evidence to show the positive effects of weight reduction on the progression of the disease process. In conclusion, evidence based guidelines in the conservative management of knee OA exist. Orthopaedic Surgeons should have knowledge of the various approaches and be aware of the fact that certain clinical propositions are supported by substantial research based evidence, while others are not

Introduction and Aims: The clavicle has several important functions each of which may be affected after fracture and malunion of the bone. The aim is to establish any association between shortening of the clavicle, following successful conservative management and clinical outcome. Method: 132 patients with history of an acute fracture of the clavicle were reviewed. None of them had previous pathology affecting shoulder function, prior to injury. Men accounted 93 with average age 25.4 years, and women 39 with average age 34.2 years. All underwent conservative management with standard protocols and the fracture was united. The length and relative shortening of the united clavicle were assessed on a standardised posteroanterior chest x-ray. Intra- and Inter-observer reliability of measurements were assessed. Clinical outcome was evaluated with the Constant score. Mean follow-up was 30 months. Results: Clavicular shortening following fracture union was 11.4 mm on average (range 3–25 mm), and was encountered in 120 patients. Intra- and inter-observer variability of measurements were not significant. Fracture healing time averaged 10 weeks (range 6–20 weeks) and 5.3% of patients presented delayed union. Thirty-four patients (25.8%) were unsatisfied with the result. The mean Constant score was 84 (range 62–100). Forty patients were having pain, and 21 had shoulder function impairment. Shortening > 14mm was statistically associated with unsatisfactory results. Conclusion: Clavicle is an important element in the integral functional mobility of the shoulder and malunion after fracture could lead to unsatisfactory results. We describe a simple, reliable method of Clavicular length-shortening evaluation and we report the results following successful conservative management. Identification of those patients likely to have poor results after conservative treatment, would give the opportunity for alternative treatment modalities. Further prospective randomised trials are necessary

There are many reasons that the surgically inclined orthopaedic surgeon should be responsible for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the knee. These include: 1) The nonoperative treatment of OA is often highly effective for all stages of the disease; 2) A nonoperative treatment program is the best preparation for a successful surgical outcome; and 3) Patients appreciate a surgeon's interest in their overall care and are likely to return if surgery is needed; 4) Medicare and many insurance companies are refusing to pay for a TJA until many months of conservative management has been administered. There are many potential causes of pain in an arthritic knee. These include intra-articular (e.g. degenerative meniscal tears, loose bodies, synovitis) and extra-articular (tendonitis, e.g. ilio-tibial band syndrome, bursitis, muscle overload syndromes and referred pain) sites. The potential sources of pain in an arthritic knee produce a wide range of symptoms that are not necessarily correlated with objective measurements (e.g. x-rays, MRI). Moreover, the natural history of an arthritic knee is unpredictable and variable. The treatment of the young, arthritic knee patient of all stages requires a systematic and consistent non-surgical approach. This approach includes the use of: 1) analgesics/anti-inflammatory agents; 2) activity modification; 3) alternative therapies; 4) exercise; 5) injections/lavage. The response to each form of non-surgical treatment is unpredictable at each stage (Kellgren 1–4) of OA. The placebo effect of each from of treatment, including the physician-patient interaction, is 50–60% in patients with mild-moderate OA. The components of a nonoperative treatment program include: 1) Education-emphasising the importance of the patient taking charge of his/her care; 2) Appropriate activity/life style modifications-emphasising the importance of remaining active while avoiding activities that aggravate symptoms (e.g. running to biking); 3) medications-oral, topical, intra-articular; 4) Physical therapy. There are extensive data to support each of these interventions. The AAOS has issued guidelines highlighted the literature based effectiveness of conservative interventions

Aim. We aimed to assess the efficacy of conservative management of proximal phalanx fractures in a plaster slab. Methods. 23 consecutive patients with proximal phalanx fractures were included in this prospective study. The fractures were reduced and the position was held with a dorsal slab for three weeks. They were followed up an average of 7 weeks (range 2 to 45) after the injury. Radiographic confirmation of adequate reduction was carried out each week until union. After removal of the plaster, range of motion of the finger and radiological evidence of union, non-union or malunion was documented. Results. In united fractures, an average angulation of 4° (apex volar) was measured (range 0 to 45°). In one case (45°) this was not acceptable. All other cases measured less than 15° of angulation. On the AP radiograph the angulation was on average 2° (range 0 to 8°). On average 1.3 mm of shortening (range 0 to 5mm) were measured. In one case delayed union with rotational deformity of 20° was evident. After removal of the slab mild stiffness was noted in one case at the metacarpophalangeal joint and in two cases at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Conclusion. Most proximal phalanx fractures can be managed conservatively with acceptable results. NO DISCLOSURES

Arthritis of the mid-foot is a common presentation to the foot and ankle clinic, resulting from primary (idiopathic), post-traumatic, or inflammatory joint degeneration. Treatment in the initial stages is conservative, with midfoot fusion regarded as the operative treatment of choice; however there is a paucity of comparative and patient reported data regarding outcomes. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), were prospectively collected from October-2015 to March-2018. Diagnoses were confirmed with image guided injection and initial management was conservative. In total, 66 patients were managed conservatively and 40 treated with mid-foot fusion. MOxFQ (Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire) and EQ-5D-3L (Euroqual) PROMS were collected pre-operatively, at 26 weeks and at 52 weeks. In the operatively managed group, the female:male ratio was 5.7:1, with a mean age of 61 (range 24–80), while in the conservatively managed group, the ratio was 2.1:1 with mean age 63 (range 29–86). In the surgically managed group, 88.2% of patients reported improvement in symptoms at 26 weeks and 88.9% at 52 weeks. This was greater than the conservatively managed group, in which 40.6% reported improvement at 26 weeks and 33.3% at 52 weeks. Mean MOxFQ improvement in the surgically managed group was +30.7 and +33.9 at 26 and 52 weeks respectively, and in the conservative group, +9.4 and +4.3, at 26 and 52 weeks. Similarly, favourable surgical outcomes were reported across all domains of EQ-5D-3L. This study has highlighted excellent early outcomes after surgical treatment and may represent promise for those patients for whom conservative management fails

The aim of management of an adult distal humeral fracture is to restore mobility, stability and pain-free elbow function. Good results are usually achieved in the majority of fractures treated with ORIF, but the management of comminuted fractures in elderly, frail patients with osteoporotic bone remains controversial. The literature focuses on elbow replacement if stable internal fixation cannot be achieved, with “bag-of-bones” management now rarely discussed eg. key-note paper - 10 successful cases reported by Brown RF & Morgan RG in 1971 (JBJS 53-B(3):425-428). We present the experience in two units in which conservative management has been actively adopted in selected cases by consultants with a subspecialty interest in the elbow. All patients over the age of 60 with distal humeral fractures (2007 – 2009) who had been treated conservatively were reviewed clinically and radiologically. Duration of follow-up and outcome, including the Oxford and quick DASH scores, were recorded, with the fractures classified using the AO system. There were 25 patients, 19 female and 6 male. 19/25 patients have been successfully treated conservatively with a mean Range Of Movement: Extension/Flexion: 45/125, Pronation/Supination 74/70. Only 5 underwent subsequent total elbow replacement and one delayed ORIF. There is a significant complication rate following surgical treatment with ORIF or elbow replacement in elderly, frail patients, including infection, painful non-union and/or stiffness. We believe that there is a role for initial conservative treatment in selected patients with low, displaced, comminuted humeral fractures in osteoporotic bone. Initial early mobilisation as pain allows can give good functional results without the risks of operation. It does not preclude future surgery if conservative treatment fails, but this is not required in the majority of cases

Introduction. Although the majority of adult distal humeral fractures are successfully treated with ORIF, the management in frail patients, often elderly with multiple co-morbidities and osteoporotic bone, remains controversial. Elbow replacement is frequently recommended if stable internal fixation cannot be achieved, especially in low, displaced, comminuted fractures. The “bag-of-bones” method ie early movement with fragments accepted in their displaced position, is rarely considered as there has been little in the literature since 10 successful cases were reported by Brown & Morgan in 1971 (JBJS 53-B(3):425–428). We present the experience of three units in which conservative management has been actively adopted in selected cases. Methods. 44 distal humeral fractures were initially treated conservatively - 2004–2010. Mean age 73.9 yrs (40–91) and 34 F: 10 M. Clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of 2 years (1–6). Results. There were 18 AO Type A, 7 B and 19 C fractures. The range of elbow movement was extension/flexion 38/124, and pronation/supination 75/76 at their last follow-up. Using the Oxford elbow score (0 = worst/4 best result), the mean pain score was 2.44 (range 1–4), 2.26 (0–4) for function, and 2.04 (0–4) for psycho-social, although several patients had early dementia. Only 5 subsequently underwent replacement out of 44 patients whose residual symptoms have not been sufficient to require surgery. Discussion. We believe that there is a role for initial conservative treatment in selected higher-risk patients, as initial early mobilisation within the limits of discomfort can give good functional results. There is a significant complication rate after fixation or replacement in elderly, frail patients, which includes infection, stiffness and loosening. Unnecessary operations can be avoided in the majority of cases, with replacement of a virgin joint at a later date only if required

Transverse fractures of the sacrum with neurological complications have been studied in four patients illustrating the following features: diagnosis is often delayed, there are radiological difficulties in making the diagnosis, and the indications for surgery are not well defined. Specific radiographic views are recommended. All the cases presented in this report responded well to conservative management

Background. Patients presenting with an acute tendoachilles (TA) rupture are managed in a dedicated clinic led by a Foot & Ankle Consultant and specialist physiotherapist. The diagnosis is made clinically and no ultrasound scan is performed. All management, rehabilitation and follow-up is undertaken within this clinic by the specialist physiotherapist, with Consultant support as required. Patients are offered a choice of conservative or surgical management (percutaneous TA repair). Both groups undergo a standardised functional rehabilitation regimen. Methods. All patients treated through our dedicated clinic between May 2010 and April 2016 were identified. Patient outcomes were reported using the validated Achilles Tendon Repair Score (ATRS). ATRS scores were collected at 3, 6 and 12 months post-injury. Re-rupture and complication rates were also documented. Results. 167 patients were identified. 79 patients underwent a percutaneous repair and 88 patients opted for conservative management. Mean age of patients undergoing percutaneous repair was 46 years (21–77 years) and 52 years (19–88 years) in the conservatively managed group. Male to female ratios were equal between both groups. Mean ATRS scores at 3, 6 and 12 months were 41.6, 69.5 and 85.3 respectively for the percutaneous repairs and 45.4, 69.0 and 77.1 respectively for the conservatively managed group. The re-rupture rate was 4.2% (3 patients) in the conservative group and 0% in our surgical group. In the surgical group, 1 patient developed a PE and 1 had a wound complication. Discussion. Our dedicated clinic for managing TA ruptures has proved popular with patients, with a patient satisfaction score of 98.7%. By standardising our rehabilitation regimen we believe our outcomes have improved. Our percutaneous repair group has an improved ATRS score compared to our conservative group at 12 months post injury. We believe that any fit active individual should be offered a percutaneous repair irrespective of age

The management of distal humeral fractures in low-demand patients with osteoporotic bone remains controversial. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been recommended for cases where achieving stable ORIF can be difficult. The ‘bag of bones’ technique, (early movement with fragments accepted in their displaced position), is now rarely considered as it is commonly believed to confer a poor functional result. The aim of this study was to present the short- and medium-term functional outcomes following the primary conservative treatment of distal humeral fractures in elderly and low-demand patients. We carried out a retrospective case note and radiograph review of all patients (n=40) aged 50 years or more, with distal humeral fractures treated conservatively at our institution over a six-year period. Short-term function was assessed using the Broberg and Morrey (B&M) score. Medium term function was assessed by telephone interview (n=20) using the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), QuickDASH and a pain questionnaire. The mean post-injury B&M score improved from 42 points at 6 weeks to 67 points by 3 months. By four years, surviving patients had a mean OES of 30 points, a mean QuickDASH of 38 points, and 95% reported a functional range of elbow flexion. Those with fracture non-union experienced greater pain on repetitive elbow activities, but no difference in rest pain, compared with patients whose fractures had united. The cumulative 1-year rate of fracture union was 53%, while the 5-year mortality approached 40%. Conservative management of distal humeral fractures confers a reasonable functional result to the patient whilst avoiding the substantial surgical risks associated with primary ORIF or TEA

We designed a prospective randomised trial to compare traditional conservative management with reaming, closed intramedullary nailing. Our aims were to compare early functional and the rehabilitation period between and of the two groups. The trial had strict criteria for entry: Group A) All patients were skeletally mature, Group B) All fractures were at least 50% displaced or angulated at least 10° in any direction, Group C) All patients had a displaced fracture of the tibial shaft more than 5 cm away from either knee or ankle and with no other significant injury, Group D) Only grade I compound fractures were admitted; grade II and III compound fractures were excluded. Group A was treated by manipulation of the fracture and the application of a long-leg plaster cast. Group B had closed intramedullary nailing of the fracture, with either dynamic or static locking as indicated. A total of 79 patients entered the trial: 37 in Group A and 42 in Group B. The criteria for fracture union was pain-free, unaided walking. There were two cases of non-union in Group A and none in Group B. Mean time to union was significantly shorter in Group B, as was the mean delay before return to work. There was significantly more angular deformity and shortening in Group A. Two patients in Group B had been nailed in significant external rotation (8 degrees). Movement at the knee, ankle and hindfoot was regained in the final control. Group B spent longer in hospital than group A. Group A had no cases of infection or wound problems. There was failure of conservative treatment in five of the 37 patients. These patients required late operation. Group B had one case of deep infection. In one case the distal locking screw was broken but no problem was encountered during follow-up. Autogenous bone grafting was performed in one case with non-union. We have concluded that displaced fractures of the tibial shaft are better and more efficiently treated by closed intramedullary nailing. This method has an acceptable complication rate when compared with conservative treatment

We designed a prospective randomised trial to compare traditional conservative management with reaming, closed intramedullary nailing. Our aims were to compare early functional and the rehabilitation period between and of the two groups. The trial had strict criteria for entry: Group A) All patients were skeletally mature, Group B) All fractures were at least 50% displaced or angulated at least 10° in any direction, Group C) All patients had a displaced fracture of the tibial shaft more than 5 cm away from either knee or ankle and with no other significant injury, Group D) Only grade I compound fractures were admitted; grade II and III compound fractures were excluded. Group A was treated by manipulation of the fracture and the application of a long-leg plaster cast. Group B had closed intramedullary nailing of the fracture, with either dynamic or static locking as indicated. A total of 79 patients entered the trial: 37 in Group A and 42 in Group B. The criteria for fracture union was pain-free, unaided walking. There were two cases of non-union in Group A and none in Group B. Mean time to union was significantly shorter in Group B, as was the mean delay before return to work. There was significantly more angular deformity and shortening in Group A. Two patients in Group B had been nailed in significant external rotation (8 degrees). Movement at the knee, ankle and hindfoot was regained in the final control. Group B spent longer in hospital than group A. Group A had no cases of infection or wound problems. There was failure of conservative treatment in five of the 37 patients. These patients required late operation. Group B had one case of deep infection. In one case the distal locking screw was broken but no problem was encountered during follow-up. Autogenous bone grafting was performed in one case with non-union. We have concluded that displaced fractures of the tibial shaft are better and more efficiently treated by closed intramedullary nailing. This method has an acceptable complication rate when compared with conservative treatment

Pyomyositis is a primary pyogenic infection in skeletal muscle, often progressing to abscess formation. It is rare in temperate climates and generally deep-seated within the pelvis with non-specific clinical features, making diagnosis difficult. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive for muscle inflammation and fluid collection and with its increasing availability is now the investigation of choice. Treatment of pyomyositis abscess has traditionally been with incision and drainage or guided aspiration followed by a prolonged course of antibiotics, although there are sporadic reports of cases treated successfully with antibiotics alone. From our 20 year database of over 16000 paediatric orthopaedic admissions we identified only 3 cases with MRI-confirmed pyomyositis abscess. These were all in boys (aged 2-12) and affected the gluteal, piriformis and adductor muscles. Despite the organisms not being identified, each patient was treated successfully with a short (4-7 day) course of intravenous antibiotics followed by 2-6 weeks of oral therapy. There were no recurrences or complications and all made a full recovery. We propose that uncomplicated pyomyositis abscess in children may usually be managed conservatively without the need for open or percutaneous drainage.

Four military recruits with complete distraction-type stress fractures of the femoral neck were treated conservatively. The radiographic diagnosis was made within two weeks of the onset of symptoms and the activities of the patients were matched to the clinical and radiographic progress of fracture healing. None of the fractures displaced and union occurred uneventfully. Our experience suggests that prophylactic internal fixation of these fractures is not necessary.

Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation is a rare abnormality of the atlanto-axial joint characterised by a fixed rotated atlanto-axial joint. Duration of symptoms is the best predictor of those cases that ultimately require surgical fixation. We report 6 cases of atlanto-axial rotatory fixation that were treated at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital between 1998 and 2005. Diagnosis was confirmed by CT scan in all cases. The mean duration of symptoms was 8 weeks. 4 cases were reduced with halo traction, for between 7–28 days (mean 15 days), and 2 cases were reduced under anaesthesia. This was followed by application of a halo jacket in all 6 cases for between 6–12 weeks (mean 7.2 weeks). There was no significant recurrence with a mean duration of follow up 24 months. This rare series demonstrates late presenters of AARF responding favourably to non surgical intervention.