A number of advantages of unicondylar arthroplasty (UKA) over total knee arthroplasty in patients presenting osteoarthritis in only a single compartment have been identified in the literature. However, accurate implant positioning and alignment targets, which have been shown to significantly affect outcomes, are routinely missed by conventional techniques. Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS) has demonstrated its ability to improve implant accuracy, reducing outliers. Despite this, existing commercial systems have seen extremely limited adoption. Survey indicates the bulk, cost, and complexity of existing systems as inhibitive characteristics. We present a concept system based upon small scale head mounted tracking and augmented reality guidance intended to mitigate these factors.

A visible-spectrum stereoscopic system, able to track multiple fiducial markers to 6DoF via photogrammetry and perform semi-active speed constrained resection, was combined with a head mounted display, to provide a video-see-through augmented reality system. The accuracy of this system was investigated by probing 180 points upon a 110×110×50 mm known geometry and performing controlled resection upon a 60×60×15 mm bone phantom guided by an overlaid augmented resection guide that updated in real-time.

The system produced an RMS probing accuracy and precision of 0.55±0.04 and 0.10±0.01 mm, respectively. Controlled resection resulted in an absolute resection error of 0.34±0.04 mm with a general trend of over-resection of 0.10±0.07 mm.

The system was able to achieve the sub-millimetre accuracy considered necessary to successfully position unicondylar knee implants. Several refinements of the system, such as pose filtering, are expected to increase the functional volume over which this accuracy is obtained. The presented system improves upon several objections to existing commercial CAOS UKA systems, and shows great potential both within surgery itself and its training. Furthermore, it is suggested the system could be readily extended to additional orthopaedic procedures requiring accurate and intuitive guidance.

Background. Achieving optimal prosthesis alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential. Imageless computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is developed to improve knee prosthesis alignment and with CAS it is possible to perform intraoperative alignment measurements. Lower limb alignment measurements are also performed for preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation. A new stereoradiography system, called EOS, can be used to perform these measurements in 3D and thus measurement errors due to malpositioning can be eliminated. Since both CAS and EOS are based on 3D modeling, measurements should theoretically correlate well. Therefore, objective was to compare intraoperative CAS-TKA measurements with pre- and postoperative EOS 3D measurements. Methods. In a prospective study 56 CAS-TKAs were performed and alignment measurements were recorded two times: before bone cuts were made and after implantation of the prosthesis. Pre- and postoperative coronal alignment measurements were performed using EOS 3D. CAS measurements were compared with EOS 3D reconstructions. Measured angles were: varus/valgus (VV), mechanical lateral distal-femoral (mLDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA). Results. Significantly different VV angles were measured pre- and postoperatively with CAS compared to EOS. For preoperative measurements, mLDFA did not differ significantly, but a significantly larger mMPTA in valgus was measured with CAS. Conclusions. EOS 3D measurements overestimate VV angle in lower limbs with substantial mechanical axis deviation. For lower limbs with minor mechanical axis deviation as well as for mMPTA measurements, CAS measures more valgus compared to EOS. Results of this study indicate that differences in alignment measurements between CAS measurements and pre- and postoperative EOS 3D are mainly due to the difference between weight bearing and non-weight bearing position and potential errors in validity and reliability of the CAS system. Surgeons should be aware of these measurement differences and the pitfalls of both measurement techniques. Level of evidence. IIb. Disclosures. The department of Orthopaedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen receives research institutional support from InSpine (Schiedam, NL) and Stryker (Kalamazoo, Mich. USA). One of the authors (ALB) will be and has been paid as a consultant by Zimmer (Warsaw, IN, USA) for purposes of education and training in knee arthroplasty

This study compared the effect of a computer-assisted and a traditional surgical technique on the kinematics of the glenohumeral joint during passive abduction after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder for the treatment of fractures. We used seven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver shoulders to create simulated four-part fractures of the proximal humerus, which were then reconstructed with hemiarthroplasty and reattachment of the tuberosities. The specimens were randomised, so that one from each pair was repaired using the computer-assisted technique, whereas a traditional hemiarthroplasty without navigation was performed in the contralateral shoulder. Kinematic data were obtained using an electromagnetic tracking device. The traditional technique resulted in posterior and inferior translation of the humeral head. No statistical differences were observed before or after computer-assisted surgery. Although it requires further improvement, the computer-assisted approach appears to allow glenohumeral kinematics to more closely replicate those of the native joint, potentially improving the function of the shoulder and extending the longevity of the prosthesis

We compared the orientation of the acetabular component obtained by a conventional manual technique with that using five different navigation systems.

Three surgeons carried out five implantations of an acetabular component with each navigation system, as well as manually, using an anatomical model. The orientation of the acetabular component, including inclination and anteversion, and its position was determined using a co-ordinate measuring machine.

The variation of the orientation of the acetabular component was higher in the conventional group compared with the navigated group. One experienced surgeon took significantly less time for the procedure. However, his placement of the component was no better than that of the less experienced surgeons. Significantly better inclination and anteversion (p < 0.001 for both) were obtained using navigation. These parameters were not significantly different between the surgeons when using the conventional technique (p = 0.966).

The use of computer navigation helps a surgeon to orientate the acetabular component with less variation regarding inclination and anteversion.

Objectives

We evaluated the accuracy of augmented reality (AR)-based navigation assistance through simulation of bone tumours in a pig femur model.

We have evaluated in vitro the accuracy of percutaneous and ultrasound registration as measured in terms of errors in rotation and version relative to the bony anterior pelvic plane in computer-assisted total hip replacement, and analysed the intra- and inter-observer reliability of manual or ultrasound registration.

Four clinicians were asked to perform registration of the landmarks of the anterior pelvic plane on two cadavers. Registration was performed under four different conditions of acquisition. Errors in rotation were not significant. Version errors were significant with percutaneous methods (16.2°; p < 0.001 and 19.25° with surgical draping; p < 0.001), but not with the ultrasound acquisition (6.2°, p = 0.13). Intra-observer repeatability was achieved for all the methods. Inter-observer analysis showed acceptable agreement in the sagittal but not in the frontal plane.

Ultrasound acquisition of the anterior pelvic plane was more reliable in vitro than the cutaneous digitisation currently used.