Improving the accuracy of measuring 6 degree of freedom tibiofemoral kinematics is a crucial step in gait analysis, but skin-marker estimated kinematics are subject to soft tissue artefacts. Fluoroscopic systems have been reported to achieve high accurate kinematics, but their induced irradiation, limited field of view, and high cost hampers routine usage on large patient cohorts. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of measuring tibiofemoral kinematics using multi-channel A-mode ultrasound system in cadaver experiment and to assess its achievable accuracy. A full cadaver was placed with its back on a surgery table while its legs were overhanging the edge of the table. Upper body was fixated and right leg was moved by means of pulling a rope. Two bone pins with optical markers were mounted to the femur and tibia separately to measure the ground truth of motion. Six custom holders containing 30 A-mode ultrasound transducers and 18 optical markers were mounted to six anatomical regions. By measuring the bone to ultrasound transducer distance and using the spatial information of the optical markers on the holders, 30 bone surface points were determined. The corresponding bones (femur and tibia) were registered to these acquired points after which the tibiofemoral kinematics were determined. This study presents a multi-channel A-mode ultrasound system and the first results have shown its feasibility of reconstructing tibiofemoral kinematics in cadaver experiment. Although the reconstructed tibiofemoral kinematics is less accurate than a fluoroscopic system, it outperforms a skin-mounted markers system. Thus, this A-mode Ultrasound approach could provide a non-invasive and non-radiative method for measuring tibiofemoral kinematics, which may be used in clinic gait analysis or even computer-aided orthopaedic surgery

Introduction. Recently, computer-aided orthopaedic surgery has enabled three dimensional (3D) preoperative planning, navigation systems and patient matched instrument, and they provide good clinical results in total knee arthroplasty. However, the preoperative planning methods and the criteria in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) still have not sufficiently established due to the uncertainty of 3D anatomical geometry of the elbow joints. In order to clarify the 3D anatomical geometry, this study measured 3D bone models of the normal elbow joints. Additionally this study attempted to apply the 3D preoperative planning to ordinary surgery. Then the postoperative position of implant has evaluated as compared with the position in 3D preoperative planning. Methods. Three dimensional bone measurements on 4 normal cases were performed. Three dimensional bone models were constructed with CT image using Bone Viewer®(ORTHREE Co., Ltd.). TEA was performed with FINE® Total Elbow System (Nakashima Medical Co., Ltd.) for 3 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cases (Fig. 1). Three dimensional preoperative planning was based on this bone measurement, and postoperative position of implant were evaluated. The postoperative assessments were evaluated by superimposing preoperative planning image on postoperative CT image using Bone Simulator® (ORTHREE Co., Ltd.). This study only covers humeral part. Results. The results of 3D bone measurements on 4 normal cases shows the average internal rotation angle between the flexion-extension axis and the epicondyles axis in the distal humerus was 2.2 degrees. The average valgus tilt of the distal humerus was 3.7 degrees. Postoperative position of humeral component for 3 RA cases was installed at proximal and valgus position compared to the preoperative planning. Discussion. This study indicates that ordinary two dimensional criteria and 3D anatomical one in the elbow joint may be different in several bony landmarks such as rotation, varus and valgus. Additionally these results show the differences between postoperative position of implant and preoperative position in 3D planning. More studies need to be conducted to validate postoperative evaluation and preoperative planning