Introduction. The authors performed a short term prospective study of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) associated to patella-femoral arthroplasty (PFA) for the treatment of bicompartmental symptomatic knee arthritis. At the latest follow-up all the implants were matched to a similar computer assisted Total Knee Replacements (CAS-TKR) group implanted for the same indications. Hypothesis of the study was that this bicompartimental implants could achieve comparable outcomes to TKR with a more conservative surgery and a higher joint function. Materials and Methods. 19 cases of anteriomedial (12) or anterolateral (7) arthritis in 19 stable knees were prospectively involved in the study. All the knees underwent to a selective reconstruction using simultaneously both UKR and PFR using the same surgical technique. All bicompartmental implants were performed by the same surgeon. Surgical time, hospital staying and all intra and post operative complications were registered. At a minimum follow-up of 20 months, every single case was marched to a similar case where had been implanted a computer assisted cruciate retaining TKR. Criteria of matching were: sex, age, pre-operative range of motion and arthritis grade. In both the groups all the cases were assessed clinically using WOMAC, KKS and GIUM scores. All the knees were radiologically investigated using the same radiological protocol. Results. Intra operatively we did not registered any complication. No revision in both groups. The mean surgical time was 86 minutes (range: 78–121) in UKR+PFR group and 81 minutes (range: 71–112) in CAS-TKR group. There were no statistical significant differences in the hospital stay. No statistically significant difference was seen for the Knee Society, Functional and GIUM scores between the 2 groups. Statistically significant better WOMAC Function/Stiffness indexes were registered for the UKR+PFR group. CAS-TKR implants achieved a statistically better aligned mechanical axes. Conclusions. The results of this prospective short term prospective study suggest that UKR+PFR implant is a viable option for bicompartmental anteromedial arthritis at least as well as TKR but maintaining an higher level of function

Background. Improving positioning and alignment by the use of computer assisted surgery (CAS) might improve longevity and function in total knee replacements. This study evaluates the short term results of computer navigated knee replacements based on data from a national register. Patients and Methods. Primary total knee replacements without patella resurfacing, reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register during the years 2005–2008, were evaluated. The five most common implants and the three most common navigation systems were selected. Cemented, uncemented and hybrid knees were included. With the risk for revision due to any cause as the primary end-point, 1465 computer navigated knee replacements (CAS) were evaluated against 8214 conventionally operated knee replacements (CON). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex, prosthesis brand, fixation method, previous knee surgery, preoperative diagnosis and ASA category were used. Results. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival at two years was 97.9% (95% CI: 97.5–98.3) in the CON group and 96.4% (95% CI: 95.0–97.8) in the CAS group. The adjusted Cox regression analysis showed a statistically significantly higher risk for revision in the CAS group (relative risk = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1–2.5, p = 0.019). The LCS complete knees had a significantly higher risk for revision with CAS, compared to CON (relative risk = 2.1 (95% CI 1.3–3.4, p = 0.004)). Mean operating time was 15 minutes longer in the CAS group. Conclusion. Survivorship at two years of computer navigated primary total knee replacements was inferior compared to conventionally operated knees. Therefore, an extensive use of CAS in primary total knee replacement surgery cannot be encouraged until proven superior in long term register studies and clinical trials

Summary. UC TKA showed similar anteroposterior translation and more femoral external rotation of earlier onset when compared to PS TKA. Introduction. Recently highly conforming ultracongruent TKA has been reintroduced with improved wear characteristics and lower complications. The purpose of the study was to assess kinematics and clinical outcome of posterior stabilized and ultracongruent rotating-platform mobile bearing TKA. Methods. Ninety patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee were randomized to undergo computer assisted TKA with PS(n = 45) or UC(n = 45) prostheses and were followed up for a minimum 2 years. The passive kinematic evaluation was performed before and after implantation with a navigation system. Three parameters of tibiofemoral relationship (anterior/posterior translation, varus/valgus alignment and rotation) were recorded from 0° to 120° of flexion. The patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated at final follow-up. Results. Paradoxical anterior translation of the femur was observed from 0° to 70° of flexion in PS(8.7mm) and 0° to 85° in UC knees(10.4mm, p = 0.064). The distance of femoral roll-back was 6.7mm and 5.5mm, but never reached the starting point. Paradoxical internal rotation of the femur was found from 0° to 62° of flexion in PS(9.9°) and 0° to 47° in UC knees(5.6°, p = 0.002). UC knees showed more external rotation of the femur during flexion from 0° to 120°(5.7:11.0, p = 0.048). There was no significant difference in the maximal flexion(123.3°:125.5°, p = 0.366), AKS knee scores(95.9:92.0, p = 0.101), AKS function scores(86.2:82.9, p = 0.435) and WOMAC index scores(13.4:15.9, p = 0.268). There was no progressive radiolucent line or loosening in all knees. Discussion and Conclusion. UC TKA showed similar anteroposterior translation and more femoral external rotation of earlier onset when compared to PS TKA. There was no difference in clinical outcome between two designs. UC TKA showed comparable kinematic and clinical results to PS TKA