Success treating AIS with bracing is related to time worn and scoliosis severity. Temperature monitoring can help patients comply with their orthotic prescription. Routinely collected temperature data from the start of first brace treatment was reviewed for 14 patients. All were female with an average age of 12.4 years (range 10.3–14.6) and average 49o Cobb angle (30–64). Our current service recommendation is brace wear for 20 hours a day. Patients complied with this prescription 38.0% of the time, with four patients averaging this or more. Average brace wear was 16.3 hours per day (3.5–22.2). There were 13 patients who had completed brace treatment. The majority had surgery (7/13; 54%) or were considering surgery (1/13; 8%). There were 5 who did not wish surgery at discharge (5/13; 38%); 1 achieved a 40o Cobb angle, with 4 larger (53o;53o;54o;68o). The Bracing in AIS Trial (BrAIST) study measured “success” as less than a 50o Cobb angle, so using this metric our cohort has had a single “success”. Temperature monitors allowed an analysis of when patients were achieving their brace wear. When comparing daywear (8am-8pm) to nightwear (8pm-8am), patients wore their brace an average of 7.6 hours a day (2.5–11.2) and 8.7 hours a night (0.4–11.5). We conclude the minority of our patients comply with our current 20 hour orthotic prescription. The “success” of brace treatment is lower than comparison studies despite higher average compliance but starting with a larger scoliosis. Brace wear is achieved during both the day and night

Introduction. Correction and arthrodesis for cervical kyphosis associated with atetoid cerebral palsy has been considered to be difficult because of their involuntary neck movements and severe deformity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcome of midline T-saw laminoplasty and posterior arthrodesis using pedicle screws. Methods. 15 patients were retrospectively reviewed. There were 6 women and 9 men, with a mean age 52.9 years (range 31–71 years). Mean follow-up period was 43 months (range 24–84 months). For clinical evaluation, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Barthel index (BI) which shows independence in ADL were used. For radiographic evaluation, change of C2–C7 Cobb angle of sagittal alignment, adjacent segment instability after the surgery were evaluated. Results. The average JOA score improved significantly from 6.2 preoperatively to 10.5 postoperatively. The average BI improved from 44.2 before surgery to 72.5 after surgery. C2–C7 Cobb angle of sagittal alignment measured 12.3 degrees of kyphosis preoperatively and 1.2 degrees of lordosis postoperatively. Solid posterior bony fusion was achieved in all cases. There was two cases of adjacent segmental instability, which required additional surgery. Seven (5.6%) out of the 125 inserted screws showed more than 2mm deviation. However, there were no neurovascular complications during or after surgery in any cases, and all cases maintained strong internal fixation. Conclusion. Midline T-saw laminoplasty and posterior arthrodesis using pedicle screw is a favorable option for the patient with kyphotic deformity associated with atetoid cerebral palsy, as it preserves cervical alignment, and improve neurological status and ADL

Objective. To identify risk factors for the presence of distal adding-on in Lenke 1A scoliosis and compare different treatment strategies. Summary of Background Data. Distal adding-on is often accompanied by unsatisfactory clinical outcome and high risk of reoperation. However, very few studies have focused on distal adding-on and its attendant risk factors and optimal treatment strategies remain controversial. Methods. All surgically treated AIS patients were retrieved from a single institutional database. Inclusion criteria included: (1) Lenke 1A scoliosis patients treated with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs; (2) minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher's exact test and Spearman's correlation test were used to identify the risk factors for adding-on. A multiple logistic regression model was built to identify independent predictive factor(s). Risk factors included: (1) age at surgery; (2) preoperative Cobb angle; (3) correction rate; (4) the gap difference of SV-LIV, NV-LIV and EV-LIV (SV=stable vertebra. NV=neutral vertebra, EV=end vertebra, LIV=lowest instrumented vertebra. Gap difference means, for example, if SV is at L2 and LIV is at Th12, then the difference of SV-LIV is 2); (5) the preoperative deviation of LIV+1 (the first vertebra below the instrumentation) from the center sacral vertical line (the vertical line that bisects proximal sacrum). Five methods for determining lowest instrumented vertebra(LIV) were compared in both the Adding-on group and No adding-on group. Results. Out of 278 patients reviewed, 45 met the inclusion criteria; 23 of these met the definition for distal adding-on, and were included in the Adding-on group. The remaining 22 patients were included in the No adding-on group. The average follow-up was 3.6 years. Age, SV-LIV difference, EV-LIV difference, and LIV+1 deviation from CSVL were significantly different (p<0.05) between the two groups, and were also found to be significantly correlated with the presence of adding-on (p<0.05). Preoperative Cobb angle, correction rate, and NV-LIV difference were not found to be affiliated with the presence of adding-on. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative LIV+1 deviation from CSVL was an independent predictive factor. Among the five methods, choosing EV as LIV was nearly unable to prevent distal adding-on; choosing EV+1 as LIV resulted in fusing many more segments than necessary; only choosing DV as LIV showed satisfactory outcome from both perspectives. Conclusion. In Lenke 1A type scoliosis, the selection of LIV is highly correlated with the presence of adding-on; incidence increases dramatically when the preoperative LIV+1 deviation from CSVL is more than10 mm. Choosing DV (the first vertebra in cephalad direction from sacrum with deviation from CSVL of more than 10 mm) as LIV may provide the best outcome as it not only prevents adding-on but also conserves more lumbar motion

Lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection is critical to preventing complications following posterior spinal arthrodesis (PSA) for thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (TL/L AIS), but evidence guiding LIV selection is limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of PSA using novel unilateral convex segmental pedicle screw instrumentation (UCS) in correcting TL/L AIS, to identify radiographic parameters correlating with distal extension of PSA, and to develop a predictive equation for distal fusion extension using these parameters. We reviewed data (demographic, clinical, radiographic, and SRS-22 questionnaires) preoperatively to 2-years' follow-up for TL/L AIS patients treated by PSA using UCS between 2006 to 2011. 53 patients were included and divided into 2 groups: Group-1 (n=36) patients had PSA between Cobb-to-Cobb levels; Group-2 (n=17) patients required distal fusion extension. A mean curve correction of 80% was achieved. Mean postoperative LIV angle, TL/L apical vertebra translation (AVT), and trunk shift were lower than previous studies. Six preoperative radiographic parameters significantly differed between groups and correlated with distal fusion extension: thoracic curve size, thoracolumbar curve size, LIVA, AVT, lumbar flexibility index, and Cobb angle on lumbar convex bending. Regression analysis optimised an equation (incorporating the first five parameters) which is 81% accurate in predicting Cobb-to-Cobb fusion or distal extension. SRS-22 scores were similar between groups. We conclude that TL/L AIS is effectively treated by PSA using UCS, six radiographic parameters correlate with distal fusion extension, and a predictive equation incorporating these parameters reliably informs LIV selection and the need for fusion extension beyond the caudal Cobb level

Objectives

The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery.

We reviewed 59 bone graft substitutes marketed by 17 companies currently available for implantation in the United Kingdom, with the aim of assessing the peer-reviewed literature to facilitate informed decision-making regarding their use in clinical practice. After critical analysis of the literature, only 22 products (37%) had any clinical data. Norian SRS (Synthes), Vitoss (Orthovita), Cortoss (Orthovita) and Alpha-BSM (Etex) had Level I evidence. We question the need for so many different products, especially with limited published clinical evidence for their efficacy, and conclude that there is a considerable need for further prospective randomised trials to facilitate informed decision-making with regard to the use of current and future bone graft substitutes in clinical practice.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:583–97.